SEO Budgets, the million dollar question???
-
Hi All,
I am currently looking to revamp my SEO strategy inline with Google's latest Panda and Penguin updates, and looking to appoint a new agency.
With SEO changing so much over the years and so many players in the marketplace quoting all sorts, I simply need to determine
- the kind of money I need to be spending on my SEO,
2) what i should be getting for the money, or different budget levels
-
what I need to be focusing on in priority order, a top ten in sorts
-
Should i be looking to increase or decrease my spend over the long term.
I am only a small business with a turnover of about 50 - 80k and need to really cement my strategy so it work long term but also shows a steady return.
I have one guy quoting $99 a month, one £250 and one £750, you can probably see my problem.
Thanks in advance.
-
Great responses from Robert and Andy below that pretty much cover a lot of what you need to think about.
I don't know your industry and how competitive it is or your market and how broad that is (local / regional / national / world) so any real targeted advice is tough.
Also, Looking at your budget, you are not going to get a lot of SEO for £750 a month from an established agency. If you want content and links developing that kind of figure is just not going to do the job if you outsource it.
You could consider taking on an apprentice or someone interested in Internet Marketing and wanting to cut their teeth. This way, you could get a full time resource, someone who can tap into the masses of information out there and really do something with it.
If you can find someone who can research and write content and is happy with the more technical side of things as well great but the focus should be on someone who can create the kind of content you need to broaden your scope and earn you links.
There is just so much good information out there that if someone can come into your business, learn what you do and then use that knowledge to create valuable content, big content and promote it socially and via outreach to get links then certainly, six months with an approach like that will benefit you far more than six days with an agency over a six month time period.
You could potentially even use an agency to come up with a six month plan for you with a mind to have an in house
Consider the link bait guide from Distilled. Primarly produced by Ed Fry, a 16 year old intern. It has now earned around 500 links. This is not only a great resource for someone with a lot of time it is also a great example of what can be accomplished with time and dedication.
My advice would be to think about getting an intern for six months. Work with an agency to fashion a plan involving search, social, content, outreach etc and then use your intern to do the graft.
Some interesting reading from this perspective:
http://www.distilled.net/linkbait-guide/
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-noob-guide-to-online-marketing-with-giant-infographic-11928
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-noob-guide-to-link-building
In this game you have to be practical and whilst skill and experience count for a lot on the strategic end, you can't get away from the need to do some great work to create the content and then the talk required to get the message out and get people to link to it and all of that takes time and effort.
I go into how to hustle for links a bit more here: http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/earning-links-work-talk-hustle/
Hope that helps!
MarcusP.S. Avoid the $99 package - that can't be any kind of good.
-
I think you should focus on a full SEO audit first with actionable recommendations. Each SEO company should be able to give this to you with reasonable cost.
The actionable recommendations should be measurable. Some measures will be easy (i.e. implementation of a sitemap and improving the crawl-rate / index ratio) while other measures will be difficult (you want to increase your SERPs and organic traffic).
Best way to approach this is to set up KPIs which will then allow you to measure progress. It will oftentimes be very murky, especially if you do SEM at the same time.
-
ETSgroup
I would answer you first with this from GWMT regarding providers of SEO:
Some useful questions to ask an SEO include:
- Can you show me examples of your previous work and share some success stories?
- Do you follow the Google Webmaster Guidelines?
- Do you offer any online marketing services or advice to complement your organic search business?
- What kind of results do you expect to see, and in what timeframe? How do you measure your success?
- What's your experience in my industry?
- What's your experience in my country/city?
- What's your experience developing international sites?
- What are your most important SEO techniques?
- How long have you been in business?
- How can I expect to communicate with you? Will you share with me all the changes you make to my site, and provide detailed information about your recommendations and the reasoning behind them?
Today, everyone does SEO and unfortunately most who say they do cannot spell it. I see new prospective clients regularly who just had their entire site optimized and all someone did was put 30 keywords (and not even the best ones) on the page or wrote a paragraph for a title tag or meta description. So, yes, I have an opinion.
If your site is fairly new and was originally set up with keyword analysis done first, good on page/ on site SEO, etc. there is less for someone to do in that vein. If they are doing an SEO audit, with no guarantee of ongoing work and are a reputable firm/pro, the cost will likely range from $500 to $2,500 or higher depending on the type, size, etc. of the site.
