Blog/Shop/Forum site structure - are we right to make these changes?
-
We run a fairly large online community with a popular blog and Europe's largest online shop for drift-specific motor sport parts and our website has been around since 2004 I believe. Since it was launched, the blog (or previous CMS system) has been at the domain root, the forums have been located at /forum and the shop at /shop (or similar) but we have decided to move things around a bit and would like some comments as to whether we are doing the right thing or if you would make any addition or different changes to us.
Currently the entire website gets around 3m page views per month from 500,000 visitors, but this is split roughly 75% to the forums, 10% to the shop and 15% to the blog (but remember the blog is at the root so anyone who visits our homepage "visits" the blog).
We plan to move the shop to the domain root (since the shop provides the income for the business - surely it should be the 1st thing visitors see?), the blog from root to /blog and the forums will stay where they are at /forum.
We have read Steven Macdonald's post here, and have taken notes to help minimize traffic loss and disruption to our army of users and hopefully avoid too many penalties from Google and plan to:
- 301 redirect old URLs to new ones where they have changed.
- Submit new site maps to search engines.
- Update old links where we have control (such as forums where we are paid traders etc.).
- Send out a newsletter to our subscribers.
- Update our forum members.
- Fix errors via WMT before and after the re-structure.
Should we be taking this opportunity to actually set each of the three sections of the site to it's own sub domain? Our thoughts are that if we are disrupting things, it's surely best to have lots of disruption once rather than a little bit of disruption several times over a 3-6 month period?
OSE shows us to have roughly 1500 inbound links to /shop, 2100 to /forum and 4800 to the root / - if we proceed with our plan and put 301 redirects in place this seems to be the best plan to retain the value of these links but if we were to switch to sub domains would the 301s lose most of the link values due to them being on "different" domains?
Any help, advise or suggestions are very welcome but comments from experience are what we are seeking ideally!
Thanks
Jay
-
Ah, yes that does change things a bit! In that case go back to your first post and do what it there. I'd agree that if you are changing the store anyway then having that as the root make sense. Your checklist is pretty good. I'd add "build new links to the new categories" too.
However I still think that the key to success for a site like your is getting the content closer to the product. You need to get the stock next to your content, where as it sounds like you are doing the opposite (putting content in to the shop). That is OK if it is supporting the sales process, but try to think of everything flowing towards the shop not aware from it.
Sounds like interesting times.
-
Thanks again Mat,
Another thing I should have mentioned (we have lots of project on the go right now!) is that we are redesigning the shop and at the point we are changing our URL structure we are also launching an updated version of the shop software (latest version of Magento - to help with internal admin issues) along with a new theme for the shop itself. Our shop has around 25,000 customers and we are using Magento's features to reduce our product page count from 35,000 to around 1,000 (thanks to Bundle and Configurable products) to reduce the number of similar pages per fitment etc.
The new shop theme (which will also incorporate our new home page) will feature content from the blog and forum - but is based around the shop.
I like some of your ideas in terms of linking to shop categories at the end of blog posts for related products.
We have a system in place (although currently disabled) that displays adverts on the forum from the shop based on keywords picked up in threads - the system is currently being refined at the moment.
-
I thought that must be what you were aiming for (because it certainly looks like a huge opportunity). I don't know whether changing the URL structure is going to help you though.
If I were working on it my ideal solution would be to rebuild on an integrated platform that could blend the 3 parts of the site using a common architecture. My choice would be drupal + drupal commerce. I'd build a common vocabulary (taxonomy) that was used for dsicussions, articles and stock items so that if users were having a discussion about tuning a Nissan 200sx then they'd see the top selling tuning components for that car. Likewise I'd be tying profiles back to the store (my ride) and articles back to it too.
However ideal solutions aren't cheap and you probably didn't come here looking for ways to blow 5-figure sums!
As the other end of the scale I'd be looking at what specific changes would help you hit those two goals: Better crawling of the shop. More users in the shop. There are probably some cheap easy wins there:
Home page : Spend some money on getting that right. Treat it as your website homepage not yourblog home page. Get recently added products, best sellers etc up on that page and link in to the blog less. Even if you have to manually edit it once a week that will probably be a win.
Blog: Get in the habit of ending blog posts with a related list - just link in to relevant categories of the shop. Keep the users and the link equity flowing.
Forum: Harder. You have the category block on the forum home page, but stats from forums I run suggest most people hardly use that page and don't scroll down much on it. Most come in and just hit "new posts" a lot. You could looking at some of the add-ons that let you have sponsored sections in forums and use these to run internal adverts related to each category. The tricky would be to change them frequently to stop ad blindness. Maybe mix them up with occasional big offers for members to help "train" them to look out for adverts.
