SEO Risks for redirecting sites
-
Hey Everyone,
I've tried searching for this question, but am not exactly sure what keywords to search for so I'm probably missing the resources if they already exist...
My client has had duplicated sites for years, and after multiple penalizations of those sites I was finally able to convince him to consolidate them into a "mega-site". Currently, he has a main domain, a geo-subdomain for each office location under the main domain, and a geo-domain for each office location.
We plan on redirecting each geo-domain to the corresponding geo-subdomain. So, the final result will be one main domain, and a sub-domain for each office location.
I'm looking for any information regarding tracking SEO data after the redirects are in place, how to guard against potential drops in SERPs, what's the smartest strategy to implement, etc... My client is very sensitive to his sites' SEO data, so if anyone has any SEO-related advice regarding redirecting sites it would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
-
Her general example was based on her, Matt Cutts and another Google employee having Fitness websites that she then buys and how she would go about the use of canonicals and 301s to show users and search engines that she is the most relevant authority. One of the pluses with the canonicals involved branded searches that would still pull the Matt Cutts site instead of the Maile Ohye site but link equity would be directed to her site and users would be less likely to bounce since the canonical would serve the Matt page whereas a 301 may be jarring at first because if you're looking for Matt and get Maile you may be more likely to bounce even though its the content you are looking for.
(God, I swear I can explain this better in my own head than I can once I attempt to write it out... which is bad considering I actually make a living writing)
-
I have found that folders perform better than subdomains.
I have done 301 redirects of subdomains into folders and the rankings went up strongly. I attribute this to combining the link popularity.
-
Hey Mike,
That sounds like an interesting discussion and sorry I couldn't hear it in person. I'm not sure if this would be relevant to my specific project though - our ultimate goal is to merge two existing sites into one. They have relatively the same content and subjects, meaning the userbase is also probably very similar. The speech that you're referring to sounds like it would be more suitable for a site that is going through a redesign and moving to a new domain name. Your thoughts?
-
I was leaning towards doing all the redirects at once, but didn't have the experience to back that theory up. Thanks for the advice!
-
Hi EGOL,
The sites that we are merging were penalized about 2 years ago. Their value has since begun to increase again, but they still haven't reached the level they were at before the penalization. After all the research we did to answer "why" they were penalized, we could only assume that it was because of our client's massive network of sites.
This was all implemented before I came onto the project. A mistake was made somewhere along the way that set off a "red flag" to Google that these sites were in cahoots (for lack of a better phrase) and penalized them.
We're hoping that the penalization occurred long enough ago that it will not harm the sites we are consolidating the penalized sites into.
My understanding of subdomains vs. folders is that for instances where the topics could virtually be separated (as is the case with multiple geographical locations), then subdomains are the optimal way to go. My client is also interested in ranking well in Google Local, and wants to have separate listings for each business location - which will also be beneficial if we take the subdomain route. I'll admit though, I'm a bit rusty on this topic and would welcome any advice or further resources! I'll do some more research, but if you have any further thoughts on the matter please do send them my way!
Thanks again!
-
Thanks, TommyTan, that's very reassuring!
-
I generally advocate for consolidating a group of sites.... but... are some of these sites penalized? Might be a good idea to understand why and the impact of merging them with unpenalized sites.
Also, if you are going to consolidate, combing the site into folders instead of subdomains can merge the domain authority. Do some research on this before move forward.
-
This reminded me of something Maile Ohye from Google was talking about at SMX NY.
In her talk about 301 vs Rel=Canonical she brought up the idea of putting notices on a site first that Site A is now a part of the Site B Family and will be consolidated in the future and giving people (and the spiders) a link to the new site to start building relevancy. Then later on implementing canonicals across Site A pointing to the relevant places on Site B. Gradually moving towards 301 redirects once Site B becomes the place people now recognize as the main site and the original is no longer needed.
[This of course is all paraphrased and from memory as I don't have my voice recordings of the session handy nor did anyone from Google provide PDFs of their slideshows]
-
Hi Daniel,
From what I know, I don't believe their is any risk at doing all the domains at once. Furthermore, you are not doing to the same page but from geodomains to different geo-subdomains. I've read about people redirecting 50,000 pages in comments and I don't recall anyone mentioning their is any risk.
