New EMD update effected my mom's legit author page? From page 1 in SERP to nowhere for her name
-
I think my mom's site, MargaretTerry.com was hit by this update for her name "Margaret Terry". Went from bouncing around the first page on google.com and .ca all the time to nowhere on the index. The results are now very strange, a mix of Youtube, linked in, and small book stores that she has done events at recently to promote her first book.
I was checking after some of my SEO buddys were freaking out about their EMD's getting hit on Sunday. She is an aspiring author with a book coming out this month. There is obviously no ads or spam content on the site... I have never done SEO for it either except a bit of on page I guess. It sucks that people might be grabbing her book soon and when they Google her name nothing shows up. This couldn't have really happened at a worse time. Not to mention the hours spent building the site to her liking, free of charge of course
Is there anyone I can contact there to help me out? Shouldn't and EMD that is someones name still rank when you search their name?
-
Being active on the Facebook page will help her shared new content on her site as it gets further developed. She can link to her blog posts once it is up and running and soon people will be bookmarking and linking to her blog versus solely following her on Facebook.
Good luck with the site, it looks like a great opportunity for building SEO experience!
-
Argh yes, content. I have been bugging her to write an about page and I have been the lazy one getting a WP blog going that matches well with the static site.
She is very active on her facebook page, so I see no reason why the blog wouldnt be quickly filled as well.
Thanks for the insight!
-
"Thank you so much for your help"
Anytime! I hate to see genuine people needing help but not knowing where to turn. I hate it almost as much as I hate none-genuine people offering to help in return for something.
"There are a lot of book stores and review sites that already have pages for her book I'm sure I can contact the owners and have them link to her home page."
That's great news! Try to be persuasive. If it looks like its failing, offer them a link back within an article on your blog section when its ready. Recipricol links aren't what they used to be but they are certainly better than no links.
I will explain more on Skype. I should be available for the next few hours at least.
Look forwards to seeing you there!
-
Yes, it took me a bit to build it to her liking before launching. I guess it could have been dancing, but it seemed to have been solid for at least a month, hence why I thought it was the update.
At least all hope is not lost. Thanks!
-
Awesome reply. Thank you so much for your help. I just assumed I would never need to do any SEO for it as no one was really competing for her name.
There are a lot of book stores and review sites that already have pages for her book I'm sure I can contact the owners and have them link to her home page.
I still don't understand how Google can value her Linked In profile more than her home page? Spokeo and 192.com that are unrelated results come up next. I mean I understand there are more than one Margaret Terry in the world but its still confusing me.
I will add you to skype as I have one more question to ask. Cheers
-
I did a little digging around your mother's site (margaretterry.com) and I don't think you have been hit by the recent updates.
Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like the domain was created in February of this year and I assume the site didn't go live till even later?
Having looked at the site with opensiteexplorer.org, there are no links being picked up and the page (and domain) authority is 1/100. Basically your site has no authority behind it.
When you initially launch a new domain, it is not unusual to see it bounce around. I also believe that Google tends to give new domains an initial artificial boost to help get started. However after a period, the site will be expected to rank on its own. This means that if your site has no links, you will not be able to rank well.
My advice would be to start building links and authority to the site. I'm afraid it's not a quick fix but it looks like your only option.
-
I know you probably don't want to hear this, but after looking at the site itself I would say the reason is because the site has very thin content. Both Open Site Explorer and Majestic SEO have no data for looking at the link profile either. I'd imagine this is also because the site is very thin.
I think if you built out more content, you might see the site back on top in Google very easily. It's still on top in Bing.
You can also build links as Matt describes above, but I'd still try to put a little more depth into the site so people have a reason to stay. Reviews and a blog which Margaret writes actively on would be great content to provide for this.
Good luck and hope this helps!
-
Give me a shout. Id happily guide you through helping and give you some pointers.
The reason it has dropped is either because they are classing it as a low value domain for precisely the reason you explained; " I have never done SEO for it either except a bit of on page I guess."... Due to the site having no links, they think it is trying to rank for the keyword "Margaret Terry" by just having the keyword in the domain name. OR it hasn't been hit by updates - it has simply lost its freshness. It is normal for new websites to rank well temporarily while Google determines the quality of the site. Almost like they are given the benefit of the doubt for a while.
Due to the book coming out, now would certainly be the time to show Google that the site does have quality to it. This wont happen instantly but you would also hope that links will start building naturally once the book is released.
I wrote a few pointers on link building for new websites (or for sites without links) earlier in an answer to another question - you may find that useful. Clicky here.
