Machine Learning - Randomness in Search Engine Ranking Algorithms
-
I believe, sometimes you may 'deserve' the first position, but get #3. And of course, sometimes you may deserve #3 and instead be #1. All due to a 'randomness factor' in search engine algorithms.
I've been holding this hypothesis for quite sometime. Really, it started when I learned about SEOmoz using machine learning to better investigate SEO best practices.
I suddenly found myself wanting to learn more about machine learning, and the implications of using it for SEO. I'm by no means able to utilize machine learning myself, but I it appears unsupervised learning would have a real chance of cracking search engine algorithms. Hey, even Stuxnet was cracked!
Surely Google/ Bing would know (and account for) this, right? We can agree they'd obviously prefer a highly skilled mathematician not be able to crack the code.
Therefore, I'm led to believe that search engines use some sort of randomness in their rankings. Maybe not much. Perhaps not all the time. But if a random percentage of search results, had a random variable of sorts included in their calculations... wouldn't that be enough to prevent the vast majority of cracking attempts?
Thoughts, opinions, criticism? Thanks.
-
Hey Ryan, thanks for the ideas. Respectfully, I disagree however.
With something as simple as 'rand(1,4)' in php you can generate random #s. There's no telling what Google could do with their algorithm(s). Okay, so it's (relatively) easy to do, but why would they do it? After-all, they have heavily invested in complicated models that do the ranking for them...
Well, they've heavily invested in complicated algorithms, and if cracked, bump- there goes there flagship product. I'm sure SEOmoz aren't the only people attempting to glean insight using machine learning. And perhaps, others don't like to publish their findings and tip anyone off.
Of course, I'm not an A.I. scientist, so perhaps I misunderstand how unsupervised machine learning works, but I'm under the impression that it very well can be used to logically explain all of those factors. I'm sure there's tons and tons of work that would go into it, but if you had the resources (and some do), wouldn't you do it?
This is why I wanted to post this question though- to get feedback and other opinions, so thanks Ryan!
-
Hi Donnie.
I enjoy your analysis but disagree with your conclusion. I believe search engines are working with an unimaginably vast amount of data. They evaluate hundreds of factors then assign different weights to each. Also consider the source data is constantly changing, and the best anyone can have is a "view" of the data at a given point in time.
There is absolutely no need for any random factor. In my naivety, I believe every last ranking result can be logically explained. We simply do not have proper access to the data, metrics and weighting involved in those calculations. Our educated guesses seem to do a pretty darn good job.
-
Darn, I can't delete this comment
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Have Semantic Search and Hummingbird questions? Don't miss Tuesday's free Mozinar.
Hey Q&A friends, I know a lot of you have questions about semantic search and Google's Hummingbird, so for this Tuesday's free Mozinar (10/21), we're having the amazing Gianluca Fiorelli on to teach you and answer all your questions. You can register for free here: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/468375870 We do record all these webinars, so if you can't make it, you'll be able to find it in our past webinars within 48 hours post-Mozinar. See you there! B0IrjznCMAMEDR7.png
SEO Learn Center | | EricaMcGillivray2 -
Hi, this is a little off topic but I hope someone can help me. I am looking for a good E Learning provider.
Within our organization we would like to start training our people at our global offices in SEO using E Learning. Just as with SEO, there is so much available, but I don't know who to trust and who not. I was hoping some of you might have some names for me, or experience with certain providers you can recommend. Best regards, Astrid
SEO Learn Center | | Cordstrap0 -
Why did one of our keyword score an F but is first place on Google search? The key word is "Barista Classes Los Angeles"
We're working with an SEO company that provides monthly details on what keywords have improved and needs work. One of our keyowords (Barista Classes Los Angeles) climbed up to number one on Google's search box. However, on SEO Moz, the same keyword got an "F" under the On-Page category. Can someone help us out and define why this is happening? This way, we can adjust and see how we can improve. Thanks!
SEO Learn Center | | ckroaster0 -
Are there any plans for a new SEOmoz ranking factors report?
The latest SEOmoz search ranking factors report I seem to find is dated 2011 http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors - any plans for an updated version at all?
SEO Learn Center | | Clicksjim2 -
How do you eliminate negative "Searches Related To This" on Google?
I have a client who when you type in their company name in Google there are some negative terms in the space that says "Searches related to this" ... Is there any way to eliminate these? We are not sure why it is showing up since it has nothing to do with their company but it does look bad...
SEO Learn Center | | JChronicle0 -
WP Permalinks, categories, and organic ranking impact
Hello. this is my first post here, so I hope it to be a question with an easy answer... I am working on a site that has an established domain, but has recently suffered significant ranking decline. one of the problems I have found involves over-use of categories and tags - making the actual content 3 to 4 clicks deep within any given post URL. My question involves the restructuring of category / tag use for improved page content and SEO organic rank impact. Here is an example: domain.com/blue-shoes/blue-shoes-tampa I want to target this specific post and optimize for "blue shoes tampa". I have used the Wordpress SEO plugin by Yoast to help achieve balanced optimization on the on-page post content itself, but now am struggling with the best approach for the URL... also, the site has about 80 (62 posts and 18 pages) total items with similar issues, , so I am hoping that any answer / opinion offered here might also be applicable to the rest of the site. thanks in advance for your time & comments.
SEO Learn Center | | MindSpark0 -
For Newbies! | Matt Cutts on "How does Google use human raters in web search?"
I answer many questions here in Q&A. Instead of helping one individual, I thought this would help many newbies understand how Google uses human raters for web search. Watch Matt and learn why you should not SPAM or make sorry titles. http://youtu.be/nmo3z8pHX1E?hd=1 I hope this short video helps you! Leave a comment if you wish.
SEO Learn Center | | Francisco_Meza2 -
Does Server Speed Effect SEO Rankings?
I was told by a website developer that Google ranks sites higher if they are hosted on faster servers. Is this true? For example my site is currently limited because it is a Quick Shopping Cart site hosted by Godaddy. He said that if I hosted my research chemical site with a different company with faster servers I could get better ranking immediately. I linked to my site. I think it loads ok. However Godaddy probably isn't the fastest service around.
SEO Learn Center | | chronicle0