Homepage vs specific page Backlink
-
Hello,
I have a local business and have been working on getting backlinks for highly relevant keywords.
- I have keyword optimized pages (keyword in URL, title, H1, etc) but I have been sending backlinks to the homepage, as these keywords represent the core of what we offer.
See example below:
-
car repair
-
car repair london
-
auto repair
-
auto repair london
I have been sending backlinks (with the correct anchor text of course) to the homepage, am I better off sending them to the specific pages?
- One more thing: the SEOMOZ report talks about cannibalisation of keywords, where for example the page optimised for "car repair" links to "Car repair london".
I have links to the optimised pages in a footer at the bottom of every single page on the website, is this bad practice? (considering SEOMOZ talks about cannibalisation? Should I do something else instead (or eliminate the footer links altogether?)
I would appreciate your expert advice.
-
I'm suggesting that you should focus on inbound links rather than internal links at this point. You've got a strong base given that you're hovering in such high positions already for the home page. Building on this through inbound link and social media efforts would be the primary place to put your link building energy and resources. And again, even in that scenario, work on a mix of links pointing to both the home page and inner pages.
If you do this, over time, you'll find you may bounce back and forth for a while between the home page and inner pages showing up in ranking, yet ultimately you'll get both the home and inner pages showing up in the results.
If you then also seed in brand related anchor text from external sources and social media, you'll also achieve the ultimate results for your brand - having Google SiteLinks show up with your brand in the #1 position AND having other site pages show up in the mix further down.
-
Alan,
thank you for your reply.
I am happy for either the homepage or the specific page to be found, it does not really matter to me.
Ok maybe I should have made it clear that the keywords I am targeting are for the highest level topical focus/intent. Looking at the analogy I give above where I use the keywords "auto repair", "auto repair london", "car repair" and "car repair london", you can see these are very close topically and the overall website theme would be "car/auto repair in london".
While the topic is the same, the homepage focusses more on the brand of our business (domain is also www.brand.com) with title, h1 etc focussed on the brand, while the inner page focus more on the specific keyword www.brand.com/keyword, with title, h1 etc focussing on keywords.
I am hovering on position 2-3 for the london-specific keywords, this is for the homepage, I wonder if I should focus link-building more on the inner page to try push to no.1.
As far as the footer links, I see what you mean, but since these pages are very similar topically and really there for SEO, unless I link from the footer, I really dont see any other place where I could link from - unless you suggest I am better off without the links at all?
Thank you.
-
Eben is correct in his answer. It's unnatural to only link to a home page or to an individual page for a specific keyword phrase or any links at all.
In my experience, cannibalization is a false flag concern for the vast majority of sites and it's overplayed by some people in the industry when there are so many other things to be focused on that have a higher value. I say this because it's like this. If your site is really well designed and people can easily navigate to find what they are looking for, then you should be happy for either your home page OR an inner specific page to be found and clicked. And when you execute properly with a mix of targets (home and inner pages), you will ultimately get BOTH the home page AND the inner page to show up in the search results.
Having said that, burying links in the footer the way you describe is NOT an SEO best practice. First, because footer links are the lowest form of link you can have on a site. Second, it's a signal that you're potentially attempting to spam the search engines.
If you wish to continue to maintain links in footers it should not be a case of keyword stuffing attempts, but instead, links to highly important pages where the anchor text is not specifically a keyword phrase, but instead, a description of the link destination. And typically, it should be a mirror of the main site navigation, or alternately, to second tier corporate pages (such as customer service, privacy, disclaimers, etc.).
On a final note, I'll suggest that you can ultimately only truly optimize the home page for the site's highest level topical focus or intent, and secondarily, to whatever other keyword focus you have actually optimized the home page for. So while it's okay (and natural) to have links pointing to the home page that have anchors with other keyword phrases, the majority should not be so.
-
Eben,
thank you - you definitely have a point.
In terms of overall SEO, I guess I am trying to understand whether it is better practice to push SEO for a specific page, or to push SEO for the homepage/entire website... Does Google favour page SEO or domain SEO? Let's not forget we are talking focussed niche here...
Thank you and I will wait to hear from the gurus as well !
I love the community of SEO MOZ
-
In regard to question 1:
I think it's best to mix it up a little. In "real life" users would sometimes link to your homepage, and sometimes to your product/services pages, so a natural mix of anchor text to home and inner pages is probably best. You don't want your inbound links to appear overly organized.
I'll defer to one of our many gurus to shed some light on question 2.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does iframe itself count as a backlink?