I'd also look at the menu. Consider 'demoting' some items to make sure everyone knows it is shop + blog + forum. Sub menus for the shop categories would help make it easier to access the store and also help with deeper indexing.
I could go on all day. Can you tell I like the site ?
-
Thanks for your reply Mat, I guess I should have been a bit more specific with the project!
The goal is to get more of our site visitors to view the shop, and increase awareness of the products we supply. Currently the blog makes us no money, and since the majority of visitors (to articles not the homepage) come via other source such as Facebook and other back-links it doesn't seem right to me to have the shop "tucked away out back" when it should be in the shop window. The blog to me is the 3rd most valuable of the 3 sections on our site - with the shop 1st and the forums 2nd, so the plan is to re-arrange things to ensure the most important asset is the one you are presented with on our homepage.
Part of the goal is to ensure that Google crawls more of the shop products and that more of our back-links add to our product/category rankings on our shop since currently lots of our incoming links are just to driftworks.com (i.e. the blog) this value could be put to better use! I think...?
-
Nice project. It sounds daft, but what are you actually trying to achieve?
Looking at your home page it is only really a visit to the blog as you call it that. It's a stand alone page with a bit of everything anyway. What do you want to achieve that you can't do with a home page redesign?
I'm going to presume that somewhere in the mix the aim is to get more of that traffic spending money.
Forums are a tricky one. People tend to use packaged forum products that feels distinct from the rest of the site (vbulletin in your case) - which encourages people to just use the forum and ignore the bits of the site that actually make money. I'm tackling that issue on a site at the moment.
Moving to subdomains would probably encourage that if anything. If that were my project I'd be looking to make the 3 parts more integrated not less. That way those who come for the community aspect wouldn't be tucked away in their own area away from all the good money making stuff!
Couple of examples: You are using tags on the blog but these don't tie back in to shop categories or products. Likewise you have discussion on blog posts, but these don't relate to the forum. I'd be trying to blur the line between all three elements as much as possible.
I don't think I have answered your specific question, but I am struggling to get what the aim is, sorry.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Making unresponsive site responsive, should I expect any ranking penalties?
Hello, I have a website made with asp.net and ranking quite well for a number of competitive keywords like in google top 10 results for more than a dozen competitive keywords. Recently in order for better user experience, I am having it developed so it is fully responsive for all screen resolutions. Basically all the design element / site text will remain the same including color scheme / layout etc outwardly but internally this will change everything all the css / page html (tables converted to divs) etc. Now my question is: 1. Will this considered by bots a complete site overhaul and ranking will take a hit even if I stay with current platform i.e. asp.net? 2. While making design responsive I can also develop a wordpress theme, which will make it easier to work with the website as the site does not require any programming. So if I also change the platform like from MS IIS/asp to Apache / php how will search engine bots take this? 3. If above in fact will result in ranking drop, how much time will it take for the rankings to get back to normal? Note that I use extensionless urls so the urls will remain the same as well even if we convert from asp to php. Sorry for long details but question is bugging me from weeks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hpk0 -
How hard would it be to take a well-linked site, completely change the subject matter & still retain link authority?
So, this would be taking a domain with a domain authority of 50 (200 root domains, 3500 total links) and, for fictitious example, going from a subject matter like "Online Deals" to "The History Of Dentistry"... just totally unrelated new subject for the old/re-purposed domain. The old content goes away entirely. The domain name itself is a super vague .com name and has no exact match to anything either way. I'm wondering, if the DNS changed to different servers, it went from 1000 pages to a blog, ownership/contacts stayed the same, the missing pages were 301'd to the homepage, how would that fare in Google for the new homepage focus and over what time frame? Assume the new terms are a reasonable match to the old domain authority and compete U.S.-wide... not local or international. Bonus points for answers from folks who have actually done this. Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
URL Structure Change - 301 Redirect - on large website
Hi Guys, I have a website which has approximately 15 million pages indexed. We are planning to change url structure of 99.99% of pages but it would remain on same domain. eg: older url: xyz.com/nike-shoes; new url: xyx.com/shopping/nike-shoes A benefit that we would get is adding a related and important keyword in url. We also achieve other technical benefits in identifying the page type before hand and can reduce time taken to serve the pages (as per our tech team). For older URLs, we are planning to do a 301 redirect. While this seems to be the correct thing to do as per Google, we do see that there is a very large number of cases where people have suffered significantly on doing something like this : Here are our questions: Will all page rank value will be passed to new url? (i.e. will there be a 100% passing of PR/link juice to the new URLs) Can it lower my rank for keywords? (currently we have pretty good rankings (1-5) on many keywords) If there is an impact on rankings - will it be only on specific keywords or will we see a sitewide impact? Assuming that we have taken a hit on traffic, How much time would it take to get the traffic back to normal? and if traffic goes down, by what percentage it may go down and for how much time. (best case, average case and worst case scenarios) Is there anything I should keep in mind while doing this? I understand that there are no clear answers that can be given to these questions but we would like to evaluate a worst case/best case situation. Just to give context : Even a 10 day downtime in terms of drops in rankings is extremely detrimental for our business.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Myntra0 -
