Can I add more then 3 competitors do my SEO moz pro account?
-
I have a client who will need more then the three competitors tracked(possibly up to 10) is there any way to do this with one campaign or will i need to start multiple campaigns to achieve this?
-
@jon-white would you be able to provide any update on this issue?
-
It seems the only reason Moz is not working on this issue is the fact that customers are going around it by creating more campaigns (everything similar but diferent compretitors) and in result paying more to Moz. This is not a practical solution for all customers spacially the smaller agencies or businesses.
Would really love to see this feature updated to at least 5 competitors. Common Moz! You can do it!
-
8 years later adding more than three competitors is a must-have. It was a work in progress in 2015, but in 2021 it's still not a feature.
-
I just signed up for the 30 day trial, and this is the first question I had. I'm also looking at Advanced Web Ranking, and they allow more than 3 competitors. The ability to track up to 10 competitors should be basic functionality for a professional tool.
-
Would indeed by very useful to be able to track more than three competitors
-
Read that useful workaround post and up voted it in the middle of this thread, but this is definitely a feature request. By the way, where do we get to see current feature requests and vote on them? Is there any such place?
-
/bump
We'd love the ability to track more than three competitors too
-
Hey! Dave here from the Help Team,
We are aware that this is something our customers want and we keep track of everyone that writes in about it but at this time we cannot guarantee this functionality or have a valid timeframe for it.
-
For us too! @Moz: When will this become available?
-
BUMP
My team also has a need to track more than 3 competitors.
Is there an update available with regard to this functionality request?
Regards,
Josh
-
I'm comparing ZEFO to MOZ, and in ZEFO you can enter as many competitors as needed. They also have a nice competition report showing your SERP position relative to the listeed copetitors.
I'm impressed by MOZ page analysis, which is most important ofr me, but would like to see similar competitors functionality with large number of competitors.
-
I agree. We have at least 20 we have to track and this is very limiting.
-
100% agree.
If we could track more than just three that would be a GREAT improvement.
-
That's good news. Right now the way my company solves this is by creating multiple campaigns, each one being identical except that three different competitors are listed. Not ideal.
-
Having just started using Moz seriously, and loving it, more competitors is definitely something I could use the most. Ten would be awesome! Three is really not enough. Perhaps there could be paid bolt-on packs for adding competitors? I imagine the resource usage is quite high. Five as standard with options for more would seem good to me.
-
Huge need for this, please add more than 3 fields to ranking analysis, prefer 10, but any more would be great
thx -
Bump for this too! Jon's answer seemed quite positive... any more news?
-
Would be helpful for us too, but for now we'll work around it.
-
Please add more competitors in each campaign!
Thanks,
-
Hello! This is still something we are considering for the roadmap. If you could rate features on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is 'very unlikely we will ever build this' and 5 is 'we are working on it right now', I would give this a 4. Very likely it will happen in the future, but we have not committed to it yet.
Hope this helps - thank you!
-
I would also like to see the availability of at least five competitors for a single campaign. Thanks!
-
Please add more then the max 3 now
-
Hi there! It's definitely something we're aware folks want, and it's on our radar for the future. There's no official ETA yet, though.
In the meantime, there are some workarounds and tools that may help.
-
If you're not using all of your available campaigns, try adding a second campaign for the same site, and add up to 3 different competitors there (OP alluded to this).
-
Some of the research tools—specifically, Open Site Explorer and Rank Tracker—can help you get data on more competitors. The only issue is that they won't automatically update each week as your campaigns do, so you'll need to go in to pull more data when you need it.
In OSE, Competitive Link Metrics lets you compare the page-, subdomain-, and domain-level metrics of up to 5 sites at a time (the one you initially searched for and four more).
Rank Tracker allows you to pull ranking information on-demand for any site.
You may also appreciate the competitive insights you can get from the Keyword Difficulty tool and its Full SERP Analysis Report. Cyrus Shepard does a great job of covering how that works in this video.
I hope that helps hold you over a bit!
-
-
More than 3 competitors is a must nowadays, when using a paid PRO version this is by far one of the weakest limitations on your wonderful service.
-
Bump... please add more than 3 competitors per campaign.
-
Right now, we still just have the three competitors, though we are looking at the possibility of adding more in the future.
-
Hi there, Has there been any update or change to this? I'd also like to have our 5 primary competitors.
-
I would love to have at least 5 competitors to track. 3 is very limited. I understand the work required for Moz to increase this, but that's what we pay for
-
I would also appreciate if more competitors were available.
For one of my websites, I would like to track 5 competitors, for the other I need 7 competitors. It seems that when I add another project, there's simply no slot left.
That's a bit disappointing. Thanks for the information guys.
-
I would really like this as well. For a PRO account, I was hoping it would be far more robust. Little disappointing. I may try to use my other 4 available campaigns to track three more competitors at a time...
-
So far, there is only the ability to track three. There has been talk of increasing this up to five (which is a number many people seem keen on) but even doing that is an increase n these specific resources of 66%. I don't think it's as simple as just creating an extra few spaces on the form.
