The primary search keywords for our news release network have dropped like a rock in Google... we are not sure why.
-
Hi,
On April 11th, a month after the farmer update was released for U.S. users of Google, the primary keywords for ALL our sites significantly dropped in Google. I have some ideas why, but I wanted to get some second opinions also.
First off, I did some research if Google did anything on the 11th of April... they did. They implemented the farmer update internationally, but that does not explain why our ranks did not drop in March for U.S. Google users... unless they rolled out their update based on what site the domain is registered in... in our case, Canada.
The primary news release site is www.hotelnewsresource.com, but we have many running on the same server. EG. www.restaurantnewsresource.com, www.travelindustrywire.com and many more.
We were number 1 or had top ranks for terms like ¨Hotel News¨, ¨Hotel Industry¨, ¨Hotel Financing¨, ¨Hotel Jobs¨, ¨Hotels for Sale¨, etc... and now, for most of these we have dropped in a big way.
It seems that Google has issued a penalty for every internal page we link to.
Couple obvious issues with the current template we use... too many links, and we intend to change that asap, but it has never been a problem before. The domain hotelnewsresource.com is 10 years old and still holds a page rank of 6.
Secondly, the way our news system works, it´s possible to access an article from any domain in the network. E.G. I can read an article that was assigned to www.hotelnewsresource.com on www.restaurantnewsresource.com... we don´t post links to the irrelevant domain, but it does sometimes get indexed. So, we are going to implement the Google source meta tag option.
The bottom line is that I think we put too much faith in the maturity of the domain... thinking that may protect us... not the case and it´s now a big mess.
Any insight you can offer would be greatly appreciated. Do you think it was farmer or possibly something else?
Thanks,
Jarrett
-
I have a client who saw big drops beginning the 11th even though they're U.S. based. A portion of their visits come from international sources. We're still in evaluation mode though because the site had no significant drops on the initial Panda update here in the U.S.
Preliminary checks of other data show it might partially be a Panda issue, but not completely - oddly enough beginning on the 11th they also had a serious lag time in content loading due to advertiser scripts, which I'm thinking is a big factor as well.
Something that I have been speculating on with several new clients is the gradual degradation concept. My theory is many of their links coming from other sites that got hit has caused a rolling drop effect. Since none of my longer term clients have seen any significant drop though it's a more difficult assessment.
-
Did you see any cases where the Panda update went live, but it did not impact a given site till later on... like 30 days plus, which is our case? I do see a downward trend in analytics starting the day Panda was implemented, but it was´t until the 11th of April did it really drop.
-
That's your biggest challenge - to find the best ways to monetize enough to justify the editorial uniqueness. Yet it's that uniqueness that will ultimately bring you back. Be aware though - I have yet to hear of a single site that's bounced back significantly. All the sites I've audited that were hit by the Panda update require tremendous changes, especially in the unique content aspect, and in building quality links to category level and deep internal pages.
-
Thanks Alan,
Yes, the number of ads is another issue I intend to address... that will be a tough one to overcome.
Yes, it appears that every site hosted on our server has suffered... even the non related news websites like www.2casarealty.com, which does not have any news stories posted on, but is in the same IP range as the news sites and does have links to it from the news websites.
I would say 50% of the paid releases sent to us are first distributed in our network and then filtered down to other relevant websites... some of whom use widgets to link back to the full story, others use our API and then there are the content scrapers of course.
We have around 50 niche news release sites in our network as well as a number of websites we have launched to further monetize our business... E.G. hospitalityexpos.com, hotelsupplyresource.com
Yes, I full intend to implement that source meta tag and assign credit to the most appropriate site in out network. Not sure what to do with stories that have come to us after the customer posted on their site or another news release network first. I suppose the safest method is to find out where it was posted first and give them credit.
I was thinking we could balance the daily submissions with more editorial content that is written by us. That will help I´m sure.
Part of the problem is the business model itself... paid news release submissions haven´t necessarily hit our service first.
J
-
Jarrett
There are potentially several other factors as well, beyond what you've already pointed to yourself.
Panda/Farmer issued in a new era where many old "rules" were tossed by the wayside. Some of these were already questionable, as the seedlings of Panda were planted with last year's May Day update. if any single site in your network saw significant drops but not the others, it might well have been something else that caused it. Given the breadth and severity, this clearly does sound like Panda.
Taking a brief look at some of your content, site structure and duplicate content issues gives me even more confidence that's the cause.
