Best solutions when homepage won't rank in Google?
-
My homepage (www.LeatherHideStore.com) will not rank for my keywords in Google - with Google mostly pulling product pages and some categories for serp results. In contrast, my homepage consistently shows for Yahoo and Bing with exceptions where a category is a better match for the keyword. In other words, it is working exactly as it should in Yahoo and Bing.
After a year of this frustration I just upgraded to a new site on Magento Community and surprise, the same problem! The SEO moz analyzer has flagged significant duplicate content issues which I think is at the heart of my problem. I have asked my developer to address these but let's just say that customer service is not his forte. I am even starting to doubt he knows what to do although the site appears is well done.
Given that it is a brand new site and duplicate content in Magento is to be expected (from what I have now read), I am deeply discouraged that my developer did not or could not plan for this so here I am again!
Can anyone give me guidance on what to do? I have read a lot about canonicalization and it seems complicated especially if you have 1000 duplicate page titles. I have seen that there are some extensions (i.e. Ultimate SEO Suite by aheadWorks) for Magento that claim to be able to solve duplicate content problems but I am really just grasping at straws and do not have the confidence or skills to implement this on my own.
Can anyone please help?
Thanks!
Hunter
-
Hi Thomas,
Yes, like many folks I do have some crappy links. Moz is a little behind as I have BBB and about 1/2 dozen high authority links not accounted for (SEO spyglass is a better assessment of link profile). More importantly, is that some of my main competitors that have less moz authority and really crappy links are sitting on top of the SERPs. I actually have lots of keywords ranking high (especially in Yahoo and Bing where the domain is perceived correctly). Even the random products and categories that are selected by google for my keywords get respectful page 2 rank but these pages have no PR or DA and I have to think that if Google recognized my homepage as the authority page I would be neck and neck with competitors that have a fraction of the quality site (and content) that I do plus they have much more polluted linking profiles. See why I am so frustrated?
Hunter
-
Hunter
your link profile is not okay I am not trying to be negative but this is not good these are your inbound links link exchanges trading links and link directories that are "guaranteed to perform number 1" are junk Google is penalizing you for this is unfortunately worse than having no links it is a pickle being put into the situation as to what to do you can remove them or not the general consensus I go with is leave them but build quality links it's not easy it's not cheap but it works and it's the only thing that works if you have not been penalized severely for the way your site is set up and these links I put bad and very bad next to the ones that are really awful some of these are legit but maybe 5 of them you need to simply think about what you want to do with this website do you want to fix it up and actually have it working correctly Google is looking for you to build the brand along with provide content that is truly good if not great they want you to be the best that whatever niche you are in and links like this tell me this is a bad link profile but with a lot of help you can change all this. I would question whoever has been giving you advice and I would like to see what SEOMoz has to say I believe they can shed more light on this and I and I do not want to sound like I am saying negative things all the time when I really just want to be of help. So I am asking for SEOmoz to tell us what they think maybe shed some light on this
| link2me.com | Link Exchange. Free Link Exchange Directory. ... |
| linkspro.com | Link Exchange Links | Links Trade Links | Links... || linkresell.com Very BAd | General Link Directory |
| edenworkshops.com | Book Binding Supply USA |
| submitlinks.us BAD | General Link Directory |
| tnb22.com BAD | TNB22 Directory- Details |
| tkseo.net BAD | tk SEO Website Directory |
| stoneycreekwoodworks.com BAD | Links to Leatherwork websites |
| handbagdistributor.com | Fashion Accessories |
| newdrama.org ? | Профилn... |
| beltmaster.com | BELTS � Men�s & Women�... |
| barstools4u.com | Leather for Bar Stools and Counter Stools Direc... |
| gold-vault.com | Craft Supplies - The Best Craft Supplies Links ... |
| 1speakerstand.com | Furniture Related Links Page 9 |
| leatherhidestore.com | Leather Hide Store | Wholesale Leather Hides |
| free-submit-url.com BAD | Free Submit Url - Web Directory- Business &... |
| intermagnetusa.org | Intermagnetusa.org | An SEO Friendly PHPLD Dire... |
| leathertobaccopouch.com VERY BAD | Exchange links with LeatherTobaccoPouch.com |
| co.in VERY BAD | Get Guaranteed Number One Ranking - Outperform ... |
| levergunleather.com | Custom Leather Work Hand crafted by Lever; |
| sklibertytrain.com ? bad | Sklibertytrain | An SEO Friendly PHPLD Director... |
| freelink-directory.net ? | Free Link Directory - Shopping |
| pressreleasedistributionservices.com | http://pressreleasedistributionservices.com/Buy... | -
Hi Hunter,
your homepage is redirecting too many times and I am not inside the website so I cannot tell you with 100% accuracy as my scan is still taking place however I am 99% certain the answer is your FAQ page has more links going to it or more page authority or trust. You are absolutely correct when you say the competitors homepages will be the 1st ones found in they should be especially in Google what you're saying is extremely odd I agree with you on that however there is a logical explanation for it search engine optimization is not voodoo there is something wrong with your homepage if not many things 1st let's talk about rel=canonical it is vital to tell Google what you believe is your homepage content so if you want www.leatherhidestore.com to be here homepage telling Google using leatherhidestore.com
will drastically improve your sites ability to place the homepage
in 1st place in Google you have to understand if you have tons of duplicate content including descriptions and titles on your homepage you're being penalized plus you don't have very much content on their you really should have more text like I said before I would be happy to go over this with you if you would like you may ring me and I will tell you at no charge what I believe you should do.
