Why one of my top pages dropped?
-
Hello here.
Our website, virtualsheetmusic.com, is pretty popular in the sheet music realm, and we used to rank on the first page for the keyword "violin sheet music" until a few weeks ago with our violin dedicated page:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html
But a couple of weeks ago we dropped to over the 5th page on Google (I can't even find us!) and I have no idea why. Most of our top ranking pages are still there though. This never happened before, after 17 years on the web.
Do you have any idea why that could have happened?
-
I almost forgot: about Internal Links, please, have a look at this discussion I am having here below:
https://moz.com/community/q/rankings-drop-and-google-search-console-internal-links-panel-correlation
I'd love to know your thoughts about it. Thank you again!
-
Thank you Everett, I understand, I started this thread thinking that just one page of my "category pages" had a rank drop, and that was the "violin sheet music" optimized page. Hence the confusion, my fault. Then, after further research, I discovered that all instrumental category pages dropped in a similar way, therefore I begun to see the problem no more "keyword relate" but "quality related"... here we go
In any case, yes, thank you for the tip, I'll check my internal links. I know that we have overoptimized those a big deal in the past years, and we may want to "de-overoptimize" them a little bit.
And yes, as I am discussing on the thread below, I have currently "noindexed" all those pages while we are working on a redesign of them:
https://moz.com/community/q/can-adding-noindex-help-with-quality-penalizations
Hopefully that'll make most of the trick.
Thank you again very much, I appreciated your help!
-
Fabrizo,
You may be correct about it being a quality issue. What makes me think it is link related is that you said it only affected certain keywords, which tends to be the result of overoptimized anchor text. You may also want to check internal links, which can be overoptimized as well.
In terms of quality, it wouldn't hurt to improve the pages visually. You conversion rates would probably skyrocket.
-
Everett, another clue that suggests me that those category pages may have been hit by a "quality" algorithm instead than a "back link" one, is that it looks like Google released a "Panda" like update in June, and that's exactly when the problem started on my own website:
http://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/june-2016-google-algorithm-update/
I can confirm what Glenn highlighted in his article over there: same dates, similar issues.
-
Thanks Everett, I am aware of those pages and they have been already put on our disavow list, but I was talking about all other category pages that have lost rankings in a similar massive way for which I can't find any particular bad back link.
For example, I have used Open Site Explorer for the following similar category pages, but I couldn't find any bad back link:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Choir.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/StringQuartet.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/TenorSax.html
The following ones belongs to a different category altogether (composer's pages) and yet, I can't find any bad back link pointing to them:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Beethoven/DownloadBeethoven.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Chopin/DownloadChopin.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html
And many others...
So, I am wondering, why those pages dropped as well? Can a single penalized page put down an entire category of similar pages?
-
This looks like a paid text ad:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
I'm not sure what this is, but it could look suspicious:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.html
Some of the links are iffy, like the ones from music sites. These are topically relevant, when every link has the exact same anchor text it begins to look suspicious.
This link seems very out of place and spammy:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.htmlThe premise for this text link, again with the exact-match anchor text, is that Dr. Who may want to relax and learn how to write "Virtual Sheet Music"?
All of these pages have links like that. You need to do a lot of disavows.
-
Thanks for your reply Everett.
Well, I don't think that may be a backlink problem because I haven't found any clearly "spammy" websites linking to those category pages. Actually those pages don't have that many backlinks overall.
Please, let me know if you think I am missing anything key here.
I appreciate your help!
-
I don't understand why you don't think it could be a backlink problem. All of those pages I checked had some spammy looking links. By "spammy looking" I mean exact-match anchor text and followable text ads on low-quality websites.
-
Everett, I have an update about this issue and I'd like to know your thoughts about it.
After further research we have discovered that our "violin category page" wasn't the only one to have lost a lot of ranking in the past month or so. A whole bunch of category pages, similar to the violin page have lost rankings as well, a big deal, from page 1-2 to page 30 or more. Strange thing, it looks like our "most popular" and most "linked" pages have lost rankings, whereas less popular and less linked page have lost nothing (!!)
