Organic Rank Volitility
-
Does anyone else see their organic rankings fluctuating wildly. I have been tracking a few key keywords by literaly typing them in each morning and looking at results.
The pages I have been doing this for where without any doubt affected by Penguin as you can see the huge drop in traffic directly correlated to the Pegnuin deployment.
What is strange is one day these phrases will be on page one position 3 and two days later but on page3 to 5 or not ranked. Four days later back on page 1. These are wild fluctuations so it appears to me that I am observing Penguin tweaking ? Just wish the tweaking would stop on one of the days were our phases for this particular site are on page one.
Most people would check rankings weekly, monthly or quarter and would not perhaps be observing these crazy swings?
Thought?
-
John,
Believe me - we all understand how frustrating it can be, and how difficult it can be to go with the patience path. So I totally feel your pain!
-
Thanks for the thoughts. I get it. Anyone doing SEO on a site can only read and react with what is deemed appropriate and prudent changes.
I resubmitted a few key pages and was seeing if there was a quick reaction. I have never done this before and just thought it was strange and wondered if anyone had an explanation. I will go back to waiting for Moz to crawl and send me my campaigns reports.
Thanks to you both for the input. I am just very frustrated. We never received any warning from Google about link farms. Have really not done any back-linking in 5 or 6 years, have never been hit by any algorithmic change till now. While I figured one day it might happen it does not make it any less frustrating.
I realize I am too far down in the details those that say on here to just wait are nuts. Obviously some action is required or we would not have been knocked down.
-
Also be aware that it's a waste of time to frequently check to see if what you've done has helped you recover from Penguin. Penguin hit sites will ONLY see improvements if they have made the right changes, however that will only be reflected when Google actually refreshes the Penguin algorithm, and so far nobody has been able to report that a Penguin update has even happened yet.
Micromanagement of SEO is a death-knell. Do what you believe to be the right thing for the right reasons, and breathe....
-
I'd add to EGOL's response by offering this. Anyone who obsesses with checking rankings every day will miss bigger picture, longer-term trends. Every single day not only is Google testing, but there are countless other changes happening on the web to at least temporarily impact many results. Other sites in the same niche, news content, social media buzz, other SEOs working in the same niche... it all can impact short term results.
The other factor is if you're checking results while logged in to Google, and/or not using the &PWS=0 method for checking non-personalized results, because Google ALWAYS alters personalized results to one extent or another, and every search you do, further impacts ever next search. This is especially made worse because they're always wanting to algorithmically provide a variety of results, in the notion that if they do so, they may eventually give you something you'll click on and not return to search for.
-
I will take a look. I have never monitored rankings this closely before but we are making on-page changes and resubmitting in webmaster to try in help with the huge hit from Penguin.
So many opinions on things to do / change out there it is hard to know what to do but I figured a complete re-visit of key page on-page for all the product category pages was the first step.
So much is written about SEO but so little of it covers the unique issue that you have if you are doing e-commerce seo....for example if I have a category page and display 50 products per page on that category and 40 of the product have the keyword of the page in the product name. There is no way to really reduce the stuffing. The irony is I could reduce the stuffing but it would make the site less effective/ appropriate for the end user of the site.
If the on-page changed do not help I guess we will turn attention to getting more good backlinks to offset the non-sense site that have backlink to us for no good reason.
Back-links - I could rail for hours about this topic.
-
If you read the book: In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives by Steven Levy (recommended reading for any SEO) you will learn how many people get "test SERPs".
Google does a lot of testing and I believe that they have been especially active at testing recently.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking penalty: Limited to specific pages or complete website?
Hi all, Let's say few pages on the website dropped in the rankings due to poor optimisation of the pages or hit by algo updates. Does Google limits the ranking drop only to these pages or the entire website will have any impact? I mean will this cause ranking drop to the homepage for primary keyword? Will Google pose the penalty to other pages in the website if few pages drop in the rankings. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Fresh backlinks vs old backlinks: A solid ranking factor?
Hi Moz community, Backlinks being a major ranking factor, do they must be very recent or fresh to make a ranking difference compared to the backlinks which are years old? We know usually fresh content ranks well, but I wonder how much the fresh/recent backlinks impact in rankings. Do the years old backlinks from related and reputed website have same impact on rankings? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
6 year old Corporate domain lost all rankings on EMD day.
Hello, our company's website goo.gl/7Q56G lost all our rankings after the EMD algo update. Our domain is NOT a EMD. At the same time, I found that we have about 6000 new, extremely low quality spam backlinks with the same anchor text ("loan"). I saw some of those a few weeks ago, but didn't really pay much attention because I didn't believe Google would think we build those. I didn't get any messages on webmaster central. If this occurred with the EMD update, is it because of the low quality backlinks? Most of the real spammers, brokers (we are the actual funding source) are now dominating the top 10 for our main keyword "merchant cash advance". We were in the top 10 for the past 4 years, why would we get hit so hard now? I really appreciate your advice.
Algorithm Updates | | DaveMri1 -
Is there a utility that can tell me what keywords my site already ranks high for?
Ok... so I'm looking for a way to understand what my site already ranks high for.. I don't necessarily want to have to manually type in keywords. The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate to a client what keywords they're already ranking high for. Is there an easy way / tool to go about doing this? Thanks in advance, Gene
Algorithm Updates | | BGroup0 -
What determines rankings in a site: search?
When I perform a "site:" search on my domains (without specifying a keyword) the top ranked results seem to be a mixture of sensible top-level index pages plus some very random articles. Is there any significance to what Google ranks highly in a site: search? There is some really unrepresentative content returned on page 1, including articles that get virtually no traffic. Is this seriously what Google considers our best or most typical content?
Algorithm Updates | | Dennis-529610 -
Ranking Riddle Who Gets the #1 Spot?
Out of these two competitors, who should receive the #1 spot on Google for Furniture Stores in Delaware and why or why not? [see attached images] fb-url-data.png cohen-url-data.png fb-anchor.png cohen-anchor.png fb-on-page.png cohen-on-page.png
Algorithm Updates | | Getz.pro0 -
Difference in which pages Google is ranking?
Over the past two weeks I've noticed that Google has decided to change which pages on our site rank for specific keywords. The thing is, this is for keywords that the homepage was already ranking for. Due to our workload, we've made no changes to the site, and I'm not tracking any additional backlinks. Certainly there are no new deep links to these pages. In SEOmoz dashboard (and via tools/manual checking with a proxy) of the 24 terms we have first page ranking for, 9 of them are marked "new to top 50". These are terms we were already ranking for. Google just appears to have switched out the homepage for other pages. I've noticed this across a couple of client sites, too, though none to the extent that I'm seeing on our own. Certainly this isn't a bad thing, as the deeper pages ranking means that they're landing on the content they want first, and I can work to up the conversion rates. It's just caught me by surprise. Anyone else noticing similar changes?
Algorithm Updates | | BedeFahey1