The only risk I can think of is it might take longer for search engines to recrawl all the pages. Maybe someone can show some light in this.
You can tell your client that suffer a few drop in ranks in the short run for success in the long run.
-
As TommyTan says:
For large redirect projects, you should redirect all that you want to keep the value from. Don't mass redirect to a single page, as most won’t end up passing value, so keep all redirects pointed to pages which are relevant to the original.
You will have to wait a little while for search engines to recrawl and update their indexes. For a clean switchover that pushes all existing link juice to the new pages I'd do them at once.
-
Hi TommyTan,
Thanks for this info and the article, it's a great resource! We plan on mapping out both sites entirely and matching the topics A to A and B to B as you mentioned and this reminded me of a question I should have included in my last post:
Are there any potential risks to doing these redirects all at once? We have at least 3 domains that we want to redirect to the corresponding subdomains, and we don't want to make such a major change to the site that we risk major SERP drops. I'm wondering if we should redirect one domain at a time over a few months, or just do it all in one major sweep...
We're expecting the delay in seeing the affects, and while I know it's unavoidable, convincing my client of this is the big challenge! Like I said, he's very sensitive to his site's SEO data, and any drop in stats after we make a major change instantly makes him second guess the move.
Thanks again!
-
Hi Daniel,
Using 301 redirect is definitely the best bet. 301 redirect usually transfer 99% of the SEO to your new page so I don't believe there is any risk other than making a mistake while setting it up.
When you are redirecting make sure that eacy specific page is redirecting to another specific that is similar. You don't want a visitor wanting to learn something specific and you redirect them to the home page. You are losing opportunities there. So redirect home page to home page, topic A to topic A, topic B to topic B.
After setting up all the redirects, it might take a while for Search Engines to recrawl so don't fret when you still don't see any effect after a week or so.
SEOmoz wrote a SEO Redirection Best Practices Article, hopefully it will help!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO Services for small business
Hi all, Apologies first of all if someone in the forum already posted this question. We are a small business in the UK looking for a proven SEO service. Can someone please advise. Thank you! note: we are using Volusion ecommerce platform for our online shop. The SEO service provider doesn;t have to be based in the UK.
Industry News | | haveahobby1 -
Changing Domains - How much link juice is lost with 301 redirect?
My company is thinking about rebranding and moving over to a new domain. While we dont have a lot of backlinks, we do have some very valuable ones that we hate to lose. That being said, I think we are in such an infancy that the backlinks we have shouldnt prevent us from rebranding if thats what we choose to do. I am just trying to get an idea of how moving to a new domain will effect the domain authority if we redirect all the pages? Is the best thing to do simply re-direct, or should we reach out to our most valuable links and let them know the domain/link has changed and hopefully they change their link to us? How much is lost by simply 301 every page? We are getting around 70 organic clicks per day and would rather not start from zero again 🙂
Industry News | | DemiGR0 -
Help seems like google is punishing our site and I don't understand why
I would love some helpMy anme is Suzanne Diamond our web site is WWW.thefutonshop.com we have been on line for years, 10 brick and mortar stores, had a strong ecommerce web site but in the past 4 months we have been dropping like a leaf. Organic search has been dropping since November 2012 but now total traffic seems to be slowing We are working on our SEO but I feel it has to be something more direct that we are being punished by google Perhaps it s obvious but not to me Can anyone help me please or give me a direction. suzanne@thefutonshop.com thanks in advance for any direction
Industry News | | FUTONSHOP0 -
Ideal SEO / Social Media Employee Skillset
I’ve been wondering recently what makes a good SEO / Social Media employee. It seems to me that SEO and Social Media are in the process of merging into a single role. What are your thoughts on the skills that this new world SEO / Social Media employee would need? Or do you think these roles should ideally remain separate and that a “traditional” SEO is more what is needed? My own role has been moving much more towards social media recently and I was wondering if this was a common trend!
