Why one of my top pages dropped?
-
Hello here.
Our website, virtualsheetmusic.com, is pretty popular in the sheet music realm, and we used to rank on the first page for the keyword "violin sheet music" until a few weeks ago with our violin dedicated page:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html
But a couple of weeks ago we dropped to over the 5th page on Google (I can't even find us!) and I have no idea why. Most of our top ranking pages are still there though. This never happened before, after 17 years on the web.
Do you have any idea why that could have happened?
-
I almost forgot: about Internal Links, please, have a look at this discussion I am having here below:
https://moz.com/community/q/rankings-drop-and-google-search-console-internal-links-panel-correlation
I'd love to know your thoughts about it. Thank you again!
-
Thank you Everett, I understand, I started this thread thinking that just one page of my "category pages" had a rank drop, and that was the "violin sheet music" optimized page. Hence the confusion, my fault. Then, after further research, I discovered that all instrumental category pages dropped in a similar way, therefore I begun to see the problem no more "keyword relate" but "quality related"... here we go
In any case, yes, thank you for the tip, I'll check my internal links. I know that we have overoptimized those a big deal in the past years, and we may want to "de-overoptimize" them a little bit.
And yes, as I am discussing on the thread below, I have currently "noindexed" all those pages while we are working on a redesign of them:
https://moz.com/community/q/can-adding-noindex-help-with-quality-penalizations
Hopefully that'll make most of the trick.
Thank you again very much, I appreciated your help!
-
Fabrizo,
You may be correct about it being a quality issue. What makes me think it is link related is that you said it only affected certain keywords, which tends to be the result of overoptimized anchor text. You may also want to check internal links, which can be overoptimized as well.
In terms of quality, it wouldn't hurt to improve the pages visually. You conversion rates would probably skyrocket.
-
Everett, another clue that suggests me that those category pages may have been hit by a "quality" algorithm instead than a "back link" one, is that it looks like Google released a "Panda" like update in June, and that's exactly when the problem started on my own website:
http://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/june-2016-google-algorithm-update/
I can confirm what Glenn highlighted in his article over there: same dates, similar issues.
-
Thanks Everett, I am aware of those pages and they have been already put on our disavow list, but I was talking about all other category pages that have lost rankings in a similar massive way for which I can't find any particular bad back link.
For example, I have used Open Site Explorer for the following similar category pages, but I couldn't find any bad back link:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Choir.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/StringQuartet.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/TenorSax.html
The following ones belongs to a different category altogether (composer's pages) and yet, I can't find any bad back link pointing to them:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Beethoven/DownloadBeethoven.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Chopin/DownloadChopin.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html
And many others...
So, I am wondering, why those pages dropped as well? Can a single penalized page put down an entire category of similar pages?
-
This looks like a paid text ad:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
I'm not sure what this is, but it could look suspicious:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.html
Some of the links are iffy, like the ones from music sites. These are topically relevant, when every link has the exact same anchor text it begins to look suspicious.
This link seems very out of place and spammy:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.htmlThe premise for this text link, again with the exact-match anchor text, is that Dr. Who may want to relax and learn how to write "Virtual Sheet Music"?
All of these pages have links like that. You need to do a lot of disavows.
-
Thanks for your reply Everett.
Well, I don't think that may be a backlink problem because I haven't found any clearly "spammy" websites linking to those category pages. Actually those pages don't have that many backlinks overall.
Please, let me know if you think I am missing anything key here.
I appreciate your help!
-
I don't understand why you don't think it could be a backlink problem. All of those pages I checked had some spammy looking links. By "spammy looking" I mean exact-match anchor text and followable text ads on low-quality websites.
-
Everett, I have an update about this issue and I'd like to know your thoughts about it.
After further research we have discovered that our "violin category page" wasn't the only one to have lost a lot of ranking in the past month or so. A whole bunch of category pages, similar to the violin page have lost rankings as well, a big deal, from page 1-2 to page 30 or more. Strange thing, it looks like our "most popular" and most "linked" pages have lost rankings, whereas less popular and less linked page have lost nothing (!!)
