Google new update question
-
I was just reading this,
http://www.entrepreneur.com/blog/220662
We have our official site, which has 200+ service pages, which we wrote once and we keep doing SEO for them, so they rank high all the time.
Now my question is, how does Google handle the site freshness ?
Service static pages or if we are adding blog items, then also they consider them as fresh site, right ?
So, we dont have to update those service pages, right ?
-
Whenever hearing SEO news from a non-industry source such as entrepreneur magazine, my first recommendation is to locate the actual report from the source. In this case, the source is Google: http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/11/giving-you-fresher-more-recent-search.html
If you desire further analysis, the next best thing would be locating the topic on a trust SEO site: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-freshness-update-whiteboard-friday. The goal is for you to obtain the most accurate and complete understanding of the change and how it affects you. Outside magazines often add glamor for headlines, make interpretative errors or miss important consideration points. This is not a hit on Entrepreneur magazine at all but a recommended best practice.
For this update, certain keywords are affected. Specifically those which are deemed affected by a "freshness" factor. The impact to your site depends upon your content. If your page titles are "sunglasses", "MX1000 Sunglasses by Revo" and such then the impact will likely be low. If your page titles are "Justin Bieber sunglasses" or "SuperBowl sunglasses" then the chance of your queries being affected by freshness are much more likely.
With respect to exactly how Google responds, no one knows for sure outside of Google, and they don't explain the details of their inner workings. It is highly likely they are looking for brand new content. For the most part, this is new web pages. They may accept new content being added to existing pages as well. What we can confidently say is that changing the date on your existing content or shuffling words around aren't going to help.
-
It is more a page by page thing, not site wide.
How I understand it, is in 2 parts
QDF Query deserves freshness, when you search for keyword, Google brings back not just the most authoritive, relevant results, it likes to bring back a few fresh ones also, as well as a few local and other factors too, like sites selling keyword, sites with documentary information about keyword.
The freshness update is different again, let’s say you enquire about football, then it is assumed that you want the latest info, like latest results, injuries, team selections and stuff. So Google tries to bring you these results, it also works out who is publishing this information regularly and indexes them more often. It gives these results more importance only why they are fresh.
The freshness update does not affect all queries, if affects about 35% of queries.
If you were looking up George Washington, then you would not expect to see the freshness update affect results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Custom Search Engine: Good Idea?
I created a Google Custom Search Engine for our site, but I"m not sure implementing it is a good idea. When I tested it with the public URL, I noticed that ads show up on the search engine that could potentially move visitors away from our site to our competitors. Has anyone had success with implementing a Google Custom Search Engine? Do the pros outweigh the cons? Thanks, Ruben
Algorithm Updates | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
January 10, 2017 - Intrusive interstitials Google Update
Hi all, As everyone is most likely aware, Google have recently announced that if a site has intrusive intersitals that push the main content below the fold, will be downgraded in the SERP's from January 10th. At the moment we have a range of international sites, .ca, .com.au, .co.uk, .fr etc - if a user from a UK IP goes to a .ca site - a country switcher dialog will appear. I am aware that this may affect our sites performance in mobile search when the update comes out - however, if we block Google from seeing this - will they still pick it up? Thanks.
Algorithm Updates | | Brett-S0 -
Meta Descriptions - Google ignores what we have
Hi I still write meta descriptions to help with CTR. I am currently looking at a page where the CTR needs improving. I check the meta on Google SERPs & it isn't pulling through the meta description we have - but other info on the page. This isn't ideal - why does this happen? Will Google just make the decision and are descriptions not worth writing?
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Google AMP (accelerated mobile pages), can it be used for non-Google news and Ecommerce Websites?
Mozzers, I've been doing a lot of research on Google's new Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) https://moz.com/blog/accelerated-mobile-pages-whiteboard-friday. From what I'm seeing, these AMP version websites are only for Google News-worthy websites such as New York Times, Cosmopolitan, and the BuzzFeeds of the world. But what about Ecommerce websites like Ebay or Amazon? Will AMP versions of "scotch tape" via OfficeDepot work in the SERP's on non-Google News cards?
Algorithm Updates | | Shawn1240 -
Deindexed from Google images Sep17th
We have a travel website that has been ranked in Google for 12-14years. The site produces original images with branding on them and have been for years ranking well. There's been no site changes. We have a Moz spamscore 1/17 and Domain Authority 59. Sep 17th all our images just disappeared from Google Image Search. Even searching for our domain with keyword photo results in nothing. I've checked our Search console and no email from Google and I see no postings on Moz and others relating to search algo changes with Images. I'm at a loss here.. does anyone have some advice?
Algorithm Updates | | danta2 -
Google indexing site content that I did not wish to be indexed
Hi is it pretty standard for Google to index content that you have not specifically asked them to index i.e. provided them notification of a page's existence. I have just been alerted by 'Mention' about some new content that they have discovered, the page is on our site yes and may be I should have set it to NO INDEX but the page only went up a couple of days ago and I was making it live so that someone could look at it and see how the page was going to look in its final iteration. Normally we go through the usual process of notifying Google via GWMT, adding it to our site map.xml file, publishing it via our G+ stream and so on. Reviewing our Analytics it looks like there has been no traffic to this page yet and I know for a fact there are no links to this page. I am surprised at the speed of the indexation, is it a example of brand mention? Where an actual link is now no longer required? Cheers David
Algorithm Updates | | David-E-Carey0 -
Drop in Traffic from Google, However no change in the rankings
I have seen a 20% drop in traffic from google last week (After April 29th). However when I try to analyze the rank of the keywords in the google results that send me traffic they seem to be the same. Today (6th March) Traffic has fallen further again with not much/any visible change in the rankings. Any ideas on what the reason for this could be? I have not made any changes to the website recently.
Algorithm Updates | | raghavkapur0 -
Why does Google say they have more URLs indexed for my site than they really do?
When I do a site search with Google (i.e. site:www.mysite.com), Google reports "About 7,500 results" -- but when I click through to the end of the results and choose to include omitted results, Google really has only 210 results for my site. I had an issue months back with a large # of URLs being indexed because of query strings and some other non-optimized technicalities - at that time I could see that Google really had indexed all of those URLs - but I've since implemented canonical URLs and fixed most (if not all) of my technical issues in order to get our index count down. At first I thought it would just be a matter of time for them to reconcile this, perhaps they were looking at cached data or something, but it's been months and the "About 7,500 results" just won't change even though the actual pages indexed keeps dropping! Does anyone know why Google would be still reporting a high index count, which doesn't actually reflect what is currently indexed? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | CassisGroup0