Best way to do a site in various regions
-
I have a client who has 2 primary services in 4 regions
He does mold removal and water damage repair.
He then serves cincinnati, dayton, columbus, and indianapolis.
Before hiring my company he had like 30 domains (keyword based) and had tons and tons of fake google places listings. He actually got a lot of traffic that way.
However I will not tolerate that kind of stuff and want to do things the right way.
First of all what is the best site approach for this. He wants a site for each service and for each city.
indy mold
cincy mold
dayton mold
dayton water
etc etc etc
In the end he will have 8 sites and wants to expand into other services and regions.
I feel like this is not the right way to handle this as he also has another site that is more generic
To me the best way to do this is a generic domain with a locations page and a page for each city.
The for the Places he would get one account - an address that is hidden since he goes to customer locations, and just multiple city defined regions.
He does have an office like address at each city. So should I make him a Places listing for each city or just the one? And of course how should the actual sites be organized?
Thanks
-
I do wish you luck, Web Feat! Show the client the Google Places Quality Guidelines. Then, it's not just coming from you - it's coming from Google. Also, heads up: Google just changed the language again the guidelines. I wrote about this today, in case you are interested and it might help you in talking with the client:
http://www.solaswebdesign.net/wordpress/?p=1205
Have a good rest of your weekend!
-
Thanks so much. That is all pretty much what I was thinking. I now get to try to convince the business owners to do things the right way. Wish me luck
-
Hi WebFeat,
You've taken on 2 tough things here - a spammed record and a business owner who may not want to do things correctly. Hopefully, you will be able to help him see the light on this. Let me copy some of your remarks and respond to them individually, please, so that I'm sure I'm covering what you want to know.
Before hiring my company he had like 30 domains (keyword based) and had tons and tons of fake google places listings. He actually got a lot of traffic that way.
Bad, bad, bad. Yes...you can game the system, but this is the type of account that eventually gets banned and getting back into Google's good graces after that can be something even the best Local SEO on earth will be unable to accomplish. The client is in an emergency situation right now. If you can get the record cleaned up before punishment occurs, you're saving his neck.
However I will not tolerate that kind of stuff and want to do things the right way.
Thumbs up for you and 'boo' to the previous company who taught the client to engage in these practices.
In the end he will have 8 sites and wants to expand into other services and regions.
Some business owners do take this approach of having a separate site for each of their cities or services. The main argument for such a practice is that a) the exact match domain name can give a ranking boost and b) links coming into the domain will have matching primary keywords because of the URL. One can choose to do this, but I don't consider it a best practice for several reasons.
The first is that it hints at a single entity being multiple entities, which is not really true. The second is that it makes management (SEO, marketing, webmastering) incredibly complicated. The third is that I believe it is better to build the authority of a single domain with tons of great content and links than to spread this thin like a scrape of butter over a whole loaf of bread. Of these three statements, the last is really just my opinion on this as a Local SEO. It's not proven fact or anything like that, but like you, I just think it's not a best practice. I would advise my own client that if they've got a single legal business, that = a single really authoritative website they can develop.
To me the best way to do this is a generic domain with a locations page and a page for each city.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by a generic domain, but at any rate, I agree with you about a single domain with a landing page for each city and each service. Then, I would build beyond this on the website, perhaps with blogging, covering every service he offers in each city one at a time. This is somewhat akin to the process your client thinks is best - having a different domain for each city and each service in each city, but instead of doing this on a ton of different domains, it's all under one roof, under the name of his business, on a single, powerhouse website.
The for the Places he would get one account - an address that is hidden since he goes to customer locations, and just multiple city defined regions.
He does have an office like address at each city. So should I make him a Places listing for each city or just the one? And of course how should the actual sites be organized?
If the client has a REAL location (and you should be sure of this because what he's told you are locations could turn out just to be virtual offices) in each of his main cities, then yes, he is allowed to have a Place Page for each of his cities. If he has only one legit location, then he should have only one Place Page.
That's good that you're hip to the recent 'hide address' guideline changes. This is still early days with this. My interpretation of the new guideline, at this point, is this:
Type A
Your business is brick-and-mortar and serves all customers at its location. Show your address.Type B
Your business is home-based and serves some customers at your home and some on the road. Show your address and use the Service Radius tool.Type C
Your business is home-based and does not serve any customers at your home. Hide your address.*see http://www.seomoz.org/blog/why-you-may-need-to-hide-your-google-places-address-asap
You'll need to figure which one of those fits your client's business model. I would also recommend that you read this post on this subject by Mike Blumenthal which points out some of the vagueness of the guidelines that have yet to be adequately resolved by Google:
Google has really done a poor job with clarity on the new guideline. Hopefully, you can figure out the right move for your client on this and he will abide by your advice.
