Why are we not seeing similar traffic patterns in a new market?
-
Good afternoon!
We have a large real estate site with over 400,000 urls. We do pretty well with long-tailed search terms (like addresses--- 123 Main Street, Atlanta GA) so we get a decent amount of traffic (3,500-4,000 uniques a day). 2 months ago we opened up in a new market (Nashville) and hoped to see similar traffic for that market after a few of months, but so far we haven't. In fact, we only get about 200 visits a day. I can't seem to figure out why it's taking so long for us to generate similar traffic in Nashville that we see in Atlanta. All of the Nashville properties are in our sitemap and are being indexed by Google. Any ideas why we aren't seeing similar effects?Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
David
-
400,000 isn't an unreasonable number of pages on a real estate site if they have reasonable amounts of unique content and the pages are implemented well within the site.
That said, it's much more difficult to pull off with a site that has lower DA & PA and few links.
-
True, I don't think site size will by itself hurt you, but I do think there is something to building your site up over time.
I think having a great first impression goes a long way. If google finds the bathroom stall before it sees the grand lobby then google my just quite at " this is a crap website."
... granted, I've never built a website with 400,000 pages... I mean there are a lot of bugs in the world, but would you read 400,000 pages about pest control?
-
Here are a few of the questions I would start with from what you have asked:
- How much of each site's traffic is coming from Google?
- How many inbound links does the original site have?
- How thin is the content of the new site?
- How quickly were the 400,000 pages added to the new site?
- How many of those pages are indexed by google right now?
- How original is the content?
While domain age in of itself isn't always a factor, a site's history in the search engine is. I am going to assume that your new site is created dynamically. If you simply plop down 400,000 pages then it's going to take some time for google index and evaluate all of those pages. Whereas your older site may have started with more history. It may have begun with a few less pages and gradually built up.
From my own personal experience, I have used the same format on several different websites and while it would seem that since the formula is the same and the search engine is using the same set of rules, I still get varying results. The formula works most of the time so I just move on and let the sites simmer. If formula A never kicks in then I move to formula B.
You may want to try a different city to check your formula A and make sure that your first success wasn't just lucky.
-
Number of URLs alone independent of anything else shouldn't be a reason to randomly deindex a lot of your site to an arbitrary number. Can you offer any more background on your suggestion?
-
You say that you have "400,000 urls" and you do not seem to realize that THIS is the problem!
You need to de-index a lof your site to gain the trust back from Google.
Trust does not come from having 400.000 urls - it comes by having 200 + good pages with original content per location.
-
Hi David,
I'm following up on older questions that are still marked unanswered. Are you still seeing this discrepancy, or has it sorted itself out now that you've had the site up longer? Are you still looking for advice about this issue?
-
It looks like the disparity of traffic is largely due to your recent entry into the market, the primary contributor to the SEO factors already mentioned. Many factors are at play, as usual, and here are some interesting sidenotes:
(According to Wikipedia)
The Atlanta metropolitan area, with 5,268,860 people,<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference">[4]</sup> is the third largest in the Southern United States and ranks fourth in the number of Fortune 500 companies headquartered within city boundaries, behind New York City, Houston, and Dallas. Atlanta Metropolitan Area ranks as the 10th largest cybercity (high-tech center) in the US, with 126,700 high-tech jobs (tech jobs=high turnover=more home sales=internet savvy population).
Atlanta is far more dynamic in the real-estate market than Nashville
The Nashville metropolitan area = 1,600,358
Music industry professionals don't tend to move around much, especially country music industry professionals.
My opinion: with time and some SEO effort, you can reduce the traffic gap, but not close it.
-
In order to rank for specific terms you must have relevant links with the right anchor text to those pages. If you have just made more pages and are only linking to yourself then you are effectively trying to just tell everyone that you are an authority without anyone else's opinion. So if you aren't being voted for (ie linked to) by other pages to say that your Nashville pages are what they are then you may just have a whole lot of low authority pages and need to build up more value.
Taking a look at your site you only have a little over 1000 links to your site with most of them going to the domain. deep linking is going to be key to your success or else you are trying to determine your own relevance.
hope this helps
-
This is a side note to the previous comments. You can try to boost your rankings quickly (quick is relative) with social media metrics. This is a real-estate agent in my city, http://hometourgoodness.com/ he gets a lot of interaction on Facebook and Twitter. If you are able to engage in social media you will boost your in-bound traffic, and help serps.
-
For me this is guess work as I don't know the URLs, but is it possible that people in Nashvile use other search terms than you are ranking for or have other ways to search for property? ans do you use those search terms as well? I've seen somthing simular within Germany where it turned out people were using a slightly different version of the keywords.
Are all pages in the Nashville section being measured properly? Is the GA code implemented on all the pages? As you mention that you have only 70% of traffic compared to that of Atlanta.
And I think it could also be a matter of trust. is your brand new in the Nashville area? Than people might be more responsive towards your competitors.
Geddy
-
Hi Barry-
We are not ranking as well for Nashville, but we follow the same formula for links/layout in both markets. We don't have any inbound links to property pages (example: http://clickscape.com/9753-Palmeston-Place-0-Johns-Creek-GA), but we rank on the first page of SERPs in Atlanta for these similar long-tailed terms due to site architecture/navigation. The formula is not working in Nashville and I was just curious if there was a reason why that might be.
Also, you are correct. The search volume in Nashville is about 70% of the volume in Atlanta so that definitely plays a role.
-
Are you ranking as well for terms in Nashville the same as Atlanta?