Another fantastic way of building links for a writer's website would be to get readers to review and give their opinions on the book with a link back to their site. Review sites are great for this but also look for reading clubs and blogs.
I see that there is not a great deal of content on the site - it would help if you got some nice articles on there. I spotted a blog section - this would be the ideal place.
Let me know if you need more help, feel free to add me to Skype or Twitter should you wish. The details are in my SEOMoz profile - just click my name above.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Question on Pagination - /blog/ vs /blog/?page=1
Question on Pagination Because we could have /blog/ or /blog/?page=1 as page one would this be the correct way to markup the difference between these two URL? The first page of a sequence could start with either one of these URLs. Clarity around what to do on this first page would be helpful. Example… Would this be the correct way to do this as these two URLs would have the exact content? Internal links would likely link to /blog/ so signal could be muddy. URL: https://www.somedomain.com/blog/
Technical SEO | | jorgensoncompanies
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.somedomain.com/blog/?page=1"> URL: https://www.somedomain.com/blog/?page=1
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.somedomain.com/blog/?page=1"> Google is now saying to just use the canonical to the correct paginated URL with page number. You can read that here:
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/ecommerce/pagination-and-incremental-page-loading But they do not clarify what to do on /blog/?page=1 vs /blog/ as they are the exact same thing. Thanks for your help.0 -
SERP result (URL) doesn't change after a 301
A couple of months ago there was a result in Google for our branded search term which wasn't the 'official' URL, actually the result shown in the SERP was www.mycompany-ip.nl. We've applied a 301 redirect of this URL to the 'official' URL which is a subdomain: department.mycompany.nl. From Google the redirect is obviously working, but up until now, I don't see Google replacing the incorrect URL by the correct URL. I am wondering what to do to make the result correct. André
Technical SEO | | ConclusionDigital0 -
What to do about removing pages for the 'offseason' (IE the same URL will be brought back in 6-7 months)?
I manage a site for an event that runs annually, and now that the event has concluded we would like to remove some of the pages (schedule, event info, TV schedule, etc.) that won't be relevant again until next year's event. That said, if we simply remove those pages from the web, I'm afraid that we'll lose out on valuable backlinks that already exist, and when those pages return they will have the same URLs as before. Is there a best course of action here? Should I redirect the removed pages to the homepage for the time being using a 302? Is there any risk there if the 'temporary' period is ~7 months? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | KTY550 -
Hit hard by EMD update, used to be #1 now not in top 50, what can I do?
We have what I think is a pretty good site, unique articles a few widgets, lots of reviews, decent enough bounce rates and user times (60% and 2:15) based on drupal. Previous updates haven't touched us and an almost identical duplicate (same site compltely different content) of the site targetting a different but related EMD is unaffected which provides a control. I have seen some discussion on it having to do with link profiles. We did pay some backlinkers to link to us, much more on the site that has dropped, and quite a few for a partial match keyword. I'm supposing this is a lot of the issue. If we try and delete these backlinks will it make the situation better or worse? I have also notice some duplicate content warnings in seomoz that weren't there previously. Any ideas?
Technical SEO | | btrr690 -
Is it bad to have your pages as .php pages?
Hello everyone, Is it bad to have your website pages indexed as .php? For example, the contact page is site.com/contact.php and not /contact. Does this affect your SEO rankings in any way? Is it better to have your pages without the extension? Also, if I'm working with a news site and the urls are dynamic for every article (ie site.com/articleid=2323.) Should I change all of those dynamic urls to static? Thank You.
Technical SEO | | BruLee0 -
New page titles not updating in Google results even though recrawlled
I have updated the page title of a website - it's a top product page and very high authority (64 PA on a 63 DA). The page has been recrawlled and the cache updated - but the page tiltle in the Google snippet is still the same. Any ideas?
Technical SEO | | OddDog0 -
Anyone notices the effect of the panda update for the rest of the world?
Friday google applied the Panda Update for the rest of the world, I checked my rankings and nothing seemed to have changed , does anybody notice any of the effects already? Is it to soon to draw any conclusions after 2 days?
Technical SEO | | Arnx0 -
How to handle URL's from removed products?
Hi All, I have a question about a fashion related webshop. Every month about 100 articles are removed and about the some amouth is added to the site. Most of the products are indexed on brandname and type (e.g. MyBrand t-shirt blue) My question is what to do with the URL / page after the product is removed. I'm thinking about a couple of solutions: 301 the page to the brand categorie page build a script which shows related articles on the old URL (and try to keep it indexed) 404 page optimized for search term with links to brand category any other suggestons? Thanks in advance, Sam
Technical SEO | | U-Digital0