ECommerce site - Duplicate pages problem.
-
We have an eCommerce site with multiple products being displayed on a number of pages.
We use rel="next" and rel="prev" and have a display ALL which I understand Google should automatically be able to find.
-
Should we also being using a Canonical tag as well to tell google to give authority to the first page or the All Pages. Or was the use of the next and prev rel tags that we currently do adequate.
-
We currently display 20 products per page, we were thinking of increasing this to make fewer pages but they would be better as this which would make some later product pages redundant . If we add 301 redirects on the redundant pages, does anyone know of the sort of impact this might cause to traffic and seo ?.
General thoughts if anyone has similar problems welcome
-
-
Many thanks , you have been most helpful.
Yes, I see your point. I think we will have a look at implementing this on a couple of categories where we can monitor traffic and rankings . Then if it looks good, then will roll it out to the rest of the site.
Thank you.
Sarah
-
Essentially yes - pages 2+ of search just look "thin" to Google. They tend to have similar title tags, META descriptions, etc., and Google honestly isn't all that fond of indexing search pages in the first place (they don't want their search to land on your search). Those 2+ pages also don't tend to attract links or make a lot of sense for someone landing on them. By using META NOINDEX,FOLLOW, Google can crawl those searches to deeper pages, but the actually search pages don't dilute your overall site and search index.
Google's preferred method (or so they say) in 2012 is rel=prev/next, but I find that implementation can be much trickier than META NOINDEX. It's a difficult topic, and I honestly find that the ideal approach varies wildly from site to site. It's important to plan well, implement careful, and measure the results.
-
Hi Peter,
Many thanks for your answer. Very comprehensive and much appreciated There's certainly some good suggestions here.
Just quickly you mention about putting a NOINDEX FOLLOW on every page from 2 or 3 onwards.I take it , that's because later pages don't rank to well ?.
Is that the suggestion so the idea behind it that the link juice is being diluted to much. By Keeping only the first 2 pages say indexed etc, I would stand a better chance of ranking higher.
I will pass your suggestions on to my developer and see what we can come up from it. Will monitor and report back , hopefully with a sorted solutioin.
Once again , many thanks for sound advice.
Sarah.
-
Unfortunately, pagination + sorts gets ugly fast. Technically, the rel=prev/next tag should contain the sort parameter AND then you should canonical to the main pagination page. So, for example if you had a page like:
www.example.com/search.php?page=2&sort=asc
You should have tags like:
- Rel=Prev: http://www.example.com/search.php?page=1&sort=asc
- Rel=Next: http://www.example.com/search.php?page=3&sort=asc
- Canonical: http://www.example.com/search.php?page=2
In practice, it's incredibly hard to implement. So, you could do a couple of things:
(1) Block the sort_by parameter with Google Webmaster Tools parameter handling
(2) Use META NOINDEX, FOLLOW on all pages 2+ of search and sort URLs
I don't find Robots.txt works that well, in practice, and 800K blocked URLs can make Google jump. I'm actually confused by how Google is crawling the sorts at all (since they're form-driven). It looks like you put the sorts in your pagination links. Would it be possible to store any sorts in a cookie or session variable and not add those to links?
Given your current situation, and that Google has indexed thousands of sort URLs (from what I can see), I think the Google Webmaster Tools approach might be the safest. This is a complex problem, though, and you may need to consult someone.
-
Hi ,
In Answer to your point on to Question 2 , Currently the maximum number of pages we have is 4 pages plus a View All for a few of our products but most products are split on 2 pages plus a view all.
For the largest product example we have 83 products broken down as Page 1 to 4 has 20 products , page5 has 3 and View all - 83 products. rel Prev and rel Next are on the pages and View all has Nothing on it (Is that okay). The title tags are duplicated on the numerous pages , so I was going to add in page 2, 3, 4 etc to sort that.
I was going to increase the number of products per page to 30 , which would in effect put me down to 3 pages plus View all but more importantly , I thought I would also get stronger link value and less dilution hence better SEO .
The pages don't rank partially well at all well but on google speed test, I think we score 85/100 anyway , so from a speed point of view, it should'nt be a problem. Was just worried, that big changes like this could have a dramatic effect .
The url incase your interested is http://www.bestathire.co.uk/rent/Scaffold_towers/266
Many thanks
Very much appreciated.
Sarah.
-
Hi ,
Many Thanks for your reply,
We do have pagination and sorts like listing products a-z , z-a , price low to high and high to low etc which all generate different urls but we have put in the robot.txt file for google not to spider them. See below .
Also from looking at WMT is says it has blocked886,996 url's in the past 90 days. Our site has approx 54,000 indexed pages.
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.price%20ASC
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.price%20DESC
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.title%20ASC
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.title%20DESC
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.distance%20ASC
Disallow: */sort_by:Product.distance%20DESC
Disallow: */stealth:onAre you suggesting we do the Canonical the sorts aas well for saftey incase we have missed anything ?