Here are some examples:
Category pages that have lost rank since June 25:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html (dropped on 7/3)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/AltoSax.html (dropped on 7/19)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/PianoSolo.html (dropped on 7-19)
and many other "instrument category pages"
Other popular category pages like our most popular composers page have lost rankings in a similar way:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Bach/DownloadBach.html (dropped on 7/2)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Mozart/DownloadMozart.html (dropped on 7/6)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html (dropped on 6/25)
And as I said above, other similar pages, but not as popular and linked within our website, haven't lost any rankings:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Accordion.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/BassGuitar.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/score/ClarinetCBb.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/EnnioMorricone/DownloadEnnioMorricone.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MichaelWSmith/DownloadMichaelWSmith.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MarkHayes/DownloadMarkHayes.html
Another strange issue is that all our "genres" category pages are ok, up and running and seems to have not been affected:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Jazz/
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Pop/
Note though that genre pages are much less popular than instrumental and composer/author pages, and less linked within our site.
Any ideas? I don't think this can be due to a "penguin" or "back-link profile" related issue, but maybe a Panda issue, or... what else?
-
Thank you Everett! That makes sense. I appreciated your help!
I'll let you know if I'll have any more questions about all this, but I think for now I'll have to work to cleanup my back link profile first... thank you again.
-
If another site is linking to you, and you don't want that link to "harm" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag within the href is enough.
That said, if you want a link to "help" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag is not recommended. I don't know if your owned sites are harming or helping you. There are much more suspicious links I'd take care of first.
Good luck.
-
Thank you Everett,
I see what you say. But, still I need to know if a rel="nofollow" is enough to get out of trouble, if any.
Thanks!
-
I found those links with Open Site Explorer.
The example you gave of the forum page doesn't see overly suspicious to me. I'd take that on a case-by-case basis. Generally you should start with the most obviously suspicious links first, like those I provided in examples above. If getting rid of those don't do the trick you can move down the list to borderline cases like the one you provided.
-
Thanks Everett for your reply.
About my first question, I am afraid I wasn't clear enough. I was asking about the links I have from those few websites I own that could appear like "paid" links.
For example, take the link to our site on the site below we also own which you already spotted above:
http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
Do you think that link could be easily "disavowed" by just adding the rel="nofollow" tag?
Also, may I ask you how did you find your above mentioned suspect links?
Thank you so much!
-
1. I don't recommend nofollowing links on your own website. If you don't trust the place you're linking to, maybe then. But usually we don't link to pages we don't trust. I doubt it would help your situation.
2. Use the Moz toolset, including Open Site Explorer. If you can find their contact information request that the link be removed. Keep records of these emails or phone calls so you can submit it with your disavow file, which you should submit for any links that do not get removed after reaching out to the webmaster, or any links for which you could not find webmaster contact details (keep track of these too so Google knows you tried).
-
Also, another couple of questions:
1. Can adding rel="nofollow" to links we own enough? I'd like to keep those links for visitors.
2. How do you suggest tackling unnatural links: contacting the web owners asking to remove those links AND submitting those pages to Google via the disavowing tool right away, or just contacting the web owners hoping they'll remove the links?
Thank you for your help.
-
Thank you Everett for your reply and kind comment about my name, grazie!
With the only exception of the link on classicalforums.com (which we own, and that link has been there for almost 10 years now), we never paid for links and we never "endorsed" those other links you wrote about. I guess like those there are many others around, no idea who and why linked to us in such weird ways. Some of those links looks like have been out there for a long time, and we have never been penalized by Penguin, only by Panda back in 2011... but then we recovered by Panda by tackling and fixing all our duplicate page issues.
In any case, I'll definitively do some research on our back-link profile, but how would you decide when a link should be disavowed or not?
