Penguin: Carry On & Hope Or Start A New Site
-
I'm at a loss and no so-called SEO agency/expert I've hired appears to know the main causes of our post-Penguin downfall of our traffic.
To set the scene, I set up a voucher code site (www.ozvouchercodes.com.au) in Australia 3 years ago and since, it's been growing very well up until Google launched the Penguin update in April.
Having read as much as I could on the update my understanding is toxic links cause the slap. For on-site I've checked the site and tried to reduce keywords [spamming], increased [unique] content across the site and made sure there are as few instances of duplicate content as possible.
To attempt to understand my back link profile I've used SEOmoz & Link Detective as the current SEO agency give me little visibility on this.
It appears we're a little top heavy with 32% & 11% of are keywords containing 'coupons' and 'promotion codes' respectively. Consequently we no longer appear on those two terms but also hundreds of other terms we once appeared in the top 3 postitions.
The Link Detective report downloaded also appears to have a number of back links with the words 'Penalized' and 'Banned' next to them. Unfortunately there is no explanation on Link Detective whether this needs action or not.
My current SEO agency suggest that we have been too focused on a limited number of keywords and that a few more months of diversifying the range will solve it.
So do I spend another £X amount for 3-6 months of SEO or drop the site on a new URL and start again.
Any ideas?
Any help is very welcome & appreciated.
Henry
-
Thank you for sharing that story. It all makes sense. Using an automated link building script to create spam links with "natural" anchor text.
I wonder how the site owners will react when Google improves their algorithm next and all the old links PLUS all the new ones need to be removed. What a mess.
-
Ryan - Thanks for taking the time to discuss Penguin recovery. Your initial thread and follow-up Moz article were very informative. On a lighter note, I moderate all of the comments to my blog. I almost fell out of my chair laughing when an automated spamer targeted the keywords "click here". LOLZ. I suppose they were going to use a bot to attempt to spam a more "natural" link profile. Only one comment like it I've seen and I was tempted to award a small amount of creativity points although their clients are probably being sold a terrible bill of goods about how to acquire a "natural" link profile.
-
Hey Henry, if you put this work out to 'seo experts' you are pretty much a victim of the system and bad advice (and people making a quick buck like you say). Sorry buddy, hope it works out for you. Marcus
-
Thank you for your help Marcus.
Whilst I have some knowledge of SEO it was good of you to put my sites situation into perspective with an honest answer to help me make a better decision.
All the best.
-
Thanks Ryan for your help. I wish I had the knowledge and help a few years back when I first started. I put my trust in to 'SEO experts' who quite possibly acted as agents on behalf of cheap out-sourced labour from developing countries with the aim of earning a quick buck. I'll do some sums and work out whether I want to start again or not.
-
**It appears we're a little top heavy with 32% & 11% of are keywords containing 'coupons' and 'promotion codes' respectively. **
You understand the basic problem... but you are sugar-coating it with the words "a little". Get rid of all of these links or move any worthwhile content to a new domain. After you have done than then stop "building links" and start earning them.
-
Hey Henry
I have just taken a quick look at your link profile in open site explorer and I think your agency is being wildly optimistic. Simply, adding more links with a wider variety of keywords is simply not going to work. Likewise, if they are using the same historical approaches to add the links then they are likely to dig you an even bigger hole.
There is only one well documented case of recovery I am aware of being the WPMU site and they were fortunate in that they could remove a huge swathe of links in one fell swoop. Looking at your link profile, you don't have any such options.
Some very quick statistics here.
1400 linking domains
- 300 approx are branded (various)
- 100 branded + keyword (various)
- 1000 keywords only (various)
Then, anchor text is only part of the picture, looking at the sites that are linking to you, they are pretty weak in general. Link farms, content farms, article sites - it's a real mess! In fact, I have not found one good to honest link that is not from a spun, barely literate article.
So, what do you do? Well, in my mind, the first thing you should do is clean up the mess and see if you can bounce back. But you have some real work to do here, no doubt about that.
I wish I could give you happier news but when it comes to applying the phrase 'toxic link profile' then your link profile is just that. Lots and lots of, and I hesitate to even use the word, 'articles' with links to your site but they are clearly outsourced webspam articles written by someone who's first language was not english.
It's very hard to advise the exact course of action, but certainly, just 'throwing some more links at it' is not the way to go here. Any work you do should be to clean up but looking at your link profile, I have looked at about 100 links and not found one that was not a 100% total webspam.
The fact of the matter is, your site, and your marketing is exactly the deliberate manipulation of search results which Google has been targeting so it may be that starting again is your best approach. Certainly, if out of that 1400 links, if there are such a small percentage of real, honest links, then that may be your only real choice.
Google has targeted three things of late:
- link farms
- web spam
- artificial links
Unfortunately, your site is (was) propped up by artificial links from web spam on link farms - so to dig your way out of this hole could be tough and may leave you with little actual link equity to make it worthwhile.!
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news so don't shoot the messenger!
Marcus
-
Henry,
I encourage you to read this article: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012
My current SEO agency suggest that we have been too focused on a limited number of keywords and that a few more months of diversifying the range will solve it.
I hear this advice a lot and to be quite candid, it pisses me off.
