Social media links/buttons - best practices
-
Has anyone tested social media buttons, to see which types, styles, and placements get the most clicks? Should they go at the top of an article, or are they OK at the bottom? Should the icons definitely have labels? Display # of tweets and Likes? How big should they be?
My preference is for discrete buttons with a smallish, plain icon and a label. I don't display tweets or Likes, unless it's a healthy number. And I still think a "share by email" icon is important. I put them at the bottom of the article, to keep the home page uncluttered and lead the eye into reading the article. I'm also concerned about leaking rank from the homepage, especially for a site that's still establishing itself. But if moving buttons to the top gets more shares, that's probably better.
Is there a Wordpress plugin that you really like? (I haven't found one yet - I'm still hardcoding my social media buttons.)
Opinions are great, but test results are better! Can anyone share?
-
I've never actually experimented with different placement, other than different positions on the bottom of posts. I can say that with one fairly popular site I run (25k visits/day) Faceook, Twitter, and email comprise just about all of the share clicks.
Of those, Facebook is clicked about twice as often as Twitter, and Twitter a bit more than twice as often as email. Despite that giant Facebook sharing lead, Twitter sends just about the same number of incoming referrals as Facebook.
-
Julie,
Thanks for the plugin, I'm trying it on a non-profit site. It'll be interesting to see what gets clicked, but again, it's only after-post chicklets w/ no comparision to top-of-post. So I guess it doesn't answer my question... yet.
Apparently no one has tested this, or they ain't talkin'!
PM sent with some feedback.
-
Related to the plugins, my company just released a free social media icon Wordpress plugin, and I would very much like to get feedback from the SEO community on it. The Wordpress plugin page is here: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/trackable-social-share-icons/
In short, it adds icons to the bottom of posts, lets you choose from a dozen icon styles, scale the size of the icons, choose whether to include text with the icons, and of course choose which icons appear. In addition, any clicks on the icons are automatically recorded in your Google Analytics event tracking (requires the current, asynchronous analytics).
We made the plugin because we wanted the tracking, but the only plugins that did what we wanted also shared all kinds of user information with a 3rd party marketing agency -- and in the process also slowed page load speed.
At any rate, we just released the public version of the plugin and would really like to hear from a wider base about what features it might be lacking, what we should change, etc. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
-
I think the results of such a test would be very site-dependent, with things like site/page layout and design, visitor eyetracking on a particular page, degree of visitor engagement with the page content, length and reading level of the content, embedded links in the content vs no links, etc. having a bearing on the outcome. Tests on my site may be totally irrellevant to yours.
I don't like showing numbers if there are only couple of tweets or likes (or none at all) - can send a message that the page is NOT popular.
-
I am really interested in this too. I personally agree with much of what you say. I keep the icons at the bottom of the page, dont show user amount or details - just keep them as basic as possible really!
I have used a number of WP plug ins but not found one I really like yet. Some look stylish but are really too in your face. It would be interesting to here which ones people recommend...
To go one step further on this topic, which social media do people show? Obviously there are hundreds out there but in terms of making the webpage readable and usable which do you normally go for? I tend to pick the typical email, twitter, fb, digg, stumbleupon and not too many others.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do I reduce the amount of internal links on my site?
Hi, Can someone help me with reducing the amount of internal links on our site please? https://www.thepresentfinder.co.uk Thanks Charlie
On-Page Optimization | | The-Present-Finder0 -
No link data in GWT
Has anyone had this problem - no data in the links section of GWT? I haven't set a preferred domain, so I don't understand what's up.
On-Page Optimization | | HeatherBakerTopLine0 -
Are there to many internal links here?
This is our main Motorcycle Parts page. In my opinion there are to many links on this page. They have put links to all the top brands after products. Do you think having all these links could be hurting our rankings/ ability for google to crawl the site efficiently? The links are good for navigation, I just think there are way to many there like over 200. Here is the page you can see what i am talking about http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/s/49/61/Motorcycle-Parts
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Are menu links considered spammy?
Hi, I'm wondering if having a footer menu with keyword links is considered spam? It makes sense to me to have your keywords and links to relevant pages on each page. Thanks 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | Memoz0 -
Too Many Links On Internal Search Pages
A client has a too many link warning being flagged in SEOmoz. The problem is that most of the pages on the site are lists of tickets for an event etc. Is there a good way to fix the site from having too many links on pages like this http://www.easyseat.com/venue/yankee-stadium-tickets-for-sale.aspx when the user experience requires a long list of links so people can find an event?
On-Page Optimization | | TimFlint0 -
Internal linking best practice
See example: car rental - sedans - bmw car rental - sedans - audi car rental - sedans - ford (internal links to sedans - audi, ford) or (internal links to suv - bmw) car rental - suv - bmw car rental - suv - audi car rental - suv - ford (internal links to suv- audi, ford) or (internal links to sedans- bmw...) Should I cross link only between the product page under each category or can I link between different products under different categories? From a user point of view, I think it will give him more options if he wants to choose the same brand but a bigger vehicle although I have read numerous posts saying that we should be internally linking most of the time within the same category. User experience or SEO?
On-Page Optimization | | echo10 -
Too many on page links
Our home page (and 1400 of our other pages) have well over 100 links, going beyond the recommend amount. Our competitors have less on page links (to other pages on their site) and way more link popularity so we are trying to figure out the best solution for this without hurting our sites conversions and usbaility.
On-Page Optimization | | iAnalyst.com0 -
Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
On-Page Optimization | | smaavie
Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards5