Where is the keyword difficulty tool data sourced from?
-
I also use Market Samurai, and I've noticed what seem to be big discrepancies with the keyword data presented by this (data comes from Majestic SEO) and the Keyword Difficulty Tool.
To take just one example, I analyze the term "how to remove tea stains" In the Keyword Difficulty Tool, this returns the following:
Root Domain Linking Root Domains: 2,233
Page Linking Root Domains: 4
When I use Market Samurai, however, the data returned is:
RDD (Domains linking to this domain): 19,911
RDP (Domains linking to this page): 19
I thought that these two metrics were the same for both tools, but I've written them out in case someone sees a difference. As I say, Market Samurai data is sourced from Majestic SEO - a reputable SEO company - but I have no idea where the Keyword Difficulty Tool data is from, nor why these differences are so pronounced? Are they indeed the same metrics in both cases, or am I missing something?
Any insight would be much appreciated.
-
Ok, thanks. I get the overall point you're making, and will indeed focus more on link quality... I guess my gripe is that if the # of linking root domains (for example) are to be counted at ALL - even as a corollary ranking factor - then it would be really good to be sure of the accuracy of the data, which it's hard to be when Majestic, for example, presents such different numbers in each case.
-
Yes, there is a discrepancy between all indexes on link counts, even though everyone might agree on the definition. But this doesn't mean one is right and one is wrong.
Counting links is like counting cats in Schrödinger's box. It changes depending on how you look at it... even though we all agree on the definition of a cat.
Using the same definitions as you described above, if you were to look at Google's index you would arrive at a number higher than this, and using Bing's index perhaps a number somewhere in the middle.
For example, consider that 50% of the web disappears every year, which means around 4% of all the links on the Internet disappear every month. But what if your crawlers only visit those links every 60 days? (this is an extreme example)
Or the fact that 80% of the web is spam that shouldn't be crawled. Depending on your definition of spam/trust, different crawlers will crawl different websites and arrive at different link counts, even though they are using the exact same definition of a link.
The important thing to remember is this - raw link counts are hardly ever useful. What is important is finding the links that matter. That's why using metrics such as Domain and Page Authority become increasingly important. 10 links can be more important that 10 million links, if they are the right ones.
That said, metrics like # of linking root domains do play a significant role in corollary ranking factors.
-
Hi Cyrus,
Thanks for this. I understand that counting links accurately is hard work, but if I am take this correctly, the above metrics are identical for SEOMoz and Majestic, which is a real head-scratcher, since it would suggest an enormous discrepancy in the data being presented, for almost every keyword link I have tested this on. To take just one other (basically random) example: "how to remove rust stains"
8th down in the first SERP is:
http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/la/how-to-remove-rust-stains-from-stainless-steel-home-hacks-108429
Which returns either THIS data (Linkscape):
Root Linking Root Domains (total # of unique domains with backlinks pointing to this specific domain?): 15,471
Page Linking Root Domains (total # of unique domains with backlinks pointing to this page?): 91
Or this data (Majestic):
RDD (same definition as RLRD, above): 71, 152
RDP (same definition as for PLRD, above): 6
I encourage you to register for Majestic's services and try this out for yourself if this is news to you. In default of further knowledge of the specific methodologies used by these two different link-measuring tools, if one were otherwise to consider them both equal, I don't see how any use could be made of this data, since it is so vastly different in each case? I still can't help feeling that I'm missing something...
Thank you again for your input on this - it's much appreciated.
Best,
Zak
-
Daniel gave the correct answer, all SEOmoz link metrics come from the Linkscape index. This is the same data found in Open Site Explorer, the API, the MozBar, SEOmoz PRO platform and all other SEOmoz tools.
All indexes (including Google, Yahoo, and Linkscape) count links differently. The vast majority of links on the web are "junk" that quickly disappeer and count very little or none at all for SEO purposes, so a big part of the Linkscape Index is an iterative process of "cleaning" and verifying the links before the Index is published every few weeks.
