Duplication Penalty through Specs?
-
I am trying to figure our how to correct a recently incurred duplication penalty on a partner site. I didn't see any posts on this yet specific to my problem. The site used to be ranked on page 1 of Google for all important keywords but now we ran into the situation that many pages were bumped to pos 100 or lower due to duplication issues. This is an aviation site, discussing airplanes and each page discusses a different model but each page also has the specs of the plane and while the data parts are different for each plane the specification terms are the same ,see here:
Primary Function:
Crew:
Engine:
Thrust:
Weight Empty:
Max. Weight:
Length:
Wingspan:
Cruise Speed:
Max.Speed:
Climb:
Ceiling:
Range:
First Flight:
Year Deployed:Is there an easy way to get Google to stop including these terms (not the data in the 2nd column) from the page anaysis to prevent this causing the duplication issues we are are seeing due to this?
Thanks in advance!
-
Dear Dan. THANK YOU for this excellent information. We are still pretty new to this so this helps a lot!
We did some work already and now are noticing also strange behaviour around capitalization, which makes no sense to us at all; any thoughts on that? Here some more details:
I am finding out some interesting things about G search results as I further explore what has happened to my site.
The results are different if you use small case or capital letters such as RC A-10 Warthog or rc a-10 warthog.
The results are different at different times of the day, sometimes within minutes. Before 7 am today most of the pages which I modified were in the top 10 results, now about 1/2 of them have slipped to page two.
There is absolutely no logic to all the variables. For example, my site returned to its normal traffic (the same way it was before the algorithm change) of over 5,000 views per day on Saturday and Sunday. Just last weekend it barely got to 3,000 views. And, I haven't changed enough pages to the new format to directly affect those results. I wonder if Google has made an adjustment and that is why many of my pages are getting back to near where they were before? I look forward to tonight's final numbers for the day to see if it was solely for the weekend or if it continues.
However, using rc a-10 warthog in small letters, the air hogs page is no where to be found, yet my page is no. 4 as of right now. In Caps, RC A-10 Warthog it is no. 11 right now.
The above example may lead you to believe that the pages on my site should all be in the higher search results when using small case. However, check out Japanese Zero vs japanese zero. Just the opposite is true. In this case my page rates higher when entering it with Capital letters.
Yet, if you look at RC A-6 Intruder vs rc a-6 intruder, they are both around no. 7 in the search results.
Check out how little content is on the page that is higher in the results than mine for the A-6:
http://www.dhgate.com/jet-airplane-a-6-intruder-high-grade-rtf/p-ff80808128ed96260128f2db154e1e9f.htmlCheck out my A-6 page:
http://www.aviationtrivia.info/Grumman-A-6-Intruder.phpI think it is because DH Gate, like Amazon, simply has thousands of pages and G likes that, even if each page has little content. Do you concur?
I think what G is doing is known as the google dance. It is reminiscent of the cypher codes used to encrypt top secret transmissions for the military in that it is constantly changing so as to discourage detection. What may be a top page one day can rate up to 10 positions lower on another.
Many of my pages have slipped only slightly when G changed their algorithm, such as from no. 1 in the search results to no. 3. (Virtually all the top rated pages are now ones which have videos.) However, that has been enough to make a big difference in traffic and sales.
Other than start taking videos of some 500 rc airplanes featured on my site, putting the videos on my site and YouTube, and hoping that the videos will be highly rated, I don't know how to get my pages as high in the search results as the YouTube pages.
The other pages which usually are higher in G's search results are forums like RC Universe and RC Groups. They have tens of thousands of pages, none of which have been changed, dating back to the late 1990's. Not much I can do about that either.
My aim is to be in G's search results right after the videos and forums. I think that someone searching for a rc airplane for sale will go right past them if they know that Aviation Trivia has ALL the rc airplanes of a particular model listed on it on a single page.
The changes I've made, ie. no longer dividing the page between the actual aircraft and rc models of it, has gotten those pages back into the top ten search results, but not for both Caps and small letters.
-
It was after. The site however has some of the best data from a people perspective. We are trying to reexplain that to the G algo
-
Tried to add as a reply to you Ralf, but it's not working. Anyone know why I cannot reply to a response?
