Merged websites issue
-
Hi
Before my time, company big.com took over company small.com.
They decided to replicate big.com web pages onto small.com - so both websites have identical pages and copy, just different domains.
Within the small.com sitmap.xml they list only big.com urls.
They are also using big.com google analytics tracking code on small.com.
I have no idea what happened to the original content on small.com or if they put 301 redirects on.
I am thinking: do a 301 redirect on small domain to big domain. A) Agree?
Small domain is likely to have valuable historic inbound links which are now going to 404 pages.
After I do the 301 should these then appear in big.com SEOMoz campaign and on big.com webmaster tool for me to fix? B) Views?
Or should I get up webmaster tool on small.com and fix that first? C) Views?
Many thanks in advance guys, sorry its a long statement!
Richard
-
Hi Ben & Robert
Many thanks again.
I have now found at least two more websites the big company has done this on ie ditched the original small company web pages and content for a copy of the Big company web pages content.
In each case the small company sitemap.xml lists the big company pages BUT many of those are wrong URLS.
I think I'll take my time on this....
Cheers
Richard
-
Richard,
Remember, first I said wait.
Look at what Ben says here. He is correct (except on domain 301). You have enough weight that you do want to move it if at all possible. If it is a thousand pages, I would at least pick my strongest and get them 301'd.
Be methodical.
Use the correct urls from small to go to large.
Homepage to homepage will only help with homepage.You cannot do domain to domain, even in .htaccess. Here is a source: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirection
You have to direct url to url. If you were simply setting the www. to non, etc. yes that can be done.
Hope it helps you out,
-
I would say that redirecting has value with that amount of domain authority. A redirect would make use of the weight acquired, switching it off would lose all of this completely.
If you are worried about the amount of work involved in matching old to new URL then you always have the option to redirect to homepage. This will still pass on the weight to the site although not as effectively.
How many URLs are we talking about?
Also I'm pretty sure you can do a domain replacement via .htaccess without having to do individual 301's - can someone correct me if this isn't the case?
-
Hi Robert, many thanks for taking the time to write a reply (and to Ben to)
Re your points, I have only just started with BIG company.
Your 'before and after' is how I assume it was. They must have done then change about 7 months ago.
I tired Archive.org but nothing much indexed and has redirects on it. Both websites had a legal notice overlay appear that had to be accepted before seeing the content.
On small.com the sitemap.xml is listing all the big URLs, its using 0.9.
OSE has approx 40 inbound links from sites with 20-30 page authority and 30-40 domain authority.
I will try Xenu link sleuth as you mention (I'll dig out my old Windows PC first!)
I suspect as you mentioned in the caveat, might be better to just turn off small!
Many thanks again
Richard
-
Richard,
One question is how long ago was before your time?????
That will be a factor in all of this. Next, Advice:
Do nothing first. Sit for a moment and develop a Plan. Find out where you are on the map before you take off to another direction. Know the variables.
So that we may understand:
Before you had and you hadSitesmall.com/pg1 SITEBIG.com/pgA
Sitesmall.com/pg2 SITEBIG.com/pgB
Sitesmall.com/pg3 SITEBIG.com/płC up until highly successful BIG bought up and comer small.
Each site had separate sitemap, content, urls, GA tracking code.
Then you had:
Sitesmall.com/pgA SITEBIG.com/pgA
Sitesmall.com/pgB SITEBIG.com/pgB
Sitesmall.com/pgC SITEBIG.com/pgC and this was simply because someone changed all on Sitesmall to look and feel identical to SITEBIG?
I cannot understand how you have a SITEBIG.com sitemap for Sitesmall with BIG urls? Are you simply saying the domain is different but url sub directories are the same on sitemap? Are they following 0.9 from Sitemaps.org? Otherwise I cannot see how this is constructed. (Look at Sitemaps info in GWMT)
As to GA code being the same, have you looked at analytics on both and does it make any sense? Have you looked for occurrence of GA code in other places (head and body, etc.) on both sites?
FIRST THE BIG CAVEAT: you may save yourself a ton of work, trouble, and time... by turning off sitesmall.com and going to work on SITEBIG.com....... get it SEO perfect using all the time this will take.
On the historic, I would go to archive.org and see what is there using wayback machine. Look at what was there - when. So if the old site was six months ago, you at least know where you are reaching to and can look at old urls.
On the, did they 301? I would first for ease of looking put current homepage url in OSE and see if it says anything about redirecting. Then I would run the whole thing through Xenu link sleuth to see what is/ is not there. So Sitesmall.com then SITEBIG.com run both and see what you will see. Lot of answers there. Response codes, etc. I do not think you will find 301's as the way they changed the urls would not seem to make sense for same.
You can look to see if they used 301's in the .htaccess file, but I do not believe you will find them.
Once I knew what I was dealing with only then would I develop a plan.
