Too Many Links Explode Upon Upgrade
-
We upgraded our CMS system in September and then had an explosion of new errors appearing in SEOMOZ.
Most concerning was the too many links area. Our main site is www.thenorrisgroup.com. Many of the links on the page are set up as no follows and nothing else changed so I don't understand why it's tracking differently all of a sudden. Any ideas?
-
Hi Aaron,
Have you been able to sort this out, or are you still looking for some help?
-
You should definitely remove the NoFollow tag. That is a separate issue from the "too many links" warning. I noticed it because you specifically mentioned you had added the NF tag to links.
With respect to the change, it is possible some of your links were previously not crawlable due to the site design. It is also possible your CMS is adding extra links as well. The only way to know for sure is to perform a thorough analysis of all links on the page. SEOmoz shows your home page has 125 links. In my experience the tool is quite accurate.
When I performed a quick scan of the page, I noticed 75 links visually. I would suggest checking the HTML of your home page and account for every link. Either I am missing something or you have a lot of links which are not visible. For example links contained in
<noscript>tags can cause this problem.</p></noscript>
-
I am so discouraged. Why would it change all of a sudden? It was fine and then it just exploded. Did SEOMOZ change the way they were tracking certain issues?
So bottom line I should take the NF off.
-
Ryan is correct; you cannot control the flow of PageRank or link juice around your site using the NF attribute, and, in general, it is not a "best SEO practice" to use the nofollow attribute on your own site links. If you would prefer the search engine to not index a page, it is far better to prohibit the crawl of that page via your robots.txt file.
Unless you are selling links (or trying to prohibit spam in blog comments, perhaps) I would not use the nofollow on a site. Why would I put a link on my site that I don't trust? I don't think I want to send that message to Google.
-
Hi Aaron,
A few things to know about your links:
1. The SEOmoz flag for "too many links" on a page is triggered when you offer 101+ links. In reality, there is no magical number whereby 100 links is ok and 101 is bad. It is a judgment call involving numerous factors and can vary per site.
2. Overall I find the number of links offered on your home page to be fine. Your site's DA of 43 can support 125 links if they are all necessary. Your sidebar and content links look good. I would suggest evaluating your navigation menu and footer menu in Google Analytics. There is a tool which allows you to see which links are used and how often. If you find links which are not used (footer links have very low usage normally) then you may wish to consider removing them.
In the end, if you research the matter and determine your links are necessary and valued by visitors then you can leave them and disregard the warning.
3. In your case, the flag is a good thing because it allowed this conversation which will be helpful. Specifically, it is a VERY bad idea to nofollow your internal links in the manner that has happened on your site. Many people think if they "nofollow" a link, the link is ignored by search engines. That is not the case.
Adding the nofollow tag to a link means you do not trust the link. You still lose link juice. It can be confusing so I will share a couple examples:
Case 1 - you offer 100 links on a page. All links are followed. Each link receives roughly 1% of link juice (1/100). In reality there are a couple other factors such as link decay and link location, but they are not relevant to this conversation.
Case 2 - you offer 100 links on a page. 50 links are nofollowed. Each of the remaining links still only receive 1% of link juice (1/100). The 50 nofollow links still have link juice flow to them, but rather then that juice being passed on to the target page, it evaporates.
As a general rule, do not ever no follow any internal links. There can be some minor exceptions but you are far better off never using nofollow on an internal link then ever misusing nofollow on any internal links. For external links, only use nofollow if you do not trust the target site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How many keywords should I optimize a page for?
Hi, There is a lot of debate going on on whether to use a single keyword per page or multiple keywords per page. What I know for sure is that it is not advisable to repeat the same exact keyword in different pages. I need to optimize product pages, categories and pages for an online store and still do not know if it is better to: 1-work with one main keyword per page plus latent semantic keywords, 2-to optimize a page for multiple different keywords (2 to 4 keywords) which are strongly related to the main topic or to the product sold in a particular product page 3- use single keyword for each page (and no more than one keyword per page). Some seo gurus argue this is the best way to get higher ranking for that particular page in the serps. My personal opinion would be 1 or 2, but I would like to hear what you suggest and think about it. Any suggestion or opinion is welcome and appreciated. Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | cinzia090 -
Need suggestion: Should the user profile link be disallowed in robots.txt
I maintain a myBB based forum here. The user profile links look something like this http://www.learnqtp.com/forums/User-Ankur Now in my GWT, I can see many 404 errors for user profile links. This is primarily because we have tight control over spam and auto-profiles generated by bots. Either our moderators or our spam control software delete such spammy member profiles on a periodic basis but by then Google indexes those profiles. I am wondering, would it be a good idea to disallow User profiles links using robots.txt? Something like Disallow: /forums/User-*
On-Page Optimization | | AnkurJ0 -
No link data in GWT
Has anyone had this problem - no data in the links section of GWT? I haven't set a preferred domain, so I don't understand what's up.
On-Page Optimization | | HeatherBakerTopLine0 -
Thoughts on these footer links
I have a site that has about 20 footer links. A main Category and 4-5 links under each. The site is very large, so I feel they do have some value for navigation, and they don't blend in with the background at all. I know penguin was cracking down on footer links, but I don't feel theses are "spammy" links. Will it hurt long-term to leave these links, or should we pull them?
On-Page Optimization | | netviper0 -
Navigation causing too many links
If I add pages to my site to cover major cities/towns/counties in the UK where I offer wedding bands and link them from the navigation using drop down menus/categories ( I believe this is the best option to allow users to find what they are looking for) I get a'too many links on page' flag. How can I best get around this problem?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links
Hi Has anybody else ever recieved this message from Google in Google Webmaster Tools and what action did you take to overcome the problem and get your position back - Dear site owner or webmaster of............... We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines. Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. Examples of unnatural linking could include buying links to pass PageRank or participating in link schemes. We encourage you to make changes to your site so that it meets our quality guidelines. Once you've made these changes, please submit your site for reconsideration in Google's search results. If you find unnatural links to your site that you are unable to control or remove, please provide the details in your reconsideration request. If you have any questions about how to resolve this issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support. Sincerely, Google Search Quality Team
On-Page Optimization | | AMG1000 -
Navigation Links
Our developers typically have a CSS driven html menu at the top of the page with links to inside pages. They then have the same links in the footer. Does this double navigation cause any SEO issues or does Google disregard the second set of links? Thanks, Mark
On-Page Optimization | | DenverKelly0 -
Do footer links apply too many on-page links?
We tend to put a a lot of links in the footers of some of our websites (e.g. www.AlohaWhistler.com). Our CAMPAIGNS report is showing that several pages on such sites have "too many on-page links". We understand the logic that having more than 100 links per page is "too much". Does this also apply to footer links?
On-Page Optimization | | RoyMcClean0