Google Drop
-
I started using SEOMOZ due to a sudden and huge drop in Google for two main keywords (hair bows and baby headbands). Our site (BloomingBows.com) has held a top three spot for years with these words and then in the last few months has dropped down on the first page and now they are completely off the charts. Is there any insight as to why? Also, we have been very active using the data from here in the last week or so to clean up and improve anything listed, but I am still seeing keywords drop into the 40 - 60 position and our traffic is drying up. Starting to panic and wondering if I am missing something or going about this in the wrong way. ANY insight is appreciated at this point!! Thank you!!
-
None of those dates coincide with Panda or Penguin. And yes, a Panda or Penguin related drop would happen immediately coinciding with that day. However, sometimes there can be a drop that gradually follows a Penguin or Panda day if sites that are linking to you have been affected. I'm guessing this is not the case for you though.
It's really hard to say what to work on because you still don't know the cause for your traffic drop. At this point it really would be just a guess. It's never wrong to work on making unique product descriptions so that may be a place to start, but again without knowing the cause, there's no way of saying for sure that that is going to help.
-
Thank you so much Marie! I was estimating the date for the drop and when looking at GA and GWT it looks like the significant drops were around Dec. 8, 14 & 23. Originally I just assumed that these were the drop in searches as the holiday approached. Then another big drop was around 1/15. So, I am not sure if the P & P updates would show an immediate drop in traffic or if it would adjust within 2-3 days of the change. So, with that said, what do you think should be the top priority to focus on in the coming weeks in my recovery effort? I had actually added some of those links in the footer within the last week hoping to optimize those pages and work on keywords that were less competitive. Now I am thinking that may have caused additional drop. Thoughts?? Thank you!!
-
Hi Ainsely, as other have suggested, you can never rule out alogrym changes contributing to changes in your organic search. Penguin & Panda are just two categories of many. It just so happens that Panda and Penguin effected a higher percentage of all queries and so we get a bit more information about them.
When you have a dramatic drop, some combination of three things happened:
1. Google changed it's algorithm (or their crawler) in a way that effected you.
2. You changed your site in a way that effected what google sees.
3. External ranking factors (backlinks) for your site changed.
As far as I know, Google doesn't send you a message via GWT that says you've been effected by Panda or Penguin, but they are getting much better (IMHO) at transparency to web owners and we're starting to get very useful messages via GWT. So it's very important that you monitor it.
In the case of the original poster, they felt didn't make any changes that could have triggered #2, and the drop didn't sync up with a major observed alo change. So you'd be inclined to rule out the most likely suspects.
The challenge is that business owners don't have time to act as full time SEOs. So even though Carol noticed the drop around 2/18, that may not be when it actually occurred. That's why a a tool like SEOMoz's campaign monitoring is so useful, so you can see dramatic changes in your profile.
-
Great info Marie, and that's why I love this community. Yeah I think the moral of this story is that if you think your site needs an overhaul it probably does. I think that Panda and Penguin have the names so are always the first to be spoken about, but your post did something great it brought me back to the little things that I missed in the above post. The devil is in the details I guess.
-
Well I would never definitelyrule out a Penguin/Panda hit. They should stay on your mind always and you should always be running regular audits to keep up with things and stay clean. the fact that you ignored the site for 9 months which in our world is like 2 years absolutely had an effect on your rankings.
Since you are back now and focused on the site, I would take a lot of the focus off of rankings and move energies towards usability, unique content, brand engagement and semantic markup. Ranking is losing its luster as searches are now tailored to the user so when you rank you really rank differently for different locations and different people.
Our buddies at Google want ranking to be an unintentional effort so instead of I want to rank for "Children's Toys" it's Oh I rank for "Children's Toys" hooray. This is evident by Chrome moving to secure search and soon the "Not Provided" will take over the land and leave us all to focus on the stuff that matters...the visitor and the journey we take them on.
