Google Places & Multiple Listings
-
Our client used to have a listing in each city, but after updating the addresses they were forever under review. Google said that businesses serving customers at their locations can only list their primary office.
Back when this client had multiple city listings, all addresses but one were UPS boxes. If they are to change back to "No, all customers come to the business location," can they once again submit a listing for each city using these addresses?
Yes, I realize they are UPS boxes, but they insist on being listed for each city.
-
You are so welcome, Zeke!
-
Thank you, Miriam. Sometimes it's good to have a third party confirm what you already know the correct answer should be. Appreciate it.
-
Hi Zeke,
Oh, clients like these are a handful! Explain, very clearly, to the client that the reason their listings went under review was because they broke the rules. What they want to do now is still breaking the rules and could risk their one legitimate location's rankings if Google decides they are spamming the index. Don't be vague. Be totally straightforward on this. Show them the guidelines: http://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
Especially this part:
Business Location: Use a precise, accurate address to describe your business location.
Do not create a listing or place your pin marker at a location where the business does not physically exist. P.O. Boxes are not considered accurate physical locations.
Do not create more than one listing for each business location, either in a single account or multiple accounts.
Businesses that operate in a service area, as opposed to a single location, should not create a listing for every city they service. Businesses that operate in a service area should create one listing for the central office or location and designate service areas. Learn how to add service areas to your listing.
If you don't conduct face-to-face business at your location, you must select "Yes, this business serves customers at their locations" under the "Service Areas and Location Settings" section of your dashboard, and then select the "Do not show my business address on my Maps listing" option.
If the client cannot see that these rules are precisely describing that what they want to do is a violation, my advice is to drop them like a hot potato.
Local SEOs strive to help honest business people - not to abet rule breakers. If your client changes his tune after he sees the guidelines, then you can offer him an alternative, legitimate strategy that would work along these lines:
-
The client may go after true local rankings for his city of location by running a well optimized website that incorporates important local hooks, by having a single Places listing/Google+ Local Page that follows all the rules, and by building citations for his single, legit address.
-
If he is a service-radius-type business (like a plumber, carpet cleaner, chimney sweep) and serves customers at their locations rather than at his location, then he must comply with the hide address rule on his single Places Listing.
-
All of the above goes toward achieving high local rankings within the pinned, lettered blended/local pack of results.
-
Now, to approach the task of ranking well for his service cities (as a plumber, carpet cleaner or lawyer would), he can begin to showcase his work in these other surrounding cities where he is not physically located by created awesome city landing pages for each. These pages must feature totally unique, first class copy (no cutting and pasting copy, no thin content). He can create a unique page for each city that he serves.
-
He can then work on earning links to these pages to improve their chances of rankings.
-
Unlike the goal of steps 1,2 and 3, the goal of steps 4 and 5 for his service cities will be organic rankings - not local rankings. Google predominantly views any business as being most relevant to its city of location - not its service cities, so this is vital for the client to understand.
By following the above method, the client will be doing all he can to try to gain high local rankings for his city of location terms, and high organic rankings for his service city location terms. This is a completely valid way of working with this type of business model. Lay it out clearly for the client what you can do, and then let him make a decision. If he just won't see the light, walk away...he's going to be living in penalty land until he decides to play by the rules. In my own work as a Local SEO, I have learned to shoot straight with clients like this one who are spamming either because they don't understand the rules, or because they do know the rules and want to bend them for their own perceived benefit. The first type, I have a wonderful opportunity to educate. The second type, I can be quite direct in stating that I only offer guidelines-compliant services. Then, let them decide. Good luck and I hope this helps!
