301 redirect from root to /index.aspx
-
I have taken over the SEO for www.domain.net.
The way i've inherited the setup is that www.domain.net is 301 redirected to www.domain.net/index.aspx Looking at top pages and linking root domains in Opensiteexplorer I can see that
www.domain.net/index.aspx has 1,006 linking root domains www.domain.net has 806 linking root domains.
I assume that www.domain.net is passing the value of it's 806 domain links to www.domain.net/index.aspx via the 301 redirect and because of this would expect www.domain.net/index.aspx to be the strongest page on the site and be the url that ranks in the listings for many relevant searches.
It appears however that www.domain.net is what is shown in listings and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
Can anyone explain why this might be??
If I do a site: search in Google then www.domain.net is indexed and not www.domain.net/index.aspx ??
-
These could be mostly internal links - are you linking to "/index.aspx" from your navigation, logo, etc.? In OSE, select "from [only external]", and you won't see your internal links. That can really skew the count.
-
Thanks once again Brian.
I have double checked the header response and the redirect from "index.aspx" to the international pages is definitely a 302.
I'm hoping that Google is not assuming that the 302 is intended to be a 301 as I want the link juice to stay at the root domain and I assume this is why 302s were used by whoever setup the IP redirects to international pages.
-
Thanks Dr. Pete,
I am comforted slightly by what you say about Google having a strong preference for the root and that you've seen it before. With the volume of links coming in to "index.aspx" you can see why seeing the root in Google listings made me nervous that all of those links were being ignored.
This comment also comforts me..
301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301
as that is what I would expect too.
I am hesitant to make changes because of the risks it involves and might just have to accept that I'll never know for sure whether those links to "index.aspx" are definitely being counted.
-
Well, here are some more possible issues....
1. Are you sure the redirect to the English page is a 302 and not a 301? As Dr Peter suggested - check the headers.
2. Google has said that in cases where it believes the 302 is a mistake it will treat the 302 as a 301....if this is the case, there's really nothing you can do, besides getting rid of the 302 and using a meta refresh instead. The meta refresh is commonly used in situations like yours, and while not a perfect solution, it would seem to be better than using a 302, which is typically not a good solution at all anymore. I'd bet this is your issue.
-
Google seems to have a strong preference for the root domain, and I've seen this before. Unfortunately, ASP/.NET can be really stubborn about going for the "index.aspx" or "default.aspx" page. You're probably still getting credit for the back-links, but it can be tough to tell. A couple of things:
(1) Make sure you're linking internally to the canonical version (in this case "index.aspx"). Otherwise, you're sending a mixed signal and that can disrupt the 301.
(2) Add a canonical tag to the "index.aspx" page. It can't hurt to double up, in this case.
Oh, sorry - just saw your follow-up. That 301/302 chain could exacerbate the problem, although it would typically leave link-juice after the 301. It's a bit complex, though. You could consider moving your English home-page up a level and only redirecting other audiences. That is a tricky proposition, though, and carries risk.
I'd also grab a header checker and just make sure Google is seeing what you're seeing. It's always best to verify that your redirects are working as expected.
-
Thanks again for giving this some thought and trying to help!
OK, I left out some info that I thought would complicate my description of setup but I wonder whether it is pertinent to the problem....
The site has international content areas and is geo-targeted using the directory method i.e /en-gb, /en-au,, /en-us etc
I have mentioned that www.domain.net does a 301 redirect to www.domain.net/index.aspx but I did not mention that www.domain.net/index.aspx then 302 redirects to the relevant international landing page based on IP address.
I'm pretty sure that the Google spider crawls from a US IP address so I believe that what it will see is:
www.domain.net 301 redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
www.domain.net/index.aspx 302 redirects to www.domain.net/en-us/index.aspx
Could the 302 redirect from www.domain.net/index.aspx be responsible for Google keeping www.domain.net in their index despite the 301??
Also, and concerning me more, do you think the considerable link juice to www.domain.net/index.aspx is being lost in all of this??
-
Quba I've thought about this more, and...I have to say that I'm at a loss. All of the links to the domain.net should be lost to domain.net and gained by domain.net/index.aspx
Is it possible that the index.aspx url has a noindex instruction from the robots.txt?. Is index.aspx showing up at all?
-
Thanks for your response Brian,
it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
According to Opensiteexplorer www.domain.net/index.aspx has more links than www.domain.net though?
Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
domain.net redirects to www.domain.net/index.aspx
-
Quba it's hard to say, but....
1. We know that (according to Google) some PR is lost in redirection, and it could be that most of the links are initially directed at www.domain.net.
2. Where is your non-www domain directed? Is it directed to www.domain.net or or www.domain.net/index.aspx ? If it's directed to the former then that could explain some or all of your issue.
