Does Frequency of content updates affect likelyhood outbound links will be indexed?
-
I have several pages on our website with low pr, that also themselves link to lots and lots of pages that are service/product specific. Since there are so many outbound links, I know that the small amount of PR will be spread thin as it is. My question is, if I were to supply fresh content to the top level pages, and change it often, would that influence whether or not google indexes the underlying pages? Also if I supply fresh content to the underlying pages, once google crawls them, would that guarantee that google considers them 'important' enough to be indexed"
I guess my real question is, can freshness of content and frequency of update convince google that the underlying pages are 'worthy of being indexed', and can producing fresh content on those pages 'keep google's interest', so to speak, despite having little if any pagerank.
-
Hello Ilya,
There are several good responses here, and I think some of them would depend on how large your site is and what types of pages they are. Judging by your URL example below, I'm guessing it is real estate related or at least that you have localized pages in different geographic areas.
You have a few issues here. First, this video might help, but it is sort of outdated and misleading in some ways. There may not be a set limit (i.e. we're only going to index 10k pages) but how much of your site gets indexed, and how often it gets crawled is based largely on the quality of your site (assuming all other factors are there, such as sitemaps and crawlable navigation, etc...). And the quality of your site depends on many, many different factors. Of course the two most important for this discussion would probably be uniqueness/usefulness of the content, and the amount of links the site and sections of the site, as well as the deep pages have.
The more links you can get into those deep pages, the more likely it is that Google is going to crawl more often, and index those pages. You said you "can't" get links into those pages. If you can't get links into them, they probably aren't "quality" and therein lies your problem.
If by "can't" you just mean there isn't enough time in the day for you to build links into ALL of these pages, you can still build links into as many as you can. This will get the bots crawling down to that level of your site more often, and make it more likely that this level of your site will be indexed.
Here is another useful link, although it is dated as well:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-indexation-capHaving fresh content (with a fresh "last modified" date) usually does, in my experience, entice Googlebot to come back more often. Does that translate into "indexing" more pages? I don't know. But I do know that having better content and more links into those inner pages does translate into more indexation, and not just for the pages linked to externally, but for that entire section/folder/directory of your site.
Consider user-generated content on those pages if you can. A lot of VERY popular review and realestate sites' deep pages would go unindexed without it.
-
We shouldn't confuse a query that deserves freshness (QDF) with enticing Google to recrawl a page or set of pages by giving them fresh content. Maybe I read your response wrong, but those are two different things. QDF would apply, for instance, if you were writing an article right now about the nuclear disaster in Japan; not if you were updating a page from three years ago about how to lose weight after pregnancy, or how to optimize a webpage.
-
From my experience, adding fresh content on a regular basis, even when the pages are rather empty, will make Google crawl more and more your website. As crawl budget gets bigger, deeper pages will be crawled.
Although I never worked on a similar case to yours, I would suggest adding fresh content on a regular basis and link those new pages on the homepage to get them crawled ASAP. Put internal links to the pages you want to be crawled in those new pages if they are revelant.
-
Not as much. You may have to engineer some process for feed generation. The idea is to have the content in RSS and help it propogate through stuff like ping.
-
It can, as Rand has said in the past, results deserve freshness, that is, results seem to always include a few such pages.
-
saibose...do you think a service like linklicious? (link->rss) would work?
-
the 100 links is more of a guideline and not a strict rule as such. Your 1st objective should be to enable the page to be indexed. If Query Deserves Freshness(QDF) algorithms in Google will eventually index your URL. Its a matter of time with you linking to that page from atleast 1 page.
My advice would be to link it from more pages (if possible) and keep the content fresh.
Maybe you can even try the RSS idea as well.
-
I guess it would depend a little how you're doing it, however the best way to get Google to crawl your product pages is to get links directly to them from other sites that are being crawled often/ have authority. I would also suggest creating a (XML) sitemap and submit it to them if you haven't already.
If all your links are coming to your homepage (not uncommon in smaller sites) then Google's going to usually enter your site that way and if there's a lot of links on the homepage and the site only has a little authority then it has to prioritise how many and which pages to visit.
Having regular content updates may get Google to change which pages it crawls at any one time, though some of your other pages may then have longer cache dates.
Ultimately if your site structure is good enough then you really need to work on building links to the product pages to regularly 'convince' Google to crawl them. Though adding relevant content is one way of doing this
-
Thank you guys.
Anthony, I am not sure I agree; indexing and crawling are 2 different things. I guess that is really what I'm getting at here. I can force google to crawl my whole site daily (or almost daily) with rss feeds, sitemaps, proper structure, frequent updates, etc....but WILL that freshness of content force google to go hm....despite the page being very insignificant, it might be important enough to go into my index.
Saibose, unfortunately i'm well beyond the 100 link limit....I am noticing quite a bit of the pages that ARE indexed, ARE ranking since they're well optimized through on-page and they are targeting extremely long-tail keyphrases. So my main goal is to convince goal to index these pages because once I do, they will rank.
What I have done so far:
1. Made sure that the page is easily accessible from at least 1 page on the website
2. Create a sitemap (proper sitemap index and several underlying sitemap files).
3. Submitted the sitemaps and increase google crawl rate; (I noted google is crawling around 1700 pages/day on my site.
4. Made sure that the page is at most 3 levels deep. (site/state/city) (we'er talking about city level pages)
5. created proper urls (/site/state/city)
I think maybe I misspoke. I am not doubting that google will 'crawl' the page. What I am asking is if I can't link externally to it, and the internal page rank passed is very small, will adding fresh content and making google think that the page gets updated frequently convince google to index it? Does frequent crawling finally force indexing or is it possible google may say "no matter how often you update this page, its just NOT important enough for me to index it," if noone links to it outside your site.