Ralf, I glanced at some pages to see if I could find anything. Here's a couple of things that I think you could change or work on to improve your standing with Google:
1. There is pretty wide consensus that pages with a lot of ads and adsense seem to have been hit the hardest. Some of your pages have up to 5 blocks of adsense. Perhaps 1 or 2 blocks of adsense would be better. Google doesn't seem to like it much when the adsense is "hidden" in a sense, as in, there's so much adsense and it looks so much like the actual content that users cannot tell the difference. Go easy on it and see if that helps.
2. You have very outdated code on your website. It seems your whole site is built in HTML tables. Your code to content ratio is going to suffer because of it, and you are using HTML elements that are deprecated I believe. (ie: font face). Perhaps a face lift of the site and an update of that clunky code could help speed up the site and present a better image to users and search engines.
3. You haven't signaled which URL of your site is the main URL. For example, you have 4 home pages according to Google:
www.aviationtrivia.info/index.php
All go to the exact same page, so that page is showing up under 4 different URL's. That is one, duplicate content and two, not making good use of your link juice. According to open site explorer, you have over 22,000 links to your domain, but 13,000 go to the www version of your domain. So your links are split between your main domain and the www subdomain. Redirect the www version or the non www version to its counterpart with or without the www. This will consolidate your link juice much better.
4. From the numbers, 68 domains are giving you 13,000 links to your www url and 10 domains are giving you about 9,000 links to the non www url. 9,000 links from only 10 domains looks a little odd to me. The odd part is your home page(s) only account for about 1,000 of your total links. I didn't take the time to find out which page or pages are getting all those links, but it doesn't appear to be your home page. 9,000 links from 10 domains going to a page other than your home page just seems, well, odd to me. If you have any paid links or have participated in a suspicious link exchange of some kind, this could be harming you as well.
Hope that helps. Another tip would be to go into your Google Webmaster Tools account and see what it tells you. Often you can get good information from them to help you out.
-
Was this before or AFTER the Panda Update? If after, you may have been hit by G's new algo which targets sites they deem to be of low quality.
-
Thanks you for your thoughts, much appreciated! The Google change is what made use think it is duplication and the only thing we could think of was the repeating specs.
It was copyscape that let us to believe it to be the duplication issue but as we checked on copyscape before the Google change and since tested some content changes that didn't make any difference to copyscape, I am beginning to think that copyscape doesn't work properly.
Now going back to the problem itself, let me describe what we are seeing and maybe you have a better idea what could cause this and what we need to be looking at.
Virtually all of the pages on my Aviation Trivia website www.aviationtrivia.info have been downgraded by Google. The aircraft pages were mostly in the top ten search results for rc airplanes and the name of the aircraft such as F4U Corsair and the words "for sale", ie: "F4U Corsair for sale". A great number of those pages are now out of the first 50 search results.
The aircraft pages all contain original content. One such page, Sikorsky CH-53
http://www.aviationtrivia.info/Sikorsky-CH-53.php
is typical of the downgraded pages. It was in the first five page results under its name and now is around no. 60. The page even has an exclusive interview with a pilot of the aircraft.A page that was in the top results for the search words "rc Airwolf Helicopter"
http://www.aviationtrivia.info/Airwolf-Helicopter.php has now been downgraded to about no. 30. The no. 1 search results for rc Airwolf Helicopter is Century Helicopters 30 Size Airwolf Helicopter
http://www.centuryheli.com/products/helikits/cn1070airwolf/index.html?currentid=120
Their page minimally describes three helicopters they sell. My page at Aviation Trivia describes over 30 Airwolf helicopters for sale plus has information from a person who has flown one, plus additional information on where you can find specifics about the helicopter on popular websites.The most popular page on my site, World's Fastest Aircraft http://www.aviationtrivia.info/THE-100-FASTEST-AIRCRAFT.php
is still no. 1 in the Google search results, however what was the second most popular page, Largest Aircraft
http://www.aviationtrivia.info/THE-LARGEST-AIRCRAFT.php
has gone from no. 1 to about no. 50. What is really interesting is that, although I expect Wikipedia pages to always be above mine in the search results, the highest ranked page after Wikipedia is Global Aircraft - Top 50 Largest Aircraft.
http://www.globalaircraft.org/50_largest.htmLooking at my page that describes 100 aircraft in detail and provides links to pages in my site that goes into their histories and full specifications, then looking at the Global Aircraft page that simply states the name of the aircraft, wingspan, and weight, I can't understand how it can now ranked no. 1 and my page no. 50 when searching for "world's largest aircraft."