Our situation is similar to YouTube. We have an original content on every subpage that is genuinely useful when embedded as a widget on 3r party websites. That is why we offer an embeddable widget that shows slightly simplified version of the content - exactly like a YouTube video embedded on your blog. The embed code is simply an iframe sourcing from our subpage: <iframe src="wikibudgets.org/subpage"></p> </blockquote> <p>1/ Does the iframe itself pass any link value at all to the subpage?</p> <p>2/ If yes, what would be the equivalent of anchor text in iframe?</p> <p>3/ If not, will any link in the subpage pass link value from the 3rd party website to my domain/subpage?</p> <p>4/ If not, will I be punished/rewarded if I ask users to put a visible, unobfuscated link to the subpage below the iframe?</p> <blockquote style="background: #f7f7f7; padding-top: 5px; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 2px; padding-bottom: 5px; white-space: nowrap; overflow-y: auto; font-family: monospace;"> <p><iframe src="wikibudgets.org/subpage" /><a href="wikibudgets.org/subpage">rich anchor text</a></p> </blockquote></iframe>
Link Building | | wikiBudgets0 -
Payday loan backlinks
Dear Friends, I just checked my backlinks in Ahrefs because my traffic has been dropping since the last 4 weeks. I have 2 questions is google penguin a part of Google core algorithm yet like Google panda is? I have backlinks of Payday loans which many webmasters claimed were the problem. The anchor text was payday loans. The sites hardly have any pagerank or anything. What is the way forward for me? So i contact the webmasters, and they dont reply then disavow the links or disavow them directly knowing that google hates pay day loans backlinks
Link Building | | marketing910 -
Spammy no follow backlinks - what should I do?
There is a individual/company that is creating lots of spam sites in my niche. It doesn't seem that they are trying to rank for any keywords, so I'm a little confused as to their purpose, but here's what they're doing. They scrape the top 10 Google results for each keyword and create a page - so if the niche is "widgets", they scrape the top 10 ranked sites for 'widgets', 'blue widgets', 'red widgets', and so on. A 'results' page is created for each keyword, which is linked from a home page. The results page always contains 10 websites - text is the site metadescription or similar. Each website gets a nofollow link back with the page title used as the anchor text. The host sites all have the keyword in the domain name - e.g www.widgetsxyz.com. The sites are thrown together but interestingly have a very crappy but individual logo (like 90's clipart). The host sites all have high DA/PA due to some very extensive link spam pointing to the sites, with very targeted keywords. There is seemingly no purpose to these sites that I can see - no other 'followed' links on the page or site. Whoever is doing this is churning out tens, if not hundreds of these sites. Any ideas what might be going on here, and whether I should be disavowing these sites (even though no follow). The fear is that they could switch the links to do follow, and get all the major players penalised in one fell swoop. ???
Link Building | | johnohara0 -
My Backlinks become 404s
if pages linking to my website went deleted (become 404 pages ) ... Do they affect my website in google ranking ? Thank you and sorry for my bad english
Link Building | | simobens0 -
Which Backlinks to Disavow?
I am a site owner just getting to learn more about managing things myself after outsourcing SEO to a firm a year back (they stopped all activities about 8 months back). The question I have is about disavowing the low quality links. After collecting all the data from many sites on the basis of this helpful posting - (http://moz.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-google-penalty-removal), I am now left with around 2,800 back-links. I discovered most of the bad ones using ahrefs and majestic (and Google webmaster did not show many of the bad links). In fact, in the very first place, I realized that there was a spam problem when I saw the anchor cloud on ahrefs which showed many unrelated anchors for my site. I have three questions: **First, **Many URL's are actually from websites which have nothing to do with my line of business and I can sure spot them. What I get confused with is this - I can not say that these sites are downright spam. Some of them look to be good sites for example - a coffee machine vendor (with full business details and a fairly decent looking business), a Nike sports shoes mart etc. But they have nothing to do with my business. So my first question is - What is spam really? Would a back link from a high ranking website in the travel industry be considered spam from the point of view of someone who runs a website for medical equipment, specially if the back-link is from an unrelated anchor text like - "3 nights travel package" (which has nothing to do with medical business). I think I should disavow all the low quality back links with an erroneous anchor but Id like some views on this. Second, I see that in the disavow file, one could either upload a whole domain or a specific URL (could somebody please confirm this). I have some sites which have 8-12 (more in some cases) back links to my site. In most cases these sites are either really bad quality or have nothing to do with my business. I am tempted to disavow the entire domain for such sites instead of going by the URL's. Any views? Third, this is what I'd really like some help with. In case I delete the very pages (on my site) to which these back links point, should I still disavow the pointing domain? Finally: I have not created most of these backlinks. In fact, over the last 2-3 months we have started creating links from good sites in my industry. Most of the anchor cloud is good for me on ahrefs but there are these bad ones to which my question relates. I have not got any manual penalty from Google, though my traffic I think took a hit in the first week of October 2013.
Link Building | | sanar0 -
Using Schema markup for backlinks
Hi, Is there any benefits for using schema markup for backlinks. Using for Article directory submission,Drupal Submission etc.. mUz1umK.png?1
Link Building | | ruddyhapiq0 -
Dofollow VS noFollow
HI What do you think about nofollow links, are they still give rank for domains. DJ
Link Building | | capitanhajs0 -
Moving off page blog to on page blog
Hi, I was using free wordpress blog and i have around 18-20 content on the blog. Now, we've managed to have blog on our main website which has www.mysite.com/blog extension. We did this so we could create more links on the website/ I am a little unsure how to move the blog now. Should we copy & paste the blog articles from old blog to new one and remove them from old blog? I am just not quite sure how would it effect the links. If i keep the old articles on the old blog and create new articles for the new one, it'll take me a while before i get them written. Any recommendation appreciated. Thanks
Link Building | | Rubix0