Why are inbound links not showing up?
-
I'm new to SEOmoz but have a question regarding inbound links that I don't see posted in the forum.
In order to become more familiar with SEOmoz tools, I've been checking out sites that friends and family members have created as practice. Things have been going really smooth until I came across a 2+ year old page that should have included an inbound link from wsj.com but said link is not appearing in OSE for this page.
Background: A friend of mine has a (basically) defunct blog that had a pretty well trafficked posting in 2009. However, when I use OSE to check out both the domain and page inbound links, I don't see the aforementioned inbound link from wsj.com.
Why is that? Or, it's insanely late - am I missing something?
Friend's blog posting:
http://bcclist.com/2009/04/21/craigslist-killer-megan-philipcom-removed/
WSJ posting with a link to my friend's blog (4th paragraph...anchor text = "taken down"):
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/21/who-is-megan-mcallister/
No rush. Again, I'm doing this as practice and being new to the site, I figure I'm overlooking something. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
-
Should I suggest my friend build a few links on his blog to the WSJ posting in question?
No. If he did then it becomes more of a link exchange which is not the desired outcome.
Or, does building links to the page mean that he needs to create a blog elsewhere, make content relevant to Megan McAllister, and build links to the WSJ posting?
Most of the time you want all the links you build to be pointed at your site. An undiscovered link from the WSJ is a reason for an exception. You don't want to build a new blog for this purpose as that would be manipulative. Instead, locate other sites which may be interested in this article and let them know about it so they may link to it.
One final note. Performing these steps will help the SEOmoz crawler locate the article, but Google already has the page indexed. If you search Google.com for "who is megan mcallister" you will notice the page is the second result.
-
That (act like a web crawler and see if you can get to the link) is great advice. Thank you!
I may need to apologize in advance for this question but...
- Should I suggest my friend build a few links on his blog to the WSJ posting in question?
- Or, does building links to the page mean that he needs to create a blog elsewhere, make content relevant to Megan McAllister, and build links to the WSJ posting?
-
Hi ICM,
Your question is quite logical. There are two possibilities:
1. (Less Likely) There is an issue with the Linkscape Index where it missed this record. You can submit this example to help@seomoz.org and request the issue be investigated.
2. (More Likely) The link is buried too deep. The WSJ is an outstanding site from which to earn a link. Even the top ranked sites have a limit to how deep you can travel before running out of juice. There are links on DMOZ, for example, which are not indexed because they are simply buried too deep.
Question for you - If you go to the main page wsj.com, how many clicks would it take you to open the page? Don't use the site's search function, but instead move through the site the way a web crawler would, by clicking links.
From the home page I went to the blog page. From there I am stuck. I tried the sitemap but could not locate a link to the archives. There is a section at the bottom of the blog page titled WSJ Blog Archive but I was unable to locate any helpful link. There is an alphabetical index on the page and I tried "W" for the article title as well as "M" for Megan McAllister. Neither were helpful.
I am not a savvy user of the WSJ site so perhaps I am missing something. Otherwise it is possible the archive section from 2009 is not reachable via links in which case that would be the problem. If that is the case, you can help resolve the issue by building links to the page which could then be discovered on a future crawl.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is my internal followed links is 0?
My internal followed links is 0. Also for top pages the report say "block by robots.txt" but the Moz bot is able to crawl my site and generate report for 10K pages. Please help me understand why. http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/comparisons?site=www.findyogi.com
Moz Pro | | namansr0 -
OK Crawl Test Link Question Again!
I've downloaded a crawl test and column G Link Count reads 62 and yep there are a total of 62 links on the page in question. Column AM Internal Links reads 303 and yep there are somewhere in the order of 303 pages pointing at this one. Root Domains is surprisingly low at 6, so maybe there are only 6 domains linking to this page. BUT... External Links read 51. There are not 51 links pointing away from this domain on this page, no way hozay, so can anybody tell me what is meant by 'External Links? A humble thank you in anticipation of an education. Jem
Moz Pro | | JemRobinson0 -
What is more important, page authority or linking root domains?
I have 2 pages in my report that are identical: www.ferringway.com (more page authority......21 vs. 1) www.ferringway.com/index.php (more linking root domains...... 40 vs. 21) Which one should I delete or should I do something like a 301 redirect? Your help is greatly appreciated! Sheryl
Moz Pro | | TOMMarketingLtd.0 -
Duplicate pages with canonical links still show as errors
On our CMS, there are duplicate pages such as /news, /news/, /news?page=1, /news/?page=1. From an SEO perspective, I'm not too worried, because I guess Google is pretty capable of sorting this out, but to be on the safe side, I've added canonical links. /news itself has no link, but all the other variants have links to "/news". (And if you go wild and add a bunch of random meaningless parameters, creating /news/?page=1&jim=jam&foo=bar&this=that, we will laugh at you and generate a canonical link back to "/news". We're clever like that.) So far so good. And everything appears to work fine. But SEOMoz is still flagging up errors about duplicate titles and duplicate content. If you click in, you'll see a "Note" on each error, showing that SEOMoz has found the canonical link. So SEOMoz knows the duplication isn't a problem, as we're using canonical links exactly the way they're supposed to be used, and yet is still flagging it as an error. Is this something I should be concerned about, or is it just a bug in SEOMoz?
Moz Pro | | LockyDotser0 -
More than 100 links
Hi Everyone, I was trawling through You Tube and came across this video from Matt Cuts from Google about the 100 links limit being removed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6g5hoBYlf0&feature=relmfu I then logged into my SEO account as I remember a previous report we did for a competitor where they had quite a number of pages just over the 100 links, but only barely (They are highlighted in SEOmoz as a warning). Given that google has removed this number from their guidelines and it's clear that a few over 100 isn't as bad as it used to be, is it not about time this was changed or looked at again? Maybe even put ones like these under a new title such as recommendation rather that the alarmist Warning one unless it's ridiculously high? I wonder if the SEOmoz team can also find out a better range figure for it instead of the outdated 100? Regards Alan watch?v=l6g5hoBYlf0&feature=relmfu
Moz Pro | | ContactOnline0 -
How can a competitor show no internal links?
I'm comparing metrics between my site and competitors. Statistics on Site Explorer show that one competitor has no internal links. How is that possible? http://screencast.com/t/P9WX7R9hpdD Thanks for your insight. P9WX7R9hpdD
Moz Pro | | addventures0 -
Newly acquired links not showing up on link analysis
I have recently gained a few links which I know are definitly up, because I have seen them, however, when I navigate to link analysis on SEOmoz pro, the number of links isnt showing as more than before. How long does it take to update?
Moz Pro | | CompleteOffice0 -
SEOMoz Campaign shows Warnings for pages with >200 and <300 links
We currently use SEOMoz's campaign tool to review the SEO progress of our site. One thing we are unsure of is that SEOMoz gives us a warning for over 1000 of our pages because we have around 200 links on those pages (all in the Menu Drop Downs). I read the post and watched the video, Whiteboard Friday Flat Site Architecture a while ago and Rand mentioned there is no issue with having a web page with 200 to 300 links and he even encouraged it. So why would these show up as warnings in our Campaign?
Moz Pro | | PBCLinear0