Custom GA tracking and link value
-
Hi
I'm working on a real estate agents web site which has a lots of links coming from paid listings in real estate linstings sites (this in France so I'm not sure examples will mean anything but basically the agents have 900 house listings in each site and each listing has a backlink)
In analytics these are classified as referals and that's fine for the moment
But because sites provide different types of links, we are considering tagging all paid links with analytics utm codes. Mainly to learn which ads are actually providing qualified traffic (providing contacts).
I'm guessing that currently these links, there are thousands, bring seo value to my client's web site and are not considered as paid links.
Will adding the analytics codes to these links cause a loss of their value by clearly indicating to Google that we paid for them?
What's the current thinking on this? I'm tempted not to be worried about being honest about the origin of these links but I'm worried that there is a real danger of loosing current ranking
Any arguments FOR tagging paid links ?
Thanks for you help
- Neil
-
Hi Neil,
I'm looking at older questions that are still marked unanswered. Did you come up with a solution for this, or are you still looking for some advice?
-
Damion,
Thanks for the reply.
I do use advanced segments and it's also easy getting info from the All Traffic Sources report
But I do have some cases where one site can contain natural editorial links and paid banner ad links. Other cases where a page can have different types of links: on a banner or text link.
We're thinking about using analytics to distinguish these ; but I think that you're right, the main drag will be making sure that all links are actually updated correcly.
- Neil
-
Do you actually need to tag all the URLs? Are you able to create an advanced segment based on "if referrer = X OR if referrer = Y" ?
Tricky explaining this I guess, my apologies -- what I'm getting at is whether you can set up a relatively complex Advanced Segment in Analytics to bucket all these referral visits together. That way you can test how that segment performs in context to the rest of the site and other groups of users.
With URL tagging you're effectively giving the visitor an allocation before they hit Analytics. With the Advanced Segment route, you're allocating the visitor afterwards.
If this can work for you, I'd recommend it as as the more suitable route, mainly because it's easier to administer (asking 900 webmasters to change URLs, and to follow them up to make sure they've done it, would be a nightmare. Plus, there's always the chance that a non-tagged URL might slip through the net, and your data integrity becomes compromised.)
I'm personally not convinced that changing URL parameters has any significant effect on link juice or ranking, but I don't think that's the most important issue here -- in my opinion, you'd be much better off using advanced segments to track these visitors, and doing that doesn't require any modification of inbound URLs.
-
You could tag them and use rel canonical on your site to the untagged version of the URL.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Days to transaction - GA
Hi We have noticed a trend with days to transaction being high for May - June for Organic for 28+ days. Does anyone have any helpful articles or ideas on why this is happening for organic?
Reporting & Analytics | | BeckyKey0 -
GA Internal Site Search Correct Query Parameter?
Hi Guys, Recently added GA internal site search to a sub-folder: http://tinyurl.com/jhm9cyl Just want to confirm would the query parameter be: /search/ Or different because it's a sub-folder? Cheers.
Reporting & Analytics | | jayoliverwright0 -
Links On Expired Domains
Does anybody know if a link on an expired domain affects your SEO? I'm just asking because the SEO agency we used before used to create websites and then link to our company - very spammy. We have since ditched this agecny, however they wanted an extortionate amount to remove these links. Therefore, we decided to wait until these domains expired and then the links wouldn't exist. However, I am now completing a link audit and some of these sites are still appearing in the results (obtained from Link Research Tools) but I cannot access the links because the domains have expired. Can anyone help?
