Google Drop
-
I started using SEOMOZ due to a sudden and huge drop in Google for two main keywords (hair bows and baby headbands). Our site (BloomingBows.com) has held a top three spot for years with these words and then in the last few months has dropped down on the first page and now they are completely off the charts. Is there any insight as to why? Also, we have been very active using the data from here in the last week or so to clean up and improve anything listed, but I am still seeing keywords drop into the 40 - 60 position and our traffic is drying up. Starting to panic and wondering if I am missing something or going about this in the wrong way. ANY insight is appreciated at this point!! Thank you!!
-
None of those dates coincide with Panda or Penguin. And yes, a Panda or Penguin related drop would happen immediately coinciding with that day. However, sometimes there can be a drop that gradually follows a Penguin or Panda day if sites that are linking to you have been affected. I'm guessing this is not the case for you though.
It's really hard to say what to work on because you still don't know the cause for your traffic drop. At this point it really would be just a guess. It's never wrong to work on making unique product descriptions so that may be a place to start, but again without knowing the cause, there's no way of saying for sure that that is going to help.
-
Thank you so much Marie! I was estimating the date for the drop and when looking at GA and GWT it looks like the significant drops were around Dec. 8, 14 & 23. Originally I just assumed that these were the drop in searches as the holiday approached. Then another big drop was around 1/15. So, I am not sure if the P & P updates would show an immediate drop in traffic or if it would adjust within 2-3 days of the change. So, with that said, what do you think should be the top priority to focus on in the coming weeks in my recovery effort? I had actually added some of those links in the footer within the last week hoping to optimize those pages and work on keywords that were less competitive. Now I am thinking that may have caused additional drop. Thoughts?? Thank you!!
-
Hi Ainsely, as other have suggested, you can never rule out alogrym changes contributing to changes in your organic search. Penguin & Panda are just two categories of many. It just so happens that Panda and Penguin effected a higher percentage of all queries and so we get a bit more information about them.
When you have a dramatic drop, some combination of three things happened:
1. Google changed it's algorithm (or their crawler) in a way that effected you.
2. You changed your site in a way that effected what google sees.
3. External ranking factors (backlinks) for your site changed.
As far as I know, Google doesn't send you a message via GWT that says you've been effected by Panda or Penguin, but they are getting much better (IMHO) at transparency to web owners and we're starting to get very useful messages via GWT. So it's very important that you monitor it.
In the case of the original poster, they felt didn't make any changes that could have triggered #2, and the drop didn't sync up with a major observed alo change. So you'd be inclined to rule out the most likely suspects.
The challenge is that business owners don't have time to act as full time SEOs. So even though Carol noticed the drop around 2/18, that may not be when it actually occurred. That's why a a tool like SEOMoz's campaign monitoring is so useful, so you can see dramatic changes in your profile.
-
Great info Marie, and that's why I love this community. Yeah I think the moral of this story is that if you think your site needs an overhaul it probably does. I think that Panda and Penguin have the names so are always the first to be spoken about, but your post did something great it brought me back to the little things that I missed in the above post. The devil is in the details I guess.
-
Well I would never definitelyrule out a Penguin/Panda hit. They should stay on your mind always and you should always be running regular audits to keep up with things and stay clean. the fact that you ignored the site for 9 months which in our world is like 2 years absolutely had an effect on your rankings.
Since you are back now and focused on the site, I would take a lot of the focus off of rankings and move energies towards usability, unique content, brand engagement and semantic markup. Ranking is losing its luster as searches are now tailored to the user so when you rank you really rank differently for different locations and different people.
Our buddies at Google want ranking to be an unintentional effort so instead of I want to rank for "Children's Toys" it's Oh I rank for "Children's Toys" hooray. This is evident by Chrome moving to secure search and soon the "Not Provided" will take over the land and leave us all to focus on the stuff that matters...the visitor and the journey we take them on.
-
You've gotten some good advice in this thread. I was tracking along with everyone else thinking that this was a Panda issue as many e-commerce sites using stock descriptions have been affected by Panda. However, if you are pretty certain that the drop was Feb 18, there was no Panda refresh on that day.
Have you checked your WMT for any messages? I see that a large number of your links come from followed blogroll links. This could possibly invite an unnatural links penalty. The reason for this is that the Google guidelines say that excessive reciprocal linking is considered a link scheme. (They don't explain what "excessive" means though.
It wouldn't be an algorithm based linking penalty like Penguin because it didn't happen on a Penguin refresh date.