-
You've gotten some good advice in this thread. I was tracking along with everyone else thinking that this was a Panda issue as many e-commerce sites using stock descriptions have been affected by Panda. However, if you are pretty certain that the drop was Feb 18, there was no Panda refresh on that day.
Have you checked your WMT for any messages? I see that a large number of your links come from followed blogroll links. This could possibly invite an unnatural links penalty. The reason for this is that the Google guidelines say that excessive reciprocal linking is considered a link scheme. (They don't explain what "excessive" means though.
It wouldn't be an algorithm based linking penalty like Penguin because it didn't happen on a Penguin refresh date.
There could be other quality issues though. I only had a quick look and I see the footer is extremely keyword stuffed. And, you've got sentences like this one that are written only for search engines:
"Our hair bows, baby headbands, infant headbands and baby bows are the softest, most comfortable hair bows, baby headbands, infant headbands you will find."
Unfortunately I think there are several reasons for your traffic drop and it is not going to be an easy thing to fix.
-
Hi Jason
I'm in a similar-ish position to Carol in that I've seen my rankings drop (from #1 to between #6 and #25 for various keywords).
This may be because for about 9 months, for family reasons, I ignored the site, so a lack of link-building/social engagement in that time could be to blame.
Question: If I've no notification of errors/messages in GWT, does this mean I can definitely rule out a Penguin/Panda hit?
-
No problem I love this stuff!
-
Thank you, Mike! Valuable lesson learned in the last few weeks. I was not even remotely prepared for the Panda & Penguin updates. Your insight is greatly appreciated!
-
Thanks Jason! There was no change to the site at the time of the drop. The content has basically stayed the same for years except for the adding and deleting of products. I thought is was fairly solid and we had strong serp rankings for years, so honestly I didn't think I need to change much. But since the drop I have corrected errors found in SEOMOZ as well as GWT crawl errors, re-submitted a new site map, turned on the canonical link feature, etc. and as you can imagine my rankings are either dropping or all over the board. Thank you so much for your input - I don't mind the time or the hard work, but was getting nervous I was chasing the wrong path. Your input is so appreciated!
-
Thank you!
-
I agree with Mike.... and beefing up those descriptions can bring in a lot more long-tail traffic if done smartly.
-
I consult on a few eCommerce sites and over the last few months I have led them in doing a complete overhaul of their product descriptions and their linking structure. Their issue was they had so many products and for years just relied on description feeds to populate the content on each product. So after getting them to understand the whole valuable unique content idea we got to work. That's a check for panda safety now for the penguin.
-
I'm really sorry to hear about your drop.
Did the drop coincide with any other changes? (Site Redesign, etc...)
Do you have a Google Webmaster Tools account? If so have you checked for any recent messages and/or new errors on your site? https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
Did you notice a similar drop in your google and bing rankings or just google?
Some likely reasons your site might drop:
Change in the Search Engine Ranking Algorithm: http://mozcast.com/ is a great tool to see if your drop coincides with other search engine changes.
Malware or Hacking, Penalty Server Problem:, Webmaster tools is the best place to start looking.
Loss of PageRank/Link Popularity, or Canonicalization/Duplicate Content Problems: Use your SEO Campaign to see if you have any duplcate content issues, or changes in backlink profile.
-
blooming bows
These anchor links would not bother me very much because they are either the domain name or the domain name in words. Local PR companies and guest blogs scare me a lot more.
If this was my site I would be working on writing very unique product descriptions that are of substantive length.
I would also explore dropping individual product pages for product groups such as "bitty bows" to a single page. Before I did that I would be looking to see if they were pulling in traffic (pre drop). If they are not pulling traffic then those product pages would be merged to show many of these similar products on a single page.
Doing that will reduce the number of pages on the site and make each remaining page more substantive. An alternative would be to use rel=canonical to attribute the individual pages to the category page, again, I would know my analytics and traffic sources before doing that.
IMO it is impossible to give good content modification advice without data from analytics.
