"Too Many On-Page Links" Issue
-
I'm being docked for too many on page links on every page on the site, and I believe it is because the drop down nav has about 130 links in it. It's because we have a few levels of dropdowns, so you can get to any page from the main page. The site is here - http://www.ibethel.org/
Is what I'm doing just a bad practice and the dropdowns shouldn't give as much information? Or is there something different I should do with the links? Maybe a no-follow on the last tier of dropdown?
-
Marcus and Alan offered some very good advice.
I've visited your website before and had a good user experience.
I'd only add two suggestions.
The Itineraries Tab could be a one-click to the Itineraries landing page. It is easy to locate individual names in the Left Nav and main events/conferences on the page.
Get Google Page Speed for Firefox. Love the wealth of information and fixes it offers. I like to copy and paste the page results into Notepad. You can see scores for each issue--helps prioritize what to fix first.
HTH
-
Some great stuff there - thumbs up!
-
While having all those links in the main nav site-wide isn't necessarily helpful to SEO, I routinely deal with clients that have twice as many links in their drop-downs. So I agree with Marcus - it shouldn't be causing you serious problems.
In addition to Marcus' suggestion, I would recommend a couple things to work on:
1. Sub-navigation
Like you have in the Staff section http://www.ibethel.org/staff - by adding in sub-navigation (links within that section that appear on each page of that section, and only for those pages) you reinforce content relationships.
2. Referrer Code in URLs - Duplicate Content
You've got links that have their URL appended to track referrer source right on the site. On the home page - the graphic call-out box (large graphic with 3 smaller graphics to the right of it). These links point to internal pages but stick
"?referrer=front_page" on the end. And since your graphics rotate, that means every page linked from this area is generating its own duplicate content conflict. While some programmers say it's fine, it's not. You could mitigate this by pushing canonical tags across the entire site, however best practices dictate to eliminate this referrer tracking method completely - Google only uses canonical tags as a signal and not all search engines use it.
3. Site Speed
I ran a couple site speed tests - you've got some serious issues regarding crawl speed. Your home page images are huge files, and you take a second hit with lots of Javascript file loading times. - More than one check came in at over 13 seconds - that's not user speed - it's crawlability by search bots. I highly recommend looking further into that. If it takes search bots too long to crawl just one single page, some of the links on that page will not be found during any single crawl - and this alone could be part of your problem. Look to have those graphic images compressed without losing quality. Look to have your Javascript files compiled.
4. Store Issues
Your category pages (http://store.ibethel.org/Childrens-Resources/c236/index.html for example) have no paragraph based descriptions so you're missing out on an important way to properly optimize those category pages for SEO.
5. Content Organization
Also in the store - your Books section organization is a bit messed up. So your breadcrumbs are broken. For example on this sub-category page http://store.ibethel.org/Books-Books/c173_25/index.html the breadcrumb shows Store Home > Catalog > Books > Books when it should be Store Home > Books. Except when I go to the top level "Books" link in the breadcrumbs I get an empty page http://store.ibethel.org/Books/c173/index.html
6. Store Page Titles
In the store, when there's more than one page of products in a category, if I click down to the 2nd or 3rd page in that category, I get the same page Title. Every page title should be unique, so the simplest way to fix that is to append page titles with the page number. Like Music then Music | Page 2 then Music | Page 3 and so on.
7. Stronger Titles
Your page titles in the store could be much stronger - Having a page TItle of "Music" isn't going to allow your site to rank extremely well given how competitive that single word is. You'd be better off with titles like:
Christian Music | Online Christian Music Downloads
Or for "Childrens Resources" a better page Title might be:
Christian Parenting | Christian Education Reources
8. Store Home Page Duplicate
Both http://store.ibethel.org/index.html and http://store.ibethel.org/ work - so that's duplicate content - have the index.html version set up with a 301 redirect pointing to the http://store.ibethel.org version.
-
Hey Blairr
Can you explain the problem a little more as I can't really see anything wrong with the site.
In your case, the 130 nav links is not the end of the world as you don't have a massive site (category, sub category, product etc). Also, I have done various searches for your title tag and the name of your church and you have great visibility in those results with a 1st place homepage listing, a google map listing, site links and various other pages so nothing to worry about there.