-
I think you are getting at the concept of continually updating the content on a few pages of your site to make sure they are indexed by google. If the page is not indexed already, that means it likely isn't being crawled by google at all so changing the content on the page won't make much of a difference.
Instead, make sure the page you want indexed is easily found within the website's internal linking structure, preferably only a handful of clicks away from the homepage. An even better way to make sure the page is indexed is to get a few external links pointed at it. If you are simply trying to achieve indexation and not expecting the page to rank high in the SERPs, something as easy as bookmarking the site to a few websites and tweeting it once or twice will probably get the job done.
As for your comment on whether or not google will consider your page 'important' enough to be indexed, I don't think you will have a problem with that as long as you are writing unique content.
-
The problem is very common for content heavy websites where content lies somewhere way down the hiearchy.
I am considering or assuming a few things here:
1. The webpage you are referring to is already crawled atleast once.
2. It is accessible from atleast one link on your homepage
3. It does not have a huge number of outbound links ..that is, around 100(within and outside your domain).
Your 1st task should be to get Google to crawl the page (s)
1. get a tool like gsite crawler and crawl your entire website. Create and submit a XML sitemap of your website to Google webmaster tools. Create links from your pages that are already indexed to this page (pages). That way, Google bot will find its way eventually.
2. Update fresh content on the page. Create a RSS feed of the content updates very frequently and serve it up front on the homepage or an important page of your website (which ranks well in Google).
All said, you have to wait and watch. There is no way you can forcefully ask Google to crawl your webpage. Also, updating your homepage content (just text with no link to your deep pages) wouldnt help in speeding up the process. But, its a good practice to keep your homepage content fresh so that Google bots visit your website regularly and you get Google love.
Hope that answers your question.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Outbound links
Hi everyone, Just a quick question about using info/statistics from other sources in my articles. If I use a quote/piece of info from another online article do I just say where it's from and link to it? Is this acceptable or do you have to get permission? I find the whole permissions thing quite confusing! I know that outbound links are good for SEO so just wanted to check this. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ClareO0 -
Site Wide Links
Howdy Moz! So our agency has been around for long enough to have a few sites we've built that have our credit in their footer resulting in a site wide link. Mostly just our name. We've heard that Google does not particularly like site wide links, should we go through and remove some of these old links?
On-Page Optimization | | wearehappymedia0 -
Linking Out To External Sites
Hi, All If I have created a (website, logo, email campaign) for a client and written an article about it with screen shots on my website and link to them with a (do-follow) link how does Google see the (do-follow) link? Regards to the sites they have one link in the footer on the home page, which is a (do-follow) back to our site. Also, the websites are not in my Niche.
On-Page Optimization | | deskjet0 -
Impact of nofollow links
Does anyone know what the impact of a nofollowed link is on the ranking value any given page has to distribute? For example, if I have 2 links on a page, both followed, I know those links each distribute nearly 50% of the total ranking value the current page has to offer. However, if one of those links is nofollowed, does that automatically mean the other link gets the ranking value cast off by the nofollowed link? In other words, the single followed link now distributes nearly 100% of the ranking value the page has to offer? It seems to me I remember hearing this was not the case and that the ranking value a nofollowed link would have if it were followed just evaporates. This would mean the single followed link still only passes on around 50%...not 100%. Is the effect different if the links are internal vs. external? If any citations are available to justify knowledge here, that would be great. I know a lot of people have opinions about this subject, but I'm not sure anyone knows Google's position. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | RyanOD0 -
Dealing with thin content/95% duplicate content - canonical vs 301 vs noindex
My client's got 14 physical locations around the country but has a webpage for each "service area" they operate in. They have a Croydon location. But a separate page for London, Croydon, Essex, Luton, Stevenage and many other places (areas near Croydon) that the Croydon location serves. Each of these pages is a near duplicate of the Croydon page with the word Croydon swapped for the area. I'm told this was a SEO tactic circa 2001. Obviously this is an issue. So the question - should I 301 redirect each of the links to the Croydon page? Or (what I believe to be the best answer) set a rel=canonical tag on the duplicate pages). Creating "real and meaningful content" on each page isn't quite an option, sorry!
On-Page Optimization | | JamesFx0 -
Duplicate content
Hello, I have two pages showing dulicate content. They are: http://www.cedaradirondackchairs.net/ http://www.cedaradirondackchairs.net/index Not sure how to resolve this issue. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | Ronb10230 -
Duplicate page content & title for www.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com/index.php?
Hi, First post so please be gentle! My Crawl Diagnostics Summary is showing an error relating to duplicate page content and duplicate page title for www.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com/index.php which are, in my view, the same thing/page? Could anyone shed any light please? Thanks Carl
On-Page Optimization | | Carl2870 -
ON SITE SEARCH INDEXED BY GOOGLE - no follow or no index
Google indexes alll our internetal searches: search box is brand - clothes types - size type - and for each page it creates a page that which creates duplicate page title and unnecessary content. Should I do a nofollow on the advance search or a no index. Many thanks for the info. Sonja
On-Page Optimization | | reallyitsme0