Do you know a case where product variations caused panda?
-
Would like to add 300 products to ecommerce site of which 150 products are just variations in different colors.
In this particular case there are some reaons for:
- Not writing partially unique product descriptions for each product variation
- Not setting them up as variations on one product page
So I would have several product pages with nearly identical product descriptions (proprietary description written by us), just name of color in title and description and EAN in description being different, as well as over time different user generated content showing up. Also different product images used.
I would not mind if google would not index some product variations.
Do you think I should be concerned about Panda? Do you know any website which had a Panda problem caused by product variations?
Thanks
-
I don't think anyone really knows how much of the text needs to be unique in order to trigger Panda.
I just finished an audit for a site that had pages that had content that was completely duplicated on another site, yet the information was all in a different order than the other site. The site was not affected by Panda. But does that mean that simply changing up the order of text is enough to evade Panda? One case like this is not enough to prove anything.
I think you need more than just a change in the meta description though.
-
Marie, thanks a lot for sharing this.
I will use the canoncical then as you suggest for now.
At a later point I will have unique product descriptions written for product variations.
From your experience, do you think small variation of description text is enough, or do you think that the majority of text may need to be unique. At zalando I actually saw that they implemented minimal variations in the beginning of the meta description. Just adding sometimes 2 words or changing word order.
-
I have done a large number of traffic drop audits for Panda hit sites and I can tell you that I have seen many sites where product descriptions have gotten them in the doghouse.
In most cases, however, the main problem is that the site is using stock product descriptions that hundreds of other sites are also using. As such Google sees that xx% of your site contains information that is exactly the same as other sites and decides that your site is of low quality and should not rank well.
In your situation though, you are talking about duplication within your own site if I understand you right. So, you are saying that you would write a unique product description and then have slight variations on each page.
I worked with one site that sold not products, but reports. The reports produced thousands of pages on the site that had 90-95% duplicated content and then just a few words that were unique to that page. I believe that the Panda issue was connected to this mass duplication.
You asked why large brands can get away with this. That is a really good question. This is a personal theory, and not something I have proven, but I am wondering if Google has some leeway in regards to Panda for brands who sell products. When I look at the site you mentioned their product descriptions are thin and yes, they are duplicate. There is almost no text on the page for some of them. These are classic things that can cause other sites to be affected by Panda.
I really think your best option is to use rel-canonical for these pages. This type of situation is exactly why Google developed rel canonical (see http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394)
-
thanks.
I understand that this is considered best practice.
But do you know about a case or heard about a case where this really was the likely reason for panda?
I noticed that some very big ecommerce sites such as zalando with top-notch SEO, actually publish color variations with near-identical product descriptions and without canonical or noindex. I was wondering, maybe google is more understanding in terms of content duplciation when it comes to product variations on ecommerce sites as it is generally not done for manipulative purposes.
-
As you describe your problem it seems to me that you will have lots of very near duplicate content pages on your site. That can cause a panda problem and is a waste of your website's power.
There are multiple solutions.
-
combine all of these color,etc. variants to a single page
-
use rel=canonical to attribute duplicates to a master version
-
write very unique descriptions for each color,etc variant, optimizing each for a different query
-
-
Use excel to concatenate unique product descriptions using different parts of the sentence as different variables.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Success cases about PIM-enrichment with SEO-benefits?
Hello 🙂 Does anybody know about any ecommerce sites that have done PIM-enrichment projects with great success, resulting in significant increase in organic traffic and rankings? Our agency is doing a presentation about leveraging better and more product information for long-tail SEO, and we'd like some success cases to point to. Thanks 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Inevo
Sigurd Bjurbeck, SEO-consultant0 -
Putting rel=canonical tags on blogpost pointing to product pages
I came across an article mentioning this as a strategy for getting product pages (which are tough to get links for) some link equity. See #21: content flipping: https://www.matthewbarby.com/customer-acquisition-strategies Has anyone done this? Seems like this isn't what the tag is meant for, and Google may see this as deceptive? Any thoughts? Jim
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jim_shook0 -
Wise or cluttery for a website? Should our "out of the mainstream" of popular products be listed on our site? (older/discontinued, umfamiliar brands, parts to products, etc...)
For instance, should we list replacement parts for a music stand? Or parts for a trumpet, like a valve button? To some, this seems like a cluttery thing to do. I suppose another way to ask would be, "Should we only list the high quantity selling items that are well branded and that everyone shops for, and leave the rest off the website for instore customers only to buy?" (FYI: Our website focus is for our local market mainly, and we're not trying to take on the world per-say, but if the world wants in, that's cool too.) (My thought here is that if a customer walks into our retail store and they request an odd ball part or item... we go hunting for it and find it for them. Or perhaps another Music Store needs a part? To me, it's ALL for sale,... right? Our retail depth, should be reflected in our online presence as much as possible,... correct? I'd personally choose to list the odd balls on our site, just as if a customer was standing in the store. Another side thought is, if we only list the main stream products... we are basically lessening our content (which could affect our rankings) and would be inviting ourselves into a higher competitive market place because we wouldn't be saying anything different than what most other music store sites out there say. I believe we need to show off our uniqueness,... and product depth (of course w/good SEO & content too) is really kinda it, aside of course also from good expert people and a large facility. But perhaps that's a wrong way to look at it?) Thanks, Kevin
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kevin_McLeish0 -
Sudden increase in number of indexed URLs. How ca I know what URLs these are?
We saw a spike in the total number of indexed URLs (17,000 to 165,000)--what would be the most efficient way to find out what the newly indexed URLs are?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
How to properly link to products from category pages?
Hi All, We have an e-commerce website and the category pages are built so that there is a product image and below it there is the title. Both the image and the title are in a href (each on its own). I encountered the following unfinished discussion here at MOZ:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet
http://www.seomoz.org/q/how-to-optimize-achor-text-links-on-ecommerce-category-page#post-93758 The discussion states that its improper. The question is - if it is wrong then why? (maybe because Google will give its weight to the image anchor instead of the text anchor since it is higher in the page). The other question is how to resolve the matter?
Should I add nofollow to the image href? Thanks0 -
Is it worth re-doing SEO for all existent products
We have a website and when we started, we had no clue about SEO, nor did we really understand the full extent of CRO amongst other things. We have slowly learnt that there are many changes that need to happen to our site; however...do we need to re SEO all the content that is already on the website or can we purely start a fresh with the new products we feed through? The website is: www.onlineforequine.co.uk if you need to take a look at the kind of platform we are working with.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | onlineforequine0 -
What directories are best for health or health related products?
I am trying to find out if there are any reputable directories related to health supplements and general health information.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DonovanHarrell0 -
We would like to know where googlebots search from - IP location?
We have a client who has two sites for different countries, 1 US, 1 UK and redirects visitors based on IP. In order to make sure that the English site is crawable, we need to know where the googlebot searches from. Is this a US IP or a UK IP for a UK site / server?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AxonnMedia0