Advertising and negative impact on SEO
-
On one of my sites, I've been trying to get the word out by contacting blogs and asking them to share my site with their readers. This has resulted in some free publicity for my site, as well as quite a few paid reviews/sponsored posts. Note, however, that I've never paid for links, just reviews of my site...
When I started this about 2 months ago, my site was a PR3 and getting fairly lowsy organic search traffic (i.e. 30-40 visits a day from Google). Then a few days ago, my PR dropped to 1. I didn't worry too much though, because my organic traffic was still around 30-40 visits a day.
Now today, I checked and I only had 1 visitor the entire day from Google. Obviously I've been penalized.
My most important question is, what can I do? Do I have an recourse, or do I need to just shut the domain down and move elsewhere?
Second, wtf is Google penalizing this? I understand the argument against paid links, but should I not be allowed to advertise my site? Apparently I can buy links all day long through Google and they'll happily take my money, but the minute I pay some poor blogger to write an article about my site to their audience, I get penalized?
Please help, I can't believe I just destroyed one of my sites like this!
-
I agree with the thin content assessment. Below is what I wrote before I read your comment a second time.
I'm looking at interior pages on the site, and my question is "if I were Google, what benefit do I get from including this site in the index?". What does this site offer that's not already on the web? I visited a few random pages. Several of the offers were expired, some as much as a couple of years ago. The product information is taken from another site, and is duplicated all across the web. The blog hasn't had a new post since January. There is very little to this site that is not from a data feed, from what I can tell. Why should Google include this site in their results, when other sites can offer more information?
On the technical side, don't include "all" in the robots meta tag, it's not an option (see http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html). I don't know if it's causing any problems, but it doesn't need to be there.
-
FYI, to add some more to the discussion, I had a long talk with an SEO buddy of mine, and he has a theory on why my google traffic might have dropped. Before, my site was a PR3, had been around for several years, but not getting much traffic, much publicity, etc.
Then I started this advertising campaign in early June. Immediately we started getting a lot of links, so from Google's perspective, it looked like there was suddenly interest in the site. Obviously, some of those links were sponsored posts, which Google possibly took note of.
However, if I look at webmastertools in Google, I noticed that Google is crawling a lot more pages. This was probably because Google said "woah, something is going on here, this site is showing up on a lot of blogs all of the sudden" so it crawled like crazy.
However, on this particular site, I basically aggregate deals on women's products. A lot of the content on each product page is pretty generic, like product titles and descriptions that are duplicate content from other sites.
Therefore, my buddy's theory is that Google took an interest in the site because of the sudden influx of links. As a result, Google crawled deeper into the site (keep in mind we have 50-75k products, each product with its own landing page). As it went deeper, it didn't like what it saw, because the content was "thin" i.e. lots of duplicate content with other sites, etc.
As a result, his theory is that Google decided to penalize the site. So in other words, he doesn't think it's the sponsored posts and the lack of nofollow links, he thinks it's the increased attention on the site that caused Google to look closer.
Any thoughts from anyone else here on this?
-
I haven't made any code changes or robots.txt changes, at least not yet. The URL is:
This is a site that historically has gotten poor SEO, I just started focusing on it in the last month by asking for links/articles/reviews from other sites.
-
Hi Dustin,
Do you know if any code changes have been made? Maybe accidentally something modified the robots.txt and excluded most of your site? Has your organic traffic from Bing and Yahoo had a similar drop? Before getting the tin foil hat on too tight, check the robots.txt file and the code on your page and make sure something didn't go astray there.
Can you share your URL with us?
-
That's what I heard from everyone too, don't rely on page rank when it dropped from 3 to 1. That happened over a week ago, but my organic search results were still healthy. Then last night I noticed the big drop down to only 1 organic search result from the standard 40-50 results I was getting from Google.
If I went back through all of the sponsored posts I've received and asked those site owners to add rel="nofollow" to all of the links to us--or at least the ones that disclosed that the post was sponsored/paid--do you think google would remove the penalty? Do I need to do anything proactive with Google to make them reconsider?
-
The site still shows up in google, but I've lost positioning for the few keywords I spot-checked, which coincides with the results I'm seeing from Google Analytics.
What should I do? One idea I had was to go back to all of the sites that wrote paid reviews for us and disclosed it, and ask them to add rel="nofollow" to all of their links. Assuming this is what penalized us, would Google re-evaluate and eventually remove the penalty if it saw that all of our sponsored posts had rel="nofollow" even if originally they didn't have nofollow attributes?