-
Thank you! So, if this is the big issue that is effecting me (the most drastic drop happened around the 18th of February), would the best/quickest way to address it be updating the content/descriptions on my site (since I can't really effect that in the other search results)?
-
For the past year or so, Google has been using two algos to identify sites that they want to hold back in the rankings.
PANDA targets sites with lots of duplicate content. That content can be duplicated on other sites or duplicated from page to page on the same site. Retail sites have had problems because many of them use product descriptions from manufacturers or data feeds. They also have very similar content on many pages because the products are very similar.
You may have a duplicate content problem. See here.
PANDA also targets sites with lots of thin content. Many of your product descriptions are quite short.
PENGUIN targets sites that have done link manipulation. If you have lots of links with keyword anchor text or lots of low quality links from forums, blog posts or article syndication.
The two most important parts of diagnosing these sites is determining when your traffic drop occurred. If you have google analytics the answer can be there. If you have log files they can be analysed to look for the answer.
There are free quizzes here that you can use to input information from your site to quickly determine if you are a candidate for these problems. In my opinion you are close to a Panda problem because of thin content that has been duplicated on and off of your site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Finding issue on Gtmetrix speed test and google speed test
Hey, when i have tested my website https://www.socprollect-mea.com/ on GT metrix. When i test morning, it shown page speed of 3.8 seconds and in noon it shown 2 seconds and later i check, it is defeclecting. speed on the Google page speed test as well. What kind of error is this and does anyone have the solution for this issue?
On-Page Optimization | | nazfazy0 -
Tag Clouds in Google Despite Canonical Links for Single Tags/Articles
I am frustrated to see a lot tag clouds in Google even though I programmed my tagged pages to display a canonical link to the linking article if the is only one result for the tag cloud. The goal to to make sure that the article, which is of better quality than the tag page, ends up in Google without a bunch of thin tag pages getting in there. For instance this article should be in Google and this tag should not be because that tag has a canonical URL for that article. I do not have a lot of experience with tag cloud SEO because I prefer to limit such pages to categories, but I have found tag clouds to be important for aggregating information for specific issues, people, or places that are not already a site category. Some tags I have used to power social media pages that update automatically from RSS feeds for their related tag archives. That is quite useful for pages like that. Should I start using Meta noindex for those instead of rel canonical? I have already done that for author profiles because author profiles get a lot of on site links compared to individual articles because my gridviews use javascript for paging. The same is true for the tags, so if a tag is tagged in 30 articles it will have links from 30 articles but if those articles are not in the latest 20 for that tag only the latest 20 will have links back from the tag archive. I also suspect having a lot of tag pages with little content to negatively impact my indexing rate. I will see a number of recent tag pages added before new articles.
On-Page Optimization | | CopBlaster.com0 -
Fetch as Google is showing this, help!
Our Fetch as Google in Google Webmaster Tools is showing this. What is this?? Thanks! https://imgur.com/k6KOQZz
On-Page Optimization | | bluejay78780 -
Strange ranking occurrences in Google (NL)
Mozzers, I got a question for all of you. Recently (about 3 months ago) I launched a renewed website for a costumer of mine. Since then rankings have been improving and some decreasing a little but overall it went quite allright. _Still, we now have some issues with some new pages and I really don't know what to do any more. _ The Case:
On-Page Optimization | | JarnoNijzing
For starters lets say the company sells vacuum cleaners. We now make pages for specific product ranges e.g. Miele Diamond vacuum cleaners which in turn tells something about this product range and has links to different pages of that series, for instance the Miele Black Diamond Silent Vacuum Cleaner. Why did we do this? We already ranked for specific product pages but also wanted to rank for more general terms and thus product ranges. What happened? We now rank perfectly well for the product pages itself but for some reason the Miele Diamond Vacuum Cleaners page doesn't rank at all or not as it should. Why is this strange? Because we applied the exact same tactic for some other product ranges on the same website and it worked like a charm (part of the reason why we started to do this for all product-ranges). I could really use some help here. If you want I can message you the pagelink in PM but I won't post it here for several reasons. The Vacuum Cleaners in this example or not the real products though but used as an exemplar. I really do hope to hear from you with some advice or request for more information. Regards
Jarno0 -
Google showing my content on the serps in a different domain
Hi all, Recently a partner of ours discovered that Google is showing a meta description on the serps for his homepage that is not his but ours. On his site, he sells add-ons for our software, so the name of our software appears many times and as well there are many links pointing to our site. He claims he hasn´t copied this text from us, and I have used some tools to verify this. I don´t understand how Google can get confused and show our text as the meta desctiption on the serps for his homepage. Any idea on why this happened?