Here are some examples:
Category pages that have lost rank since June 25:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html (dropped on 7/3)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/AltoSax.html (dropped on 7/19)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/PianoSolo.html (dropped on 7-19)
and many other "instrument category pages"
Other popular category pages like our most popular composers page have lost rankings in a similar way:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Bach/DownloadBach.html (dropped on 7/2)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Mozart/DownloadMozart.html (dropped on 7/6)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html (dropped on 6/25)
And as I said above, other similar pages, but not as popular and linked within our website, haven't lost any rankings:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Accordion.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/BassGuitar.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/score/ClarinetCBb.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/EnnioMorricone/DownloadEnnioMorricone.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MichaelWSmith/DownloadMichaelWSmith.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MarkHayes/DownloadMarkHayes.html
Another strange issue is that all our "genres" category pages are ok, up and running and seems to have not been affected:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Jazz/
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Pop/
Note though that genre pages are much less popular than instrumental and composer/author pages, and less linked within our site.
Any ideas? I don't think this can be due to a "penguin" or "back-link profile" related issue, but maybe a Panda issue, or... what else?
-
Thank you Everett! That makes sense. I appreciated your help!
I'll let you know if I'll have any more questions about all this, but I think for now I'll have to work to cleanup my back link profile first... thank you again.
-
If another site is linking to you, and you don't want that link to "harm" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag within the href is enough.
That said, if you want a link to "help" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag is not recommended. I don't know if your owned sites are harming or helping you. There are much more suspicious links I'd take care of first.
Good luck.
-
Thank you Everett,
I see what you say. But, still I need to know if a rel="nofollow" is enough to get out of trouble, if any.
Thanks!
-
I found those links with Open Site Explorer.
The example you gave of the forum page doesn't see overly suspicious to me. I'd take that on a case-by-case basis. Generally you should start with the most obviously suspicious links first, like those I provided in examples above. If getting rid of those don't do the trick you can move down the list to borderline cases like the one you provided.
-
Thanks Everett for your reply.
About my first question, I am afraid I wasn't clear enough. I was asking about the links I have from those few websites I own that could appear like "paid" links.
For example, take the link to our site on the site below we also own which you already spotted above:
http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
Do you think that link could be easily "disavowed" by just adding the rel="nofollow" tag?
Also, may I ask you how did you find your above mentioned suspect links?
Thank you so much!
-
1. I don't recommend nofollowing links on your own website. If you don't trust the place you're linking to, maybe then. But usually we don't link to pages we don't trust. I doubt it would help your situation.
2. Use the Moz toolset, including Open Site Explorer. If you can find their contact information request that the link be removed. Keep records of these emails or phone calls so you can submit it with your disavow file, which you should submit for any links that do not get removed after reaching out to the webmaster, or any links for which you could not find webmaster contact details (keep track of these too so Google knows you tried).
-
Also, another couple of questions:
1. Can adding rel="nofollow" to links we own enough? I'd like to keep those links for visitors.
2. How do you suggest tackling unnatural links: contacting the web owners asking to remove those links AND submitting those pages to Google via the disavowing tool right away, or just contacting the web owners hoping they'll remove the links?
Thank you for your help.
-
Thank you Everett for your reply and kind comment about my name, grazie!
With the only exception of the link on classicalforums.com (which we own, and that link has been there for almost 10 years now), we never paid for links and we never "endorsed" those other links you wrote about. I guess like those there are many others around, no idea who and why linked to us in such weird ways. Some of those links looks like have been out there for a long time, and we have never been penalized by Penguin, only by Panda back in 2011... but then we recovered by Panda by tackling and fixing all our duplicate page issues.
In any case, I'll definitively do some research on our back-link profile, but how would you decide when a link should be disavowed or not?
-
Hello Fabrizo Ferrari,
Your name is fantastico!
I would listen to Patrick and do a backlink audit. Here are a few I found that would in-and-of-themselves, help explain an anchor-text specific ranking drop to a specific page:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
This page has a text link ad with that anchor text.http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
This forum has a text link ad with that anchor text.This "looks like" a purchased link:
http://www-education.org/music-schools.htmlThis "looks like" a purchased link too, as it seems very out of place:
http://www.scifipulse.net/how-long-can-doctor-survive/I'm sure there are more to consider disavowing. Good luck to you.