-
Hi
I would wait another few days before confirming that you have been penalised, as this is unlikely. First check that nothing else has changed, especially your analytics tool? What are your actual organic results positions for your keywords? Do you have an adwords campaign, has that changed? Also, I wouldn't rely on page rank as a metric. Instead, use Seomoz DA and PA.
-
Paid reviews are pretty much the same as paid links, becuase you are paying for the content to be placed on a block with links.
The worst thing is if the person you purchased the paid review is listing the stuff on a public forum or public site. Then Google can easily just see the content and hit it hard.
In regards to making content that is not paid I advise to use Guest posts where you make content for free for a site.
You can try and make sections of the site on sub domains and see if they have any ranking, I would also advise to make sure then content is natural and unique.
Maby it is worth while also too type in site:yoursite.com into google to see if it is also still in the index, worst case senario is if Google has removed the site from the index.
My advice is to try a reconsideration request if that is the case.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will redirecting a logged in user from a public page to an equivalent private page (not visible to google) impact SEO?
Hi, We have public pages that can obviously be visited by our registered members. When they visit these public pages + they are logged in to our site, we want to redirect them to the equivalent (richer) page on the private site e.g. a logged in user visiting /public/contentA will be redirected to /private/contentA Note: Our /public pages are indexed by Google whereas /private pages are excluded. a) will this affect our SEO? b) if not, is 302 the best http status code to use? Cheers
Technical SEO | | bernienabo0 -
Alt Tags - how important for SEO?
Hi I know alt tags should be on an image, however at the moment I have 23,741 missing on the site, how important are these? It's a big project for someone to update & I need some justification Thanks Mozzers 🙂
Technical SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Most common SEO issues with Magento
Which issues does Magento provide out of the box, what should i be aware of? What would you recommend to change/fix as soon as possible?
Technical SEO | | Mickelp0 -
Does Quantcast interfered with SEO?
Quantcast (http://www.quantcast.com/), a stats program was removed from my clients website because the former SEO consultant said it interefered with his SEO efforts, claiming the google bots weren't reading it right. I have never heard of that before and my client now wants Quantcast back on their website. Has anyone heard of this problem with Quantcast?
Technical SEO | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Should WordPress themes be hard coded for better SEO?
In the interests of making my site faster I have recently come across the suggestion of removing unwanted PHP from my WooThemes WordPress theme. The suggestion is to hard code the choices I have made in the WordPress template to reduce on database calls. Has anyone actually done this to their WordPress theme before and seen any measurable results?
Technical SEO | | Wallander1 -
Advice on SEO for videos on a streaming server
I am looking for some advice on video SEO when the video file is housed on a streaming server. An example page is below. The onlyvideo element on the page is a script reading in the filepath to the streaming server so I am not sure what the best course of action is. Currently, none of our videos are indexed. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/webinars/Making-Agile-Work-for-You.cfm
Technical SEO | | SEI0 -
Managing SEO during web site migration
We have an old web site which currently has good traffic and search ranking. However, the old design is not helping us convert traffic into customers and we have decided to re-design the web site. Due to challenges resolving 4XX issues in the current setup, we will be moving the site to a new CMS and hosting provider. The domain will remain the same. The plan is to create exactly the same pages in the new CMS, as what we have today. And to use the same URLs for each page. Content will remain the same in step one. We will only apply a new layout and design. Besides keeping the URLs the same as in the old system. What else should we be aware of when doing a web site migration, that might impact our search ranking?
Technical SEO | | petersen0 -
When to SEO optimize a blog post?
Hi there, Here's our situation: there are two people working on the blog. person 1) writes the posts person 2) SEO optimizes the posts I know this is not ideal but it's the best we can do and it's a whole lot better than no blog. 🙂 I'm the fellow optimizing the posts. I've found that my best SEO efforts usually slightly undermine the readability of these posts -- not in an extreme way, I'm not going overboard with keywords or anything. Rather, things like a sexy & enticing article heading may have to be dummed down for search engines... Because of this dumming down, I like to wait a couple of weeks to SEO optimize our posts, the logic being that we get the best of both worlds: a happy regular readership on topic articles that are clearly described for (and aligned to the terms used by) our search engine visitors What I'm wondering is, Generally: can you see any problems with this setup? would you do it differently? Specifically: does Google (et al) punish this sort of backwards re-writing? and, does it somehow amount to less SEO mojo when done retroactively? Thanks so much for your time! Best, Jon
Technical SEO | | JonAmar0