I would imagine other sites are outranking you and you need to build 'Nashville' specific links into some of your pages to start showing up.
Also are the search volumes for real estate terms as large in Nashville as Atlanta?
A combination of all of these could be the cause of the lower search volumes.
-
All thing being equal, the age of a domain accounts for a very tiny amount of ranking weight, if any at all. It's not really ever a reason I would give for why a website is or is not ranking for any given set of terms.
-
First, are you being outranked by competitors? Try doing some long tail searches similiar to what you get for areas like Atlanta.
If you seem to be ranking for those searches just as well as you normally would, it could be that areas like Nashville have less heavy internet users. Keep in mind that you're likely to have more results for a good ranking result based in NYC compared to the boondocks of Oregon... simply because of the number of people in the area searching for the item in quesiton.
-
Some of the following will be guesswork since you didn't provide any URLs, but I'll try my best. This old (Atlanta targeted) website, has it been around for a (quite) longer time than the newer (Nashville) domain? Besides the amount of links the older domain has most likely collected, domain age appears to influence ranking on its own (even though only slightly, #10 in the ranking factors http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors). Does the Nashville targeted website have the same amount of local (and related) backlinks as the Atlanta targeted website? You've mentioned that the Nashville website is only live for about 2 months, which I'd consider a really short time to draw any real conclusions to be honest.
With some more time and the same effort as you've put into the Atlanta targeted website, I'm sure the new one will perform in a similar fasion!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Over the last few months i have seen a huge spike in traffic from foreign countries
In GA i have seen a huge spike in traffic from foreign countries like japan, china, brazil, germany. the bounce rates are almost all 100%. any ideas why this is occurring?
Reporting & Analytics | | dhanson240 -
Strange Traffic Spike In Google Analytics
Over the last two days I have seen a huge spike in the pageviews to my site www.learnbonds.com. Up to this point my average page views per visit has been less than 2. For the last couple of days it has jumped to 5 but the average time on the site has not increased. Upon further investigation under the browser and OS page of google analytics I found that traffic coming from internet explorer and IE with Chrome Frame is reporting 10+ pageviews per visit. Below is a screenshot. Any insight into what might be causing this and how to fix it that the community can provide would be appreciated. Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | davidwaring
DaveZUaQWJd.png?1?21800 -
Organic Traffic down after WordPress switch.
I recently switched our company's website over to Wordpress in February. Organic traffic went down.... http://www.screencast.com/t/dJ0Oeyma5Xs Same content, there are a few different page URLs but most of all it is all the same and I've SEO'd it to pieces. Any thoughts? I can't figure this one out.
Reporting & Analytics | | SteveZero120 -
Google Analytics tracking code for completely new website
Hello! I use Google Analytics to monitor our company's websites. In the coming weeks we will roll out a brand new website for one of our brands to replace its current site. The domain name will remain the same. My question is, should I use the same tracking code that's been used on the existing site for the new site, or is there a benefit to creating a new tracking code? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | SmileMoreSEO
Erik0 -
Magic UVs - PPC landing pages delivering organic traffic by magic...
I have checked and double checked this. GA is showing over the last couple of weeks mysite.com/ppc/landingpage1 as a landing page for organic traffic, where it shouldn't. Main facts: The entire /ppc/ folder is blocked from the googlebot, and doesn't appear on any internal site maps. As far as I can tell, these pages have never been cached for the main index. I cannot recreate any of the organic searches myself (i.e. typing in keywords that triggered the traffic, even the almost unique long-tail ones). We just don't appear in the organic listings with these pages. The analytics and adwords accounts are linked. We are not paying for this mystery traffic through our PPC - these keywords are not appearing in our AdWords account (though other keywords / traffic are). The traffic is real - we have received phone calls from these pages, tracked to the visits recorded as organic These pages should only receive PPC traffic. They are receiving organic traffic also, but I can't recreate it. Can anyone suggest what's going on? I'm concerned about duplicate content issues and also skewing the analysis of the PPC campaign. Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | RobPell0 -
Standard % of nonbranded organic search traffic?
I am working on developing goals for 2012. I will be doing several SEO projects, including one on a website for study abroad programs. Currently, nonbranded organic search is 15.49% of our visits and in 2010, it was 15.02%. I am wondering if anyone has any advice or knows of a benchmark percentage that could help me set an attainable goal. Thank you!!
Reporting & Analytics | | CIEEwebTeam0 -
Segmenting traffic from referring sites in GA
Most of our traffic is from Referring sites, and in referring sites, job sites are sending most of the traffic. How can we segment traffic from job sites. There are about 40 such sites. We would like to receive a report which shows traffic excluding from these job sites.
Reporting & Analytics | | seoug_20050 -
Why do I get lots of traffic from a bizarre keyword?
Bit of an odd one but I've been getting a large and steady stream of traffic over the last few months from a very random keyword that according to addwords figures shows "on data". Its our second biggest referring term only beaten by our brand name. We get more traffic from this term than keywords we have invested a lot of time in that show thousands of traffic volume in addwords. When looking at behavioral data its gets odder, a bounce rate of 98.11% time on site 2 seconds and page visits 1.02. So this traffic isn't real traffic and it's not real people. So my questions are, what is it? why do we get this random traffic, has anyone els noticed things like this and is it a problem? I presume it must be something to do with some sort of spam but apart from that i'm stumped. It's just one of those things that has been bugging me so I would appreciate any help. Kind Regards Paul
Reporting & Analytics | | pauldoffman0