I'm still not convinced by Panda/Penguin...
-
Okay, granted, it's still early. But supposedly Panda/Penguin has "changed SEO" so spammy back links from web 2.0 sites (like Squidoo and Hub Pages) won't be worth anything, right?
Why then, did I get a Google Alert yesterday (for one of the keywords I'm trying to rank for) for a Squidoo lens that has not only pushed a certain website up to top 10, but overtook my top 10 spot (pushing me back to page 2 or 3)?
It's pretty frustrating (doubly so on an already poopy Monday!) to try to be all white-hat with link building, including writing good content (which I do), and yet get beat consistently by other folks who are clearly doing the grayish-hat stuff.
Thoughts?
-
Thanks for the reminder of that post – had completely forgotten about it!
-
Personally, it's only helped me as it's knocked down a couple of truly horrible backlink spammers in my niche...but I still think Penguin is bull. I should not be able to hurt competitors, period. And for all of those that say "A good backlink profile will trump the bad links"...that may be true for Amazon and SEOmoz, but for the Barbecue Restaurant in a Pop. 20k town on the interstate, it can mean disaster. It's bad enough with all of the fake reviews going around, but add in the fact that 20 bucks can get your competitor 20k bad links compared to their 5 good ones, it's going to make a huge difference.
Search engines cannot should not operate like this. They should be moving forward instead of backward, it's simply not fair to the real businesses that try to do good. They need to focus on rewarding the good instead of punishing the bad. Heck, regardless of fairness that's just good operant conditioning technique. Anyway, there's got to be a better way...
-
I think Google really wants to return SERPS which are naturally popular and circulated through the internet. As with any intent, once its known it can be exploited.
The whole industry that has sprung up around SEO can be considered in a small sense, a way to manipulate the search engines intent. If on one hand as a search engine you're going to give credit to a website that many other websites link to, then you also have to know that once that is understood there are going to be people and companies who will exploit that.
In a perfect world one would build a website, make the website great and enjoy top position in the search engine. In our world, one makes a website, makes its great and watches droves of copy cats decimate it by manipulating the search engines.
We all struggle with it. Personally, I have worked in 2 completely different industries and seen the exact same things happening. You get to a point where you say, well I can't rank unless I do X, so you do, then something changes and now you look like a chump. While the real exploiters work on a way to get a round it, only to re-market their solution in greed. It can be quite frustrating so I really do understand your plight.
That said, I like to wear the white hat, treat my customers, viewers and website followers as my best tools, because they are. If you're running an e-commerce site, treat a customer like they are worth 100x whatever profit you made from the sale. Keep your tools sharp, help them help you. If you treat somebody well, give them the necessary tools to let others know your site is a great place to do business, then the referrals, whether it is just word of mouth, anchor links or social buzz will come back to you.
Zappos.com is the model of customer service, and you know what, Amazon realized it and purchased them. In all fairness to Amazon.com I have spent well over a 100k personally with them and I have never once had a bad experience. Of course there has been issues with stuff I bought, but they treated me like I spent a million dollars with them and took care of each issue well over my expectations. Those 2 companies operate at a level I only wish other major sites would.
Now I'm a web guy, I have competed with Zappos and Amazon and still do to this day. But here I am giving them a glowing review. I'm still one of their customers and competitors and have nothing bad to say about them without being a liar. I hope those who use the sites I work on, have the same feeling, and strive every day to make that a reality.
My thoughts...
-
I completely understand and agree. I think it's a constant cat and mouse game.
I don't know if you have read this post by Will or not, but if you haven't do read it: How Google Makes Liars Out of the Good Guys in SEO
-
Don't believe everything you read. Vary your link profile, promote with quality content and stay consistent.
I still have lens' on top of 200 million plus result terms that have been sitting there for years with only other web 2.0 sites linking in.
What is working for me is daily content creation and at least 2 tiers of promotion.
The top level being higher level social sites (think pintrest) being promoted by second tier links such as bookmarking and the profile based social media sites.
This really is a content game in my eyes and my method usually takes a minimum of five pieces (video,article etc). These are placed strategically along the top tier and promoted on the second tier and yes I am still using squidoo in my procedures.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do i have too many 'follow' backlinks and am i being penalised by Google for it?
Hi all. I read on Moz recently that if a website has too large a percentage of 'follow' backlinks, that Google penalise the website because that is unnatural. IS this correct please? I ask because i have recently found that our own website, according to Moz, has 16,500 inbound links and they are ALL 'follow' links. These are all from independent 3rd parties and we havent commissioned any of them, so it is completely natural. URL if anyone cares is www.themosquito.co.uk Any advice would be appreciated. Cheers
Link Building | | TheMozzy0 -
Do three way links still help in moderation?
do three way links still help in moderation? Have some friends with websites in the same genre as mine and was told three way links were better than reciprocal links. Thanks mozzers!
Link Building | | Ron100 -
I use to have very good ranking for my website, now I'm struggling
I use to have very good ranking for my website, now I'm struggling with ranking, I've been trying almost everything, I purchased an advance link building, a contextual link building campaign with Submit, and doesn't seem to be working. Any recommendations!
Link Building | | desdetj0 -
Is Penguin 2.1 an actual penalty?
By that, I mean that does Google just devalue spammy links, or does it devalue the links and penalize your site on top of it? Does it hit specific keywords, or does it have effects site wide? Does penguin run constantly, or only on specific days? If spammy links are removed, how long does it take to recover?
Link Building | | CsmBill0 -
Linking with or without the http://
When linking from forums, blogs, or any other forms of SEO link building, should we link with or without the http://? Does google favor one more than the other or index them as two different pages? For example: | http://4wheelonline.com/ | or | 4wheelonline.com/ |
Link Building | | WebRiverGroup0 -
How to Check if a Sites Backlink Profile is Penguin Friendly?
Post penguin I am of course very wary about which sites I proactively solicit links from. Here is the scenario. Let's say for example I found a blog relevant to my business sector, had good domain authority/moz rank and noticed that they accepted guest posts. Sounds great? Well on the surface it sounds like it would be worth reaching out to the blog owner - but what if that blog had been involved in some really shady link building practices in the past and the reality is that I could end up damaging my own site by association. Can anyone share any useful resources such as articles or tools that will help to understand how to qualify if a sites backlink profile is shady and should be avoided as a link prospect?
Link Building | | Luia0 -
Anchor text diversity - post penguin.
Hi, It seems that achor text diversity is hugely important post penguin but what's the best strategy? What kind of anchor text should I be going for? As I understand it more that 60% of links with the keywords in trigger a google flag. For example are the following good examples for the term 'wedding singer'? local wedding singer, best wedding singer, wedding singer website, hire wedding singer. Would these cause triggers in google as all contain the keyword 'wedding singer'? Or should I be going for: click here, visit us, listen now, view a profile Obviously these words don't contain the anchor text 'wedding singer' but with a few exact match #wedding singer' anchor texts and good on page SEO will this mix give better results?
Link Building | | SamCUK0 -
Exact match domains still work??
I'm sure this has been asked and it also has been answered but I'd like some insight from another SEO as to why this site -> <cite>www dot newhomesglasgow.co.uk/ </cite> is ranking on the first page for the keyword(you guessed it) 'new homes in glasgow' OSE shows about 4 backlinks. Is it just the content on the page(that's jammed with keywords) and the matching URL? Any feedback would be appreciated 🙂
Link Building | | DanHill0