-
Patrick, I have tried the Panguin Tool you suggested, and it looks like we had a drop in traffic after the last Mobile update of May 1st, but our website is mobile friendly, why should we have been penalized because of that?
I am eager to know your thoughts on that. Thanks!
-
Thank you Patrick for your reply.
Yes, here is what we have already done and keep doing regularly:
1. Competitor research: We are perfectly aligned with our top competitors, and we would deserve the 5-10 spot in search results. Actually most of the top ranked pages are crappy websites with pages plenty of ads and pretty much the same (messy) contents, it is surprising we have been penalized compared to those ugly pages.
2. SEO Audit: We perform that monthly and we have no special technical issues right now besides some thin content among our product pages that we are trying to improve continuously since 2011.
What we have NOT done is a backlink quality audit, and what you suggest doing (and the tool you are suggesting) is something we can definitively look into right now.
What really puzzles me why that page has dropped so much (or completely removed, I can't find it!) compared with all other top pages of ours that haven't changed. The only logical explanation that now comes to my mind, after reading your posting, is that some kind bad back link pointing to that page has caused this issue... any more thoughts?
-
Hi there
What I would do is this - take a look at your competitors that are now ranking for this - look at the content that's ranking, the type of content it is (educational, transactional, informational, etc.) and see how it aligns with your content. From there, write down what you feel is most important that they are doing and how you can apply (tweaking of course for your unique site) to your marketing strategy.
I would also, because this is such a drastic drop, try aligning your Google Analytics with Google algorithm updates - you can do so with Panguin Tool, it's immensely helpful. Sometimes this could show you if you need to conduct a backlink or content audit depending on what type of penalty you align with, if any.
Also, make sure that you conduct both a SEO audit and a technical audit to see if there are any low hanging fruit.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Patrick
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Top hierarchy pages vs footer links vs header links
Hi All, We want to change some of the linking structure on our website. I think we are repeating some non-important pages at footer menu. So I want to move them as second hierarchy level pages and bring some important pages at footer menu. But I have confusion which pages will get more influence: Top menu or bottom menu or normal pages? What is the best place to link non-important pages; so the link juice will not get diluted by passing through these. And what is the right place for "keyword-pages" which must influence our rankings for such keywords? Again one thing to notice here is we cannot highlight pages which are created in keyword perspective in top menu. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0 -
Why has my home page replaced my sub-category page for set of keywords? Happened 2x in last 2 weeks for day or so only to fix itself. What is going on?
Today I noticed a really weird problem. Our LED Step Lights page (https://www.pegasuslighting.com/led-step-lights.html) has been replaced in the search results with our home page. See screenshot below. As I started to research what was going on, I noticed that this same thing must have happened on January 26 and 27 because in my Analytics I can see that our LED Step Lights sub-cat page had a sudden drop in traffic on those two days only to bounce back again on the 28th. See screenshot below. Our LED Step Lights page has had no changes in content, meta information, or anything in months. We have done no recent link building to this page in years. I don't understand what is going on. This is a popular page for us generating decent traffic. I really don't understand what is going on or even how to try and resolve this problem. I checked our Search Console. No messages. No manual web spam actions. Nothing to suggest that anything is going on except for the weird drops in traffic. Has anyone ever seen this happen before? Does anyone have any ideas as to what may be going on? serp-led-step-lights.png organic-traffic-drops.png search-console-led-step-lights.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cajohnson0 -
Help! The website ranks fine but one of my web pages simply won't rank on Google!!!
One of our web pages will not rank on Google. The website as a whole ranks fine except just one section...We have tested and it looks fine...Google can crawl the page no problem. There are no spurious redirects in place. The content is fine. There is no duplicate page content issue. The page has a dozen product images (photos) but the load time of the page is absolutely fine. We have the submitted the page via webmaster and its fine. It gets listed but then a few hours later disappears!!! The site has not been penalised as we get good rankings with other pages. Can anyone help? Know about this problem?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CayenneRed890 -
Can too many "noindex" pages compared to "index" pages be a problem?