On-Page Optimization | | Paessler0 -
90 days for Google
Hi, I'm new to Moz so still getting a feel of the forums. If my question has been answered then please point me in the right direction. I have noticed with many SEO companies they advertise that they can get you on google front page in 90 days. I'm not really interested in their techniques but more of why google takes 90+ to even appear. I have been working on my site for over a month, adding content, building good links, social media, blogs etc... but have not even come close to appearing in the top 50 pages for google. Is this normal? Is it just a matter of time before it starts to appear? Also, I have checked my backlinks and there is about 8 links that are coming from random pages in the US and some from China and india which i have no idea of. I tried to visit on of the sites but it had malware. I added all these back links to google disavow so hopefully that will fix it. Could that be the reason google would not even list my site? Thanks... Rick
On-Page Optimization | | pureozone0 -
Why Google did not index exactly these 2 pages? Any ideas?
Dear Community, on 27th of July I relaunched my own website and submitted the sitemap as well I send the index-page to crawl it including all linked pages. Already the next day the new pages have been indexed. Today I checked them manually if they have been indexed. The result is that 2 of 13 pages have not been indexed, here marked in bold: http://inlinear.com/
On-Page Optimization | | inlinear
http://inlinear.com/suchmaschinenoptimierung-online-marketing.php
http://inlinear.com/design/
http://inlinear.com/design/printmedien-gestaltung.php
http://inlinear.com/design/corporate-design-und-corporate-identity.php
http://inlinear.com/design/corporate-raum-design.php
http://inlinear.com/webentwicklung/
http://inlinear.com/virtueller-rundgang-360grad-fotografie.php
http://inlinear.com/business-atlas-online-verzeichnis.php
http://inlinear.com/baudokumentation-bauueberwachung.php
http://inlinear.com/ueber-uns.php
http://inlinear.com/blog/
http://inlinear.com/kontakt/ The page "/design/" (which is the index.php of this folder should be the main-page because its about WEB DESIGN.
Should I create a copy and call it /design/web-design.php? May be Google prefers a meaningful URL than the index.php? So I put then a rel=canonical to web-design.php in my index.php? design/corporate-design-und-corporate-identity.php
The URL is a little long, but this should not be the reason? Or might be a reason that another page which is still in the index, but not online anymore (even redirecting to /design/) is still more dominant? Strange.... orshould I simply wait a little or try submitting these to sites manually to google? When checking Google Webmasters Tools Google tells me that just 3 pages have been indexed.
When I was checking which page is indexed or not I checked each URL with the site-search option:
site:inlinear.com/pageX.php ... when Google shows this page, it was a sign that it was indexed but why webmasters tools show up only 3 pages? (see screenshot) Do you have any ideas?
Thank You 🙂 indexed.png0 -
Sudden Drop in Impressions
Hi all- I'm a bit confused and hope someone may have an idea. In the last few days, traffic to our site has taken a big hit, so much so that I even got an email from webmaster tools that the home page was receiving significantly less traffic. I can't find anything particular that we changed that should have this much of an effect, but then again, I have been shortsighted in the past 🙂 The site is bulkcandystore.com and if anyone has any thoughts, I would appreciate it. Thanks Ken
On-Page Optimization | | CandymanKen0