Anyone know where we can find a validator for schema.org?
-
I was searching Bing and Google for a validator for schema.org but I can not seem to find one. It seems a little odd for them to promote and use the new standard but not give developers a way to ensure the markup is correctly parsed.
I am looking for something like the rich snippets tool Google has.
-
And that is why so many developers prefer to work in flash or silverlight. HTML will never be a standard as long as major browsers only support parts of it. Those development languages include the validation in the complier.
It is only asking for misuse of a schema to release a 'standard' with little documentaion and no validation. Arrh, the good ond days of IE6 and every second line of HTML being a test for what the browser is.
-
Supposedly, a tool is in the works, but frankly, I wouldn't expect to see it terribly quickly. As I understand it, schema.org's new "standard" is somewhat of a kluge - made up of many different others. As such, the validation process will be more complex, and more easily subverted by tons of potential issues.
To further complicate things, part of a schema.org validation would be looking at html5 as well, which can't be validated as a single markup. Instead, it's a kluge too. Interesting times ahead, I think.
-
I had that same question Donnie and also checked out the Rich Snippets Testing tool. It would be really handy to have a validator that actually worked!
-
I was in the process of adding videos to the site and when I saw the whiteboard Friday with the Bing interview, I thought this would be a good time to add the markup. Since the examples are very limited, I wanted to ensure my interperation complied, but alas it looks like I will have to wait for Google to index the page and see what happens. It does surprise me that they release a 'standard' without having a validator available. I have also posted on Microsoft connect to see if I can get a beta tool via MSDN.
Thanks for looking up those references for me Donnie.
-
I found where I read it. Thanks for that post, I hadn't yet read it. However, we have some misinformation going on here from the engines because on [schema's getting started page](2c. Testing your markup) @ '2c.Testing your markup', they say, "Google provides a rich snippets testing tool, which you can use to test your markup and identify any errors."
Perhaps, we're just too soon, too early of adopeters
Thanks oznappies -
Hi Donnie,
I know that one, but it does not test the schema.org markup as yet. Google makes note that although they support the new markup, the current rich snippets tool does not and they hope to have a new one out shortly.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/introducing-schemaorg-search-engines.html
states the following :4) Test your markup using the rich snippets
testing tool.
...
rich snippets previews are not yet shown for schema.org
markup. We’ll be adding this functionality soon. 6/5/11 -
I think I read somewhere that Google's Rich Snippets Testing Tool works for testing schema's markup also. I'll see if I can find where I heard/ read this.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to rank a keyword?
My competitor has158 ranking keywords but has only 30 anchor texts on his all backlinks. i am only ranking for 2 keywords , how do i increase ranking keywords? whats the strategy?
Whiteboard Friday | | calvinkj0 -
Domain and Sub-Domain Question
Hi, My company owns the domains www.NYSTATEMLS.COM and www.MYSTATEMLS.COM both of these sites are already on there way with a lot going on. I did just review video 5 on technical SEO and Rand was talking about how much harder it is to rank two websites. So i'm wondering what could be done in this area? Should something be done? The website nystatemls.com is necessary because it's dedicated to the state of new york & has been around for a long time. mystatemls.com came later because the business grew and we opened up to the national market. Looking for some insight. Thanks so much, Chris Farcher
Whiteboard Friday | | Cfarcher0 -
Targeted Keyword in the document
Hi, I write long articles 3k and 5k words my question is that I read in Moz article not use your keyword more than 15 times is also apply for 3k articles ??? and if yes than my second question is that I used my targeted keyword in heading also include in 15 times ???
Whiteboard Friday | | Frozen_Fry0 -
I am looking for my "Flywheel" that can help me scale link building
I am looking to scale our link building efforts to create better inner link opportunities, according to the "flywheel" method by Rand, I need to find something that is "evergreen" and creative, What are some of the coolest campaigns you guys have seen?
Whiteboard Friday | | uBreakiFix1 -
Sentences RDF Format
Why do we need to write sentences in RDF format (subject, object predicate) is there a reason for that ? Thank you,
Whiteboard Friday | | seoanalytics0 -
Internal linking: Global Nav Bar obscuring link authority?
I was watching Rand's whiteboard on how links in the headers/footers can impact SEO: moz.com/blog/links-headers-footers-navigation-impact-seo If I understood correctly: 1) Google will use the first link in the html that it sees for a given page. Additional links will not be considered for passing weight. 2) Text links in body (carry more weight than) > image links > nav links > footer links If we want to use a global nav bar, is there a simple solution for not obscuring the links in the body content? (It seems very awkward to load the header nav last (and bring it up via css after the page loads), and this also goes against Google wanting people to load above-the-fold content quickly.) If I internally link to a page that was not important enough to get a spot in the global nav, but I include this link in the body as a text link (for example, an accessory specific to that item), is this internal link really getting more weight in Google's eyes because it wasn't in the nav? This seems strange to me. Thanks!
Whiteboard Friday | | HalfPriceBanners0 -
Should this site be using Rel=Canonical VS No Index
I'm currently working on this site https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation I've been watching this video by Rand - https://moz.com/blog/rel-canonical but it's still unclear in this scenario. if you use the search facility "check availability" half way down the page the results page (urlparams) are no indexed. Would it be better to index and canonicalise? There is no similar content but I'm concerned that no index will remove the ability for semantic content to be visible to google. LADkajY
Whiteboard Friday | | Andrew-SEO0 -
Any recommendations on how to keep track of time that clients can see
I know there are programs you can log into to keep track of how much time you are spending on a clients site Does anybody have one they like and feel works well for SEO? Opinions on working this way? I like the idea for my benefit as much as theirs. I find myself struggling to make sure I work ENOUGH for some clients and not WAY to much for others. Plus I want to make sure I am staying focused on THEIR site and not wandering down a rabbit trail doing research and learning about something new on the clients dime. I REALLY like the idea of my clients being able to log into their account and seeing the status / progress on their account from MY website. I think I have only seen this 1-2 times so i'm sure it isn't easy. Thoughts? Have an AWESOME week everybody! Matthew
Whiteboard Friday | | Mrupp440