Press Release Newswires - a dangerous option?
-
Hi, I'm a PR and haven't used a newswire once over last 10 years. There are usually better alternatives which give you more control.
Anyway, now a client has asked me for distribution of investor information via a newswire and now I've started worrying about the SEO consequences.
I've spent a couple of days phoning around newswires and I think there's a real danger of picking up lots of backlinks from syndication sites (most of the distributors have sites they "partner" with to reproduce your original news release) so...
Lots of backlinks will suddenly appear from external duplicate content (I will not carry the news release on client's website (no newsrooom) and I will just use url as link).
I'm thinking there's the potential for a penalty (and even if not now, then in the future if Google decides to tighten rules further which looks likely).
One newswire has recognized this and now only syndicates on 2 websites. The others haven't including the business newswire I've been asked to use.
Your thoughts would be welcome... Thanks in advance!
-
Hi Cyrus - that's really helpful, and interesting - thanks so much. I think you're dead right RE: sticking to newsworthy releases! Look forward to your blog post on the subject
Best wishes, Luke -
Hi Luke,
Thanks for asking this question. There's been a lot of misconceptions around press releases lately, in the wake of Matt Cutt's recent statements, and I've been meaning to write a blog post about it soon.
I happen to use press releases for link building, successfully, quite a bit. The trick is realizing that the links on the press release sites themselves don't really help you, and can actually hurt you if you over-optimize (or even optimize) the anchor text.
Press releases distributed across a vast network of duplicate, low quality pages have the potential to create a very Penguin-like problem.
Here's a portion of my presentation from MozCon which addressed this topic:
http://www.slideshare.net/cyrusshepard/high-roi-content-strategies-for-seo/48
My three rules for press releases are:
- Don't link to yourself (or client) using important keywords
- Linking using generic anchors or your domain name is fine, i.e. http://example.com
- The goal is not links directly from the press releases themselves, but from 3rd party sources that pick up on the news and write their own content about you - the way a press release is traditionally supposed to work.
In my opinion, if you press release doesn't earn links from independent 3rd party sources (news sites, reporters), or earn you significant traffic, then you most likely didn't have anything newsworthy to announce in the first place, and likely wasted your money.
The whole thing rest on newsworthy content. As a PR professional, I'm probably preaching to the choir, and I'm sure you understand better than most, perhaps even better than me.
In the end, don't fear the press release. They serve a legitimate purpose. Just use them the way they were meant to be used - by earning links instead of buying them.
-
The competitor is only doing press releases, guarateed - looking at the links pointing back to their site, the only ones going back to the pages that are ranking for this high value keyword are from spammy press release sites, many of which are specific to different states in the USA (The competitor is from the UK).
Doesn't look like anyone is sharing or linking to the content or the press releases.
-
James, Is your competitor doing only press release ? As per the video, links from Press release doesn't affect SEO directly but when the content is published on several sites, it might get into the eye and he might share it out that helps in SEO. Matt Cutt has mentioned that in last part of Video.
-
That's not what i've found though.
A pretty big competitor of mine started targetting a high value keyword several years ago and several months ago released a whole wave of these press release distributions - They had a slight improvement for a couple of weeks and then went from #40 to #4 in the space of a month.
They're now #2 and it looks like they'll take #1 within the next couple of weeks.
-
Hi Guys,
Do you know this ???
Matt Cutts of Google said in a Google Webmaster Helpforums that links from press releases shouldn't have a positive impact on your rankings.
More information: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-press-release-links-16136.html
-
Just to give you an idea of what kind of partnership they are referring to..
The sites they partner with generally just pull the text and occasionally maybe the link within the PR. What I've seen from a few PR I had with PRweb, there are no links to your site other than PRweb and any outlet that decides to publish your content.
No actual site or 'partner' would want to aggregate that many PR...AND give link juice. That is just not cool SEO.
So there is little danger of PR damaging your SEO.
Whether or not PR is still a good source of SEO is another topic for another day.
Hope that helps
-
You could find a PR wire which doesn't produce a backlink, far as I know they use to sell the service through the SEO benefit, saying you can even have a link or 2 in the body content, well just don't include them or at the end of the article include a text link which isn't actually a active link.
Just a thought.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Press Releases. What are the reasons (if any) that I should even consider them?
