Blocking spammy links
-
i have a client that that google has said in a reconsideration request has spmmy links.
My question is can i simply block those request at the server, make the server drop the responce rather then go though the imposible process of getting them removed?
Does anyone have any expirence with this?
Thanks
-
Hey Alan -
Great question here. I honestly do not know if that htaccess trick will work. I've heard it postulated that it will, but have not seen anything conclusive on it! Unfortunately reinclusion requests take some time. If you think that you have been targeted unfairly, I'd recommend making as much noise publicly as possible. Get in front of Google and plead your case.
As far as I see it, here are your options for the spammy links -
-
If it's a KEYWORD-SPECIFIC penalty to that page, 404 the page to disavow the links and build a new page on your domain targeting that term. Build good links to this.
-
If it's a sitewide drop in traffic, then you need to remove as many of the links as possible. There are tools out there to help with this, but generally you need to find low-PA/DA, exact anchors. These are going to be the ones that are hurting you most. Also look for sitewides with exact anchors that can be seen as manipulative.
-
Google wants to see "good faith" in getting links removed. So document all sites that you contact, the sites that get back to you, the links you get removed, and the links you know about that you have not been able to get removed, including reasons for why (ie 4 emails sent, no reply, cannot find an email on WhoIs, etc). You have to be completely transparent.
One tip for you is to share all of these links in a Google Doc, which you link to from the reinclusion request. Then, shorten the link within the reinclusion using a bit.ly link so that you can see if/when they look at the links.
Good luck man. I know how hard it is to wait on hearing back, having gone through it a few times myself.
John
-
-
will do
-
Alan - I haven't seen any postings by anyone who has tried this but several people have suggested this tactic in various forums. If you try this, please share whether it works. Given the lack of success in response to deletion requests, a more direct route would be much more effective and preferred if G wants to favor it.
-
I am doing so as we speak, but i am a impatient SEO, i want to know if i am wasting my time, a reconsideration takes weeks
but i will let all know the results
-
Ok, I can see how something like that might work... it all depends how Google's crawlers look at links when it comes to penalties like this. I haven't heard of anyone who has tried this, so you might just have to test it to see if it works. It would make a very interesting case study.
-
It is not just trafic that is blocked link juce would also be blocked. Search engines would get 64 - Host not available.
In the article Matt states that if you remove the page that will work, this is simular.
i am not saying it will work, just that this would not just stop trafic it would stop any request.
i think google when finding a link will test to see that the link exists.so in that way I think it would work, but a thought just hit me, what if they say ok, this page does ot exist and remoe it from index?
But then the next time they found it it would be added again.
It would be the best approch rather then contact evey web site, and as Ryan Kent stated, he had a 14% sucess rate.
-
I don't think it will work, Google isn't looking at whether traffic from the spam sites is blocked or not. Just the fact that the spammy links exist is enough for Google to penalize you for link manipulation.
Matt Cutt's did say yesterday that they are considering adding a "disavow link" feature in Webmaster Tools, but you won't see it for another few months, if at all:
http://searchengineland.com/live-blog-you-a-with-matt-cutts-at-smx-advanced-123513
The best thing to do in the meantime is to just attempt to remove the links and file a request.
-
Thanks,
I plan to put it in my recon request, but to wait weeks for an answer, is a bit of a problem.
i would have thought the idea would have more mentions on the net, but i cant find anyone with expirence
-
If nothing else you can use it as proof in a reconsideration request.
I don't have clients, and never been involved with black hat tricks so I have personally never been in the position to have to deal with it, but I am for nothing else curious.
-
Thats what i have done, but i dont want to sit and wait, I would like to know if it works.
Cant seem to find much on the internet about it.
My fgirst thoughts were that it would work, but maybe google worries you will just remove the rules after penalty is lifted.
-
HTTP_REFERER matching maybe a possibility, but I don't know if Google will see you're dropping them or not
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} stupidsite.com [NC]
RewriteRule .* - [F]I would be curious to see a case study on this.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We are moving to HTTPS and wanted to know if our link building efforts were in vain or will the link juice pass to HTTPS?
We are switching to HTTPS and want to make sure the links we've gotten in the past will still transfer since they are pointing to HTTP? I'd hate to go back through and ask people to please add an s to the link.
Link Building | | bryant25560 -
Any benefits to having Wikipedia links now they are 'no-followed' (apart from traffic and natural link prof.)
I see that Wikipedia outbound links are all no-followed, is there any benefit (aside from the traffic) for having links here now ? For example is their co-citation and co-occurance benefits. I know there is without the links since from seeing previous Moz content about this saying Google getting good at connecting brand/s and topic mentions on a page (without any links) so appreciate Wikipedia is still good for that sort of thing. And a no-followed link is obviously good for the potential traffic. But is there any additional SEO benefit to having a no followed link on a wikipedia entry/stub too ? (aside from its contribution to your no-followed links which in turn contribute to a natural looking link profile) Cheers Dan
Link Building | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Spammy Links in MOZ but when I go to the external link I can't find a link to us
I was going to try to contact webmasters to see if they would remove some of our spammy links. I see alot of them in MOZ but when you go to the site our anchor text is not there. Is this good? How often does MOZ refresh external links. Please see: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?site=www.totalvac.com None of the links for the anchor text <a class="clickable title link-pivot" title="See top linking pages that use this anchor text." data-text="vacuum cleaner parts vacuum parts vacuum bags vacuum cleaner bags" data-id="46391436859">vacuum cleaner parts vacuum part...</a> in MOZ exist? We got hit extremely hard by Penguin in May
Link Building | | totalvac0 -
Link Exchange
Hi everyone, I just started working for a client in a new niche. After reviewing the backlink profiles of his competitors I can see that the top sites are using a ton of link exchanges. They are from really spammy sites too. The kind that will link to anyone that provides a link back. Anyone else seeing much of this?
Link Building | | SixTwoInteractive0 -
Link Pharming
My company has been using an SEO company for a while and have built up our pagerank to a 6. However, we have noticed that they're involved in link pharming - they're buildng extra websites and linking to our site on them. We are not happy with this as we know it will only be a matter of time before Penguin hits us. The contract with the SEO company is coming up for renewal soon and we're thinking of cancelling it. However, we are not sure if the company will delete all our backlinks, which will probably decrease our PageRank too. Has anyone here ever had a similar experience? What did the SEO company do when you cancelled the contract? Does anyone here work for an SEO company and what do you do when someone cancels your service?
Link Building | | AAttias0 -
How do you check to see if your site (site A) has already been linked to by another site (site B) when you have a large site with lots of links
There are some basics in SEO relating to finding out about who has linked to whom that I could use some help with.
Link Building | | hughman0 -
Link footprints
Hi! I have question about link footprints. What should be taken into consideration? Is it real issue when your backlinks have heavy footprint? Thanks for answer..
Link Building | | asystematic1 -
Link building diagram
is there a simple chart or diagram that explains the linkbuilding process from start to finish? thank you, Vijay
Link Building | | vijayvasu0