Sarah
-
(1) DON'T canonical to the first page of results - Google definitely has issues with that. If you've got rel=prev/next in place, then I wouldn't canonical to "View All", either. They're kind of competing signals. You can use rel=prev/next with rel=canonical, but it's a bit complicated. Basically, it's for situations where you have pagination AND some other parameter, like a sort.
(2) If you increase it, just make sure it doesn't negatively impact users or load-times (might be worth A/B testing, honestly). Are you saying that you might end up with a URL like "?page=7" which basically doesn't exist because now you'll have less pages? I think you might be safer just letting that 404 and have Google recrawl the new structure. The odds of having any links to Page 7 of search results (inbound links, that is) are very low, and just letting those pages die off may be safer.
-
I think the best solution to get something properly done on your website, if you're displaying a page with 20 products (by default) and it has a complicated extension to see the next one ( domain.com/?abc=123etc#321 ) you have a significant problem that you should be concerned about more - whether it's domain.com/category/page/1/ and page/2/.
In theory, page/1/ and page/2/ (blog style) contain the same content as the home page (/1/ or /). Some practices are noindex,follow for any page [2-∞). You should definitely consider rel=canonical across the site though. It's essential. As well as rel="next" rel="prev".
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Drupal duplicate pages
Anyone else encountered massive numbers of duplicate pages being reported on SEO Moz crawls for Drupal based sites? I assumed it was b/c there was no redirect on the print format pages, so I fixed that with a cannonical tag. But still seeing 2 or 3 duplicate pages reported for many pages. Any experience fixing this would be awesome to hear about. Thanks, Kevin
Technical SEO | | kevgrand0 -
Has anyone had problems with google webmaster tools verified sites
Hi, i have just been into google webmaster tools and i have noticed that five of my websites are no longer verified. i have tried putting the code back into the head and also i have tried verifying it through google analaystics but nothing is working can anyone let me know what has happened and if anyone has noticed this regards
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
We have duplicate page titles on the footer menu section of our site. Is this considered spammy?
When our new site was in development stages our digital agency convinced me that we should have duplicate menu links in the footer section of the site. The general justification being that the menu links are key word relevant. I have received opposing opinion from SEO advisers indicating that these duplicate menu links could be considered 'spammy'. I would appreciate some views on this please
Technical SEO | | saints0 -
Keyword targeting by page, site, or both?
Hi, We recently discovered that a product we sell has a misnomer, and that a ton of people take to Google and use variations of that misnomer while trying to find us. Unfortunately we don't rank in Google for this keyword, and its costing us thousands in lost sales. I've been slowly building the misnomer into the content of our site in hopes that the spiders will pick up on it. It has started to work in the last couple weeks, but we're nowhere near the top (and we are #1 and #2 for most of our other prime keywords.) The site which sells the product is specialized, and only sells this specific product (in different models, but they're all the same product essentially.) With that in mind, I'm trying to figure out the best way to attack a new keyword. I know that normally you would dedicate a specific page (in an eCommerce store probably that product's own page) to employ your SEO tactics. However, because this site specializes in this product and offers different models and information about it I'm confused about the best approach. Does Google take into consideration the entire site a s whole, or are the pages within my site competing against each other for rank?
Technical SEO | | ninjaprecision0 -
Redirecting one ecommerce site to another
Hi I'm planning to redirect one large ecommerce site to another. Here's how I was thinking of doing it: crawl both sites with Xenu and export urls to a CSV match urls where possible, redirecting pages from site A to relevant ones in site B all others will be redirected to site B's home page Now, I'm dealing with thousands of URLs here, so any way to make it easier would be great. Could this mean just redirecting all of Site A's pages to Site B's homepage would be worth it? Or does redirecting relevant pages where possible seem the best idea? Thanks guys!
Technical SEO | | neooptic0 -
Htm vs. aspx page extensions & duplicate content
We have a client whose site is fairly new. There isn't much in the way of SEO results so far. In their content management system they have implemented friendly URLs and changed the extensions from aspx to htm. Now the htm pages are all indexed in Google but when I run a campaign report in SEOmoz it shows that all pages are duplicated with there being both htm and aspx pages for each page. Should we do 301 redirects from the aspx pages to the htm pages? Or would we be safe by removing the htm pages and letting Google reindex the site with the aspx page extensions? Does Google have any kind of preference as to what the page extensions are as long as the URLs include keywords?
Technical SEO | | IvieDigital0 -
Are lots of links from an external site to non-existant pages on my site harmful?
Google Webmaster Tools is reporting a heck of a lot of 404s which are due to an external site linking incorrectly to my site. The site itself has scraped content from elsewhere and has created 100's of malformed URLs. Since it unlikely I will have any joy having these linked removed by the creator of the site, I'd like to know how much damage this could be doing, and if so, is there is anything I can do to minimise the impact? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Nobody15569050351140