Wordpress & use of 'www' vs not for webmaster tools - explanation needed
-
I am having a hard time understanding the issue of canonization of site pages, specifically in regards to the 'www' or 'non-www' versions of a site. And specifically in regards to wordpress.
I can see that it doesn't matter whether you type in 'www' or not in the url for a wordpress site, what is going on in the back end that allows this?
When I link up to google webmaster tools, should i use www or not?
thanks for any help
d
-
Thanks Christopher.
Sorry I'm not quite sure what the code you have supplied is for? My site currently works fine with or without the 'www' - but does the code you have supplied acheive something else?
thanks
d
-
The issue is www.EXAMPLE.com and EXAMPLE.com are considered two different websites, and Google may split the links in if people are linking to both versions. A 301 redirect tells Google to assume all links are pointed at one version.
Your Question: I can see that it doesn't matter whether you type in 'www' or not in the url for a wordpress site, what is going on in the back end that allows this?
My Answer: This is not WordPress, it is your web host. Most LAMP webhosts will automatically server your website with our without "WWW". WordPress will create the links on the pages it creates to the one specified in your settings, but the site will come up weather or not you use "WWW."
To Address the Concern: Because you are using WordPress, you are probably on Apache, so add this to your .htaccess file in the root directory.
After:
END WordPress
Add:
Rewrite all old filenames RewriteEngine on
Options +FollowSymlinks
rewritecond %{http_host} ^EXAMPLE.com [nc] rewriterule ^(.*)$ http://www.EXAMPLE.com/$1 [r=301,nc]Test with and without "WWW." Test with a different browser.
-
Hi Joseph, do you run into any SSL errors by using absolute links especially with images? I hate when you get an error message on secure pages saying that some content is not secure would you like to see it... do you think leaving the http part out is a better idea for sites that have SSL pages, use something like www.mydomain.com instead?
Thanks!
-
Hello David,
When you install wordpress it installs the files which can be found with or without the www.
On the settings page you can add the www as the version you want to use.
What is going on in the back that allows this ? => ( .htacess file re-write rules)
Your host should have rewrite rule available via .htacess file This will rewite all the pages on the site to which ever version you choose.
then in your webmaster account choose the www. version as well.
Redirecting your site to one version or the other is going to reduce two versions of your site down to one version so you do not have duplicate content issues or penalties.
I always use the full url (absolute link) with the www.for several reasons below.
This should always be used in your links within your site and the code as well.
Absolute link example is = http://www.your-site-url.com
-
easier and faster for search engines to follow
-
safer when worried about site hijacking
-
works better in emails ( make sure a visitor gets to the right page)
-
better if your content gets stolen and the thief does not take time to check and fix all the code (i actually caught someone who stole one of my sites content this way )
If you use one version all the time you are also going to make sure you get all your link benefits to the right domain and not split between the two.
Some seo's and many web designers don't use the full url to save time and code bloat of the site. Myself as well as many other think the absolute link has added benefits.
I hope that helps.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Www to non-www redirect without loop still necessary?
Hi Guys, My question is: Is it still necessary to redirect www. to non www. version of your website or other way around?
Technical SEO | | gaben
I ask because I feel that Google should be able to read these as the same by now. Thank you in advance.
Gabe0 -
Help! added WWW to wordpress site and now lost SEO ranking
Hi there Everyone! I have recently added a www to my wordpress website by going to settings>general and adding "www" to the wordpress address and the site address. After i did that i lost my SEO ranking, and also that MOZ is detecting that im getting site crawl issues stating that i have duplicate pages. an example is below: http://www.mefco.co.nz/news http://mefco.co.nz/news any ideas on how to fix this?
Technical SEO | | jfactor0 -
Duplicate Content Showing up on Moz Crawl | www. vs. no-www.
Hello Moz Community! I am new to SEO, Moz and this is my first question. My questions; I have a client that is getting flagged for Duplicate Content. He is getting flagged for having two domains that have the same content i.e. www.mysite.com & mysite.com. I read into this and set up a 301 redirect through my hosting site. I evaluated which site had a stronger Page Authority and had the weaker site redirect to the stronger site. However, I am still getting hit for Duplicate pages caused by the www.mysite.com & mysite.com being duplicates. How should I go about resolving this? Is this an example of a Canonical tag needed in the head of the HTML? Any direction is appreciated. Thank You. B/R Will H.
Technical SEO | | MarketingChimp100 -
Can I use a 410'd page again at a later time?
I have old pages on my site that I want to 410 so they are totally removed, but later down the road if I want to utilize that URL again, can I just remove the 410 error code and put new content on that page and have it indexed again?
Technical SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
SEOMOZ and Webmaster Tools showing Different Page Index Results
I am promoting a jewelry e-commerce website. The website has about 600 pages and the SEOMOZ page index report shows this number. However, webmaster tools shows about 100,000 indexed pages. I have no idea why this is happening and I am sure this is hurting the page rankings in Google. Any ideas? Thanks, Guy
Technical SEO | | ciznerguy1 -
Should we redirect 404 errrors seen in webmaster tools with ... (dot.dot,dot) ?
Lately I have seen lots of 404 errors showing in webmaster tools that are not really links. Many of them from shammy pages. (I did not put them there) One of the most common types is ones that show the link ending in ... ( dot, dot, dot) The appearance of the link is being sent from pages like this http://www.the-pick.com/00_fahrenheit,2.html For example a link like this would show up in webmaster tools as a 404 error. http://www.ehow.com/how_2352088_easily-... Are these worth redirecting? So far I have redirected some of them and found that is was not helpful and possibly harmful. Anyone else had the same experience? Also getting lots of partial urls showing up from pages that reference my site but the url is cut off and the link is not active. Does Google really count these as links? Is redirecting a link from a spammy page acknowledging acceptance and could it count against you?
Technical SEO | | KentH0 -
What can I do if Google Webmaster Tools doesn't recognize the robots.txt file?
I'm working on a recently hacked site for a client and and in trying to identify how exactly the hack is running I need to use the fetch as Google bot feature in GWT. I'd love to use this but it thinks the robots.txt is blocking it's acces but the only thing in the robots.txt file is a link to the sitemap. Unde the Blocked URLs section of the GWT it shows that the robots.txt was last downloaded yesterday but it's incorrect information. Is there a way to force Google to look again?
Technical SEO | | DotCar0 -
Redirect non-www if using canonical url?
I have setup my website to use canonical urls on each page to point to the page i wish Google to refer to. At the moment, my non-www domain name is not redirected to www domain. Is this required if i have setup the canonical urls? This is the tag i have on my index.php page rel="canonical" href="http://www.mydomain.com.au" /> If i browse to http://mydomain.com.au should the link juice pass to http://www.armourbackups.com.au? Will this solve duplicate content problems? Thanks
Technical SEO | | blakadz0