Once that is done, it is on to what Andy writes about and content is first. Authorship, Rich Snippets and structured data like Schema, Links that are quality and are earned (recent WBF by Rand) are best.An ongoing SEO program of building links, etc. is difficult and expensive in time and people. For us with a site that is trying to get a lot of good links, we can charge up to $5K per month, but this is really having someone on it about 20 hours a week doing nothing but link building, etc.
If you are blogging it will depend on whether you are doing it or having copywriters do it. A decent page can run $50 to $250. (Length and Technical level, etc.).
I would look for someone who understands that SEO is not about ranking in Google, et al. It is about getting the business clients/customers/revenue, etc. What you have to weigh is what result you want for a given spend. If the site is bringing in customers, how many more do you need to spend say $500 to $1,000 a month? If you spend that you want to cover more than just the SEO piece, you want it to give you additional funds as well. My rule would depend on margins in your vertical, but probably minimum of 2:1 and more like 3:1 in most.
I hope this helps as I understand it is a difficult line to walk. Please check out those who say they do SEO. Make sure they have happy clients that will talk with you. Not that they never made a mistake; but if they did they owned it and improved.
Lastly, what Andy says about who to steer clear of is very important. Anyone who has some "special" way of doing it with magic windows, sites they own that link to one another, etc. cannot spell SEO.
All the best,
Robert
-
Never an easy question and I have no doubt you will be scratching your head a little after everyone has contributed because each SEO has a different way of charging, different rates and different strategies.
The only things I can tell you that will be (should be) the top of the lists for any SEO are, in no order:
- Content
- Authorship / Rich Snippets
- Links
- Page Quality
These are all based on some of the latest algorithm updates that Google is targeting heavily.
As for what to spend - how long is the proverbial piece of string? $99 might be a really good price if you are getting loads of really great work completed, but in reality, how much manual work will be done for this price?
At £250, that is a low-end daily rate with £750 being something towards the top end of daily rates (top being around £900 per day).
Try and get examples of past work and get a detailed breakdown of all of the manual work that is to be carried out. Steer clear of anyone who tells you they will build links to directories or do article marketing or that uses tools to complete important tasks.
Hope that helps a little.
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
38% of SEOs Never Disavow Links: Are you one among them or the other 62%?
Hi all, Links disavowing is such a advanced tasks in SEO with decent amount of risk involved. I thought many wouldn't follow use this method as Google been saying that they try to ignore bad links and there will be no penalty for such bad links and negative SEO is really a rare case. But I wondered to see only 38% SEOs never used this method and other 62% are disavowing links monthly, quarterly or yearly. I just wonder do we need to disavow links now? It's very easy to say to disavow a link which is not good but difficult to conclude them whether they are hurting already or we will get hurt once they been disavowed. Thanks Screenshot_3.jpg
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
Question regarding very unique SERP -
Hi guys, I have been brainstorming regarding a very unique SERP that i figured out while navigating search, the serp looks some thing like this http://postimg.org/image/phkol0d97/. i checked the site in structured testing tool but the only thing that i found is some PMR meta tags nothing except that. Can any one help me understand this and i would be more helpful if some one can guide me for the same. #peace
Algorithm Updates | | prashanth1230 -
Hi guys, I have a question about linking to a product page for linkbuilding. Does that count adversely vs. linking to a homepage?
Hi - so until now we have been building links via blog posts and articles and linking them to the homepage. It seems the ranking of some of my top keywords has fallen so had a few questions/concerns: Does it affect the rankings adversely if I link to the product page vs the homepage? What is rule of thumb for increasing rankings of inside pages/keywords and building links to them? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | DGM0 -
How do I code SEO for a secondary site without impacting the main site?
We have a secondary site for our online magazine, how do I code the SEO so I don't steal links from the main site?