There could be other quality issues though. I only had a quick look and I see the footer is extremely keyword stuffed. And, you've got sentences like this one that are written only for search engines:
"Our hair bows, baby headbands, infant headbands and baby bows are the softest, most comfortable hair bows, baby headbands, infant headbands you will find."
Unfortunately I think there are several reasons for your traffic drop and it is not going to be an easy thing to fix.
-
Hi Jason
I'm in a similar-ish position to Carol in that I've seen my rankings drop (from #1 to between #6 and #25 for various keywords).
This may be because for about 9 months, for family reasons, I ignored the site, so a lack of link-building/social engagement in that time could be to blame.
Question: If I've no notification of errors/messages in GWT, does this mean I can definitely rule out a Penguin/Panda hit?
-
No problem I love this stuff!
-
Thank you, Mike! Valuable lesson learned in the last few weeks. I was not even remotely prepared for the Panda & Penguin updates. Your insight is greatly appreciated!
-
Thanks Jason! There was no change to the site at the time of the drop. The content has basically stayed the same for years except for the adding and deleting of products. I thought is was fairly solid and we had strong serp rankings for years, so honestly I didn't think I need to change much. But since the drop I have corrected errors found in SEOMOZ as well as GWT crawl errors, re-submitted a new site map, turned on the canonical link feature, etc. and as you can imagine my rankings are either dropping or all over the board. Thank you so much for your input - I don't mind the time or the hard work, but was getting nervous I was chasing the wrong path. Your input is so appreciated!
-
Thank you!
-
I agree with Mike.... and beefing up those descriptions can bring in a lot more long-tail traffic if done smartly.
-
I consult on a few eCommerce sites and over the last few months I have led them in doing a complete overhaul of their product descriptions and their linking structure. Their issue was they had so many products and for years just relied on description feeds to populate the content on each product. So after getting them to understand the whole valuable unique content idea we got to work. That's a check for panda safety now for the penguin.
-
I'm really sorry to hear about your drop.
Did the drop coincide with any other changes? (Site Redesign, etc...)
Do you have a Google Webmaster Tools account? If so have you checked for any recent messages and/or new errors on your site? https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
Did you notice a similar drop in your google and bing rankings or just google?
Some likely reasons your site might drop:
Change in the Search Engine Ranking Algorithm: http://mozcast.com/ is a great tool to see if your drop coincides with other search engine changes.
Malware or Hacking, Penalty Server Problem:, Webmaster tools is the best place to start looking.
Loss of PageRank/Link Popularity, or Canonicalization/Duplicate Content Problems: Use your SEO Campaign to see if you have any duplcate content issues, or changes in backlink profile.
-
blooming bows
These anchor links would not bother me very much because they are either the domain name or the domain name in words. Local PR companies and guest blogs scare me a lot more.
If this was my site I would be working on writing very unique product descriptions that are of substantive length.
I would also explore dropping individual product pages for product groups such as "bitty bows" to a single page. Before I did that I would be looking to see if they were pulling in traffic (pre drop). If they are not pulling traffic then those product pages would be merged to show many of these similar products on a single page.
Doing that will reduce the number of pages on the site and make each remaining page more substantive. An alternative would be to use rel=canonical to attribute the individual pages to the category page, again, I would know my analytics and traffic sources before doing that.
IMO it is impossible to give good content modification advice without data from analytics.
-
Thank you! So, if this is the big issue that is effecting me (the most drastic drop happened around the 18th of February), would the best/quickest way to address it be updating the content/descriptions on my site (since I can't really effect that in the other search results)?
-
For the past year or so, Google has been using two algos to identify sites that they want to hold back in the rankings.
PANDA targets sites with lots of duplicate content. That content can be duplicated on other sites or duplicated from page to page on the same site. Retail sites have had problems because many of them use product descriptions from manufacturers or data feeds. They also have very similar content on many pages because the products are very similar.
You may have a duplicate content problem. See here.
PANDA also targets sites with lots of thin content. Many of your product descriptions are quite short.
PENGUIN targets sites that have done link manipulation. If you have lots of links with keyword anchor text or lots of low quality links from forums, blog posts or article syndication.
The two most important parts of diagnosing these sites is determining when your traffic drop occurred. If you have google analytics the answer can be there. If you have log files they can be analysed to look for the answer.
