Have I chosen the wrong SEO consultant?
-
Hi all
I've very recently started a small chimney sweeping business for which my friend has designed and built a website, kembersembers.co.uk. Not approaching this from a tech-savvy background I have learnt a lot over the past month but am still an utter novice and as such require some form of help to get me up and running.
My main and immediate priority (sweeping season starts soon!) was to have it so when my company name, kembers embers, was googled I would come up at the top of the results. I understand this can take a little time but it has been a month now since I indexed and I have been told my domain authority is 0.1% so I have sought help.
I don't want to sign up to a 3/6/12 month contract with a firm so I found an SEO consultant local to me who said they could spend a couple of hours doing the right things to hopefully help jump this initial hurdle. I parted with £120 for this which I deemed to be the going rate and they do/did seem honest and professional enough. Upon meeting the consultant he has since told me that he would like to set the website up under a Wordpress template and has cajouled me into changing my hosting over to one he uses also. He says it will take a couple of hours work to do this (there goes my £120) but without this he would hit walls which would be timely to get past and so will save me money in the long run.
Do these kind of suggestions ring an alarm bell to anyone? It didn't seem right that a good SEO couldn't work with what I already have so it leads me to the question is this one to avoid?
On a side note I have also received bad advice from friends of friends/family who claim to know SEO but have, for example, put me in the direction of a link scheme through fiverr.com which I understand may have done me more damage than good. I am now more aware of white hat vs black hat and wish to proceed with the development of my online presence in an ethical way growing organically.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
-
Definite pros and cons to both it would appear.
I don't have the answers to those questions but I will look into this with my developer.
You've been a great help Brendan! Thank you for the insights and for your time.
-
Personally, I've worked with a wide variety of content management systems and part of being an SEO consultant you have to be able to adapt to the clients specific business needs. The appeal to Wordpress is it's easier to implement SEO changes by using plugins. For example, if you have an image heavy site it's easier to set up a plugin to dynamically compress images and add another plugin to cache static resources to improve your site speed.
Whereas in a custom CMS you may need to work with a developer to implement certain changes and it can become costly on your end. But with Wordpress there comes possible performance limitations and security vulnerabilities since it is an open source platform.
Does your old site have a content management system by any chance? If not it may be easier from a content creation standpoint to stay within Wordpress. For example, if you wanted to add a new page because you identified a content gap would your developer need to code a page from scratch or do you have templates that can be easily implemented? How difficult is it to implement title tag and other metadata updates vs. using Wordpress?
I hope that helps some. It's kinda hard to give you a concrete answer without knowing what your backend system looks like and what limitations would be imposed by making the switch. In the end, it's not enough to have a sharp looking site if it's not driving leads for your business.
-
Hi Jordan
Thank you for your response. That's interesting to know about the importance of site speed. Is there any reason why an SEO worth his/her salt should not be able to work with any sort of platform which the website has been built through? Does having a platform outside of Wordpress for example create big limitations for the vast majority of SEO consultants to do their work efficiently and make the relevant changes?
I'm potentially looking at finding another consultant as the Wordpress site which has been created by the current consultant does not IMO look as near as sharp as the site my friend developed. My friend didn't use a website builder, he created it himself. He just used a code template to make it faster and although he can code in PHP chose not to go with Wordpress as it wasn't as customisable.
Any advice you can provide would be super helpful right now. I'm in a proper quandary!
-
SEO takes time to yield results and I wouldn't worry much about your domain authority being .1%. Reading your response I don't personally see anything that would signal alarm bells yet. Also regarding WordPress, I am not a fan personally but I use them for my personal websites. The issue with WordPress is everytime you add an image, plugin or whatever it will create a new page and multiple files for your CSS and Javascript files. CSS and Javascript are what add interactivity to your website. This can slow your website down over time and cause unnecessary bloat. Now that Google ranks websites based on the mobile version of their site and speed is a ranking factor I would definitely keep an eye on your site speed.
However, if you account for these issues and take the proper steps you should be fine. The main concern I'd keep an eye on is site speed. If your website is loading fast and being indexed within Google then that's a solid start. As far as the hosting provider that's not important for SEO necessarily. It comes back to having a website that loads fast and is responsive.