I think you will find the information here interesting
http://marketing.grader.com/site/www.leatherhidestore.com
along with this
http://searchengineland.com/canonical-tag-16537
like I said I can tell you how to fix your site if you wish to chat with me about it I'm more than happy to do that but my advice regardless of what you do is use a search engine optimization specialist not just the developer we are far different from developers and they do their thing we do ours if you want to rank you need to make some adjustments to your site.
Respectfully,
Thomas
-
Hi Thomas,
Yes the URL with the servlet was required by Prostores, my old platform, so when we moved over to Magento I was able to have my dedicated domain name. A 301 was put into place for the www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront but since the move was just done on 11/5 I am wondering if Google is still sorting this all out? This servlet URL is no longer indexed by Google and leatherhidestore.com also directs to www.leatherhidestore which is my preferred domain. I know the use of rel=canonical will help but what specifically might be going on that would lead Google to choose things like my FAQ page or randon products instead of my homepage? All my competitors have their hompage ranking so it cannot be the nature of the products. This is even more vexing since I have a solid backlink profile that nearly all points to my homepage? It does not make sense.
-
Hunter I don't mean to keep sending you messages man but I think this might help as well it is dealing with a lot of the issues you are dealing with now
http://searchengineland.com/8-canonicalization-best-practices-in-plain-english-44475
What about rel=canonical?
The canonical tag is a neat little gadget that’s supposed to let you tell search engines the correct URL for any page. So, by adding to any page, I could tell visiting search bots to index just that version, and to direct all link authority to that one URL. It sounds ideal.
You can avoid the heartbreak of bad canonicalization, or at least minimize it, by doing a few simple things:
- Use 301 redirection to ensure that your home page is only found at one URL. If you don’t know how, read Stephan Spencer’s column about rewrites and redirects.
- Link consistently to your home page from within your own site. Use a single URL for your home page. Don’t mix in instances of ‘www.iansnerdvana.com/index.html’ with ‘www.iansnerdvana.com’. If you aren’t doing this properly right now, a quick change may have a big impact on SEO.
-
Hi Hunter,
your the homepage is redirecting to www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront then back again
"Oh Hey! It looks like that URL redirects to www.leatherhidestore.com. Would you like to see data for <a class="clickable redirects">that URL instead</a>?" without the/ however the storefront URL is better off without /servlet/ if it can be helped. The amount of linking root domains and see box along with the moz score and moz trust will make it so search engines continually gravitate towards www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront you have very complicated redirection problems and that's not a bad thing because those are easily fixed most of the time. Did you work with your search engine optimization consultant when you were working with their developer or was it pure developer doing the SEO? here some information Below I'm sorry about the format it's in however it gives you some very clear data on some of the problems with your site. one thing I might recommend if you have not found the data useful here is a full site analysis with recommendations on what to do next you can find that for $200 here I strongly recommend it whether you go with a SEO to fix this or you try to do with the developer however I do not know your developer but from the site I can tell you your return on the investment will be much higher if you use somebody that understands search engine optimization take a look at usinghttp://www.alexa.com/siteaudit now please understand it will not give you all the answers or SEO your site for you however it's a step in right direction like I said if you would like to talk I may know I can tell you quite a bit about your site.