Question about best approach to site structure
I am curious if anyone can share some advice. I am working on planning architecture for a tour company. The key piece of the content strategy will be providing details on each of the tour destinations, with associated profiles for each city within those destinations. Lots of content, which should be great for the SEO strategy. With regards to the architecture, I have a ‘destinations’ section on the Website where users can access each of the key destinations served by the tour company. My question is – from a planning perspective I can organize my folder structure in a few different ways. http://www.companyurl.com/destinations/touring-regions/cities/ or http://www.companyurl.com/destinations/ http://www.companyurl.com/touring-regionA/ http://www.companyurl.com/touring-regionB/cities-profile/ I am curious if anyone has an opinion on what might perform best in terms of the site structure from an SEO perspective. My fear is taking all of this rich content and placing it so many tiers down in the architecture of the site. Any advice that could be offered would be appreciated. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VERBInteractive0 -
Automotive part / OEM / Manufacturer numbers
Hi All, What's the best way to optimise pages for OE / Manufacturer Part numbers? Disclaimer: All part numbers in this post are fictional. I dont want this post out ranking my client for real part numbers 🙂 Take this for Throttle Body for example: WOODYS S-AB-Q.123.53G This is the main part number from WOODYS (the manufacturer). However, these are all variations of exactly the same product: Woodys 2.78972.11.0 Woodys 2.78972.16.0 Woodys 2.78972.20.0 Woodys 2.78972.26.0 Oh, and car brands use OE numbers for these parts, such as: VWA 9808e40923G VWA 9808e40923L VWA 9808e40923M VWA 9808e40923P VWA 9808e40923Q These internal part numbers are vitally important as most of my clients customers are garages/mechanics so they're very likely to search on OE numbers. So, would you suggest: Optimising 10 different pages for the same product (using the part numbers in the URL, Title and H1). The problem is there's no unique content for these pages, only the part number varies, so this would likely get penalised for dupe content, or not enough unique content. Optimising one page for all terms. If so, how do you suggest doing this to ensure all part/OE numbers rank well and part numbers are prominent in the SERPS?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seowoody
Could Schema.org help here by marking up these EO numbers with the isSimilarTo property of the Product type? I'm trying to ensure these part number get equal presence in the SERP snippet when searched for, even though I can't physically include all these numbers in the Title tag, URL and H1 of one page. 3. Something else? Thanks, Woody 🙂1 -
Panda/Penguin & Ecommerce Sites in similar niches
Hello, We have a few online stores that are in similar niches. How do we make sure that we don't get penalized for this (Panda/Penguin) We have the sites interlinked, but our newest one is not going to be linked to the others. Also, will rewriting descriptions help if the product is on more than one site? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
A Client Changed the Link Structure for Their Site... Not Just Once, but Twice
I have a client who's experiencing a number of crawl errors, which I've gotten down fo 9,000 from 18,000. One of the challenges they experience is that they've modified their URL structure a couple times. First it was: site.com/year/month/day/post-name
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | digisavvy
Then it was: site.com/category/post-name
Now it's: site.com/post-name I'm not sure of the time elapsed between these changes, but enough time has passed that the URLs for the previous two URL structures have been indexed and spit out 404s now. What's the best/clean way to address this issue?I'm not going to create 9k redirect rules obviously, but there's got to be a way to address this issue and resolve it moving forward.0 -
Posing QU's on Google Variables "aclk", "gclid" "cd", "/aclk" "/search", "/url" etc
I've been doing a bit of stats research prompted by read the recent ranking blog http://www.seomoz.org/blog/gettings-rankings-into-ga-using-custom-variables There are a few things that have come up in my research that I'd like to clear up. The below analysis has been done on my "conversions". 1/. What does "/aclk" mean in the Referrer URL? I have noticed a strong correlation between this and "gclid" in the landing page variable. Does it mean "ad click" ?? Although they seem to "closely" correlate they don't exactly, so when I have /aclk in the referrer Url MOSTLY I have gclid in the landing page URL. BUT not always, and the same applies vice versa. It's pretty vital that I know what is the best way to monitor adwords PPC, so what is the best variable to go on? - Currently I am using "gclid", but I have about 25% extra referral URL's with /aclk in that dont have "gclid" in - so am I underestimating my number of PPC conversions? 2/. The use of the variable "cd" is great, but it is not always present. I have noticed that 99% of my google "Referrer URL's" either start with:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James77
/aclk - No cd value
/search - No cd value
/url - Always contains the cd variable. What do I make of this?? Thanks for the help in advance!0