Sold Products appear as duplicate pages 'Page Not Found' ???
-
Hi there,
I'm down to just 6 duplicate page warnings but I'm not sure how to deal with this one:
Information Page Not Found!
http://www.vintageheirloom.com/index.php?route=information/information&information_id=6
My Ecommerce shopping site products are unique, 1 of a kind. So once one product has sold and been delivered we take the product off our website, hence the Information Page Not Found!
As I understand when search engines re-index these warnings will drop off but new sold products would replace them. So redirecting seems like hard work and never ending.
Is it ok to ignore these warnings?
Thanks Mozzers..
-
Woohoo! Yes, I think it's a great solution too. I have a lot of respect for B & H Photo (even though they are a competitor, lol) - They know what they are doing.
-
Dana
I like it, I like it a lot!
This makes a lot of sense, hadn't thought of that.
My ecommerce site allows me to keep the product 'Active' but I just remove the Links to category so it doesn't appear by default and voila, problem solved.
For example this product: http://www.vintageheirloom.com/vintage-designers/bottega-veneta/silk-rafia-style-bag-1347390241
Isn't visible in this category anymore: http://www.vintageheirloom.com/vintage-designers/bottega-veneta
Perfect solution
-
I do no several sites that never take a page down for products that are no longer available. Here is an example:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/677584-REG/Yamaha_P_95S_PG_95_Digital_Stage_Piano.html
It's really kind of a brilliant approach, definitely one we are considering. Notice how there is a note on the page that says "This product is no longer available" and then there is a link that says "View Similar Items." So not only are they retaining the original page and its authority, they are making the most of their internal linking structure too.
-
HI Dana
I'm hoping there is an alternative to 301 redirects, not that this is a big problem for me, we aren't a large sales website.
Our shopping cart comes with a friendly looking 404 page site structure menu bars, footer etc all intact, but thanks your right I should add more user friendly text.
Let's both keep our fingers crossed, sounds like it is an issue for your site too.
-
Interesting scenario. You are correct in that yes, those pages would eventually drop off. However, you have a couple of problems. First, in the event that your product page has built up some page authority, you are going to lose that when the page goes away unless you execute a 301 redirect, at the very least back to a category page. The other problem is just from a visitor/usability standpoint. That is, you don't want potential visitors being served up a bunch of 404 pages because that's going to negatively impact your traffic, bounce rate, etc.
As much work as it is, I would do 301s and create a user-friendly, branded 404 page, so you're covered from both aspects. It looks like you already have a custom 404. I would just add language to it that explains better to a visitor why they are on that page and then give them a link that takes them directly back to your storefront.
There may be some other alternatives that folks here can suggest. I'll be interested to see what others have to say as I too am in the e-commerce space and clearance products often fall into a similar situation for us. Hope this helps!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How come canonicalized pages are showing in the Duplicate Titles report?
I am currently removing all duplicate titles from my site via title tag changes, 301's, and in some instances, canonical tags. I'm confused about why the Moz report spit out pages with duplicate titles that are canonicalized to other pages. Does Google actually consider these pages as having duplicate titles? Or is Roger Mozbot not intuitive enough to to disregard those pages?
On-Page Optimization | | StevenLevine0 -
Duplicate Page Titles in Crawl Errors (although Google is rewriting in serps ??)
Hi Im working on a client/project and crawl report is showing thousands of dupe page titles In the case of the blog/news section its aprox 50 since aprox 50 posts and they all have the same meta-title: "Brand News | Brand" as opposed to: "Title Unique to Page/Topic/KW Relating to Content | Brand" Since these are the main content pages we want to rank (in addition to the main site category pages) then i have instructed dev must prioritise populating these pages meta-titles with the actual post/article titles, as per the latter version of the above example. (I should mention that i have requested they fix all dupe titles but main content pages are the priority). Whilst this will reduce the number of dupe titles in crawl error/warning report which is a good thing, is it actually likely to increase the ranking of these news/content pages given that Google does seem to be rewriting the titles correctly in the serps based on the page content ? Many Thanks in advance for your input
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Duplicate Page Titles? I thought this was good structure....
I have several warnings for duplicate page title.... I thought that I had good structure, but I guess I am doing something wrong. On my website (http://www.farnorthkennel.com), I am getting duplicate page errors for pages like this: http://www.farnorthkennel.com/german-shepherd-puppies-the-girls/hazel
On-Page Optimization | | Joshlaska
and
http://www.farnorthkennel.com/german-shepherd-puppies-the-girls/emerald I thought that this sort of structure was a good idea since the end page is different. Should each page be set up right after the original domain name? I'm new at this....0 -
Number of Words Product Pages
Hello, Can you give me some examples of how many words you use for product pages? I know it's going to vary and that quality is more important than number of words, but what's been optimal for you and why?
On-Page Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Can't see why been marked 'Avoid Keyword Stuffing'
Hi SEOmoz! I'm a newbie, first post, here goes... Working my way through On-Page Report Cards. Noticed this page http://www.vintageheirloom.com/vintage-chanel/vintage-chanel-bags flagged with 'Avoid Keyword Stuffing in Document'. Keyword is 'Vintage Chanel bags' and there is just one instance of it on this particular category page?? Any ideas? Any general pointers for me on www.vintageheirloom.com would also be much appreciated. Thanks SEOmozzers...
On-Page Optimization | | well-its-1-louder0 -
Is reported duplication on the pages or their canonical pages?
There are several sections getting flagged for duplication on one of our sites: http://mysite.com/section-1/?something=X&confirmed=true
On-Page Optimization | | Safelincs
http://mysite.com/section-2/?something=X&confirmed=true
http://mysite.com/section-3/?something=X&confirmed=true Each of the above are showing as having duplicates of the other sections. Indeed, these pages are exactly the same (it's just an SMS confirmation page you enter your code in), however, they all have canonical links back to the section (without the query string), i.e. section-1, section-2 and section-3 respectively. These three sections have unique content and aren't flagged up for duplications themselves, so my questions are: Are the pages with the query strings the duplicates, and if so why are the canonical links being ignored? or Are the canonical pages without the query strings the duplicates, and if so why don't they appear as URLs in their own right in the duplicate content report? I am guessing it's the former, but I can't figure out why it would ignore the canonical links. Any ideas? Thanks0 -
20 x '400' errors in site but URLs work fine in browser...
Hi, I have a new client set-up in SEOmoz and the crawl completed this morning... I am picking up 20 x '400' errors, but the pages listed in the crawl report load fine... any ideas? example - http://www.morethansport.co.uk/products?sortDirection=descending&sortField=Title&category=women-sports clothing
On-Page Optimization | | Switch_Digital0 -
What is the best solution for printable product pages (duplicate content)?
What do you think is the best solution for preventing duplicate content issues on printable versions of product pages? The printable versions are identical in content. Disallow in Robots.txt? Meta Robots No Index, Follow? Meta Robots No Index No Follow? Rel Canonical?
On-Page Optimization | | BlinkWeb1