Duplicate content - how to diagnose duplicate content from another domain before publishing pages?
-
Hi,
My company is having new distributor contract, and we are starting to sell products on our own webshop.
Bio-technology is an industry in question and over 1.000 products. Writing product description from scratch would take many hours. The plan is to re-write it.
With permission from our contractors we will import their 'product description' on our webshop. But, I am concerned being penalies from Google for duplicate content.
If we re-write it we should be fine i guess. But, how can we be sure? Is there any good tool for comparing only text (because i don't want to publish the pages to compare URLs)?
What else should we be aware off beside checking 'product description' for duplicate content?
Duplicate content is big issue for all of us, i hope this answers will be helpful for many of us.
Keep it hard work and thank you very much for your answers,
Cheers,
Dusan
-
Thank you again Monica. The reviews are definitely be implemented. Good luck!
-
I think you should stay above 90% unique.
I would strongly encourage you to make sure you add user generated content to the pages. Even rewriting the content to be exactly unique will not be enough to guarantee your pages can rank. The content is going to be written in unique words, but it will essentially be the same thing. You will need something that is uniquely valuable to the user.
No you won't necessarily be penalized, but, it will become harder to rank in branded searches.
-
Thank you Monica, really good answer!
Now, with copyscape.com what is the percentage of uniqueness that is 'allright'?
We are selling laboratory products for cell analysis, tittles and descriptions of our products are highly scientific. Manufacturer is the only one who can write it. Re-writing is our only option.
However, i am not that scared of being penalies any more. Thank you very much!
-
I would add that if you are going to have user generated content, make sure there's a review process so it doesn't get spammed/abused.
-
Monica said basically everything I would and probably a little better. The review system is extremely helpful in generating unique content, for a few reasons. One, you don't have to write it yourself (just review it), second customers want to hear from other customers, third the way a user describes a product may actually attract keyword opportunities you may not have thought of on your own.
-
Hi Dusan,
I have a couple of suggestions for you. The first, to answer your question, is that copyscape.com will let you compare two pieces of content for free, and then it will tell you the percentage of uniqueness. This will be a good way to tell if your rewrites are adequate.
My second suggestion is to implement a review system that will stream user generated content onto your pages. The duplicate content "penalty" you are referring to is really not a penalty in the empirical sense. When it comes to ranking, Google will look at two sites with the same content and pick one to display. Usually the branded site would win in a branded search. There are many other factors, like page rank and domain authority that can influence which page is displayed, and the user query can influence that as well.
Having uniquely valuable content on your site, like user generated comments and reviews, can be the offset for your duplicate content issue. Rewriting the manufacturer's descriptions isn't really going to accomplish the goal of offering the searcher something they can't find anywhere else. In my opinion, just rewriting the content isn't enough of an advantage to beat out other sites. You have to offer something valuable, that can only be found on your site. User generated content is (in my opinion) the best content you can have. Every consumer reads reviews when they are available. They want to find out what regular people have to say about a product. Is is the right size, is the color consistent, how long did it last, is this a fair price? These are all questions that can be answered in a review system.
I added reviews to my Ecommerce site about 6 months ago and have seen great success. 80% of my content is the same as 4 other sites, except my category pages. I write extremely unique content for those pages, which helps me target long tail and branded key terms. Then my product pages have the manufacturer's descriptions, tech specs and warranty info plus the user generated content. It has been very successful whenever I have implemented it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No Index thousands of thin content pages?
Hello all! I'm working on a site that features a service marketed to community leaders that allows the citizens of that community log 311 type issues such as potholes, broken streetlights, etc. The "marketing" front of the site is 10-12 pages of content to be optimized for the community leader searchers however, as you can imagine there are thousands and thousands of pages of one or two line complaints such as, "There is a pothole on Main St. and 3rd." These complaint pages are not about the service, and I'm thinking not helpful to my end goal of gaining awareness of the service through search for the community leaders. Community leaders are searching for "311 request service", not "potholes on main street". Should all of these "complaint" pages be NOINDEX'd? What if there are a number of quality links pointing to the complaint pages? Do I have to worry about losing Domain Authority if I do NOINDEX them? Thanks for any input. Ken
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KenSchaefer0 -
Duplicate content. Competing for rank.