| Total Links: | 2,692 | 900 | -- | -- | -- |
| Followed Linking Root Domains: | 46 | 33 | -- | -- | -- |
| Total Linking Root Domains: | 51 | 35 | -- | -- | -- |
| Linking C Blocks: | 45 | 32|
www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront www.leatherhidestore.com <a class="external seoquake-nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">+ Add URL</a> <a class="external seoquake-nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">+ Add URL</a> <a class="external seoquake-nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">+ Add URL</a> Page Authority: 42 38 -- -- -- Page MozRank: 4.71 4.15 -- -- -- Page MozTrust: 5.83 5.61 -- -- -- Internal Followed Links: 870 835 -
www.leatherhidestore.com/servlet/StoreFront www.leatherhidestore.com <a class="compare">+ Add URL</a> <a class="compare">+ Add URL</a> <a class="compare">+ Add URL</a> --- --- --- --- --- Page Authority: 42 38 -- -- -- Page MozRank: 4.71 4.15 -- -- -- Page MozTrust: 5.83 5.61 -- -- -- Internal Followed Links: 870 835 -- -- -- External Followed Links: 1,816 63 -- -- -- Total Internal Links: 870 835 -- -- -- Total External Links: 1,822 65 -- -- -- Total Links: 2,692 900 -- -- -- Followed Linking Root Domains: 46 33 -- -- -- Total Linking Root Domains: 51 35 -- -- -- Linking C Blocks: 45 32 -
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for responding. I think there must be some mistake as I do have a sitemap page that is being submitted to Google daily (I double checked in webmaster tools). Of course, I cannot speak to the effectiveness of the site map structure. I will take a look at the private message. Since the site map is being published does that change the source of the problem?
Thanks,
Hunter
-
just to let you know a few things I just discovered you have no sitemap.xml page you have no robot.txt
your ratio needs to be slightly higher your text to HTML ratio is 26 as of now it should be higher so Google may be penalizing you for thin content without a sitemap Google will still crawl your site of course however a site map tells it where you would like it to go robot text is something that is absolutely necessary and keeps the robots from going in places that create duplicate content. This will probably be a pretty easy fix I sent you a private message with my information feel free to contact me
all the best,
Thomas
-
Hi Hunter,
I would be more than happy to spend some time analyzing your site talking to you about it and really figuring this out. If you have 1000 duplicate page titles that is something you can change and I'm more than happy to tell you how to fix most of this at no cost. However when I do work I partner with the guys recommended here however if you're interested I'd be more than happy to assess your site get to the bottom of this problem and fix it.
So you know canonicalization is nor complicated or hard to implement especially using a CMS like Magento now given that complexities I can't tell you what's wrong right now and the size of your site but if you want to talk about it and have me analyze it for free I'd be happy to do that for you.
Sincerely,
Thomas Zickell
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Google ignore content styled with 'display:none'?
Do you know if an H1 within a div that has a 'display: none' style applied will still be crawled and evaluated by Google? We have that situation on this page on line 136: view-source:https://www.junk-king.com/services/items-we-take/foreclosure-cleanouts Of course we also have an H1 up at the top of the page and are concerned that the second one will cause interference with our SEO efforts. I've seen conflicting and inconclusive information on line - not sure. Thanks for any help.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rastellop0 -
Why isn't the rel=canonical tag working?
My client and I have a problem: An ecommerce store with around 20 000 products has nearly 1 000 000 pages indexed (according to Search Console). I frequently get notified by messages saying “High number of URLs found” in search console. It lists a lot of sample urls with filter and parameters that are indexed by google, for example: https://www.gsport.no/barn-junior/tilbehor/hansker-votter/junior?stoerrelse-324=10-11-aar+10-aar+6-aar+12-aar+4-5-aar+8-9-aar&egenskaper-368=vindtett+vanntett&type-365=hansker&bruksomraade-367=fritid+alpint&dir=asc&order=name If you check the source code, there’s a canonical tag telling the crawler to ignore (..or technically commanding it to regard this exact page as another version of the page without all the parameters) everything after the “?” Does this url showing up in the Search Console message mean that this canonical isn’t working properly? If so: what’s wrong with it? Regards,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Inevo
Sigurd0 -
Will using my Homepage as a KW target improve my Inner page Ranking?
Hello your help please! I have 2 KWs that i have targeted Inner pages for and they have got them to page 2 in SERPs, but now its getting difficult to move them up to page 1. Will targeting the home page with a higher authority, for the same terms, help or hinder the inner pages current position? Many Thanks Ash
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AshShep10 -
Does Google still don't index Hashtag Links ? No chance to get a Search Result that leads directly to a section of a page? or to one of numeras Hashtag Pages in a single HTML page?