I also did a search for a snippet of text from one of your deep testimonial pages "but I trust it will be encouraging to all. In March" - what was interesting was that it returned three pages, two of which were from another site called healingherald.org.
So, you may find that these pages are not going to rank so well as this content already exists on another site which is ranking above you for the content.
If you have ranking issues, I would investigate these first and depending on who owns the content either remove these dupe pages from the index or investigate using a canonical URL to the other site (or from the other site to you if it is your content).
Certainly, that is where I would start rather than the navigation as whilst there is a general 100 links a page rule, I would not obsess about that in the overall hierarchy of this site.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
One landing page or many?
I can not understand which is the best way to target similar keywords. Do the best way is create landingpage for each long tail keyword landing page or better one but with all included keywords? On the siste i have landingpages: 1. Metal doors 1.2. Steel doors for private houses 1.3. Durvis 1.4 Metal doors for technical rooms and so on. In Latvian language it sounds ok. Some time ago for other sites it worked good but now it just does not work. I see google meses these results up and seo performance is bad. Can you suggest correct structure? Thanks metāla durvis dzīvoklim un mājai m24 metāla durvis sos serviss durvju atvēršana
Technical SEO | | Felter0 -
Google+ Contibutor to: Link To Main Domain or Content Page?
Which is the best practice for the link to claim authorship for a guest post? I have tried both the main domain URL in the "contributor to" section of my Google plus and the page URL where the post is and both show my picture when testing in the Structured Data Testing Tool. Which is best to use? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | WSIDW0 -
Why are the bots still picking up so many links on our page despite us adding nofollow?
We have been working to reduce our on-page links issue. On a particular type of page the problem arose because we automatically link out to relevant content. When we added nofollows to this content it resolved the issue for some but not all and we can't figure out why is was not successful for every one. Can you see any issues? Example of a page where nofollow did not work for... http://www.andor.com/learning-academy/4-5d-microscopy-an-overview-of-andor's-solutions-for-4-5d-microscopy
Technical SEO | | tonykelly0 -
Is it bad to have your pages as .php pages?
Hello everyone, Is it bad to have your website pages indexed as .php? For example, the contact page is site.com/contact.php and not /contact. Does this affect your SEO rankings in any way? Is it better to have your pages without the extension? Also, if I'm working with a news site and the urls are dynamic for every article (ie site.com/articleid=2323.) Should I change all of those dynamic urls to static? Thank You.
Technical SEO | | BruLee0 -
How many pages should my site have?
Right now I think I only have 36. What is a good amount of pages to have? Any ideas on ways to add relevant pages to my site? I was thinking about starting a message board. Also, I have a free tech support chat room, and was thinking about posting the logs somewhere on the site. Does that sound like a good idea? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | eugenecomputergeeks0 -
Too many internal links on one page
Hello All, I have just started using SEO moz. I had one quick question i would like answered. Currently SEOmoz is telling me that there are too many internal links. The recommendation is 100 links per page but the majority of my pages have 125+ links Will this effect the page when its crawled? Look forward to your comments. Thanks in advance
Technical SEO | | TWPLC_seo0 -
404 crawl errors from "tel:" link?
I am seeing thousands of 404 errors. Each of the urls is like this: abc.com/abc123/tel:1231231234 Everything is normal about that url except the "/tel:1231231234" these urls are bad with the tel: extension, they are good without it. The only place I can find this character string is on each page we have this code which is used for Iphones and such. What are we doing wrong? Code: Phone: <a href="[tel:1231231234](tel:7858411943)"> (123) 123-1234a>
Technical SEO | | EugeneF0 -
Having both <title>and <meta name="title"...> on a web page?</title>
Hi All, Client of mine using reversed Meta Tags format in their website and Honestly i never saw such Meta Tags formats. In my opinion having 2 Title tags and wrong reversed description tag is not correct and the needs to be removed, and other tags need to be changed,too But they said that it probably doesn't make a difference because weird thing is Search Engines are apparently able to index them ,So they don't think it affects search engine results and won't remove it just based on opinion. So should i persist in correcting them or just hope for the best and ignore it?!?!?! Thanks!
Technical SEO | | DigitalJungle0