Pages not indexed by Google
-
We recently deleted all the nofollow values on our website. (2 weeks ago)
The number of pages indexed by google is the same as before?
Do you have explanations for this?
website : www.probikeshop.fr
-
Good advice from Andrea and Brent.
To use multiple sitemaps, do something like this:
The main sitemap points to the other sitemap files.
You can have up to 50,000 URLs in those files.
- mine are gzipped
This one is sitemap_index.xml
<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"><sitemap><loc>http://yourdomain.com/writermap.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2012-03-15</lastmod></sitemap>
<sitemap><loc>http://yourdomain.com/mainmap.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2012-03-15</lastmod></sitemap>
<sitemap><loc>http://yourdomain.com/201201.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2012-03-15</lastmod></sitemap></sitemapindex><sitemap><loc>http://yourdomain.com/201202.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2012-03-15</lastmod></sitemap>Here is a tip:
Google will index some of those pages and some it will not index.
If you have 5,000 urls in one sitemap and they only index 4957
you probably can't work out which 43 URLs they didn't index,
so if you make the numbers smaller, it can be easier to discover the pages they don't like.
- not easy, but easier
-
Well, there's a lot of ways to look at this - this wouldn't result in more pages indexed, so the two issues are totally separate.
If the goal is to get more pages indexed, then a site map (either XML or event a text list) uploaded to your server for Google to find can help. Or, at least that makes sure that Google is finding and indexing the pages you want them to find. Your Google Webmaster Tools account (assuming you have one) will also tell you some data.
For example, we used to have 100K+ pages; many weren't quality content I wanted to rank. Like, a PDF of a catalog ranking about the product page. So, I reduced the number of pages indexed so Google would have better, more quality content to serve to searchers.
Using Xenu or Screaming Frog is another good way to help uncover pages. Those tools crawl your site like Google would,then you can download the file and not only see all the URLs found, but also if they are 301/404/200, etc. And, Screaming Frog can crawl your site and output a XML sitemap for you (it's an easier way to make one).
I prefer SF and it's about $150 US dollars for the use - well worth it.
As for why - well, if you have a lot of pages, Google doesn't always find them. That's where a site map can help (it directs Google what to crawl). Otherwise, there could be technical issues to a bunch of pages and they aren't properly linked up or something and that could be causing the issue.
-
So according to you, it's normal if we dont have more pages indexed by Google, since we have deleted the nofollow values?
Google actually index 28,200 pages, but i'm sure we have more pages on site.
From where, could come the problem?
Thanks
-
Do you have XML sitemaps? If not this is a great way to measure what is being indexed by Google. Make sure you create multiple sitemaps based on your categories so you can track exactly which pages are not being indexed.
-
'No follow' isn't the same as a 'no index' code. No follow just tells the search engine it "should not influence the link target's ranking in the search engine's index." 'No index' is where you tell the crawler to not index the pages, then you can remove that if you at some future point want them indexed.
So, in theory, what you did wouldn't have anything to do with how many pages are indexed on your site anyway.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Just validating a theory I have about why Google is Soft 404ing some of my doctor pages.
As of June 1 doctor pages on our website that say "No ratings are available yet" are being Soft 404ed in our Google Console. We suspect the issue is that wording, due to this post. https://www.contentkingapp.com/academy/index-coverage/faq/submitted-soft-404/ Just wondering if anyone with more expertise than me on 404s or local seo can validate that it is likely this issue. Some examples:
Technical SEO | | Patrick_at_Nebraska_Medicine
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/neil-s-kalsi
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/leslie-a-eiland
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/david-d-ingvoldstad 63647547-aa09-42a8-afe5-4431f277f611-image.png0 -
Need to de-index certain pages fast
I need to de-index certain pages as fast as possible. These pages are already indexed. What is the fastest way to do this? I have added the noindex meta tag and run a few of the pages through Search Console/Webmaster tools (fetch as google) earlier today, however nothing has changed yet. The 'fetch as google' services do see the noindex tag, but it haven't changed the SERPs yet. I now I should be patient, but if there is a faster way to get Google to de-index these pages, I want to try that. I am considering the removal tool also, but I'm unsure if that is risky to do. And even if it's not, I can understand it's not a permanent solution anyway. What to do?
Technical SEO | | WebGain0 -
Google indexing staging / development site that is redirected...