I have set up my site from the view point of a person who is interested in scale rc model aircraft and the aviation history of their actual aircraft. The information I put on the site is there to not only inform the people about the full scale aircraft, but to give them choices about the rc model airplanes that are available, and other information that may be helpful in choosing the right rc model for them.
Just to clarify, someone would search for rc F4U Corsair, or rc F-14 Tomcat and that would come up in the top search results as well as F4U Corsair for sale and F-14 Tomcat for sale, etc.
Hope that makes sense
Thanks!
Ralf -
If I understand correctly, you have a site with several pages that discuss different models, and each of those pages has this same spec list? You are not being hit with a duplicate content penalty. If you were, every website in the world that does reviews would be hit hard. I just did a quick search on treadmill reviews. Look at those results on the top page. They all use the same specs on all their pages. Treadmilldoctor.com and treadmillreviews.com seem to use a near identical system to each other even. Yet none of them have duplicate penalties.
WIthout knowing your website, there is definitely some other reason you are not ranking anymore. There was a new algorithm change that could have affected you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content
Hello guys, After fixing the rel tag on similar pages on the site I thought that duplicate content issue were resolved. I checked HTML Improvements on GWT and instead of going down as I expected, it went up. The duplicate issues affect identical product pages which differ from each other just for one detail, let's say length or colour. I could write different meta tags as the duplicate is the meta description, and I did it for some products but still didn't have any effects and they are still showing as duplicates. What would the problem be? Cheers
Technical SEO | | PremioOscar0 -
URLs Case Sensitive Serving Duplications
At PakWheels.com we have URLs being generated in upper and lower cases. For example following URLs serve pages: http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_Toyota/ http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_toyota/ Both show same content. Similarly in following four cases: http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_Toyota/md_corolla/ http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_Toyota/md_Corolla/ http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_toyota/md_Corolla/ http://www.pakwheels.com/used-cars/search/-/mk_toyota/md_corolla/ all of these 4 URLs serve page with same content. What is the best practice for this issue, is it generating duplication? Please advise
Technical SEO | | razasaeed0 -
Penalty on two primary keywords
Hi Seomoz, I have been strugling to get www.texaspoker.dk out of what seems to be a keyword specific penalty (we are on page 5 on "poker" and "online poker"). First I thought it was Penguin related, but I'm not so sure any longer. I have removed all the bad links to my site possible (it's not easy to get other people to remove links, I can tell you), and I have reported all the links that I would like google to "ignore" (reconsideration request) ... all in all I have requested for reconsideration 5 times, and - despite some small changes - I got the same answer every time. We violate the quality guide lines and we should be looking for unnatural links pointing to our site. If any one - by having a look at our site - have any idea what could be wrong, please don't hold back, we would love to hear your point of view. Right now we are in the middle of making our partners take off their site wide links to us (the partners you'll find if you click the flags to the right in the top of the home page). On Texaspoker.dk we only link to the partners from the home page, but maybe we should consider to take of even these links? No one is really clicking on them anyway. Another thing, which is only under consideration, is to ask our partners from Betxpert.com (with whom we have exchanged our news feed - you will find their feed if you schroll down the home page) to set the feed to "no follow" and do the same our selves. What do you think of this thought? As far as I can see, there is nothing wrong with the on page optimization, but maybe some one can see what I don't see? Again - what ever thoughts you guys may have - shoot ... i'm ready to take all bulets 🙂 Thanks in advance! Nicolai, Texaspoker.dk
Technical SEO | | MPO0 -
Duplicate Page Title & Content Penalty On Website Tonight Platform