Industry News | | RG_SEO0 -
Picking a degree that will benefit SEO/IM career
I really had no idea where to place this question as there seemed to be no 'suitable' place. I do though feel that it is a viable question and would appreciate any responses that I receive. Essentially, I'm currently working full time doing digital marketing covering most general aspects as it is in-house and primarily local venturing to maybe 50-70 miles in the region of the local area. I'm doing SEO, PPC, Social Media etc. I'm certified in networking (I studied in Australia) and have my UK GCSEs along with a variety of other general certifications e.g. business. The college in the area where I work is offering a NVQ in digital marketing and social media so although I'm self taught I'm currently doing this once a month purely for the paper to recognize that I know what I'm doing. Anyway, getting to the point. I have the opportunity to pursue a degree long term with my employer. I've always had an interest in actually learning to code in a web development language (I can cope at the moment with PHP and do what I need to do) and I've also had an interest in developing iPhone apps etc. What degree would you recommend in aiding a career in SEO and Digital/Internet marketing in general?. To me it seems to boil down to either a marketing degree or a web development degree. Thank you in advance, I would love to hear your own experience and what you have a degree in. Thanks, Luke Hutchinson.
Industry News | | LukeHutchinson0 -
What is the best method for getting pure Javascript/Ajax pages Indeded by Google for SEO?
I am in the process of researching this further, and wanted to share some of what I have found below. Anyone who can confirm or deny these assumptions or add some insight would be appreciated. Option: 1 If you're starting from scratch, a good approach is to build your site's structure and navigation using only HTML. Then, once you have the site's pages, links, and content in place, you can spice up the appearance and interface with AJAX. Googlebot will be happy looking at the HTML, while users with modern browsers can enjoy your AJAX bonuses. You can use Hijax to help ajax and html links coexist. You can use Meta NoFollow tags etc to prevent the crawlers from accessing the javascript versions of the page. Currently, webmasters create a "parallel universe" of content. Users of JavaScript-enabled browsers will see content that is created dynamically, whereas users of non-JavaScript-enabled browsers as well as crawlers will see content that is static and created offline. In current practice, "progressive enhancement" in the form of Hijax-links are often used. Option: 2
Industry News | | webbroi
In order to make your AJAX application crawlable, your site needs to abide by a new agreement. This agreement rests on the following: The site adopts the AJAX crawling scheme. For each URL that has dynamically produced content, your server provides an HTML snapshot, which is the content a user (with a browser) sees. Often, such URLs will be AJAX URLs, that is, URLs containing a hash fragment, for example www.example.com/index.html#key=value, where #key=value is the hash fragment. An HTML snapshot is all the content that appears on the page after the JavaScript has been executed. The search engine indexes the HTML snapshot and serves your original AJAX URLs in search results. In order to make this work, the application must use a specific syntax in the AJAX URLs (let's call them "pretty URLs;" you'll see why in the following sections). The search engine crawler will temporarily modify these "pretty URLs" into "ugly URLs" and request those from your server. This request of an "ugly URL" indicates to the server that it should not return the regular web page it would give to a browser, but instead an HTML snapshot. When the crawler has obtained the content for the modified ugly URL, it indexes its content, then displays the original pretty URL in the search results. In other words, end users will always see the pretty URL containing a hash fragment. The following diagram summarizes the agreement:
See more in the....... Getting Started Guide. Make sure you avoid this:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=66355
Here is a few example Pages that have mostly Javascrip/AJAX : http://catchfree.com/listen-to-music#&tab=top-free-apps-tab https://www.pivotaltracker.com/public_projects This is what the spiders see: view-source:http://catchfree.com/listen-to-music#&tab=top-free-apps-tab This is the best resources I have found regarding Google and Javascript http://code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/ - This is step by step instructions.
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=81766
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content
Some additional Resources: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/10/proposal-for-making-ajax-crawlable.html
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=357690 -
Do "big" SEO companies remove links after termination of service?
Or worded differently: Has anyone heard of "big" SEO companies removing links after termination of service? I have a client who isn't particularly happy with the SEO he's getting from a big Aussie SEO firm, and he wants to terminate, however they've built thousands of links for him and he's a little concerned they might all get pulled. Has anyone heard of this happening, or; Do you think this is a legitimate concern? I think its physically possible to remove backlinks like this because it seems the SEO firm in question is building links by using other client's websites. I also wonder if they might have large content farm style sites where they place links for clients which might be quite easy to take down. Please discuss!
Industry News | | CheapGames990