Google News not indexing .index.html pages
-
Hi all,
we've been asked by a blog to help them better indexing and ranking on Google News (with the site being already included in Google News with poor results)
The blog had a chronicle URL duplication problem with each post existing with 3 different URLs:
#1) www.domain.com/post.html (currently in noindex for editorial choices as showing all the comments)
#2) www.domain.com/post/index.html (currently indexed showing only top comments)
#3) www.domain.com/post/ (very same as #2)
We've chosen URL #2 (/index.html) as canonical URL, and included a rel=canonical tag on URL #3 (/) linking to URL #2.
Also we've submitted yesterday a Google News sitemap including consistently the list of URLs #2 from the last 48h . The sitemap has been properly "digested" by Google and shows that all URLs have been sent and indexed.However if we use the site:domain.com command on Google News we see something completely different: Google News has indexed actually only some news and more specifically only the URLs #3 type (ending with the trailing slash instead of /index.html). Why ? What's wrong ?
a) Does Google News bot have problems indexing URLs ending with .index.html ? While figuring out what's wrong we've found out that http://news.google.it/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=inurl%3Aindex.html gives no results...it seems that Google News index overall does not include any URLs ending with /index.html
b) Does Google News bot recognise rel=canonical tag ?
c) Is it just a matter of time and then Google News will pick up the right URLs (/index.html) and/or shall we communicate Google News team any changes ?
d) Any suggestions ? OR Shall we do the other way around. meaning make URL #3 the canonical one ?
While Google News is showing these problems, Google Web search has actually well received the changes, so we don't know what to do.
Thanks for your help,
Matteo
-
To follow up on this.
Look what I've found in the Google News Forum:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/news/thread?tid=248ef4e6fe372e91&hl=en
The problem is almost the same. Google News not indexing URLs with the trailing index.html.
The only person who answered was a Top Contributor suggesting to contact directly Google News team.
-
Hmmm, that is strange! Check a cached version of one of your URLs to make sure they new version is in the index. If it is, maybe you should switch to option 3.
I am not sure what if any the implications would be of leaving it the way you have it.
Since it is in 2 different areas of search I am not sure that duplicate content issues apply if you were to just leave it be.
-
hey Roger,
Look the CNN seems to have exactly the same "problem" as we do.
They have the "/" article indexed in google news and the index.html version on the non-google news index. They did exavtly what we did, putting a rel=canonical on the "/" version to the "index.html" one. Despite this the "/" version is still the only one showing up on google news
Here is the screenshot just in case
and here the two versions of the same article:
- http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/22/obama.campaign/
- http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/22/obama.campaign/index.html
-
They seem to meet these requirements. The only one that is a problem is requirement #3, but it clearly states that is waived with News sitemaps which Matteo said they submitted.
With that said I do like Matteo's option #1 better than the naming convention they chose to go with.
-
It does sound weird, but I am not sure that search operator works in Google News.
Here is a simple test. Search Google News for "Google"
The second story I see is http://phandroid.com/2011/04/22/will-spotify-be-google-musics-savior/
However a Google News search for "inurl:will-spotify-be-google-musics-savior" returns no results.
Clearly the story is indexed!
-
My hunch, and it's only a hunch, is that it relates to their URL requirements that the URL has to be dedicate to an article. An index.html page is usually not a page that would be dedicated to one individual news story. See http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=68323 for their URL requirements.
-
Hi roger and thx for the very insightful answer !
what about the fact that not a single URL ending with index.html is indexed in Google News ?
http://news.google.it/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=inurl%3Aindex.html
compare that with the normal google index
http://www.google.it/search?q=inurl%3Aindex.html&hl=en&ned=us&tab=nw
doesn't that sound weird to you ?
matteo
-
I had another thought too. Just because the pages say they are indexed in Google WMT, doesn't mean the new content including the new canonical tags have been crawled or added to the index yet.