Assuming SiteSmall had some Auth, PR, links, etc. and some of that still existed, I would begin the redirect plan. In the SEOmoz search bar I would place the query How to use 301 redirect? You will find a wealth of information. There are also numerous sites with code laid out, etc. in a simple search query online.
Note, I would not be using 301 of current to current as that is without value. You have to try and reconstruct old to new. Real Sitesmall.com to SITEBIG.com as it is now. Remember this is not a .com to .com redirect as that does not work. 301's are url to url. You need to know what the url was with the juice and use it.
For GA code, I would definitely change it prior to 301 if you can get it to old that might help.
This is the way to clean up the site duplication, capture a bit of juice, and possibly correct a mistake.
Hopefully, given there are some unanswered questions from what you stated, this is still helpful.
For your A. As per above.
B. Read above
C. Read above
Best
-
Hi Richard,
My thoughts would initially be:
a) yes a 301 redirect is probably the best way to avoid the duplicated pages and pass the weight on
b) if you have 301 redirected them they won't be 404 errors, the weight of the previous URLs will be passed on (although there is a slight decay factor involved with redirects so you won't get 100% of the weight)
c) I can't see how there will be too many errors as long as you 301 small.com to big.com sitewide. If anything big.com should get a boost from any links that the small.com pages had. Also this should help clear up the duplicate content issues.
Hope that helps,
Ben
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Ive been using moz for just a minute now , i used it to check my website and find quite a number of errors , unfortunately i use a wordpress website and even with the tips , is till dont know how to fix the issues.
ive seen quite a number of errors on my website hipmack.co a wordpress website and i dont know how to begin clearing the index errors or any others for that matter , can you help me please? ghg-1.jpg
Moz Pro | | Dogara0 -
404 errors High Priority Issues in Moz Pro: change to 301 or not ?
Hi there, Moz Pro is showing us 404 errors on our site as High Priority Issues. These 404 errors regard deleted product pages, which we did not 301. Should we 301 them all backwards ? We have an ecommerce site. After reading How Should You Handle Expired Content? on Moz and a few other Q&A discussions I now know we should 301 each expired url and now we do so. My concern is with what was done in the past, and what we should do about it: for the past few years we have been leaving the pages on the site, creating a big amount of outdated url's without either content nor traffic in march our IT decided to delete these url's, and ask for a webpage removal in Google Search Console: we 301 only a 40 url's and 404 the other 3500 now 6 monthts after, we still have 2500 crawl errors in the Search Console, and Moz Pro finding each week new 404 errors Our SEO consultant says we should not bother about the errors shown in the Search Console. But I am concerned about these errors not reducing, and about Moz Pro High Priority Issues: should we 301 the url's to similar categories or products?
Moz Pro | | isabelledylag0 -
Schema.org Identification issues?
Hello, My question relates to Schema.org identification on specific pages within our site. This may sound very amateurish so please bare with me. Using the MozBar Chrome plugin and looking withing the Markup tab, the results say that MozBar does NOT find Schema.org markup on our page. However, going to the Google Structure Data Testing Tool results in the opposite. I see the Schema.org code and the tool seems to verify with no errors. An example of a page that has Schema.org implemented would be: http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Acura_MDX/ So the final question is: Should I be worried that the MozBar isn't locating the markup? The results in Google SERP seem to reflect the correct code. thank you!
Moz Pro | | usnseomoz
Chris1 -
I have a new website and would like to use the keywords my competitors are using and was wondering the best way to take a look using Moz Pro?
The website is www.fapwrap.com - it's a new adult wall decals website. [editor's note: may not be safe for some workplaces] The wall decals we have are obviously a bit more niche than the bigger competitors, but I want to get into the first page to see how it helps us. I'm slowly taking over some kws like "xbox wraps" and "ps4 wraps" but those have low search volume and I feel like "wall decals" will help - though it's highly competitive. Suggestions? I just kinda want to plug in my competition and pick from their list of existing kws..... Ha.
Moz Pro | | JohnnyRoq0 -
Moz Website Grader Export Omits Check Graphics
So, I love the Grader, but when I export to PDF the pretty little graphics go away. Is this correctable?
Moz Pro | | ClickMonsterIM0 -
Issues with Moz producing 404 Errors from sitemap.xml files recently.
My last campaign crawl produced over 4k 404 errors resulting from Moz not being able to read some of the URLs in our sitemap.xml file. This is the first time we've seen this error and we've been running campaigns for almost 2 months now -- no changes were made to the sitemap.xml file. The file isn't UTF-8 encoded, but rather Content-Type:text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1 (which is what Moveable Type uses). Just wondering if anyone has had a similar issue?
Moz Pro | | BriceSMG0 -
Site is showing forwarded /301 to another website
My site http://riyas.in is showing a 301 redirect or a forward to http://flicker.com/muhammedriyas . I had done a 301 redirect long before from my site to this domain, but i removed that after 2-3 days. Please help me to solve this problem. I attached a screen shot seomoz1.jpg
Moz Pro | | riyas_0