Duplicate Content due to Panda update!
-
I can see that a lot of you are worrying about this new Panda update just as I am!
I have such a headache trying to figure this one out, can any of you help me?
I have thousands of pages that are "duplicate content" which I just can't for the life of me see how... take these two for example:
http://www.eteach.com/Employer.aspx?EmpNo=18753
http://www.eteach.com/Employer.aspx?EmpNo=31241
My campaign crawler is telling me these are duplicate content pages because of the same title (which that I can see) and because of the content (which I can't see).
Can anyone see how Google is interpreting these two pages as duplicate content??
Stupid Panda!
-
Hi Virginia
This is frustrating indeed as it certainly doesn't look like you've used duplicate content in a malicious way.
To understand why Google might be seeing these pages as duplicate content, let's take a look at the pages through the Google bot's eyes:
Google Crawl for page 1
Google Crawl for page 2What you'll see here is that Google is reading the entirety of both pages, with the only difference being a logo that it can't see and a name + postal address. The rest of the page is duplicate. This should point out that Google reads things like site navigation menus and footers and interprets them, for the purpose of Panda, as "content".
This doesn't mean that you should have a different navigation on every page (that wouldn't be feasible). But it does mean that you need to have enough unique content on each page to show Google that the pages are not duplicate and contain content. I can't give you a % on this, but let's say roughly content that is 300-400 words long would do the trick.
Now, this might be feasible for some of your pages, but for the two pages you've linked to above, there simply isn't enough you could write about. Similarly, because the URL generates a random query for each employer, you could potentially have hundreds or thousands of pages you'd need to add content to, which is a hell of a lot of work.
So here's what I'd do. I'd get a list of each URL on your site that could be seen as "duplicate" content, like the ones above. Be as harsh in judging this as Google would be. I'd then decide whether you can add further content to these pages or not. For description pages or "about us" pages, you can perhaps add a bit more. For URLs like the ones above, you should do the following:
In the header of each of these URLs you've identified, add this code:
This tells the Googlebot not to crawl or index the URLs. In doing that, it won't rank it in the index and it won't see it as duplicate content. This would be perfect for the URLs you've given above as I very much doubt you'd ever want to rank these pages, so you can safely noindex and nofollow them. Furthermore, as these URLs are created from queries, I am assuming that you may have one "master" page that the URLs are generated from. This may mean that you would only need to add the meta code to this one page for it to apply to all of them. I'm not certain on this and you should clarify with your developers and/or whoever runs your CMS. The important thing, however, is to have the meta tags applied to all those duplicate content URLs that you don't want to rank for. For those that you do want to rank for, you will need to add more unique content to those pages in order to stop it being flagged as duplicate.
As always, there's a great Moz post on how to deal with duplication issues right here.
Hope this helps Virginia and if you have any more questions, feel free to ask me!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Fred Update & Ecommerce
Hi I wondered if there had been any other insights since March about the Fred update or any other Google update? I don't think we were hit by Fred but in March we dropped out for a lot of keyword rankings, I just cannot pinpoint why. We are an ecommerce site, so some of our product/category pages don't have a huge amount of written content. We might have a couple of extra backlinks to disavow, but nothing major. Does anyone else have any insights? Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BeckyKey1 -
Duplicate content warning: Same page but different urls???
Hi guys i have a friend of mine who has a site i noticed once tested with moz that there are 80 duplicate content warnings, for instance Page 1 is http://yourdigitalfile.com/signing-documents.html the warning page is http://www.yourdigitalfile.com/signing-documents.html another example Page 1 http://www.yourdigitalfile.com/ same second page http://yourdigitalfile.com i noticed that the whole website is like the nealry every page has another version in a different url?, any ideas why they dev would do this, also the pages that have received the warnings are not redirected to the newer pages you can go to either one??? thanks very much
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ydf0 -
Determining if our ranking is due to increased competition
Hello, I'd like to give you a list of DA/PA and see if the slipping of our rank is due to competition. This if for our main keyword. Below is the top ten sites in our industry - their DA and PA for this head term. This is for the plural form of the keyword - a product term. If I don't say differently the following are where the title has the keyword in it exactly and also these are ecommerce site listings. Does this look like we are being outdone by competition or would you say that there might be some other cause: 1. DA 85, PA 38 2. DA 34 PA 34 (These guys are mostly paid links by the way) 3. DA 100 PA 55 (singular form of keyword and also informational site) 4. DA 91 PA 41 5. DA 23 PA 24 (The only thing I see about this one is that their backlink profile is very white hat and they have the nicest looking site in our niche) 6. DA 29 PA 31 (exact match domain) 7. DA 99 PA 1 8. DA 22 PA 34 (Guide including infographics - doesn't sell products themselves) 9. DA 96 PA 1 10 DA 26 PA 38 -- This is us with 57 total root domains sitewide and 43 root domains to the home page. Let me know what additional information you need.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobGW0 -
Spam report duplicate images
Should i do a spam report if a site competitor as copied my clinical cases images and placed as their own clinical cases. That site also does not have privacy policy or medical doctor on that images. My site: http://www.propdental.es/carillas-de-porcelana/
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Rel author and duplicate content
I have a question if a page who a im the only author, my web will duplicate content with the blog posts and the author post as they are the same. ¿what is your suggestion in that case? thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
DIV Attribute containing full DIV content
Hi all I recently watched the latest Mozinar called "Making Your Site Audits More Actionable". It was presented by the guys at seogadget. In the mozinar one of the guys said he loves the website www.sportsbikeshop.co.uk and that they have spent a lot of money on it from an SEO point of view (presumably with seogadget) so I decided to look through the source and noticed something I had not seen before and wondered if anyone can shed any light. On this page (http://www.sportsbikeshop.co.uk/motorcycle_parts/content_cat/852/(2;product_rating;DESC;0-0;all;92)/page_1/max_20) there is a paragraph of text that begins with 'The ever reliable UK weather...' and when you via the source of the containing DIV you will notice a bespoke attribute called "threedots=" and within it, is the entire text content for that DIV. Any thoughts as to why they would put that there? I can't see any reason as to why this would benefit a site in any shape or form. Its invalid markup for one. Am I missing a trick..? Thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Kris P.S. for those who can't be bothered to visit the site, here is a smaller version of what they have done: This is an introductory paragraph of text for this page.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | yousayjump0 -
We seem to have been hit by the penguin update can someone please help?
HiOur website www.wholesaleclearance.co.uk has been hit by the penguin update, I'm not a SEO expert and when I first started my SEO got court up buying blog links, that was about 2 years ago and since them and worked really hard to get good manual links.Does anyone know of a way to dig out any bad links so I can get them removed, any software that will give me a list of any of you guys want to do take a look for me? I'm willing to pay for the work.Kind RegardsKarl.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | wcuk0 -
Showing pre-loaded content cloaking?
Hi everyone, another quick question. We have a number of different resources available for our users that load dynamically as the user scrolls down the page (like Facebook's Timeline) with the aim of improving page load time. Would it be considered cloaking if we had Google bot index a version of the page with all available content that would load for the user if he/she scrolled down to the bottom?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | CuriosityMedia0