Hi Moz Fans! - Please help. We had a acme.stagingdomain.com while a site was in development, when it went live it redirected (302) to acmeprofessionalservices.com (real names redacted!!) no known external links to staging site although staging site url has been emailed from Google Apps(!!!) now found that staging site is in the index even though it redirects to the proper public site. and some (but not all) of the pages are in the index too. They all redirect to the proper public site when visited. It is convenient to have a redirect from the staging site to the new one for the team, Chrome etc. remember frequently visited sites. Be a shame to lose that. Yes, these pages can be removed using webmaster tools.
Technical SEO | | mozroadjan
But how did they get in the index to start with? And if we're building a new site, and a customer has an existing site is there a danger of duplicate content etc. penalties caused by the staging site? We had a similar incident recently when a PDF that was not linked anywhere on the site appeared in the index. The link had been emailed through Google Apps, and visited in Chrome, but that was it. So 3 questions. Why is the staging site still in the index despite the redirects? How did they get in the index in the first place? Will the new staging site affect the rank of the existing site, eg. duplicate content penalties?0 -
Why blocking a subfolder dropped indexed pages with 10%?
Hy Guys, maybe you can help me to understand better: on 17.04 I had 7600 pages indexed in google (WMT showing 6113). I have included in the robots.txt file, Disallow: /account/ - which contains the registration page, wishlist, etc. and other stuff since I'm not interested to rank with registration form. on 23.04 I had 6980 pages indexed in google (WMT showing 5985). I understand that this way I'm telling google I don't want that section indexed, by way so manny pages?, Because of the faceted navigation? Cheers
Technical SEO | | catalinmoraru0 -
Google Places Page Changes
We had a client(dentist) hire another marketing firm(without our knowledge) and due to some Google page changes they made, their website lost a #1 ranking, was disassociated with the places page and was placed at result #10 below all the local results. We quickly made some changes and were able to bring them up to #2 within a few days and restore their Google page after about a week, but the tracking/forwarding phone number the marketing company was using shows up on the page despite attempts to contact Google through updating the business in places management as well as submit the phone number as incorrect while providing the correct phone number. And because the client fired that marketing company, the phone number will no longer be active in a few days. Of course this is very important for a dental office. Has anyone else had problems with the speed and updating Google Places/Plus pages for businesses? What's the most efficient way to make changes like this?
Technical SEO | | tvinson0 -
Differing numbers of pages indexed with and without the trailing slash
I noticed today that a site: query in Google (UK) for a certain domain I'm looking at returns different numbers depending on whether or not the trailing slash is added at the end. With the trailing slash the numbers are significantly different. This is a domain with a few duplicate content issues. It seems very rare but I've managed to replicate it for a couple of other well known domains, so this is the phenomenon I'm referring to: site:travelsupermarket.com - 16'300 results
Technical SEO | | ianmcintosh
site:travelsupermarket.com/ - 45'500 results site:guardian.co.uk - 120'000'000 results
site:guardian.co.uk/ - 121'000'000 results For the particular domain I'm looking at the numbers are 19'000 without the trailing slash and 800'000 with it! As mentioned, there are a few duplicate content issues at the moment that I'm trying to tidy up, but how should I interpret this? Has anyone seen this before and can advise what it could indicate? Thanks in advance for any answers.0 -
Number of Indexed Pages in Webmaster Tools
My # of indexed pages in Webmaster Tools fluctuates greatly. Compared to the # of URLs submitted (4700), we have 3000 indexed. The other day, all 4700 were indexed. Why does it keep changing? I obviously want all of them indexed right? What can I do to make that happen?
Technical SEO | | kylesuss0 -
Site just will not be reincluded in Google's Index
I asked a question about this site (www.cookinggames.com.au) some time ago http://www.seomoz.org/qa/view/38488/site-indexing-google-doesnt-like-it and had some very helpful answers which were great. However I'm still no further ahead. I have added some more content, submitted a new XML sitemap, removed the 'lorem ipsum...' Now it seems that even Bing have ditched the site too. The number 1 result in Australia for the search term 'cooking games' is now this one - http://www.cookinggames.net.au/ which surely is not so much better to deserve a #1 spot whilst my site is deindexed? I have just had another reconsideration request 'denied' and am absolutely out of ideas/. If anyone can help suggest what I need to do... or even suggest how I can get feedback from the search engines what's wring that would be fantastic. Thank you David
Technical SEO | | OzDave0