Algorithm Updates | | gacwebteam0 -
SERP Question - Site showing up for national term over local term recently
Hey Moz, This has been happening to me with a couple of clients recently and I wanted to kick it out to the community and see if anyone else has experienced it and might be able to shed some light on why. (Disclaimer: Both clients are in the elective healthcare space)
Algorithm Updates | | Etna
Scenario: Client's site is optimized for a fairly competitive "procedural keyword + location" phrase. Historically, the site had been ranking on the first page for a while until it suddenly dropped off for that query. At the same time, the page now ranks on the first page for just the procedural term, without the location modifier (obviously much more competitive than with the location modifier). Searches on Google were set to the city in which the client was located. Not that I'm complaining, but this seems a little weird to me. Anyone have a similar situation? If so, any theories about what might have caused it? TL;DR - Site ranked on 1st page for "keyword + location modifier" historically, now ranking on 1st page for "keyword" only and not found with "keyword + location modifier" TRQd9Hu0 -
Video SEO: Youtube, Vimeo PRO, Wistia, Longtail BOTR Experience and questions
Obviously Video SEO is changing, Google is figuring out how to do it themselves. We are left wondering… Below we have tried to explain what we have learned and how the different sites work and their characteristics (links to graphics provided) Our problem is: We are not getting congruent Google site:apalytics.tv Video filter results. We are wondering how duplicate content may be affecting our results… and if so, why will Youtube not be duplicate and prevent your own site SEO efforts from working. Is Youtube special? Does that include Vimeo too? We see our own duplicate videos on multiple sites in Google results, so it seems it is not duplicate related…? We’d appreciate your experience or add to our questions and work as a community to get this figured out more definitively. Thanks! We’ve tried four video hosting solutions at quite a cost monetarily and in time. 1.) Youtube, which gets all the SEO Juice and gets our clients on to other subjects or potentially competitive content. Iframes just don’t get the results we are looking for. 2.) See Vimeo Image: Vimeo PRO, a $200 year plus solution that allows us to do many video carousels on our own domains hosted on Vimeo, but are very limited in HTML as only CSS content changes are allowed. While we were using Vimeo we allowed the Vimeo.com community to SEO our content directly and they come up often in search results. Due to duplicate content concerns we have disallowed Vimeo.com from using our content and SEOing our content to their domain. However, we have many “portfolios” (micro limited carousal sites on our domains) that continue to carry the content. The Vimeo hosted micro site shows only three videos on Google: site:apalytics.tv During our testing we are concerned that duplicate content is causing issues too, so we are getting ready to shut off the many microsite domains hosted at Vimeo. (Vimeo has an old embed code that allows a NON-iframe embed – but has discontinued it recently) That makes it difficult if not impossible to retain SEO juice for anything other than their simple micro sites that are very limited! 3.) See Wistia Image: Wistia, a $2000 year plus solution that only provides private video site hosting embedding various types of video content on one’s site/s. Wistia has a free account now for three videos and limited plays – it’s a nice interface for SEO but is still different than BOTR. We opted for BOTR because of many other advertising related options, but are again trying Wistia with the free version to see if we can figure out why our BOTR videos are not showing up as hoped. We know that Google does not promise to index and feature every video on a sitemap, but why some are there and others are not and when remains a mystery that we are hoping to get some answers about. 4.) See Longtail Image: Longtail, Bits On The Run, (JW Player author) a $1,000 year plus like Wistia provides private hosting, but it allows a one button YouTube upload for the same SEO meta data and content – isn’t that duplicate content? BOTR creates and submits video sitemaps for your content, but it has not been working for us and it has been impossible to get a definitive answer as I think they too are learning or are not wanting the expose their proprietary methods (which are not yet working for us!) 2O9w0.png 0eiPv.png O9bXV.png
Algorithm Updates | | Mark_Jay_Apsey_Jr.0 -
SERP and SEO Moz ranking
Until a couple of months ago the predicted SEO Moz ranking for a specific keyword was fairly close to what I actually experienced with my website. However, since then the correlation has not been good. For example, according to SEO Moz I am ranked #1 for a specific keyword with google.ca and google.com yet my site actually shows up consistently at #3 for that keyword. Has anyone else noticed this divergence?
Algorithm Updates | | casper4340 -
SEO updates and rank changes
We have been updating page titles and meta descriptions for a client (not changing ANY links and the content we are replacing is "fluff," no major keywords or any relevant information) yet in the past few weeks, rankings have plummeted. I used the SEOMoz grader to check and make sure we have the keywords in there, in the right places for the updated page source info, and we're getting A's yet for those same keywords, the website is nowhere to be found. For example for the phrase "organic t shirts," we get an A for this page: http://greenpromotionalitems.com/organic-t-shirts.htm but when searching organic t shirts, no Green Promotional Items... Ideas?
Algorithm Updates | | laidlawseo0