I recently did a similar project adding canonical tags to an ecommerce site. The new URLs are only showing up correctly in the search results maybe 10% of the time, even for pages I know have been crawled and I submitted a week ago. The important thing is that more URLs are updated each day.
I dont believe they throw out their index the first time they crawl an established page and something has changed. I believe the index gets changed as they continue to crawl they compare versions and index data based on multiple crawl agregates, especially if it is for existing pages that have been in the index for a while. So in other words, if they compare 20 recent crawls and only see 1 version as being different, they may not throw out the old version right away until they crawl it multiple times and see that the the new version exists, say 5 or 10 of the most recent 20 crawls. BTW I don't have any data to back that up just my personal observation/theory.
-
If you used the rel canonical tag properly and only submitted sitemap yesterday, its just a waiting game. You will get crawled and indexed properly soon.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google indexing .com and .co.uk site
Hi, I am working on a site that is experiencing indexation problems: To give you an idea, the website should be www.example.com however, Google seems to index www.example.co.uk as well. It doesn’t seem to honour the 301 redirect that is on the co.uk site. This is causing quite a few reporting and tracking issues. This happened the first time in November 2016 and there was an issue identified in the DDOS protection which meant we would have to point www.example.co.uk to the same DNS as www.example.com. This was implemented and made no difference. I cleaned up the htaccess file and this made no difference either. In June 2017, Google finally indexed the correct URL, but I can’t be sure what changed it. I have now migrated the site onto https and www.example.co.uk has been reindexed in Google alongside www.example.com I have been advised that the http needs to be removed from DDOS which is in motion I have also redirected http://www.example.co.uk straight to https://www.example.com to prevent chain redirects I can’t block the site via robot.txt unless I take the redirects off which could mean that I lose my rankings. I should also mention that I haven't actually lost any rankings, it's just replaced some URLs with co.uk and others have remained the same. Could you please advise what further steps I should take to ensure the correct URL’s are indexed in Google?
Technical SEO | | Niki_10 -
3,511 Pages Indexed and 3,331 Pages Blocked by Robots
Morning, So I checked our site's index status on WMT, and I'm being told that Google is indexing 3,511 pages and the robots are blocking 3,331. This seems slightly odd as we're only disallowing 24 pages on the robots.txt file. In light of this, I have the following queries: Do these figures mean that Google is indexing 3,511 pages and blocking 3,331 other pages? Or does it mean that it's blocking 3,331 pages of the 3,511 indexed? As there are only 24 URLs being disallowed on robots.text, why are 3,331 pages being blocked? Will these be variations of the URLs we've submitted? Currently, we don't have a sitemap. I know, I know, it's pretty unforgivable but the old one didn't really work and the developers are working on the new one. Once submitted, will this help? I think I know the answer to this, but is there any way to ascertain which pages are being blocked? Thanks in advance! Lewis
Technical SEO | | PeaSoupDigital0 -
Home page deindexed by google
when I search my website on google by site:www.mydomain.com I have found my domain with www has been de-indexed by google, but when I search site:mydomain.com, my home page--**mydomain.com **show up on the search results without www, put it simple, google only index my domain without www, I wonder how to make my domain with www being indexed, and how to prevent this problem occure again.
Technical SEO | | semer0 -
Getting Pages Indexed That Are Not In The Main Navigation
Hi All, Hoping you can help me out with a couple of questions I have. I am looking to create SEO friendly landing pages optimized for long tail keywords to increase site traffic and conversions. These pages will not live on the main navigation. I am wondering what the best way to get these pages indexed is? Internal text linking, adding to the sitemap? What have you done in this situation? I know that these pages cannot be orphaned pages and they need to be linked to somewhere. Looking for some tips to do this properly and to ensure that they can become indexed. Thanks! Pat
Technical SEO | | PatBausemer0 -
How do you know what version of your site of Google is in their index?
