800,000 pages blocked by robots...
-
We made some mods to our robots.txt file. Added in many php and html pages that should not have been indexed.
Well, not sure what happened or if there was some type of dynamic conflict with our CMS and one of these pages, but in a few weeks we checked webmaster tools and to our great surprise and dismay, the number of blocked pages we had by robots.txt was up to about 800,000 pages out of the 900,000 or so we have indexed.
1. So, first question is, has anyone experienced this before? I removed the files from robots.txt and the number of blocked files has still been climbing. Changed the robots.txt file on the 27th. It is the 29th and the new robots.txt file has been downloaded, but the blocked pages count has been rising in spite of it.
2. I understand that even if a page is blocked by robots.txt, it still shows up in the index, but does anyone know how the blocked page affects the ranking? i.e. while it might still show up even though it has been blocked will google show it at a lower rank because it was blocked by robots.txt?
Our current robots.txt just says:
User-agent: *
Disallow:Sitemap: oursitemap
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Craig
-
Hey Matt,
Thanks for taking the time to answer!
Well, the good news is, this caused us to find some issues with our sitemaps that we have now fixed and we might not have found them if this hadn't happened.
According to wmtools, however, we are still at 937,000 pages blocked... I don't know if they are actually blocked or not... Now that we have re-submitted our sitemap, hopefully we will start to see this change soon.
Thanks for the load time info. Yeah, we are aware that we could speed things up. We are always trying to do that more and more.
Hopefully we will start seeing that number go down very soon...
Thanks!
Craig
-
Hi Craig
Sorry for taking a while to come back to you but I have been very busy, however I have a couple a question -
When you first noticed the blocked pages had you made any changes to the site at that time and if so what were they?
Have you done anything that could have slowed your site down - running your homepage through a speed of load test I notice that it took over 4 secs which isn't very quick.
I once had an issue of lots of pages being de-indexed when we made an update to our sites template and the load time increased drastically. Even if this isn't the cause of the issue looking at optimizing your load time will help increase the speed at which your site is re-crawled. Google will be able to get through more in the time it allocates to crawl your site each time it visits if it is smaller and loads quicker hence speeding up your recovery.
There are lots of tools and information on optimizing load times - here is just one - http://www.webpagetest.org
-
Hey Matt,
Just sent you a PM with our site details.
Yeah, we are on SEOMoz, but nothing standing out there.
We are up to 941,364 pages blocked today. I thought I saw that it had gone down a tiny bit yesterday, but was mistaken.
Thanks for taking a look!
Craig
-
Hi Craig - you are right that the directive without a slash means allow everything - I was just trying to figure out how you could have caused this issue because Google doesn't appear to be following your directive to crawl everything hence why I asked about the layout. Have you tested your robots.txt in Google Webmaster Tools?
What is the location of your robots.txt?
What does your index status say in Google Webmaster Tools?
You can also just create an empty robots.txt file which will allow all as well or
User-agent: *
Allow:/I take it that you have this website setup as a campaign in SEOMoz - has this identified any relevant issues in the latest crawl?
Would you share your web address with us or even private message me with it so I can have a look for clues as this is very interesting!
-
Hi Matt,
Sorry for the confusion, I should have pasted that text using plain text so it wouldn't be on the same line.
I edited it as seen above. The user agent and disallow are on separate lines.
Today we are up to 940,000 blocked URLs in webmaster tools.
The reason I didn't delete robots is I read some suggestion that if you delete it, Google will think that there was a problem accessing it and continue relying on the former version for a period of time. Not sure how much truth is in that, but seemed to make enough sense not to delete it, but just correctly modify it.
Are you saying that my command above is disallowing all? From the research I have done, you have to have a slash at the end to disallow all, i.e. Disallow: /. Having Disallow: with nothing after it, is supposed to allow all, which is the goal.