Maybe you could put a request in for an increase - the more we tell the team what we would like, the more they will prioritize the important requests.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Link Explorer for Google Data Studio
I want to put Moz's link explorer into my data studio report. (Including Domain Authority, Linking Domains, Inbound Links, and Ranking Keywords). How can I do this?
Feature Requests | | Kaili0 -
Localized pages with hreflang markup being reported by Moz as duplicate content
We have 5 websites, each targeted at a different geography. They are all in English, but targeted per country (e.g. US, Canada, UK, Australia). And we've properly implemented hreflang tags on each page, with the US site being the x-default, and with each country-specific page having a self-referencing hreflang tag as well as individual hreflang tags pointing to the other country-specific versions. All seems to be working properly with the search engines. But, each week in our Moz Pro campaigns, Moz reports the pages as "duplicate content". It seems that Moz does not regard the hreflang tags when deciding if content is duplicate or not. I'm not 100% sure that's what's causing Moz to report them as duplicate, but it's my best guess. To date, I've been marking these as "ignore". But, that creates two problems. First, we have new pages all the time, and so this gets to be laborious. Second, it makes it somewhat likely we might miss a real duplicate content issue. Can someone confirm whether Moz should be looking at hreflang tags before considering pages as dupliacte? And possibly offer any suggestions to us if Moz doesn't do that?
Feature Requests | | seoelevated0 -
Can I track Page Authority on a custom report?
I'm trying to set up a custom report that will track my e-commerce website's authority. I've already added the Domain Authority module, but I can't find a Page Authority module. (There are options to track the page score or grade, but this appears to be very different from Page Authority--whereas Page Authority is a holistic score, page score/grade seems to focus only on page content.) Is it possible to track Page Authority on a custom report? If possible, I'd like to track the following pages: Page Authority of my homepage, compared to my competitors' homepages Page Authority of each of my 4 product pages, compared to my competitors' product pages
Feature Requests | | Jessica_Pettit1 -
In Moz's Keyword Explorer/Explore By Site, Can I Exclude a Keyword From the Results?
Hypothetical question - Let's say I sell tax preparation software and I want to see the keywords that "turbotax.com" ranks highest for. Based on that list I might want to optimize for similar keywords on my site. But if I use Keyword Explorer, select "Root Domain", and enter "turbotax.com" as the root domain, the first 200 or so keywords in the list have the word "turbo". None of those interest me. Can I exclude certain keywords (like "turbo") from the list? Thanks.
Feature Requests | | CurtisB0 -
Moz Crawler failing with https redirect?
Is there a way to get the Moz Crawl Test to work with HTTPS? I just got back this error: 902 : Network errors prevented crawler from contacting server for page. Site is set up with a standard 301 to redirect http to https - or at least I certainly hope it is! Rex Swain's HTTP Header Checker took shows a standard 301. Anyone else experiencing this error? btw - this is both a specific question and an opportunity for open discussion... Thanks!
Feature Requests | | seo_plus0 -
Can you add a "Show All" to Rankings Pagination?
For some reason, you've decided to paginate the Rankings page. You state the community has requested it, however I find it far less user-friendly and more time consuming. A feature that would fix it for me is to add a "Show All" link. A "Show All" is common in pagination, not sure why it was left off. Here is why I want it - supporting statement: "Since page lengths are changing, and I've exhausted keywords for one of my clients, I am going back and rewriting copy. I am choosing which pages to rewrite based ranking and they have over a couple hundred keywords so pages 1, 2, 3.....14 does me no good and takes forever to find page 10 or 9 or whatever page has the rankings that are in the 11-20 spot so I know which ones to plan for the next month. It's a valid concern. If your software slows me down over prior versions, I don't care what anyone "wanted", it's not smart."
Feature Requests | | harmsway1 -
Posted by Link on Moz - Broken
I wasn't sure which category to place this in as Support doesnt feature Q&A or the Moz site in general so I dropped it under other research tools to which the Q&A kind of is 🙂 Now I am not sure if it is just me and that you have rectified the issue, but when ever I click on the "posted by" links to the user. I am getting a page not found error. The links in question can be seen in my two grabs and effect all posted by links on the Q&A section of Moz. A simply trailing slash after .com "/" will do the trick 🙂 https://moz.comusers/view/636129 - BROKEN
Feature Requests | | TimHolmes
https://moz.com/users/view/636129 - FIXED Aj5S2Pj,YfSQEmZ#0 Aj5S2Pj,YfSQEmZ#10 -
My moz.com profile page authority has vanished.
Hi there Anybody has seen his page authority regarding his own profile page from moz.com vanishing? Mine was aproximately 46, now PA=1 I´ve checked it and nobody is making any comments about this so maybe.... it´s just me :S? Any clues? I loved my link from moz.com!!! Cheers Claudio Heilborn
Feature Requests | | ClaudioHeilborn0