Does Google still don't index Hashtag Links ? No chance to get a Search Result that leads directly to a section of a page? or to one of numeras Hashtag Pages in a single HTML page? If I have 4 or 5 different hashtag link section pages , consolidated into one HTML Page, no chance to get one of the Hashtag Pages to appear as a search result? like, if under one Single Page Travel Guide I have two essential sections: #Attractions #Visa no chance to direct search queries for Visa directly to the Hashtag Link Section of #Visa? Thanks for any help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Muhammad_Jabali0 -
Homepage bombed from rankings
I'm working on a site that has historically had issues ranking the homepage. We cleaned up some on page issues and then it went into a high and low pattern - page 4 then page 12 etc (was static around page 9 before), settling at page 6. The link profile was not good and there were a high level of links that should have been no-follow as they were clearly looking paid for - we addressed this along with some other poor links. This effectively dropped ranking down to page 23, but not unexpected considering the very big drop in followed links. Meanwhile we have embarked on a fresh steady link building strategy with nice clean links, varied anchor text coming from varying DA domains, smattered with a few no-follow links - strongly focussing on being as natural as possible. At the Penguin update the homepage has totally disappeared. Frustratingly just after the update (same day) we removed a 301ed old domain from the profile. This was the old company URL which we discovered had a lot of spam linking associated with it. An oversight - there were other 301 domains that were removed some time ago which were totally unrelated to the main site and we were told all other domains were simply bought and redirected to stop hijacking - all but this were. Considering the work we have done would it be good assumption this domain 301 could be the underlying factor? So far organic traffic is steady, in fact a tad up. What would you guys do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MickEdwards0 -
Our Site's Content on a Third Party Site--Best Practices?
One of our clients wants to use about 200 of our articles on their site, and they're hoping to get some SEO benefit from using this content. I know standard best practices is to canonicalize their pages to our pages, but then they wouldn't get any benefit--since a canonical tag will effectively de-index the content from their site. Our thoughts so far: add a paragraph of original content to our content link to our site as the original source (to help mitigate the risk of our site getting hit by any penalties) What are your thoughts on this? Do you think adding a paragraph of original content will matter much? Do you think our site will be free of penalty since we were the first place to publish the content and there will be a link back to our site? They are really pushing for not using a canonical--so this isn't an option. What would you do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline1 -
Ranking Factors for Google
Yesterday a blog post appeared on SEOMOZ titled 'A Tale Of Two Studies' - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/a-tale-of-two-studies-google-vs-bing-clickthrough-rate It suggested some of the ranking factors Google and Bing take into account when ranking. A few of them I want to talk about: Social Signals, Age of Domain and H1 HTML Tag So I thought age of domain and H1 both had some weight in Google? I guess not! And social signals, now I know it gives some weight but its right up there in the list for both SE's, so should getting likes, tweets, plus1's now be part of my everyday link building? Bing-Google-CTR-Infographic-e1321978731479.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0 -
Google sees redirect when there isn't any?
I've posted a question previously regarding the very strange changes in our search positions here http://www.seomoz.org/q/different-pages-ranking-for-search-terms-often-irrelevant New strange thing I've noticed - and very disturbing thing - seems like Google has somehow glued two pages together. Or, in other words, looks like Google sees a 301 redirect from one page to another. This, actually, happened to several pages, I'll illustrate it with our Flash templates page. URL: http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | templatemonster
Has been #3 for 'Flash templates' in Google. Reasons why it looks like redirect:
Reason #1
Now this http://www.templatemonster.com/logo-templates.php page is ranking instead of http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php
Also, http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php is not in the index.
That what would typically happen if you had 301 from Flash templates to logo templates page. Reason #2
If you search for cache:http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php Google will give the cahced version of http://www.templatemonster.com/logo-templates.php!!!
If you search for info:www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php you again get info on http://www.templatemonster.com/logo-templates.php instead! Reason #3
In Google Webmaster Tools when I look for the external links to http://www.templatemonster.com/logo-templates.php I see all the links from different sites, which actually point to http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php listed as "Via this intermediate link: http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php" As I understand Google makes this "via intermediate link" when there's a redirect? That way, currently Google thinks that all the external links we have for Flash templates are actually pointing to Logo templates? The point is we NEVER had any kind of redirect from http://www.templatemonster.com/flash-templates.php to http://www.templatemonster.com/logo-templates.php I've seen several similar situations on Google Help forums but they were never resolved. So, I wonder if anybody can explain how that could have happened, and what can be done to solve that problem?0