Modifying Well Established & Well Indexed Content
-
I have a page that is very well indexed and has a 1st position ranking in google. It is the best landing page in my site.
That being said, it's several years old and I honestly think it could be better. The images could be enlarged, the the images could have fancy box enlargements instead of just linking out to flickr, there could be more content about follow up projects that people have done.
I'm noteably nervous about changing such a clutch piece of content on my site.
I do want to improve the content for users, not just make it more SEO friendly (it's already SEO'd), but I'm afraid that any change could cause a set back in ranking.
Am I being afraid of nothing, should I just go for it and improve my content, or should I be extra cautious when editing well indexed content like this?
Thanks for the advice
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I would drop all of the CMS stuff. Just be sure that it does not change the URL of your page. Check the referral traffic to see if the CMS words are pulling any traffic if you have any doubts.
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? If you change an image name you will lose all current image traffic for that image. If I had lots of traffic I would not change it. If the traffic was nil I would consider a change.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **I have no fear of adding that. None. It is huge upside if you have a great image.
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Do it if you enjoy farting around. I don't think it will make any difference at all.
My most important advice. If you are improving the page, keeping it relevant and are not changing the URL, title tag or optimization have no fear.
-
**What about shortening the title tag? **I think that it's correct , I would do the same thing
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? Normally the alt image must explain what rapresent the images and help the crawler, for me you can cleaner the incorrect tag
What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? I spoke about the content (text) in the top of page
What about making these changes incrementally? Maybe you can try the change the title before and some tags ( alt) and wait some days
-
Read these answers knowing that this is what I do and how I think. On lots of these answers I don't know what google does and what google prefers. I am betting on my gut rather than on something that somebody somewhere said sometime in the past which might be very different now. I only trust what a very small number of people say and realize that google changes their mind about lots of stuff that they said in the past and don't tell anybody anything.
Make sense? lol
Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings"
I'd say that is waaaayyyyy too long. I keep mine at about 62 characters or less. Without doing a detailed analysis of traffic that the page is currently pulling I would probably shorten to...
How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk
What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage?
Lots of my pages get over half of their traffic from image search. I would not change the image file name or the alt attribute unless I thought that there was a significant upside.
These can be part of the optimization of the page.
I do replace images when I have something better or update a graph, map or photo. However, I always maintain the file name and alt attribute.
Sometimes content update requires images to be deleted and I do that with reluctance.
OMG!
My image tags look like this....
"keyword" is something simple... probably two or three absolutely relevant keywords that describe the image.
giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN
All of my images are on the same server as the website, in the same folder as the article.... like this...
egolsite.com/article-name/image-name.jpg
Some people have told me to move my images to cloud hosting or a free service instead of my server but I don't want to make it look like I am not serving my own content. I don't know if that makes any difference at all but I gladly pay to transfer terrabytes of images per month to keep them on my own servers. If someone hotlinks one of my images does that help my domain's authority? I don't know... but I got 'em there where I can see what's happening.
But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
I assume you are talking about a nice big image at top of page that will make visitors salivate? If that is what you are talking about then I would say... do it by all means and do it often.
What about making these changes incrementally?
Don't fart around. Go for it.
-
yeah it seems as if the image tag as thrown int out of proportion, I will try to correct.
-
there is a little problem with your text...
-
Ok a couple of followup questions:
What about shortening the title tag? Currently it's "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk - Blog - Projects, Ideas, Inspiration, Kee Klamp, Fittings". The stuff at the end was added by the CMS and I want to shorten it to "How To: Build a Custom Ergonomic Computer Desk". Is there any fear in shortening the Title tag when I am refining it and make it more potent (e.g. getting rid of the crap)
**What about changing the image file names and adding alt tags when they are nonsense or garbage? **
Here's an example of what's there now:
src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3039/2770274783_e9c2df4616.jpg"
width="500" />
You can see it's just junk. I could see improve the meta substantially and also giving the files real names and putting them on my own CDN. Doing this of course would cause google to see them as different (but better?) images.
**What about adding a "finish" picture to the top? **Maurizio mentioned not editing the top of the page. But what if I wanted to add a nice "finish" picture to to the top? Would that cause any issues?
**What about making these changes incrementally? **Would it be better to make a little change. Like change an image a week or something silly like that, or make all the changes at once.
-
The changes are always dangerous when you have a good position in Google.
But I always think if you avoid touching the tag in the page type:
meta Title
meta Description
Meta Keywords (only if you were already there!)
and finally, I would not change the content at the top of the page but only the graphic design.
I was afraid too when i did the same for many customers, but i did always so and never i lost a positions
Ciao
Maurizio
-
I improve pages all of the time and have great results. Traffic always goes up and rankings often go up. (A drop is very very rare.)
Adding content to an existing page can significantly increase your longtail keyword traffic.