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Video Hosting & Embedding
Hi Does anyone have experience with Wistia and does it still hold try embedding a video from Wistia is better for SEO? Or is there no difference with this compared with YouTube if embedding a product video on your product page? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Multiple Instances of the Same Article
Hi, I'm having a problem I cannot solve about duplicate article postings. As you will see from the attached images, I have a page with multiple variants of the same URL in google index and as well as duplicate title tag in the search console of webmasters tools. Its been several months I have been using canonical meta tags to resolve the issue, aka declare all variants to point to a single URL, however the problem remains. Its not just old articles that stay like that, even new articles show the same behaviour right when they are published even thought they are presented correctly with canonical links and sitemap as you will see from the example bellow. Example URLs of the attached Image All URLs belonging to the same article ID, have the same canonical link inside the html head. Also because I have a separate mobile site, I also include in every desktop URL an "alternate" link to the mobile site. At the Mobile Version of the Site, I have another canonical link, pointing back to the original Desktop URL. So the mobile site article version also has Now, when it comes to the xml sitemap, I pass only the canonical URL and none of the other possible variants (to avoid multiple indexing), and I also point to the mobile version of the article.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ioannisa
<url><loc>http://www.neakriti.gr/?page=newsdetail&DocID=1300357</loc>
<xhtml:link rel="alternate" media="only screen and (max-width: 640px)" href="http://mobile.neakriti.gr/fullarticle.php?docid=1300357"><lastmod>2016-02-20T21:44:05Z</lastmod>
<priority>0.6</priority>
<changefreq>monthly</changefreq>
image:imageimage:lochttp://www.neakriti.gr/NewsASSET/neakriti-news-image.aspx?Doc=1300297</image:loc>
image:titleΟΦΗ</image:title></image:image></xhtml:link></url> The above Sitemap snippet Source: http://www.neakriti.gr/WebServices/sitemap.aspx?&year=2016&month=2
The main sitemap of the website: http://www.neakriti.gr/WebServices/sitemap-index.aspx Despite my efforts you see that webmasters tools reports three variants for the desktop URL, and google search reports 4 URLs (3 different desktop variant urls and the mobile url). I get this when I type the article code to see if what is indexed in google search: site:neakriti.gr 1300297 So far I believe I have done all I could in order to resolve the issue by addressing canonical links and alternate links, as well as correct sitemap.xml entry. I don't know what else to do... This was done several months ago and there is absolutelly no improvement. Here is a more recent example of an article added 5 days ago (10-April-2016), just type
site:neakriti.gr 1300357
at google search and you will see the variants of the same article in google cache. Open the google cached page, and you will see the cached pages contain canonical link, but google doesn't obey the direction given there. Please help! duplicate-articles.jpg duplicate-articles-in-index.jpg0 -
Multiple brands issue
My client has his main brand on the domain name .com and then 3 brands that exist on .com/brandA , com/brandB and .com/brandC We created a lot of content for .com main brand and we noticed that brandB copied some of our content and put it on .com/brandB . How to deal with this? Canonical tags?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aliciaporrata10090 -
"Null" appearing as top keyword in "Content Keywords" under Google index in Google Search Console
Hi, "Null" is appearing as top keyword in Google search console > Google Index > Content Keywords for our site http://goo.gl/cKaQ4K . We do not use "null" as keyword on site. We are not able to find why Google is treating "null" as a keyword for our site. Is anyone facing such issue. Thanks & Regards
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vivekrathore0 -
Shopify and multiple stores for seo
Hi, We have a potential client who has multiple stores targeting different countries using Shopify. He has set the domains for specific countries using geo targeting in webmaster tools. Anybody had any experience on how fool proof this is? (all the sites have the exact same products/content on them) Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OnlineAssetPartners0 -
Number of images on Google?
Hello here, In the past I was able to find out pretty easily how many images from my website are indexed by Google and inside the Google image search index. But as today looks like Google is not giving you any numbers, it just lists the indexed images. I use the advanced image search, by defining my domain name for the "site or domain" field: http://www.google.com/advanced_image_search and then Google returns all the images coming from my website. Is there any way to know the actual number of images indexed? Any ideas are very welcome! Thank you in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau1 -
Pagination & SEO
I have the WP-Pagination plugin and I am wondering how to handle duplicate content issues and what's best for SEO. My developer initially downloaded the plugin to speed up loading for the home page. Now my home page has 21 pages of paginated content. But the pagination continues with each of my categories as well. Should I be placing a canonical reference to my home page, or category main page? My site name is gracessweetlife (dot) com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gracessweetlife0 -
Fixing Google Places once Banned
I have a lot of clients who have somehow botched up their Google Places listing, and now are not showing up in local search results. In one particular case, they were using 2 different Gmail accounts and submitted their listing twice by accident. It appears Google has banned them from local search results. How does one undo steps like this and start fresh? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ocsearch0