Best practice: unique meta descriptions on blog 'tag' pages
-
Hi everyone,
I'm curious, are there best practices for introducing unique meta descriptions on blog tag pages (I'm using wordpress)?
For instance, using platinum seo, on an original post, the meta description is either the excerpt or a specified custom sentence. It doesn't appear that platinum seo allows for custom descriptions on tag pages.
Love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks!
Peter
-
Kane is correct here.
Generally, you don't want to index tagged pages because you'll run into duplicate content issues in addition to providing useless pages that do not bring much value.
In terms of user navigation, tagged pages can be convenient but not as a strategy to grow your site. Here's another example of a personal site that has the category page with a "noindex" tag (http://www.onblastblog.com/blog/) and chose to remove tagged pages altogether.
If unique content was written on that category page, only then can it be considered to be indexed.
If you're using WordPress, the best plugin to organize your basic title & description data is Yoast.
Biznit, since you wrote that message a couple years ago, I hope you haven't exploited tag pages by creating hundreds and indexing them.
-
Hi Chaps, Nice thread....is there a plug in that will take the title and description of your tags and put it into the page? It seems kinda obvious... I'm happy to write unique content for each tag page (I have the same issue, alot of my tag pages rank well)...but I want to improve those tag pages with unique content. It kinda seems ridiculous why it is not easy to add unique content...perhaps a unique "area" - but without using a widget of text that only shows up on a give tag page (perhaps using widget logic! zzz).
I have like 200 tag pages.....if I could just have a plugin that takes the tag title - as page h1 title and the description as a unique intro paragraph that pops up automatically each one (if I choose to write it)...I guess that would be better. All I would have to do is keep the descriptions up to date in the wordpress back end?
I'm amazed that someone hasn't done this, because tags and categories are a great way to build a deep seo friendly website - and then with time and effort, it should be equally easy to edit those pages (as if they were a page), and why they aren't is a mystery to little old me....but I'll settle for an easy way to create a unique header and paragraph for the moment!
-
My opinion is that the tag pages if done correctly are not considered duplicate content, just make sure that you only use excerpts on your tag pages and not the full article. Custom descriptions for tags is not found in Platinum SEO as there is no need, you can assign tag descriptions directly from Wordpress > Posts > Tags . Just like you, my tag pages rank very well and bring me a lot of traffic
-
Gotcha. I agree - don't cut off the traffic if those pages are already ranking. Unique descriptions for each tag page are definitely the way to go, if you can keep up with all of your tags. This will obviously be much easier if you use 1-3 tags per post, and not 10 random ones. I personally try to reuse tags as much as possible, and combine similar ones... helps keep your sanity.
For the record, I consider the unique paragraph approach the ideal solution for categories and tags, but typically tags are harder to keep up with.
-
Thanks for replying, Kane. I'm with you re: noindexing of tags. I'm all for it, but I have a few tags that return a reasonable amount of traffic on a daily basis. I'd hate to cut it off so I guess I'm forced with dealing on a tag by tag basis (ugh).
After I posted this I figured out how to 'activate' the tag description on my blog (it was a theme issue). So, now it's off to setting up custom descriptions...
-
I usually noindex Wordpress tag pages, meaning I tell Google not to show them in search results. This is because they don't add a ton of SEO value to the site - tag pages are typically 100% duplicate content.
That said, IF you provide a custom description at the top of each tag page, you could make an argument for keeping them indexed, since there would now be relevant unique content at the top of each page.