I built my primary website on Website Tonight (WT) five years ago when I was a net newbie and I'm presently new to seomoz. The initial crawl indicated a problem with duplicate page title and duplicate content with my website home page in WT. It turns out that the WT platform makes you assign a file name to your homepage i.e: www.business.com/homepage.html that differs from the www.business.com that you want as your homepage url. Apparently the search engines are recognizing these identical pages as separate and duplicate. I know that the standard answer would be to just do a 301 redirect from the long file name to the short file name - end of story. But WT does not allow you to do 301 redirects and they also do not give you the ability to go into the htaccess file to fix this yourself manually. I spoke to the folks at WT tonight and they claim that they automatically do 301 redirects on the platform. But if this true then why am I getting the error message in seomoz? Does anyone know if this is a problem? If so, does anyone here have a fix? Thanks in advance. Sincerely - Bill in Denver
Technical SEO | | anxietycoach0 -
Duplicate content
I'm getting an error showing that two separate pages have duplicate content. The pages are: | Help System: Domain Registration Agreement - Registrar Register4Less, Inc. http://register4less.com/faq/cache/11.html 1 27 1 Help System: Domain Registration Agreement - Register4Less Reseller (Tucows) http://register4less.com/faq/cache/7.html | These are both registration agreements, one for us (Register4Less, Inc.) as the registrar, and one for Tucows as the registrar. The pages are largely the same, but are in fact different. Is there a way to flag these pages as not being duplicate content? Thanks, Doug.
Technical SEO | | R4L0 -
Dealing with manual penalty...
I'm in the back-and-forth with Google's Quality Search team at the moment. We discovered a manual penalty on our website and have been trying to get it removed as of late. Problem is, tons of spammy incoming links. We did not ask for or purchase any of these links, it just so happens that spammy websites are linking to our site. Regardless, I've done my best to remove quite a few links in the past week or so, responding to the Quality Search team with a spreadsheet of the links in question and the action taken on each link. No luck so far. I've heard that if I send an email to a website asking for a link removal, I should share that with Google as well. I may try that. Some of the links are posted on websites with no contact info. A WhoIs search brings up a hidden registrant. Removing these links is far from easy. My question is, what are some techniques that are proven to be effective when working your way through the removal of a manual penalty? I know Google isn't going to tell me all of the offending links (they've offered a few examples, we've had those removed - still penalized) so what's the best way for me to find them myself? And, when I have a link removed, it may stay in Webmaster Tools as an active link for a while even though it no longer exists. Does the Quality Search team use Webmaster Tools to check or do they use something else? It's an open-ended question, really. Any help dealing with a manual penalty and what you have done to get that penalty removed is of great help to me. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | ccorlando0 -
Similar Content vs Duplicate Content
We have articles written for how to setup pop3 and imap. The topics are technically different but the settings within those are very similar and thus the inital content was similar. SEOMoz reports these pages as duplicate content. It's not optimal for our users to have them merged into one page. What is the best way to handle similar content, while not getting tagged for duplicate content?
Technical SEO | | Izoox0 -
How to resolve duplicate content and title errors?
Hello, I'm new to this resource and SEO. I have taken the time to read other posts but am not entirely sure about the best way to resolve the issues I am experiencing and so am hoping for a helpful hand. My site diagnostics advise me that most of my errors relate to duplicate content and duplicate page titles. Most of these errors seem to relate to our ecommerce product pages. A little about us first, we manufacture and retail over the internet our own line of unique products which can only be purchased through our website. So it’s not so important to make our product pages stand out from competitors. An example of one of our product pages can be found here: http://www.nabru.co.uk/product/Sui+2X2+Corner+Sofa In terms of SEO we are focusing on improving the rankings of our category pages which compete much more with our competitors, but would also like our product pages to be found via a google search for those potential customers that are at the late stage of a buying cycle. So my question: Whilst it would be good to add more content to the product pages, user reviews, individual product descriptions etc (and have good intentions to do this over time, which unfortunately is limited) is there an easy way to fix the duplicate content issues, ensure our products can be found and ensure that the main focus is on our category pages? Many thanks.
Technical SEO | | jannkuzel0