Hello, I have a question for you: our website virtualsheetmusic.com includes thousands of product pages, and due to Panda penalties in the past, we have no-indexed most of the product pages hoping in a sort of recovery (not yet seen though!). So, currently we have about 4,000 "index" page compared to about 80,000 "noindex" pages. Now, we plan to add additional 100,000 new product pages from a new publisher to offer our customers more music choice, and these new pages will still be marked as "noindex, follow". At the end of the integration process, we will end up having something like 180,000 "noindex, follow" pages compared to about 4,000 "index, follow" pages. Here is my question: can this huge discrepancy between 180,000 "noindex" pages and 4,000 "index" pages be a problem? Can this kind of scenario have or cause any negative effect on our current natural SEs profile? or is this something that doesn't actually matter? Any thoughts on this issue are very welcome. Thank you! Fabrizio
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
Getting individual website pages to rank for their targeted terms instead of just the home page
Hi Everyone, There is a pattern which I have noticed when trying to get individual pages to rank for the allocated targeted terms when I execute an SEO campaign and would been keen on anyones thoughts on how they have effectively addressed this. Let me try and explain this by going through an example: Let's say I am a business coach and already have a website where it includes several of my different coaching services. Now for this SEO campaign, I'm looking to improve exposure for the clients "business coaching" services. I have a quick look at analytics and rankings and notice that the website already ranks fairly well for that term but from the home page and not the service page. I go through the usual process of optimising the site (on-page - content, meta data, internal linking) as well as a linkbuilding campaign throughout the next couple of month's, however this results in either just the home page improving or the business page does improve, but the homepage's existing ranking has suffered, therefore not benefiting the site overall. My question: If a term already ranks or receives a decent amount of traffic from the home page and not from the page that its supposed to, why do you think its the case and what would you be your approach to try shift the traffic to the individual page, without impacting the site too much?. Note: To add the home page keyword target term would have been updated? Thanks, Vahe
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Vahe.Arabian0 -
Dynamic pages - ecommerce product pages
Hi guys, Before I dive into my question, let me give you some background.. I manage an ecommerce site and we're got thousands of product pages. The pages contain dynamic blocks and information in these blocks are fed by another system. So in a nutshell, our product team enters the data in a software and boom, the information is generated in these page blocks. But that's not all, these pages then redirect to a duplicate version with a custom URL. This is cached and this is what the end user sees. This was done to speed up load, rather than the system generate a dynamic page on the fly, the cache page is loaded and the user sees it super fast. Another benefit happened as well, after going live with the cached pages, they started getting indexed and ranking in Google. The problem is that, the redirect to the duplicate cached page isn't a permanent one, it's a meta refresh, a 302 that happens in a second. So yeah, I've got 302s kicking about. The development team can set up 301 but then there won't be any caching, pages will just load dynamically. Google records pages that are cached but does it cache a dynamic page though? Without a cached page, I'm wondering if I would drop in traffic. The view source might just show a list of dynamic blocks, no content! How would you tackle this? I've already setup canonical tags on the cached pages but removing cache.. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bio-RadAbs0 -
Traffic drop off and page isn't indexed
In the last couple weeks my impressiona and clicks have dropped off to about half what it used to be. I am wondering if Google is punishing me for something... I also added two new pages to my site in the first week of June and they still aren't indexed. In the past it seemed like new pages would be indexed in a couple days. Is there any way to tell if Google is unhappy with my site? WMT shows 3 server errors, 3 Access denied, and 122 not found errors. Could those not found pages be killing me? Thanks for any advise, Greg www.AntiqueBanknotes.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Banknotes0 -
Is there an optimal ratio of external links to a page vs internal links originating at that page ?
I understand that multiple links fro a site dilute link juice. I also understand that external links to a specific page with relevant anchortext helps ranking. I wonder if there is an ideal ratioof tgese two items
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Apluswhs0