This difficulty was highlighted by our friends at Majestic when they wrote a guest post for the SEOmoz blog on Why Counting Links is not So Easy.
Regarding the Keyword Difficulty Tool, link metrics are only one part of a larger formula for calculating difficulty. Because all queries use the same Linkscape data to calculate difficulty, the score is relative so changes in link counts generally don't become a factor.
-
Any linking data presented by SEOMoz will be from their own Linkscape Index. This data is also presented at opensiteexplorer.org. If you see any SEOMoz tool showing links, linking domains or anything related to link metrics, that data comes from their proprietary Linkscape Index.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Tools for editorial organizations?
Other than google trends, are there tools a publication could give its writers to help them optimize their articles. Sometimes these articles are very newsy pieces, sometimes they are more evergreen features. In other words, if they're writing a story about the Greek Debt Crisis, I'd love to give them a tool that would suggest the language that is trending most at the moment and then, as the story evolves, identify the language that would be important then. Are there tools to help with this?
Moz Pro | | nymedia0 -
Other tools to check keyword competition/difficulty
I really like the Keyword Analysis tool/process at MOZ, particularly the composite score of keyword difficulty. However, on my budget/account level I can only check 400 kw's per day and sometimes that's not enough. So my question is... What other tools do you rely on or recommend to provide a preliminary measure of competition for a keyword? Not Adwords competition, but the kind of analysis Moz does by looking at specific ranking factors like phrase the page authority, domain authority, kw in title tag, URL, anchor text, number of external links to the page, etc. Are there any other tools you'd recommend for checking those kind of competition/difficulty factors for a keyword? I know SpyFu.com, Open Site Explorer, Majestic, etc will provide backlink metrics, but hoping for something more comprehensive. Thanks!!
Moz Pro | | flyntime_tx
Mike0 -
Why My Keyword Rank Had a Huge Drop?
Hi guys.. i really need your help.. I have a problem, why after i optimization my keyword with one article each day, after 1 week later my keyword rankings had a huge drop from page 1 down to page 5? (the data from moz.com rankings) How the best way to increase my keyword rank in Google? Is there any other way than to use article? Really appreciated for your help..
Moz Pro | | newbie_SEO0 -
List ranking analysis for all keywords?
I would love to see the option of having the ranking analysis listed for all my keywords! As it it now I have to click and get the numbers one by one and manually create a spreadsheet in order to have an overview of which keywords to pursue. I want to see my google ranking for each keyword next to information on how many people search for that term (in my country of choice - google.xxx) and the keyword competition in % Please tell me there's a way to do this and save me a truckload of time!
Moz Pro | | JaneVO0 -
Seomoz keyword difficulty api
Is there a way to get this from an api or a better method than pasting 5 keywords at a time into the keyword difficulty tool to get these numbers?
Moz Pro | | insitegoogle0 -
Keyword ranking tool
Hello, What is best practice for knowing if a keyword is too difficult to try to rank for. i understand the keyword difficulty tool in seoMOZ, but am unsure of how it actually relates to if I should attempt to rank for the keyword. Is there a differential people use such as if a site has a Page Authority of 60 we will not try to rank for a keyword that has a keyword difficulty ranking of 40?
Moz Pro | | digitalops0 -
Changing the Timeframe of Historical Crawl Data
Hello, Just read a great post about the implications of duplicate content for sites after the most recent Panda update: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+seomoz+(SEOmoz+Daily+Blog) In the post is an image or crawl data history that shows months, not days or weeks, worth of trending data as it relates to duplicate content. So my question is this: How do I change my view/date range on my own campaigns so that I can view the trailing months of data rather than only what seems to be the past 4 weeks or so? This would really help me identify the impact of some on page changes we've recently made for a client. Many Thanks, Jared
Moz Pro | | surjm0 -
Anyone having problems with the SEOmoz KWD Tool??
Just a quicky: Tried to run keyword difficulty tool reports last couple of days but keep getting error messages regardless of how many words/phrases I request. Is this a general outage or just me? Cheers
Moz Pro | | lovealbatross
James0