From robots.txt.org:
To allow all robots complete access
User-agent: *
Disallow:Strangely, we haven't noticed an enormous traffic drop. However, this happened right at the time that we fixed some other issues that should have caused a significant improvement, so it could just be that no positive impact has been felt and things just remained the same.
Ultimately, the fact that the blocked pages keeps rising is worrisome, or says that there is a bug in Google's system.
Thanks!
Craig
-
I have experienced something similar after a site redesign the test version was put live with the robots.txt disallowing all. My site was deindexed quickly as when you block pages with a robots.txt their page content wont be indexed so won't appear in the search results. Google may index urls that are disallowed if they are linked from another page online however the rank will be lower due to the page content being ignored. Remove your robots.txt above as it is disallowing all It would appear although that command should allow all but there is no point in having robot file allowing all as this happens without. Though you would usually have disallow: / - to stop all!! Then I would resubmit an updated site map in Google Webmaster Tools and you should see your pages start to be indexed again. If you don't have a site map you can just wait for Google to start to re crawl your site. I would also check your homepage source code to make sure there isn't a robots meta tag turned on by accident saying no index no follow as I have seen this done by accident with CMS before.
have a look here on exactly how google handles robots.txt - http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156449
One quick question - have you laid out your file exactly as above with the user agent and disallow on the same line as this might be what is causing the issue? I haven't tested it but the standard is to have them on separate lines.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do modal pop-ups impact the Google Analytics of the host page?
We have an instance of a page where visitors can click a button to start an interactive quiz. The quiz pops up in a modal window that references another domain (the interactive content provider). Will the person completing the quiz in the modal pop-up still be counted as an active visitor on the original host page during the time they are completing the quiz?
Reporting & Analytics | | MuhammadInc0 -
Hello, our domain authority dropped significantly overnight from 37 to 29\. We have been building good links from high DA pages and producing quality, regular content.
Hello, our domain authority dropped significantly overnight from 37 to 29. We have been building good links from high DA sites and producing regular, good quality content. Anyone able to offer any ideas why? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | ProMOZ1231 -
Find Pages with 0 traffic
Hi, We are trying to consolidate the amount of landing pages on our site, is there any way to find landing pages with a particular URL substring which have had 0 traffic? The minimum which appears in google analytics is 1 visit.
Reporting & Analytics | | driveawayholidays0 -
How can you add a rel canonical tag if you haven't created the wrong pages?
For one of our white paper campaigns we are getting multiple URL's some how but we only have one version of the page. So do I put the rel canonical tag on that one single page? Will that fix the other url's from being indexed? I'm assuming people are typing in the urls with underscores and capital or non-capital letters and it's showing up that way in analytics. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | Sika220 -
Webmaster Tools Error: Unreachable page
Hi all, When I try to the "Fetch as Google" feature on Webmaster Tools, I get the error Unreachable page. I checked the Google Analytics code, everything seems to be OK. What should I do?
Reporting & Analytics | | fisniks0 -
SERPS showing wrong page
Hi there, searching Google UK for the term 'wireless alarms' returns the following page at position 39'ish - http://www.compoundsecurity.co.uk/security-information/gsm-gprs-alarm-systems The page that should be returned for that search is - http://www.compoundsecurity.co.uk/security-equipment The page being returned by Google at present is not optimised in any way for 'wireless alarms' but the page it should be showing is optimised for that term and the Moz grading tool agrees. The correct page also has a higher PA and 533 inbound links and the page being displayed has a lower PA and only 3 links. Could some kind soul tell me what i am doing wrong please? Thank you Si
Reporting & Analytics | | DaddySmurf0 -
Duplicate Page Title
I'm new to SEO and have just signed up to SEOMOZ to see what I can learn. I got the report back on my site and it indicates various errors, one of them being Duplicate Page Title - I have a blog on my site and a lot of pages identified as with duplicates are like this: http://www.martinspencephotography.co.uk/blog?page=2 Is it important I rectify this? Do I need to rectify it?
Reporting & Analytics | | MartinSpence460