So, bottom line on this is that my professional preference would be for a single domain and whatever number of place pages matches the legitimate offices of the client. I would focus on building out content rather than building out domains.
That being said...if the client has built an empire of domains that are getting him business, it may be necessary to maintain those, but whatever he decides on that, he should be informed that by spamming Google Places he is risking his total visibility in Google. Additionally, if he ends up with just 1-2 Place Pages and 20 domains, it's going to be complicated deciding which URL the legit Place Page/Pages can point to. Again, another reason to put everything in one basket. If he wants to keep the domains, you can go with that, though it's not ideal, but insist on him cleaning up his act in Google Places or tell him you can't work with him as he's heading for a train wreck, sooner or later.
Hope this helps!
Miriam
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Partner Sites
Hi All, Within our company we have a media group that publishes magazines and videos, the sites have footers that link to our shopping site, one of them has 118,459 links to one URL, domain authority 23, and the other 17,726 to seven URLs, domain authority 52, (there are some articles which link organically). My question is are these links because they're from identifiable companies with the same ownership worth keeping or are they detrimental? The site being linked to has a DA of 39 Cheers Stew
Technical SEO | | StewMcG0 -
Site verification in WMT
Hello all, I have a site and I want to set a preferred domain but when I do it says I need to verify my site but it gives me no ideas how to do that. I know that normally you have to do it when you set the account up but I had an analytics account for this domain first then just logged on with those details and I was in with no verification process. Cheers
Technical SEO | | jwdl0 -
How to link site.com/blog or site.com/blog/
Hello friends, I have a very basic question but I can not find the right answer... I have made my blog linkbuilding using the adress "mysite.com/blog" but now im not sure if is better to do the linkbuilding to "mysite.com**/blog/ "** Is there any diference? Thanks...
Technical SEO | | lans27870 -
What Would i do to get my site ranking high?
Hello Friends, I need your help please tell me what would I do to get my site ranking high in Google search engine. When I start my work on my site my work blog commenting , social bookmarking, keyword targeting etc.… But now the scene is completely changing. Now I am working on just guest blogging. I don’t understand that what would I do next after the guest blogging. Because I think there is now just one way to promote your site VIA guest blogging. Now please tell me is there any other option to work and get high ranking?
Technical SEO | | KLLC0 -
Seo on a dk site
hi my client has asked if we can seo their dk site , my question is does all link building and article submission have to be in danish
Technical SEO | | Westernoriental0 -
I am Posting an article on my site and another site has asked to use the same article - Is this a duplicate content issue with google if i am the creator of the content and will it penalize our sites - or one more than the other??
I operate an ecommerce site for outdoor gear and was invited to guest post on a popular blog (not my site) for a trip i had been on. I wrote the aritcle for them and i also will post this same article on my website. Is this a dup content problem with google? and or the other site? Any Help. Also if i wanted to post this same article to 1 or 2 other blogs as long as they link back to me as the author of the article
Technical SEO | | isle_surf0 -
Site Disappeared off of Search
A friend of mine has a site (http://bit.ly/q4iWkM ) that was ranking number one for their key word (Drimnagh() and has now completely disappeared off of the ranking. I did some checking and can't see a problem. She does have duplicate meta and titles throughout but this shouldn't be a punishable offence that I know of and is something that I am going to correct with a quick plugin install. I couldn't see any redirects or code stopping search either. When you do site:URL it shows up OK as well. She is client of mine (for website not for SEO) and she is really upset about it so any help from the forum would be appreciated. This isn't even a site I did but you couldn't get a better person to work with so I am eager to help where and if possible. Guinness all round if someone solves it next time you are in Ireland
Technical SEO | | kdaly1000 -
Site Architecture Trade Off
Hi All I'm looking for some feedback regarding a site architecture issue I'm having with a client. They are about to enter a re-design and as such we're restructuring the site URLs and amending/ adding pages. At the moment they have ranked well off the back of original PPC landing pages that were added onto the site, such as www.company.com/service1, www.company.com/service2, etc The developer, from a developer point of view wished to create a logical site architecture with multiple levels of directories etc. I've suggested this probably isn't the best way to go, especially as the site isn't that large (200-300 pages) and that the key pages we're looking to rank should be as high up the architecture as we can make them, and that this amendment could hurt their current high rankings. It looks like the trade off may be that the client is willing to let some pages be restructured so for example, www.company.com/category/sub-category/service would be www.company.com/service. However, although from a page basis this might be a solution, is there a drawback to having this in place for only a few pages rather than sitewide? I'm just wondering if these pages might stick out like a sore thumb to Google.
Technical SEO | | PerchDigital1