Individual Link Value
-
We understand the PA, DA, trust and all of that. My question is, is there a process or formula anyone uses that shows an individual links value as to the link juice it passes. The old Domain Juice seemed to be that, but after further investigation (And Rand setting me straight) I now understand it's not a good metric.
Today, we use PA divided by the number of external links on that page to get some sense of an individual links actual value to the site or page we link to. I understand this is a very sloppy system, but seems to be the only choice we have?
It's based on this simple thought. If you get a back link on two different pages, and both are equal in every way, except one has 3 outbound links and the other has 30, the link from the page with 3 will be significantly stronger as far as passing juice.
So... anyone using something to determine an individual links value? I did ask the SEO staff, and they do not current have it.
-
I believe that the problem is.... people are spending too much time worrying about the value of a link and not enough time producing something worth linking to.
-
Nobody knows but Google... but I think that advertising links and reference links (usually) have very different formats.
-
you mention reference citation. My question to you is does the google algo actually look out and read titles such as references ? As it would in a similar way to spot advertising links ?
-
Rather than use numbers I would use qualitative measure....
- How relevant is the site?
- Where is the link on the page? (in footer?... in contextual paragraph?.... in sidebar?... above the fold?.... in reference citation?
- Is the link on a kickass domain or a dog?
I think that these are much more important than numbers.
-
Ryan, yes there are a lot of factors. But .... going back two page example. Two pages of the same value. One has 3 outbound links, the other has 30. Clearly in most cases the page with 3 is better. In other words, if you have this situation 100 times, you might see it proving correct 70 or 80.
I doubt that figuring out several of the SEOmoz metrics is much (if at all) more difficult than the one I am describing, and a Link value would be of huge.
Every metric we see on reports is in fact a guess. PA, DA, Trust, Cblocks, Backlinks.. none can be completely trusted and we all use these tools with that understanding, and the hope that they are at least generally correct. What would be any different in a link value report that took as much into consideration as possible?
Can you imagine the time savings and efficiency acceleration of Link building if such a tool existed and was even somewhat accurate.
I think SEOmoz attempted this with the old Domain Juice passed metric. But seeing the formula for it, I can understand why they felt it was not very helpful.
-
I am not aware of any solid tool that provides this information. You may find a tool which estimates or otherwise provides a link value, but the challenge is that guesses are being stacked upon other guesses.
If someone responds "yes, try the Link Valuation Tool from Company X" my questions would be:
-
What metric is being used to value the link? PA? DA? PR? If PA/DA are being used, then those metrics are limited by the Linkscape crawler and the various factors concerning it's use (i.e. 1-2 months behind, issues mentioned by Carin, etc). If PR is being used, then the tool's PR is a guess and may be quite different from Google's PR
-
How is decay being handled? Is the PA/DA/PR being fully distributed? Or is the natural decay being calculated, and if so how? It's another guess factor.
-
How is the weighting of links being handled? The SEO consensus is that links in content are given more weight then links in footers and other site-wide links.
There are other factors such as multiple links to the same domain, multiple links to the same page, etc. I feel there are too many unknowns for a tool to provide a meaningful link valuation. I would love to be proven wrong. Such a tool would clearly offer great value to SEOs.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can Moz generate 404 Broken links report in an excel format
Hi all, Hope you are doing good and that all is well at your end. I'm a marketing team member here at Zephyr and I take care of the content side things for the team. I'm reaching out to you this morning in regards to figuring whether any Moz feature can be used for fixing broken links on our website and whether or not it can generate the broken links report which can be exported and saved in a spreadsheet. We are in the middle of cleaning up all the broken links which are currently live on our drupal site and which is why we are in need of a tool that generates the report of all the broken links onto an excel spreadsheet.Once we have the list of broken links set in a spreadsheet, we will work towards fixing those links. Meanwhile, we have also created a 404 error image for our readers who can be directed towards our homepage. Please, let me know if you can help me take care of these below-mentioned requests: 1. Suggest a tool /Moz feature which can generate the site report and list of broken links onto excel/spreadsheet 2. Once I've the list in an excel format, is there an automated way in which we can fix all the broken links which are currently live on our website, instead of manually deleting/unlinking those pages. Truly appreciate your help. Thank you! Is there an automated way in which we can fix all the broken links which are currently live on our website, instead of manually deleting/unlinking those pages.
Moz Pro | | LilianB0 -
Same linking c-blocks trend as competitor
I noticed in our competitive link report that our number of linking c-blocks has risen and fallen in the exact same pattern as one of our competitors. Is there a reason why this would be happening?
Moz Pro | | ZoomInformation0 -
Canonical link on canonical url
This might seem a bit of an odd one, but we seem to be going around in circles on this when using the on page optimizer tool. We have an ecommerce site (magento) which by default is putting a canonical link in the header on every product page. For example; www.example.com/product1.html has the But when we run the on page optimiser tool, we're losing points on the critical section for not having canonical set correctly. If we remove the tag, we get the tick and the a grade, but then further down the report we lose a tick for not using canonical links. What are we missing here?
Moz Pro | | andyjsi0 -
On page links tool here at Seomoz
Hi Seomoz - first of all, thanks for the best SEO tools I have ever worked with (this is my first question in this forum, and also I just subscribed as a paying customer after the 30 days trial you guys offer). My question: After having worked for several weeks on getting the numbers of links in our forum on www.texaspoker.dk down, we are somewhat surprised to see that we didn't succeed in getting lower numbers. For instance, this page: http://www.texaspoker.dk/forum/aktuelle-konkurrencer/coaching-projekt-bliver-du-den-udvalgte has (that's what Seomoz seo tool tells us): 239 on page links. Can this really be true? We can't find these links, and we actuually did a lot to lower the numbers of links, for instance the forum members picture was a link before, and also there was a "go to top" link in each post in the forum. Thanks a lot.
Moz Pro | | MPO0 -
Why Do Links, DA and PA have no affect on this search result?
When I type 'plumbing courses' into Google, why does Able Skills with these statistics: Page Authority: 57,
Moz Pro | | MartinHof
2,752 Links from 330 Root Domains
Domain Authority: 52,
575,594 Links from 1,211 Root Domains rank below other pages with inferior statistics?0 -
Is there a tool that will show me where links with a given anchor text are coming from?
In OSE I can see how many links there are with a given anchor text, but I can't see where those links come from.
Moz Pro | | seocraig-3101770 -
OSE Linking Domains CSV Export Blank?
For some client domains, I've tried to do a CSV export from the OSE Linking Domains page, I get a CSV that contains the typical OSE header text, but no output records. Before I click the CSV link I always choose "show domains with links to All pages on the Root Domain". It doesn't happen with every domain I've tried this with, and when I've had the time/patience, some of the time if I try hours later, I get data. The problem though is I rarely have the luxury of running reports a second time during the audit cycle. Has anyone else experienced this? Is it a bug, or just an export fail due to system resources or something?
Moz Pro | | AlanBleiweiss0 -
In OpenSiteExplorer - how do I find out which in bound links were lost?
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/www.homefinder.com/a!links The # of inbound root domains is ~3,100 and has remained relatively flat for a while yet we've been acquiring 1000's of new root domains that link to us. That said, we want to get some clarity on why the count has remained flat. It would be helpful if we could see which domains have stopped linking to us from one OSE index to the next. Is it really the case that we're losing links as fast as we're gaining them or is something else going on?
Moz Pro | | homefinder1