There are free quizzes here that you can use to input information from your site to quickly determine if you are a candidate for these problems. In my opinion you are close to a Panda problem because of thin content that has been duplicated on and off of your site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Snippet showed in google search is not from metaDescription
This is my page https://www.collegehippo.com/graduate-school/programs/top-ranked-masters-degree-museum-museology-and-curatorial-studies The metaDescription is | |
On-Page Optimization | | etattva
| name="description" content="Master's degree in Museum, Museology and Curatorial Studies is offered by 49 American universities. New York University had highest number of international students receiving a Master's degree. Johns Hopkins University had the most women graduates in this program. Job outlook for Museum, Museology and Curatorial Studies Museum, Museology and Curatorial Studies is projected to grow 13 percent from 2016 to 2026, faster than average for all occupations. Median pay for Museum, Museology and Curatorial Studies in 2018 was $53,360. The number of jobs were 11170. Check out best universities offering online Master's program in Museum, Museology and Curatorial Studies "/> |
| | | But when I see the page in google search results for (museum studies graduate programs), This is how it appears in the search results. It is showing the breadcrumbs from the page. I am not sure why is google is treating the page like this. It was not like that 5 months back. Nothing much changed in page and google is displaying the page content like this . How can I fix this?0 -
Google Increases Titles and Meta Descriptions Length
So, we now know that Google are changing the Title and Meta Desc length limits to 70 and 200 respectively. Does this mean we all need to jump to immediate attention and modify all our current pages OR, do we wait?
On-Page Optimization | | dynamyt1000 -
How does Google treat Dynamic Titles?
Let's say my website can be accessed in only 3 states Colorado, Arizona and Ohio. I want to display different information to each visitor based on where they are located. For this I would also like the title to change based on their location. Not quite sure how Google we treat the title and rank the site.... Any resources you can provide would be helpful. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Firestarter-SEO0 -
My website ranking recently dropping - why?
Hi all, I am a photographer and do my own website and links etc. Website is: http://www.mckayphotography.com.au I have enjoyed good google rankings for my main keyword 'wedding photography sydney' for many years, and even recovered after taking a hit from the penguin (may 2012) update. But the last month has seen a steady drop from around 2nd - 4th down to now 10th. I have analyzed my site using all the moz tools and on most counts eg moz rank and moz trust I am ahead of my competitor sites....but still rank under them on google. So I would greatly appreciate on advice people could give on getting my ranking back up again! Thanks in advance Darryn
On-Page Optimization | | dmck0 -
Inches or " Feet or ' Does Google translate the symbols?
I have a client who sells things that the size is important. In their industry some people say "15 Inch Blue Widget" and others say "15" Blue Widget" using the symbol " for inches. On the page I know we could say both to cover all the bases but I want to get the title right. In their industry there is not one more preferred than the other. Does anybody know if Google translates ' to feet and " to inches. Should I work both into the title for a product or only one?
On-Page Optimization | | JoshuaLindley0 -
Will Google penalise me for duplicating my own website on a new domain?
Hi guys, Currently, we are using Magento Enterprise to run two separate ecommerce websites, for arguments sake lets say these two websites are ElectronicsX.com and electronicsY.co.uk. ElectronicsX.com isn't doing too well, it has little traffic, makes next to nothing each month and is just a waste of resources. ElectronicsY.co.uk on the other hand is getting 30,000 unique visits every month and is over exceeding every month in terms of revenue in sales. At the moment, the only traffic we get from Europe tends to be the odd "word of mouth" customer and English customers who have emigrated to Europe but still like to use English companies. We can't rank on Google FR or ES or anything like that because the website we have "electronicsY" is on a .co.uk TLD (a GeoTLD). So what we want to do is take ALL the content from electronicsY.co.uk and place it on electronicsX.com so that we can start targeting Europe and ranking in the serps internationally. What sort of effect will that have in terms of penalisation from Google? Or because the websites are on the same C block, would it have any effect at all? Thanks guys Tom
On-Page Optimization | | tomhall900 -
Google pulling in wrong title tag!
Has anyone else seen their title tag different in the SERPS to what you have called it in the <title>?? </p> <p>I work for MITIE and when you type in "facilities management" it shows our title tag as "<a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.mitie.com/services/strategic-outsourcing/integrated-facilities-management">Integrated <em>facilities management</em> - Mitie</a>" and it should be "<span>MITIE | Facilities management - Facilities management companies - Facility management UK" </span></p> <p><span>The only thing I can think of is that it's picking it from the H1 on the page but why it'd do that! The page is here www.mitie.com/services/strategic-outsourcing/integrated-facilities-management</span></p> <p><span>Any ideas?</span></p></title>
On-Page Optimization | | KarlBantleman0