Confused about canonicalization
-
Hello Guys,
I have just started to use SEOMOZ and I am trying as much as possible to follow the advise from the initial scan and suggestions I received from SEOMOZ. However, it appears that the first changes I made has somehow made my website to disappear on Google and other search engines.
Canonicalization The first changes I made was "Canonicalization" of my domain name (redirecting to a single dominant version) from the instructions here: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/canonicalization.
So I redirected and changed my domain name from "domainname.com" to "www.domainname.com" I did check my listing in Google before these updates and Google have my website down as "www.domainname.com"
My keywords that were previously performing well before these recent updates have now disappeared which is causing me some great level of frustration and I am really not sure weather to continue with the instructions from SEOMOZ or not.
However, it could be that I am being impatient or checking too soon. I'd appreciate some form of advise on what to do?
Many thanks.
-
Unfortunately, if your site is being indexed (and the duplicates are gone) but it isn't ranking at all, this may have nothing to do with the redirection. You could be looking at a more classic penalty, for various reasons.
Have you run a header checker, like:
http://tools.seobook.com/server-header-checker/
It's always good to make sure the redirects are doing what you think they're doing (they aren't multi-hop, 302s, etc.). Next step is to try very targeted searches - brand queries and long-tail queries in quotes. See if you can rank for anything - is it a total ban or just targeted? At this point, you've got to isolate the problem.
-
Thanks for the info Peter. I tried both options as you have suggested, and they both revert to my site:www.domainname.com So it seems the redirection has kicked in.
However, the only issue right now is the disappearance of my site when searching under my keywords.
-
Is the www version of your site being indexed. You can check with:
site:www.domainname.com
...or you could search something like:
site:domainname.com intitle:"some title keywords"
...with part of your home-page title and make sure that only one version has been indexed. Step one is to make sure that only the "www" version is being indexed and you haven't created duplicates. I'd also run a header checker - often, redirects get set up and don't work as planned (maybe they're taking more than one "hop" or the 301s are really 302, etc.). It's also worth that check, because mistakes happen more often than you'd think.
If everything is working properly and it's a very recent change, it could just be a matter of time to sort it out. Sometimes, any major change (even a positive one) can cause some short-term bouncing in rankings. Unfortunately, these situations can get technical pretty fast, so it's hard to speak in generalities.
-
Thanks for the feedback Darin. I have Google WMT set-up and will follow your instructions. I will also run a SEOMOZ report card as you have suggested, and get back to you with the results. Thanks again for the prompt answer to my question.
-
If you haven't done so already I would recommend setting up Google WMT. In there you can set your "preferred domain". This way all links that go to the non www version of your site will be considered to have the www.
I can tell you from experience that the SEOmoz tools are excellent for rankings. I swear by them but remember these are guidelines and not specifically guided towards your site. Just for the record, there has been some questions today about ranking drops so it may indicate a Google update.
Have you run report cards for your pages yet? Its a great place to start and will give you some guidance on where the best places to make changes.
If you need help walking through them you can run one and post it and we'll all be glad to help you out with it. If you can provide your domain name we can do some research for you and see what's up.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Confusion with Brand Rules
Hi All, I have labeled my keywords, some are branded and some aren't and i have set them accordingly. I know get the the 'manage brand rules' section and even having watched the tutorial twice, i still don't know what this is for as i have already labeled my branded keywords. Can anyone clarify for me please? Many thanks DaddySmurf
Moz Pro | | DaddySmurf0 -
Rogerbot's crawl behaviour vs google spiders and other crawlers - disparate results have me confused.
I'm curious as to how accurately rogerbot replicates google's searchbot I've currently got a site which is reporting over 200 pages of duplicate/titles content in moz tools. The pages in question are all session IDs and have been blocked in the robot.txt (about 3 weeks ago), however the errors are still appearing. I've also crawled the page using screaming frog SEO spider. According to Screaming Frog, the offending pages have been blocked and are not being crawled. Webmaster tools is also reporting no crawl errors. Is there something I'm missing here? Why would I receive such different results. Which one's should I trust? Does rogerbot ignore robot.txt? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | KJDMedia0 -
Rankings confusion in pro campaign
Hello Moz-world! I recently set up a new campaign, and the crawl is still in the process of wrapping up (been 4 days). When I look at my rankings it tells me "not in the top 50" then when I scroll over, it shows me that my client is ranking in position 3, in the instance of one keyword. Anyone know why there is a discrepancy between what the report shows, and what it shows when you mouse over the rankings? Thanks! Tyler
Moz Pro | | kbaltzell0 -
What is the correct htaccess code for Canonicalization?
I've been working on a clients site and put up the following but when I check back on seomoz i have over 3000 errors and notices and its been crawling a silly amount of pages that don't exist!! ErrorDocument 404 /404.html Options +FollowSymLinksDirectoryIndex index.html RewriteEngine OnRewriteBase / RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /index.html\ HTTP/ RewriteRule ^index.html$ http://hiperformanceautocentres.co.uk/ [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /index.html [L]
Moz Pro | | SeoSheikh0 -
Very confused on site.com/ or not using a /
I'm wanting to put the rel="canonical" tag on my homepage but I'm not sure which to use? How would you know what to use and always links to, http://www.site.com or http://www.site.com**/** Personally I never knew there was a difference until I used the seomoz tool and I wasn't using the tag.
Moz Pro | | GYMSN0 -
Canonical Confusion
Hey guys, I'm having a hard time grasping canonical links and the warnings I'm getting on my report card. I'm using Yoast SEO Plug-In and can see that every page on my site has a canonical reference to the URL of the page I'm at. Can someone please enlighten me on this subject. I'm reading everything I can about Canonicalization (honestly...an easier word please) but I does not make sense yet. Thanks! I added the notice I'm getting on my report card. This is my domain http://bbguard.com.ve swG7x.png
Moz Pro | | FDSConsulting0 -
To block with robots.txt or canonicalize?
I'm working with an apt community with a large number of communities across the US. I'm running into dup content issues where each community will have a page such as "amenities" or "community-programs", etc that are nearly identical (if not exactly identical) across all communities. I'm wondering if there are any thoughts on the best way to tackle this. The two scenarios I came up with so far are: Is it better for me to select the community page with the most authority and put a canonical on all other community pages pointing to that authoritative page? or Should i just remove the directory all-together via robots.txt to help keep the site lean and keep low quality content from impacting the site from a panda perspective? Is there an alternative I'm missing?
Moz Pro | | JonClark150 -
Rel-canonical tag confusion
I had our web development company implement the rel-canonical tag on all pages of our website to get rid of the duplicate content months ago. However, when I use the On Page optimizer tool (in previous version) it would tell me I'm not using the rel-canonical tag correctly on the page I was grading and when I untagged use rel-canonical tag in our CMS (which was pointing to the correct page) my grade would go to an A. Now with the new version it says I'm using it wrong either way, when I have the tag used in my CMS and everything else is good I have a B, but one I click to not use Rel-canonical tag I have a C. Both ways it shows up in On-page tool without a check in Apprpriate Use of Rel Canonical. I've attached pictures. In C version it says - Canonical URL "/info/solutions/" and "/info/solutions/" In B version: Canonical URL "/info/solutions/" What am I doing wrong and how do i fix this? Because ALL of my grades have dropped to Bs and Cs. Thanks! iklEHOjJLZE4966 [URL]]([URL=http://imgur.com/5BYcV][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/5BYcV.jpg[/IMG][/URL]) 5BYcV
Moz Pro | | aircyclemegan0