Google's message is quite clear and it has been for some time. STOP BUILDING LINKS AND START EARNING THEM. The point of Penguin is to penalize sites which built links in an effort to manipulate search ranking. The manner is which Penguin identifies links currently is to examine anchor text.
Many SEOs have the idea that all they need to do to fix manipulative links is fix the anchor text. It is shocking to see how many people are confusing the mechanism with the message.
White hat SEO....the kind of SEO which does not get penalized....is about building value for clients. It's about never having to worry that a client's site will be penalized. It sounds like you paid an agency in the past to build manipulative links on your behalf, and the result is your site is now penalized. So the solution they are proposing is to build more manipulative links to your site, but this time the links will be disguised better.
Could this solution work? It might! The question is...for how long. I predict Penguin will continue to evolve in a similar manner to Panda. If that is true, Google will continue to focus on manipulative links and get better at detection just how Panda continues to improve its ability to detect low quality content. IF that happens, then paying for more links to be built is likely a very bad idea for the long term health of your site.
As far as ideas, you can clean up your link profile by removing the bad links to your site, or find another domain. Those are the only two choices I would recommend.
Please note this advise is controversial and many SEOs will disagree. The advice offered is mine which you are welcome to take or leave.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Bad Links to New Domain - Do I Disavow?
About 2 months ago a new client of mine bought a domain and we built him a nice new site; however, it appears the previous owner of the domain used some spammy SEO tactics. I've had to redirect about 30 pages and now I've found some spammy links. I've only discovered a few of them, but he doesn't have that many links yet so I'm wondering what kind of impact this will have. Is it worth disavowing a half dozen links? The sites are in Chinese and appear to be unmanaged link farms so getting the webmaster to remove them is unlikely. Also wondering what else is lurking out there that I haven't discovered yet... I suggested to the client we consider a different domain since the site is new, but he's become pretty attached to it. Any ideas?
Link Building | | Dino640 -
Spam Links sent to my site.
Hello, I'll try to be concise as I can. I run a coupon codes site.
Link Building | | affigroup
Today when I loggein in webmaster tools I noticed many new links to my website. And all to a single page. (mydomain.com/stores/companyname).
I tend to think that spam was made by the person who owns that company because he/she used achors related to his bussiness rather than the company name + coupon or company name + discounts. Besides the fact that these links have no value and created automatically by software there are also links from pornographic websites. (bet he paid someone on fiverr for link building and made my website tier 1) I was thinking of 2 options:
1. I remove that page from my website. (mydomain.com/stores/hiscompany) and use disallow. Not sure I can find all the links poiting to that page.
2. Redirect that page mydomain.com/stores/company to hiscompany.com so he can enjoy his spam. I would appreciate if someone can answer me.1 -
Penguin 2.0 Loss of rankings
Hi all, My website http://www.tomlondonmagic.com has been hit hard by penguin. I was rank 1 for magician london, magician in london, magicians in london and now am ranking around 3-4 😞 I need to recover fast, anyone have any idea how to do this, what strategy to employ. It would be much appreciated as I have never been hit by an update so not sure on how to recover from one. Thanks!
Link Building | | TomLondon1 -
Wordpress & On-Page Optimization
Seomoz, Our current SEO provider built a squeeze page using Wordpress. http://www.buddyrents.com/rent-to-own-furniture/spring-hill-34608/ The page has minimal links and the one drop-down menu links to other pages that look exactly the same with the exception of the page name and Google map. Since the pages were built a 2 years ago there have been zero copy changes or code changes until a few weeks ago, yet the provider maintains that there is a maintenance charge to make sure the pages function correctly and are easily read by Google. This sounds like a made up charge. Wordpress pages like these should be pretty stable and search friendly. Am I missing something? Is this common to charge for SEO, On-page SEO and Maintenance for pages that have not changed and only rank if you actually enter the long-tail keywords that match the page title? They also don't create a lot of traffic, but the provider says they are essential to our online footprint. The pages have a PA of 1 and the below on-page links (the exact same links for all 120 pages) | Internal Followed Links | 23 |
Link Building | | Buddys
| Internal Nofollow Links | 0 |
| External Followed Links | 3 |
| External Nofollow Links | 0 | Thank you in advance for your insight!0 -
Remove links after Penguin?
My site did not get hit. I am worried that Google will come back and get me for those anchor-text links I built a while back. They are of low to medium quality guest posts. Should I remove my old low-quality links? What about those on sites and pages that have been deindexed by Google? Any point in removing those? I know we can only speculate at this point, but would really appreciate some opinions on this. Has the trend in the past been a slight rollback after a big algorithm update like this? Or could we expect to see more and more sites being penalized? -Mathias
Link Building | | mathiasppc0 -
Link building for ecommerce site
What are your recommendations for the best link building strategy for a B2C ecommerce site?
Link Building | | DenverKelly0 -
What are good sites to get no-follow links from?
Yahoo Answers is a good one. What other sites have you guys used to get no-follow links? Blog comments excluded from this.
Link Building | | qlkasdjfw0 -
Same IP for sites & linkbuilding - negative signal for search engines?
Let's say you have 40 websites which share the same IP and you place links to them on a bunch of sites (directories, blogs), albeit on different pages on these sites. Will search engines (google) see that they use the same IP and start having the links not-pass link juice based on that same IP?
Link Building | | qlkasdjfw0