Reporting & Analytics | | AAttias0 -
ECommerce Tracking Code Installation
Hi All, Kindly explain how to implement eCommerce tracking code on the website.I am aware how to enable and generate eCommerce tracking code in Google Analytics but have confusion from website end.Also, where i read the steps, everywhere i read the below code: <script< span="">type="text/javascript"> var _gaq = _gaq ||[]; _gaq.push(['_setAccount','UA-XXXXX-X']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); _gaq.push(['_addTrans', '1234', // transaction ID - required 'Acme Clothing', // affiliation or store name '11.99', // total - required '1.29', // tax '5', // shipping 'San Jose', // city 'California', // state or province 'USA' // country ]); // add item might be called for every item in the shopping cart // where your ecommerce engine loops through each item in the cart and // prints out _addItem for each _gaq.push(['_addItem', '1234', // transaction ID - required 'DD44', // SKU/code - required 'T-Shirt', // product name 'Green Medium', // category or variation '11.99', // unit price - required '1' // quantity - required ]); _gaq.push(['_trackTrans']);//submits transaction to the Analytics servers (function(){ var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type ='text/javascript'; ga.async =true; ga.src =('https:'== document.location.protocol ?'https://ssl':'http://www')+'.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); ----------------------------------------</script<> In the above code specific transaction id, SKU/code are mentioned. What will be the modifications in the above code if i have to track all products present on my eCommerce website??
Reporting & Analytics | | RuchiPardal1 -
Google Webmaster Tools - When will the links go away!?
About 9 months back we thought having an extremely reputable company build our client some local citations would be a good idea. You definitely know this citation company, but I'll leave names out. Regardless, it's our mistake to cut corners. Google Webmaster Tools quickly picked up these new citations and added them to the links section. One of these citation spawned a complete mess of about 60K+ links on their network of sites through ridiculous subdomains of every state in the country and so many other domain variations. We immediately went into remove mode and had the site's webmaster take down the bad links from their site. This process took about a month for outreach. The bad links (60K+) have not been on the spam site for well over 6 months but GWT still shows them in the "links to your site" section. Majestic, Bing, and OSE only displayed the bad links for a brief time. Why is webmaster tools still showing these links after 6+ months? We typically see GWT update about every 2 weeks, a month tops. Any ideas? Could a changed robots.txt on the bad site prevent Google from updating the links displayed in GWT? We have submitted to disavow, but Google replied with "no manual penalty". We even blasted the bad site with Fiverr links, in hopes that Google would re-crawl them. No luck with anything we do. We have patiently waited for way too long. The rankings for this site got crushed on Google after these citations. How do we fix this? Should we worry about this? Any advice would really help. Thanks so much in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | zadro0 -
Problem with Enhanced Link Attribution
I set up Enhanced Link Attribution yestarday on two my websites, but it still doesn´t work. When I look at numbers of clicks at In-page analytics I see the same numbers of clicks for example on heading, read more button, thumbail of blogposts - so it doesn´t work. My GA code: <script type="<a class="attribute-value">text/javascript</a>"> var _gaq = _gaq || []; var pluginUrl = '//www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ga/inpage_linkid.js'; _gaq.push(['_require', 'inpage_linkid', pluginUrl]); _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'XXXX']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); script> Could you help me? thanks 🙂
Reporting & Analytics | | mysho0 -
Quantifying link building efforts
Does anyone have a way to quantify the value of link building efforts? I am trying to devote resources to improve our link building initiatives but is there any way to correlate it to page rank etc? I know you can't tie it down directly but any rough gauge or studies in the past that people may be aware of? Any thoughts on how you would tackle this question? I need to demonstrate the value it provides in a slightly more scientific manner than saying "it just helps". Thanks,
Reporting & Analytics | | NicB1
Nic0 -
Why is Benetton ranking with tracking parameters?
For this search: https://www.google.com/search?q=benetton&pws=0 I see the following URL ranking #1 http://www.benetton.com/?utm_source=centrum.sk&utm_medium=listing Why is this happening? I could likely figure it out but I'm busy so I was hoping someone could dig around and let me know 🙂 Anyone? Incidentally, Benetton is in the middle of a massive campaign at the moment so it's strange timing for them to have this showing up and screwing with their GA tracking... EDIT: I should clarify, Benetton is not a client - I don't know anyone who works for or with them. I'm just curious why this is showing up. cmNWx.png
Reporting & Analytics | | TomCritchlow1