Here's an example from a personal site where I keep my category pages indexed: http://www.seattlehomestead.com/category/gardening/. See the paragraph at the top of the page? That's the minimum amount of unique content you'd want on a tag or category page to keep it indexed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should the canonical tag for the redirected pages be changed
Hi! Does anyone know if the canonical tag of the old redirected page should be changed, and include the URL of the new destination? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | AnahitG0 -
Panda Cleanup - Removing Old Blog Posts, Let Them 404 or 301 to Main Blog Page?
tl;dr... Removing old blog posts that may be affected by Panda, should we let them 404 or 301 to the Blog? We have been managing a corporate blog since 2011. The content is OK but we've recently hired a new blogger who is doing an outstanding job, creating content that is very useful to site visitors and is just on a higher level than what we've had previously. The old posts mostly have no comments and don't get much user engagement. I know Google recommends creating great new content rather than removing old content due to Panda concerns but I'm confident we're doing the former and I still want to purge the old stuff that's not doing anyone any good. So let's just pretend we're being dinged by Panda for having a large amount of content that doesn't get much user engagement (not sure if that's actually the case, rankings remain good though we have been passed on a couple key rankings recently). I've gone through Analytics and noted any blog posts that have generated at least 1 lead or had at least 20 unique visits all time. I think that's a pretty low barrier and everything else really can be safely removed. So for the remaining posts (I'm guessing there are hundreds of them but haven't compiled the specific list yet), should we just let them 404 or do we 301 redirect them to the main blog page? The underlying question is, if our primary purpose is cleaning things up for Panda specifically, does placing a 301 make sense or would Google see those "low quality" pages being redirected to a new place and pass on some of that "low quality" signal to the new page? Is it better for that content just to go away completely (404)?
Technical SEO | | eBoost-Consulting0 -
Phone Number In Meta Description
People are more likely to call us, than email us. However, if they're using a mobile device, there's a click to call button on that site. My question is this: google does not include our phone number in our meta description. I could try to get the description changed, but it doesn't seem like it would make that big of a deal for just the desktop site. Am I missing something about the importance of the phone number on a desktop site? Any experience with this situation? Thanks, Ruben
Technical SEO | | KempRugeLawGroup3 -
To integrate a blog tool onto site - or build a blog solution - what's better for SEO?
Currently looking at adding a blog to our company site subdirectory and wanted to know if there was a SEO distinction between the following methods: Integrating a bolt-on blog tool with the site to create the blog VS. just using the current site infrastructure to build blog functionality. What's better for SEO? (and if tool integration is the overwhelming response - which tool?). Cheers.
Technical SEO | | Oxfordcomma0 -
Auto-loading content via AJAX - best practices
We have an ecommerce website and I'm looking at replacing the pagination on our category pages with functionality that auto-loads the products as the user scrolls. There are a number of big websites that do this - MyFonts and Kickstarter are two that spring to mind. Obviously if we are loading the content in via AJAX then search engine spiders aren't going to be able to crawl our categories in the same way they can now. I'm wondering what the best way to get around this is. Some ideas that spring to mind are: detect the user agent and if the visitor is a spider, show them the old-style pagination instead of the AJAX version make sure we submit an updated Google sitemap every day (I'm not sure if this a reasonable substitute for Google being able to properly crawl our site) Are there any best practices surrounding this approach to pagination? Surely the bigger sites that do this must have had to deal with these issues? Any advice would be much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | paul.younghusband0 -
Sitemap for pages that aren't on menus
I have a site that has pages that has a large number, about 3,000, pages that have static URLs, but no internal links and are not connected to the menu. The pages are pulled up through a user-initiated selection process that builds the URL as they make their selections, but,as I said, the pages already exist with static URLs. The question: should the sitemap for this site include these 3,000 static URLs? There is very little opportunity to optimize the pages in any serious kind of way, if you feel that makes a difference. There is also no chance that a crawler is going to find its way to these pages through the natural flow of the site. There isn't a single link to any of these pages anywhere on the site. Help?
Technical SEO | | RockitSEO0 -
Best Pracice to Obsolete a Blog
Hi, I have a blog that has thousands of URL, the blog is a part of my site. I would like to obsolete the blog, I think the best choices are 1. 404 Them: Problem is a large number of 404's. I know this is Ok, but makes me hesitant. 2. meta tag no follow no index. This would be great, but the question is they are already indexed. Thoughts? Thanks
Technical SEO | | Bucky0 -
Canonical tag used on several pages?
Is it a bad idea to use rel=canonical from several pages back to one (if you are planning on no-indexing them)? Does this concentrate the “link juice” from those several pages back to one?
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0