-
Hello Fabrizo Ferrari,
Your name is fantastico!
I would listen to Patrick and do a backlink audit. Here are a few I found that would in-and-of-themselves, help explain an anchor-text specific ranking drop to a specific page:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
This page has a text link ad with that anchor text.http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
This forum has a text link ad with that anchor text.This "looks like" a purchased link:
http://www-education.org/music-schools.htmlThis "looks like" a purchased link too, as it seems very out of place:
http://www.scifipulse.net/how-long-can-doctor-survive/I'm sure there are more to consider disavowing. Good luck to you.
-
Patrick, I have tried the Panguin Tool you suggested, and it looks like we had a drop in traffic after the last Mobile update of May 1st, but our website is mobile friendly, why should we have been penalized because of that?
I am eager to know your thoughts on that. Thanks!
-
Thank you Patrick for your reply.
Yes, here is what we have already done and keep doing regularly:
1. Competitor research: We are perfectly aligned with our top competitors, and we would deserve the 5-10 spot in search results. Actually most of the top ranked pages are crappy websites with pages plenty of ads and pretty much the same (messy) contents, it is surprising we have been penalized compared to those ugly pages.
2. SEO Audit: We perform that monthly and we have no special technical issues right now besides some thin content among our product pages that we are trying to improve continuously since 2011.
What we have NOT done is a backlink quality audit, and what you suggest doing (and the tool you are suggesting) is something we can definitively look into right now.
What really puzzles me why that page has dropped so much (or completely removed, I can't find it!) compared with all other top pages of ours that haven't changed. The only logical explanation that now comes to my mind, after reading your posting, is that some kind bad back link pointing to that page has caused this issue... any more thoughts?
-
Hi there
What I would do is this - take a look at your competitors that are now ranking for this - look at the content that's ranking, the type of content it is (educational, transactional, informational, etc.) and see how it aligns with your content. From there, write down what you feel is most important that they are doing and how you can apply (tweaking of course for your unique site) to your marketing strategy.
I would also, because this is such a drastic drop, try aligning your Google Analytics with Google algorithm updates - you can do so with Panguin Tool, it's immensely helpful. Sometimes this could show you if you need to conduct a backlink or content audit depending on what type of penalty you align with, if any.
Also, make sure that you conduct both a SEO audit and a technical audit to see if there are any low hanging fruit.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Patrick
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Page getting indexed and not the main page!
Main Page: www.domain.com/service
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ishrat-Khan
Duplicate Page: www.domain.com/products-handler.php/?cat=service 1. My page was getting indexed properly in 2015 as: www.domain.com/service
2. Redesigning done in Aug 2016, a new URL pattern surfaced for my pages with parameter "products-handler"
3. One of my product landing pages had got 301-permanent redirected on the "products-handler" page
MAIN PAGE: www.domain.com/service GETTING REDIRECTED TO: www.domain.com/products-handler.php/?cat=service
4. This redirection was appearing until Nov 2016.
5. I took over the website in 2017, the main page was getting indexed and deindexed on and off.
6. This June it suddenly started showing an index of this page "domain.com/products-handler.php/?cat=service"
7. These "products-handler.php" pages were creating sitewide internal duplicacy, hence I blocked them in robots.
8. Then my page (Main Page: www.domain.com/service) got totally off the Google index Q1) What could be the possible reasons for the creation of these pages?
Q2) How can 301 get placed from main to duplicate URL?
Q3) When I have submitted my main URL multiple times in Search Console, why it doesn't get indexed?
Q4) How can I make Google understand that these URLs are not my preferred URLs?