Also, steer clear of Fiver and anyone who offers to get you backlinks for cheap or quickly. Any backlink that will help your business will not come easy.
Moz offers a lot of good resources to get you up to speed. I'd recommend reading https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo.
Hope that helps some.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO audit on a beta site
HI there, Is there much point conducting an SEO site audit on a site that has not yet launched and is protected behind a login? Presumably none of the usual SEO tools (Moz, Screaming Frog etc) can crawl this site becuase it is all locked behind a login. Would it be better to launch it and then do a site audit? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | CosiCrawley0 -
Is a resource page bad for SEO
This is the page http://www.christoit.com/free-resources/articles. While this page isn't what I would consider to be a "resource page" (there are no downloads or any other resources) The question is, does a page like this that just has links to articles, hurt the overall ranking of the site. If you have any examples to support your opinion that would be great! Thanks so much for all awesome threads and answers on this site. There are some really smart people all in one place!
On-Page Optimization | | Britewave0 -
Infinite scroll SEO
I was curious about the implications of Infinite scroll homepages on SEO, and more specifically, no-indexing subpages of the homepage (ie www.homepage.com/page/2/ ). I know its often a good practice to noindex subpages of archives, but in this case, would it be a bad idea? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | stackstreet0 -
SEO For Replacement Site
I have a client with a website that has gotten a bit outdated. We've already built his new website and optimized it, but I'm trying to figure out the best way to replace the site while doing the least amount of damage to his current Google rankings. He's ranking #1 for some very competitive keywords that are responsible for the bulk of his revenue, so we want to jeopardize that. We've already built a new site and written all new content, although the homepage page title, h1 header and meta descriptions will all remain what they currently are. I'm also trying to keep the keyword density as close to the current site as possible. I am aware of transferring all existing site URLS using 301 redirects. Can anyone provide any tips that I should use when replacing the site? Should I expect a slight rankings drop or am I worrying about nothing?
On-Page Optimization | | atstickel0 -
Image heavy pages: Google friendly fonts / seo text etc
Hi Google friendly fonts - are these in wide use now, do they work ? If you have image heavy site do they work just as well as using what we used to call 'seo text'. I have heard that 'seo text' not really used anymore or at least rebranded to 'helpful, informative paragraph or two of body copy about the page with a couple of the pages target keywords in it'. I take it if fonts in image not google friendly then should still ask dev for some space to fit in a para or two of some proper body copy, with couple of pages target kw in it ? Also looking like if i succeed in this request will be below the fold, how hard should i fight for it to be above the fold ? cheers dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Geo-targeted content and SEO?
I am wondering, what effect does geo-targeted "cookie cutter" content have on SEO. For example, one might have a list of "Top US Comedians", which appears as "Top UK Comedians" for users from the United Kingdom. The data would be populated with information from a database in both cases, but would be completely different for each region, with the exception of a few words. Is this essentially giving Google's (US-based) crawler different content to users? I know that plenty of sites do it, but is it legitimate? Would it be better to redirect to a unique page, based on location, rather than change the content of one static page? I know what the logical SEO answer is here, but even some of the big players use the "wrong" tactic. I am very interested to hear your thoughts.
On-Page Optimization | | HalogenDigital0 -
Re-write homepage url for non EMD for SEO
Hi, A lot of talk about EMD's lately not just here but all over SEO and affiliate forums. I've dabbled in emd's but have decided to go against the grain and use a non emd. I think I can optimise hard enough to rank and at the same time build a brand, which is where most emd's fail. But my question is this: If you are targeting lets say the term 'running trainers' and the domain is runyoursocksoff.com would it be more beneficial to rewrite the root domain to this: runyoursocksoff.com/running-trainers/ It does look messy to me and more then likely I would not use this but I have seen it a few times and was wondering if its a work around for non emd's.
On-Page Optimization | | activitysuper0 -
Should I include a "|" for better page title SEO results?
I have seen many sites that include the "|" in page titles and was wondering if there is some SEO value in the practice. Example: Product Name | Company Name Instead of: Product Name by Company Name I have not seen any value in it myself other than a good way to avoid stop words. I wanted to make sure. Currently I have the "by" included in the page titles.
On-Page Optimization | | JedHenning0