Scenario: An automotive dealer lists cars for sale on their website. The descriptions are very good and in depth at 1,200 words per car. However chunks of the copy are copied from car review websites and weaved into their original copy. Q1: This is flagged in copyscape - how much of an issue is this for Google? Q2: The same stock with the same copy is fed into a popular car listing website - the dealer's website and the classifieds website often rank in the top two positions (sometimes the dealer on top other times the classifieds site). Is this a good or a bad thing? Are you risking being seen as duplicating/scraping content? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bee1590 -
Domains and Domain Authority
Looking for some advice 🙂 I have a domain that has been registered since 1999 and currently hosts my website - the problem is that my business has moved in a different direction and my URL is no longer associated with my main product offering. For example in the past I was xyzgarden.com however now something like xyzhomedecor.com is much more appropriate. How should I handle this so that I am not at a disadvantage for SEO. thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MainstreamMktg0 -
Translated Content on Country Domains
Hi, We have blogs set up in each of our markets, for example http://blog.telefleurs.fr, http://blog.euroflorist.nl and http://blog.euroflorist.be/nl. Each blog is localized correctly so FR has fr-FR, NL has nl-NL and BE has nl-BE and fr-BE. All our content is created or translated by our Content Managers. The question is - is it safe for us to use a piece of content on Telefleurs.fr and the French translated Euroflorist.be/fr, or Dutch content on Euroflorist.nl and Euroflorist.be/nl? We want to avoid canonicalising as neither site will take preference. Is there a solution I've missed until now? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoeuroflorist
Sam0 -
Duplicate Pages #!
Hi guys, Currently have duplicate pages accross a website e.g. https://archierose.com.au/shop/cart**#!** https://archierose.com.au/shop/cart The only difference is the URL 1 has a hashtag and exclamation tag. Everything else is the same. We were thinking of adding rel canonical tags on the #! versions of the page to the correct URLs. But Google doens't seem to be indexing the #! versions anyway. Does anyone know why this is the case? If Google is not indexing them, is there any point adding rel canonical tags? Cheers, Chris https://archierose.com.au/shop/cart#!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jayoliverwright0 -
Bespoke Website With Lack of Front Page Content
Hey guys, I wanted to ask you your opinion.. If you had a website - portfolio style for argument's sake and it was based on wordpress, obviously the front page won't be SEO friendly if you want to keep the minimalistic approach - there will be hardly any content to tell google what to rank your site for... So my question is, can you use a plugin that Google can 'see' content - such as a long unique article - that the user can't see in order to help you rank? I.e. for Gbot, the plugin would load the content plugin as plain html, but 'hide' it from most people visiting the site... What would you do in this scenario? Your response would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | geniusenergyltd0 -
Duplicate content on sites from different countries
Hi, we have a client who currently has a lot of duplicate content with their UK and US website. Both websites are geographically targeted (via google webmaster tools) to their specific location and have the appropriate local domain extension. Is having duplicate content a major issue, since they are in two different countries and geographic regions of the world? Any statement from Google about this? Regards, Bill
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MBASydney0 -
Can use of the id attribute to anchor t text down a page cause page duplication issues?
I am producing a long glossary of terms and want to make it easier to jump down to various terms. I am using the<a id="anchor-text" ="" attribute="" so="" am="" appending="" #anchor-text="" to="" a="" url="" reach="" the="" correct="" spot<="" p=""></a> <a id="anchor-text" ="" attribute="" so="" am="" appending="" #anchor-text="" to="" a="" url="" reach="" the="" correct="" spot<="" p="">Does anyone know whether Google will pick this up as separate duplicate pages?</a> <a id="anchor-text" ="" attribute="" so="" am="" appending="" #anchor-text="" to="" a="" url="" reach="" the="" correct="" spot<="" p="">If so any ideas on what I can do? Apart from not do it to start with? I am thinking 301s won't work as I want the URL to work. And rel=canonical won't work as there is no actual page code to add it to. Many thanks for your help Wendy</a>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chammy0