Example 1: Duplicate content severity
I randomly picked one article and searched Google. Found a dozen sites where the same article shows up, including the site that's currently #1 in organic rankings in my result, which is the actual author's own site (Daniel Edward Craig). http://www.google.com/search?q=In+this+post+I+discuss+how+newly+available+reputation+metrics+are+paving+the+way+for+the+integration+of+the+online+reputation+management+and+revenue+m&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
How many sites are in your network where you share the content? So that begs the question - do you intend to find a way to give credit to the original news source for articles shared across sites? That's a big recommendation.
Obviously just this factor alone shouldn't necessarily cause bottoming out. News articles from major wire services routinely spread across the net in massive numbers every day.
Yet it's just one indicator to now consider. Especially when considering other major factors. Like the sheer volume of ads on pages. Too many ads is a big factor now. Amount of content that's unique to each site is a big part of the puzzle. If most of the content is duplicated across all sites, what makes each site uniquely valuable?
I could go on, but those are some high level areas for consideration.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will Google Judge Duplicate Content on Responsive Pages to be Keyword Spamming?
I have a website for my small business, and hope to improve the search results position for 5 landing pages. I recently modified my website to make it responsive (mobile friendly). I was not able to use Bootstrap; the layout of the pages is a bit unusual and doesn't lend itself to the options Bootstrap provides. Each landing page has 3 main div's - one for desktop, one for tablet, one for phone.
Web Design | | CurtisB
The text content displayed in each div is the same. Only one of the 3 div’s is visible; the user’s screen width determines which div is visible. When I wrote the HTML for the page, I didn't want each div to have identical text. I worried that
when Google indexed the page it would see the same text 3 times, and would conclude that keyword spamming was occurring. So I put the text in just one div. And when the page loads jQuery copies the text from the first div to the other two div's. But now I've learned that when Google indexes a page it looks at both the page that is served AND the page that is rendered. And in my case the page that is rendered - after it loads and the jQuery code is executed – contains duplicate text content in three div's. So perhaps my approach - having the served page contain just one div with text content – fails to help, because Google examines the rendered page, which has duplicate text content in three div's. Here is the layout of one landing page, as served by the server. 1000 words of text goes here. No text. jQuery will copy the text from div id="desktop" into here. No text. jQuery will copy the text from div id="desktop" into here. ===================================================================================== My question is: Will Google conclude that keyword spamming is occurring because of the duplicate content the rendered page contains, or will it realize that only one of the div's is visible at a time, and the duplicate content is there only to achieve a responsive design? Thank you!0 -
Creating a new website, but I'd like to control it under a different domain.
I'd like to control it under the domain of another website with a higher DA. Can I create the new website (website A) and do an immediate re-direct to another website (website B)? Or would I be better at putting it as a subdomain? Such as www.websitea.websiteb.com? Cheers all, Rhys
Web Design | | SwanseaMedicine0 -
Responsive Site has "Not Found" Errors for mobile/ and m/ in Google Search Console
We have recently launched a new responsive website for a client and have noticed 2 "Not Found" errors within Google Search Console for /mobile and /m Both these URLs are not linked from anywhere within the site. However Google is reporting them as being linked from the homepage. This is not the first site we have seen in which Google has reported this error, however the other site was not a mobile friendly site. My thoughts are to 301 them back to the Homepage. Anybody else have any thoughts on this? or have recently received the same errors?
Web Design | | JustinTaylor881 -
Looking for a developer with Network Solutions platform experience
Looking for a developer with Network Solutions platform experience. 714-744-1926Tony Ashford
Web Design | | OCFurniture0 -
Does Google have problem crawling ssl sites?
We have a site that was ranking well and recently dropped in traffic and ranking. The whole site is https and and not just the shopping pages. Thats the way the server is setup, they make whole site https. My manager thinks the drop in ranking is due to google not crawling https. I think contrary, but would like some feedback on this. Site is here
Web Design | | anthonytjm0 -
Does anyone think the <figcaption>attribute from HTML5 will have any influence for image search?</figcaption>
There is a <figure>element that is supposed to provide better descriptions of image on the web in HTML5 - do you think that will replace the importance of the "Alt" tag? Link to figcaption description </figure>
Web Design | | RankSurge2 -
Why is this page removed from Google & Bing indices?
This page has been removed from indices at Bing and Google, and I can't figure out why. http://www.pingg.com/occasion/weddings This page used to be in those indices There are plenty of internal links to it The rest of the site is fine It's not blocked by meta robots, robots.txt or canonical URL There's nothing else to suggest that the page is being penalized
Web Design | | Ehren0 -
Drop Down Menus & SEO?
Do these typically have a negative impact on SEO? I know this is kind of a vague question, does it make it harder to spider? Are there SEO friendly ways of coding these? There are so many sites out there that have these, so I've got to assume it's different on a case by case basis.
Web Design | | MichaelWeisbaum0