-
Why has the main domain been redirected to index.aspx? it makes no sense
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should existing canonical tags be removed where a 301 redirect is the preferred option?
Hi, I'm working on a site that is currently using canonical tags to deal with www and non-www variations. My recommendation is to setup 301 redirects to deal with this issue instead. However, is it ok to leave the existing canonical tags in place alongside the new 301 redirects or should they be removed? My thoughts are that this is not a canonical issue and therefore they should be removed? If 301 redirects are not possible it would be better have them that nothing at all but I don't think we need both, right? Any feedback much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | MVIreland0 -
Will a Robots.txt 'disallow' of a directory, keep Google from seeing 301 redirects for pages/files within the directory?
Hi- I have a client that had thousands of dynamic php pages indexed by Google that shouldn't have been. He has since blocked these php pages via robots.txt disallow. Unfortunately, many of those php pages were linked to by high quality sites mulitiple times (instead of the static urls) before he put up the php 'disallow'. If we create 301 redirects for some of these php URLs that area still showing high value backlinks and send them to the correct static URLs, will Google even see these 301 redirects and pass link value to the proper static URLs? Or will the robots.txt keep Google away and we lose all these high quality backlinks? I guess the same question applies if we use the canonical tag instead of the 301. Will the robots.txt keep Google from seeing the canonical tags on the php pages? Thanks very much, V
Technical SEO | | Voodak0 -
HTACESS Redirect Root Domain To Sub-Directory
Hi Guys, I posted on another post here http://moz.com/community/q/site-migration-between-cms-s about an issue I am hleping out on with a client about migrating between Joomla and Wordpress. He wants to keep some of the old links live on the Joomla installation (I have advised that Google won't be able to crawl these) he wants the new wordpress installation to run on www.site.com/customise (a subdirectory) I have researched this and can't see any issues with indexing or page authority as it's just like having an index.php on the end of every URL. So basically if you go to www.site.com it will be redirected to www.site.com/customise. Will there be any issues, will go frown upon this in anway? Kind Regards Neil
Technical SEO | | nezona0 -
301 Redirect on a PDF, DOCX files?
Hi, I have to rename many pdf and docx files. How can I implement 301 redirect on them as they are linked from 'n' number of places? Regards, Shailendra Sial
Technical SEO | | IM_Learner1 -
301 redirects & merging two sites into one
We have a client that has two sites that rank well for different searches in their market. The main pages ranking are things like advice articles and news pieces. For various reasons, they just want one site. I believe they need to duplicate the content from the outgoing site and place it on the main site, with a 301 redirect from each old page to each new one. What happens when they eventually want to redirect the entire domain? Would these smaller, internal redirects become obsolete, therefore removing any link value they once had? I am not sure how this works or if there is a best practice way to do this. Thanks Gareth
Technical SEO | | Gmorgan0 -
Does it really matter to maintain 301 redirect after de-indexing of old URLs?
Today, I was reading latest blog post on SEOmoz blog about. Uncrawled 301s - A Quick Fix for When Relaunches Go Too Well This is very interesting study about 301 & How it useful to maintain traffic. I'm working on eCommerce website and I have done similar stuff on my website. I have big confusion to manage 301 redirect. My website generates new URLs due to following actions. Re-write dynamic URLs. Re-launch entire website on different eCommerce platform. [osCommerce to Magento Commerce] Re-name category. Trasfer one product from one category to another category. I'm managing my 301 redirect with old practice. Excel sheet data from Google webmaster tools and set specific new URLs for redirect. Hoooo... Now, I have 8.5K redirect in htaccess... And, I'm thinking it's too much. Can we remove old 301 redirect from htaccess or not? This is big question for me. Because, all pages are not hyperlink on external website. Google have just de-indexed old URLs and indexed new URLs. So, Is it require to maintain 301 redirect after Google process?
Technical SEO | | CommercePundit0 -
How to 301 redirect via OpenCms/7.5.4
Hi everyone, My programmer told me it is impossible to do a permanent redirect from www.website.com/index.html to www.website.com due to cms technical limitation which I do not want to believe hence is it possible / is there documentation available instructing on how to do a proper 301 permanent redirect on OpenCMS 7.5.4? Thanks a lot! Steve
Technical SEO | | sjcbayona-412180 -
301 redirecting some pages directly, and the rest to a single page
I've read through the Redirect guide here already but can't get this down in my .htaccess I want to redirect some pages specifically (/contactinfo.html to the new /contact.php) And I want all other pages (not all have equivalent pages on the new site) to redirect to my new (index.php) homepage. How can I set it up so that some specific pages redirect directly, and all others go to one page? I already have the specific oldpage.html -> newpage.php redirects in place, just need to figure out the broad one for everything else.
Technical SEO | | RyanWhitney150