These are what I use as a guide
-- don't do anything that will change the title tag (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't do anything that will change the onpage optimization (unless you are targeting different keywords)
-- don't change image file names or alt attributes
-- add as much new content as possible
-- revise existing content without fear
-- add additional images whenever you have them
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best practices for publishing sponsored content
Hello, Our website hosts sponsored content from different brands. Should we be listing the sponsor either on the frontend and/or through markup? - Would either way have any sort of an impact? The content itself is already clearly marked as 'sponsored content' but we were more interested in listing the specific sponsor. Also, we’re assuming the outbound links would need to be marked rel="sponsored" but are there any other best practices we should be implementing? Any insight would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | Ben-R
Thank you in advance.
Best,0 -
Regarding internal duplicate content
Suppose two of my webpages from the same site are having 30% to 35% common content. The reason behind this common content is that I put same data and images (in the main content area) since both pages are partially related. But, title tag, meta description, h1 tag, urls are different.
On-Page Optimization | | b.me
My questions are Can Google consider it as duplicate content?
Can it hamper the ranking of my pages ?
How can I deal with it?0 -
How to fix duplicate content for homepage and index.html
Hello, I know this probably gets asked quite a lot but I haven't found a recent post about this in 2018 on Moz Q&A, so I thought I would check in and see what the best route/solution for this issue might be. I'm always really worried about making any (potentially bad/wrong) changes to the site, as it's my livelihood, so I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. Moz, SEMRush and several other SEO tools are all reporting that I have duplicate content for my homepage and index.html (same identical page). According to Moz, my homepage (without index.html) has PA 29 and index.html has PA 15. They are both showing Status 200. I read that you can either do a 301 redirect or add rel=canonical I currently have a 301 setup for my http to https page and don't have any rel=canonical added to the site/page. What is the best and safest way to get rid of duplicate content and merge the my non index and index.html homepages together these days? I read that both 301 and canonical pass on link juice but I don't know what the best route for me is given what I said above. Thank you for reading, any input is greatly appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | dreservices0 -
Do quotation marks in content effect SERPs?
Some of my art object products have words and phrases engraved on them. The words relate to the images on the product. In the product descriptions, I have been putting quotes around the entire list. Would I get better long tail results if I didn't use the quotation marks? In other words, do the quotes make everything between them an exact match phrase? For example:
On-Page Optimization | | stephenfishman
Current product description:
The worlds around the edge of the lazy susan read, "Explore nature. Dream big. Take time to smell the flowers. Enjoy the changing seasons. Seize the day. Relish the night. Live life to the fullest." Thank you for helping with this, all comments on how to present this kind of content are welcomed- Stephen kSOjt5a0 -
Content with changing URL and duplicate content
Hi everyone, I have a question regarding content (user reviews), that are changing URL all the time. We get a lot of reviews from users that have been dining at our partner restaurants, which get posted on our site under (new) “reviews”. My worry however is that the URL for these reviews is changing all the time. The reason for this is that they start on page 1, and then get pushed down to page 2, and so on when new reviews come in. http://www.r2n.dk/restaurant-anmeldelser I’m guessing that this could cause for serious indexing problems? I can see in google that some reviews are indexed multiple times with different URLs, and some are not indexed at all. We further more have the specific reviews under each restaurant profile. I’m not sure if this could be considered duplicate content? Maybe we should tell google not to index the “new reviews section” by using robots.txt. We don’t get much traffic on these URLs anyways, and all reviews are still under each restaurant-profile. Or maybe the canonical tag can be used? I look forward to your input. Cheers, Christian
On-Page Optimization | | Christian_T2 -
Google index text that I can not find
Hello everybody, As you can see here: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:G-iicHoDJeYJ:www.billigste-internet.dk/&hl=da&gl=dk&strip=1 Google index the text "Forside" as the H1 tag, and "Right" and "Left" as body text, on my website. But I do not want that Google indexes this. But when I look in mine source code (see here: view-source:http://www.billigste-internet.dk/) I can not find "Forside", "rigth" or "Left", so I can delete it. Is there anyone who can help me where I need to delete the text "Forside", "Right" and "Left", so Google does not index this text? Hope someone can help.
On-Page Optimization | | JoLindahl910 -
Indexation problem
Hello, I have an online store specialized in offers and discounts (http://www.offertazo.com/) with an indexation problem. The products are not updated correctly. I think the problem is that when I publish a new offer, it doesn´t appear on the top of my page´s SERP. I would appreciate any suggestions. Best regwards.
On-Page Optimization | | ofuente0 -
Why are some of page indexed and others not
I have created a site structure like this: domain/for-sale/brand domain/for-sale/brand-model domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg1 domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg2 domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg3 etc.... I cannot understand why the domain/for-sale/brand-model does not seem to be indexed, yet the domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg6 is? This is a new site, but I cannot understand why this URL would be indexed without the others... Any ideas? My home pages has links to the domain/for-sale/brand, this page has links to domain/for-sale/brand-model1, domain/for-sale/brand-model2 etc, each of these pages have links to domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg1, domain/for-sale/brand-model/pg2 etc...
On-Page Optimization | | MirandaP0