Q5) How can I permanently remove these (products-handler.php) URLs? All the suggestions and discussions are welcome! Thanks in advance! 🙂0 -
Google Page Speed
Is it worthwhile going after a good score on Google page speed? Had prices but a LOT of money, and don't know if it's worth it or not. Also to add to the complication it is a new site. Does anyone have any experience if it helps rankings? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Location Pages On Website vs Landing pages
We have been having a terrible time in the local search results for 20 + locations. I have Places set up and all, but we decided to create location pages on our sites for each location - brief description and content optimized for our main service. The path would be something like .com/location/example. One option that has came up in question is to create landing pages / "mini websites" that would probably be location-example.url.com. I believe that the latter option, mini sites for each location, would be a bad idea as those kinds of tactics were once spammy in the past. What are are your thoughts and and resources so I can convince my team on the best practice.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KJ-Rodgers0 -
HELP! How does one prevent regional pages as being counted as "duplicate content," "duplicate meta descriptions," et cetera...?
The organization I am working with has multiple versions of its website geared towards the different regions. US - http://www.orionhealth.com/ CA - http://www.orionhealth.com/ca/ DE - http://www.orionhealth.com/de/ UK - http://www.orionhealth.com/uk/ AU - http://www.orionhealth.com/au/ NZ - http://www.orionhealth.com/nz/ Some of these sites have very similar pages which are registering as duplicate content, meta descriptions and titles. Two examples are: http://www.orionhealth.com/terms-and-conditions http://www.orionhealth.com/uk/terms-and-conditions Now even though the content is the same, the navigation is different since each region has different product options / services, so a redirect won't work since the navigation on the main US site is different from the navigation for the UK site. A rel=canonical seems like a viable option, but (correct me if I'm wrong) it tells search engines to only index the main page, in this case, it would be the US version, but I still want the UK site to appear to search engines. So what is the proper way of treating similar pages accross different regional directories? Any insight would be GREATLY appreciated! Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Scratch_MM0 -
Urgent Site Migration Help: 301 redirect from legacy to new if legacy pages are NOT indexed but have links and domain/page authority of 50+?
Sorry for the long title, but that's the whole question. Notes: New site is on same domain but URLs will change because URL structure was horrible Old site has awful SEO. Like real bad. Canonical tags point to dev. subdomain (which is still accessible and has robots.txt, so the end result is old site IS NOT INDEXED by Google) Old site has links and domain/page authority north of 50. I suspect some shady links but there have to be good links as well My guess is that since that are likely incoming links that are legitimate, I should still attempt to use 301s to the versions of the pages on the new site (note: the content on the new site will be different, but in general it'll be about the same thing as the old page, just much improved and more relevant). So yeah, I guess that's it. Even thought the old site's pages are not indexed, if the new site is set up properly, the 301s won't pass along the 'non-indexed' status, correct? Thanks in advance for any quick answers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JDMcNamara0 -
Does an H1 have to be at the top of a page?
Because H1 "may" carry some weight with Google does it have to be placed at the top of the page? Can I place it towards the bottom of the page instead in normal body size? My goal is to keep the main keywords in the H1 but create a much friendlier title for the customer to read at the top of the page.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PottyScotty0 -
Should I block temporary pages
I need some SEO advice on an odd scenario: We are launching a new product line (party supplies) on it's own domain (PartySuperCenter.com). Due to some internal/technical reasons we will not be able to launch the site until the summer. We already have the product in our warehouse so the owners want to created a section on our current site (CostumeSuperCenter.com) for the new products. Once the new site is up the product will be removed from our current site and moved to the new site. I am concerned about the effect this will have on our SEO - having thousands of product pages appear and then disappear after a few months. I was thinking about blocking the pages using the "noindex" tag. Is this how you would handle it? Thanks in advance for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | costume0 -
On Page vs Off Page - Which Has a Greater Effect on Rankings?
Hi Mozzers, My site will be migrating to a new domain soon, and I am not sure how to spend my time. Should I be optimizing our content for keywords, improving internal linking, and writing new content - or should I be doing link building for our current domain (or the new one)? Is there a certain ratio that determines rankings which can help me prioritize these to-dos?, such as 70:30 in favor of link-building? Thanks for any help you can offer!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Travis-W0