For the last couple years, i believed common knowledge that press releases was NOT the way to go for SEO. So I avoided it like crazy! Now, I'm doing some research and I realize that some (or alot) companies still create press releases to get the word out so that they can spread the message. I am going to be signing with some clients that are bigger brands and I want to do everything in our power to get the word out. I've done social outreach, commenting and cold emails to influencers before, but now I've been seeing some competitors using press releases with a little success, I want to ask the community, is there a method they recommend of testing efficacy of press releases? My biggest fear is using press releases then months/years down the line be hit hard by a penalty just for testing different PR sites.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | JasonKhoo0 -
Competitor ranking well with duplicate content—what are my options?
A competitor is ranking #1 and #3 for a search term (see attached) by publishing two separate sites with the same content. They've modified the title of the page, and serve it in a different design, but are using their branded domain and a keyword-rich domain to gain multiple rankings. This has been going on for years, and I've always told myself that Google would eventually catch it with an algorithm update, but that doesn't seem to be happening. Does anyone know of other options? It doesn't seem like this falls under any of the categories that Google lists on their web spam report page—is there any other way to get bring this up with the powers that be, or is it something that I just have to live with and hope that Google figures out some day? Any advice would help. Thanks! how_to_become_a_home_inspector_-_Google_Search_2015-01-15_18-45-06.jpg
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | inxilpro0 -
Glossary pages - keyword stuffing danger?
I've put together a glossary of terms related to my industry that have SEO value and am planning on building out a section on our site with unique pages for each term. However, most of these terms have synonyms or are highly similar to other valuable terms. If I were to make a glossary, and on each page (that will have high-quality, valuable, and accurate definitions and more), wrote something like "{term}, also commonly referred to as {synonym}, {synonym}," would I run the risk of keyword stuffing penalties? My only other idea beyond creating a glossary with separate pages defining each synonym is to use schema.org markup to add synonyms to the HTML of the page, but that could be seen as even more grey-hat type keyword stuffing. I guess one other option would be to work the synonyms into the definition so that the presence of the keyword reads more organically. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | alecfwilson0 -
Using a geolocation service to serve different banners in homepage. Dangers? Best Practices?
Hello, our website is used by customer in more than 100 countries. Becasuse the countries we serve are so many, we are using one single domain and homepage, without country specific content. Now, we are considering to use an geolocation service to identify the customer location and then to change the contents of one banner in the home page accordingly. Might this be dangerous from a SEO perspective? If yes, any suggesiton on how can we implement this to avoid troubles and penalties form the Search Engines? Thanks in advance for any help,Dario
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Darioz0 -
Pagination for Search Results Pages: Noindex/Follow, Rel=Canonical, Ajax Best Option?
I have a site with paginated search result pages. What I've done is noindex/follow them and I've placed the rel=canonical tag on page2, page3, page4, etc pointing back to the main/first search result page. These paginated search result pages aren't visible to the user (since I'm not technically selling products, just providing different images to the user), and I've added a text link on the bottom of the first/main search result page that says "click here to load more" and once clicked, it automatically lists more images on the page (ajax). Is this a proper strategy? Also, for a site that does sell products, would simply noindexing/following the search results/paginated pages and placing the canonical tag on the paginated pages pointing back to the main search result page suffice? I would love feedback on if this is a proper method/strategy to keep Google happy. Side question - When the robots go through a page that is noindexed/followed, are they taking into consideration the text on those pages, page titles, meta tags, etc, or are they only worrying about the actual links within that page and passing link juice through them all?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | WebServiceConsulting.com0 -
How to Explain The Danger of Link Networks
A client of mine has been approached by a company that sets up one-off private link networks like this: Main site: http://www.klausparking.com/ Network sites: http://www.carparkingtechnology.com/
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | waynekolenchuk
http://www.carparkingsystem.com/
http://www.victoriaparking.net/
http://www.reginaparking.com/
http://www.torontoparking.net/
http://www.multicarparkingsystem.com/
http://www.carparkingsolutions.com/ The company doing this actually promotes this as a patent-pending feature they call "silos". How do I explain the real danger to my client?1 -
Publishing Press Releases after Google Panda 2.5
For the past few years I have been publish press releases on my site for a number of business. I have high traffic on my site. I noticed that with the Google Panda 2.5 update PRNewswire.com dropped visibility by 83%. Should I stay away from publishing press releases now? Does Google consider Press Releases to be "content scraping" since multiple sources are publishing the release?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BeTheBoss2