This is going to sound like a strange question, but I am trying to understand which version of our site is in the index. You might think this is an obvious question, but here is why I am asking: 1. Today I searched for a specific keyword and found the listing. 2. I liked on the right arrow next to the listing and checked the cache date. It says 6/28 and shows the site as of 6/28. 3. I expected to see that we were just indexed as we jumped several pages since yesterday and I had just checked two days ago and we hadn't moved at all. It seems like Google may have taken the changes we made on 7/2 but since it is showing 6/28, I am note sure. Since this is confusing, here is the chronology: 1. Made changes 6/20. 2. Site appeared to be indexed on 6/28. 3. Made changes on 7/2. 4. Checked the site on 7/2 and we were in position 60. Checked the site on 7/4 and we were in position 61. 5.. Checked the site today (7/6) and see we are in position 8. The cache date shows as 6/28. I suspect that Google just indexed us yesterday and is reflecting the changes I made on 7/2. But the fact that it says it was cached on 6/28 seems to sugges otherwise. I want to be sure I know which version got us the good rankings - is there any way to be sure? Thanks!!
Technical SEO | | trophycentraltrophiesandawards0 -
Getting More Pages Indexed
We have a large E-commerce site (magento based) and have submitted sitemap files for several million pages within Webmaster tools. The number of indexed pages seems to fluctuate, but currently there is less than 300,000 pages indexed out of 4 million submitted. How can we get the number of indexed pages to be higher? Changing the settings on the crawl rate and resubmitting site maps doesn't seem to have an effect on the number of pages indexed. Am I correct in assuming that most individual product pages just don't carry enough link juice to be considered important enough yet by Google to be indexed? Let me know if there are any suggestions or tips for getting more pages indexed. syGtx.png
Technical SEO | | Mattchstick0 -
Google refuses to index our domain. Any suggestions?
A very similar question was asked previously. (http://www.seomoz.org/q/why-google-did-not-index-our-domain) We've done everything in that post (and comments) and then some. The domain is http://www.miwaterstewardship.org/ and, so far, we have: put "User-agent: * Allow: /" in the robots.txt (We recently removed the "allow" line and included a Sitemap: directive instead.) built a few hundred links from various pages including multiple links from .gov domains properly set up everything in Webmaster Tools submitted site maps (multiple times) checked the "fetch as googlebot" display in Webmaster Tools (everything looks fine) submitted a "request re-consideration" note to Google asking why we're not being indexed Webmaster Tools tells us that it's crawling the site normally and is indexing everything correctly. Yahoo! and Bing have both indexed the site with no problems and are returning results. Additionally, many of the pages on the site have PR0 which is unusual for a non-indexed site. Typically we've seen those sites have no PR at all. If anyone has any ideas about what we could do I'm all ears. We've been working on this for about a month and cannot figure this thing out. Thanks in advance for your advice.
Technical SEO | | NetvantageMarketing0 -
Getting Google to index new pages
I have a site, called SiteB that has 200 pages of new, unique content. I made a table of contents (TOC) page on SiteB that points to about 50 pages of SiteB content. I would like to get SiteB's TOC page crawled and indexed by Google, as well as all the pages it points to. I submitted the TOC to Pingler 24 hours ago and from the logs I see the Googlebot visited the TOC page but it did not crawl any of the 50 pages that are linked to from the TOC. I do not have a robots.txt file on SiteB. There are no robot meta tags (nofollow, noindex). There are no 'rel=nofollow' attributes on the links. Why would Google crawl the TOC (when I Pinglered it) but not crawl any of the links on that page? One other fact, and I don't know if this matters, but SiteB lives on a subdomain and the URLs contain numbers, like this: http://subdomain.domain.com/category/34404 Yes, I know that the number part is suboptimal from an SEO point of view. I'm working on that, too. But first wanted to figure out why Google isn't crawling the TOC. The site is new and so hasn't been penalized by Google. Thanks for any ideas...
Technical SEO | | scanlin0