Best url structure
-
I am making a new site for a company that services many cities.
I was thinking a url structure like this,
website.com/keyword1-keyword2-keyword3/cityname1-cityname2-cityname3-cityname4-cityname5.
Will this be the best approach to optimize the site for the keyword plus 5 different cities ?
as long as I keep the total url characters under the SeoMoz reccomended 115 characters ?
Or would it be better to build separate pages for each city, trying to reword the main services to try to avoid dulpicate content.
-
Joseph
I'd make each page totally unique to the city. Don't worry about/focus on getting a penalty or not. Make the pages so useful for the user that if you have a sentence or two that's similar you won't get a penalty. Useful to me would be information that's entirely specific to what the page is "about". A page with some testimonials and an in-depth case study, photos and useful info in regard to that location should really deliver and give people what they need to know about the services in that location!
-Dan
-
Hello Handcrafter,
thank you for your reply.
We have one long tail keyword per page but service about 15 cities with only 3 offices.
So we need to attract business from multiple cities is my dilema.
Just trying to get advice how to do this the best way.
Having one main service page and then listing all cities served in the description and content.
Or make a page for each city with case studies and testimonials unique to the city but same basic description of the service.
In your experience how much content would make it seem like duplicate content ?
-
Hello dan,
Thank you.
We do have many testimonials and case studies for each city which would be unique content for the city.
So we could describe the service in general which would have to be basically the same, but could add 2 or 3 testimonials and 5 or 6 case studies related to that service but for that cities customers.
Is that first description going to trigger a duplicate content issue ?
Would that be based on percentage of total content or having one paragraph basically the same be penalized ?
-
Thank you for all the input, some great help for sure.
After reading some answers, I was thinking to myself, what was I thinking...lol
I should have been a little clearer about the keywords.
Keyword 1, 2 and 3 are one long tail keyword not 3 separate keywords.
Example shiny blue widget
My client has a company that travels across a big area to do service calls for this shiny blue widget.
So we want the company to rank in multiple cities. There are 3 offices servicing 15 cities.
@mat - I totally agree about the URL.
-
Right on the money Matt, thank you!
So now the challenge is somehow creating separate pages about each location that are not duplicates and are actually useful.
Not sure what the niche is, but let's say you're targeting a city the business is not actually located in. How could you make a page about that? You could make a page all about that town with case studies of clients from that town. With testimonials of customers from that town. The company could hold or sponsor an event in that town. Or a piece like "The State Of [company type] in [town]". Perhaps that may get some ideas going.
-Dan
-
Hi Joseph- What will people be searching for? Does each keyword have it's own unique focus? It seems you may want to create unique pages covering each keyword or group of keywords that stand alone. Within that content you might list locations or services unique to each city. If the services are all the same, could you make 1 unique page describing those services? That way you could simply list the cities and use text links to the services page. Good luck- Handcrafter
-
If you saw that address in a search result would you actually click it?
I'd say cramming that many keywords in to a URL would send a bad signal anyway. More to the point though it is going to look like someone jumped in Marty McFly's Delorean and came back with a boot full of spam from the late 1990s.
Ranking is NOT the most important thing (even if this would help, which I would doubt). If the listing looks poor quality then that ranking will bring less traffic. Less traffic means less money.
I would much rather see a short URL without the keywords, and use the keywords in the title. Better still break it up in to every page that makes logical sense and have an appropriate URL and matching content for each. There is no "trying" to avoid duplicate content though - you have to avoid it
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Question regarding Site and URL structure + Faceted Navigation (Endeca)
We are currently implementing the SEO module for Endeca faceted navigation. Our development team has proposed URLs to be structured in this way: Main category example: https://www.pens.com/c/pens-and-writing/ As soon as a facet is selected, for example "blue ink" - The URL path would change to https://www.pens.com/m/pens-and-writing/blue-ink/_/Nvalue (the "N" value is a unique identifier generated by Endeca that determines what products from the catalog are served as a match for the selected facet and is the same every time that facet is selected, it is not unique per user). My gut instinct says that this change from "/c/" to "/m/" might be very problematic in terms of search engines understanding that /m/pens-and-writing/blue-ink/ as part of the /c/pens-and-writing/ category. Wouldn't this also potentially pose a problem for the flow of internal link equity? Has anyone ever seen a successful implementation using this methodology?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danatanseo0 -
Whats the best practice for acquisition?
Hi, My company have just bought out a competitor. We wan't to dissolve their website and if possible steal some of their link juice. The site hasn't got any spammy links or 404's so i'm not worried in that department. What I am not sure about is which of the following is best practice? a. Redirect every single page (even pages like /?checkout) to a relevant page on our website. b. Only redirect important pages, category pages, contact pages etc and leave the other pages to 404? c. Redirect the important pages to a relevant URL and redirect the less important pages to our homepage. d. Redirect the entire domain to our home page (i assume this isn't a good idea) e. Don't redirect any of the pages just delete the site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DannyHoodless0 -
All URLs in the site is 302 redirected to itself
Hi everyone, I have a problem with a website wherein all URLs (homepage, inner pages) are 302 redirected. This is based on Screaming Frog crawl. But the weird thing is that they are 302 redirected to themselves which doesn't make any sense. Example:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | alex_goldman
https://www.example.com.au/ is 302 redirected to https://www.example.com.au/ https://www.example.com.au/shop is 302 redirected to https://www.example.com.au/shop https://www.example.com.au/shop/dresses is 302 redirected to https://www.example.com.au/shop/dresses Have you encountered this issue? What did you do to fix it? Would be very glad to hear your responses. Cheers!0 -
How and When Should I use Canonical Url Tags?
Pretty new to the SEO universe. But I have not used any canonical tags, just because there is not definitive source explaining exactly when and why you should use them??? Am I the only one who feels this way?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | greenrushdaily0 -
Does having a ? on the end of your URL affect your SEO?
I have some redirects that were done with at "?" at the end of the URL to include google coding (i.e. you click on an adwords link and the google coding follows the redirected link). When there is not coding to follow the link just appears as "filename.html?". Will that affect us negatively SEO-wise? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RoxBrock1 -
What's the best SEO practice for having dynamic content on the same URL?
Let's use this example... www.miniclip.com and there's a function to log in... If you're logged in and a cookie checks that you're logged in and you're on page, let's say, www.miniclip.com/racing-games however the banners being displayed would have more call to action and offers on the page when a user is not logged in to entice them to sign up but the URL would still be www.miniclip.com/racing-games if and if not logged in, what would be the best URL practice for this? just do it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AdiRste0 -
Best practice for site maps?
Is it necessary or good practice to list "static" site routes in the sitemap? I.e. /about, /faq, etc? Some large sites (e.g. Vimeo) only list the 'dynamic' URLs (in their case the actual videos). If there are urls NOT listed in a sitemap, will these continue to be indexed? What is the good practice for a sitemap index? When submitting a sitemap to e.g. Webmaster tools, can you just submit the index file (which links to secondary sitemaps)? Does it matter which order the individual sitemaps are listed in the index?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shawn810 -
Can your site be penalized for changing the url structure and if so how long till you get back?
I'm doing well on yahoo and bing and the only reason I can think of for why I'm not showing on Google is because I changed the url structure a couple of months ago. I have solid on and off page done for this site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | deciph220