Page authority old and new website
-
Dear all,
I tried to find this question using the search option but cannot find the exact same problem.
This is the thing: I launched a new website in January, replacing our old website that did pretty good in the SERPs. The old website is still running on a subdomain old.website.com and the new website is on www.website.com (www.denhollandsche.nl)
Both sites are indexed by google right now, but I'm not sure if that's a good thing. For our main keyword, the page on the new website has an authority of "23" and the exact same page (some minor differences) on the old website still has an authority of "30". Both currently are on the second page of google while some time ago, they where still on position 2/3/4.
My question is: if I would take down the old website and make a 301 redirect for the old page with P/A 30, to point to the new page with a P/A 23, will the p/a of this new page take over the P/A of the old page? What effects can I expect?
The reason the old website is still running is that google images still shows images from old.domain.com in stead of images from the new website...
Thanks for your help guys!
-
Thanks Andy! I know what to do now! Let's mark this question as 'answered!'
-
Thats correct.
Ok my suggestion is to 301 your old.domain to your www.domain AND add the whole subdomain old.domain to robots.txt to ban indexing of that subdomain. Once the domain itself is gone from search results delete the files or back them up etc etc...
As for image search as long as you've pointed old urls to new ones you should be fine
-
Ah ok I understand. The old.domain pages indeed are the former www.domain pages and the for each of the old www pages, a redirect to the new www.domain URL is in place in the .htaccess. However, the old www pages are now running on the subdomain old.domain.com and are indexed again by Google and if I now understand correctly, are actually competing with our new domain website that is running on the www.domain.com.
-
I assume that your website curerntly in old.domain was formerly of www. my question is do the 301's you have in place point to old.domain or to the new page within www.domain ?
-
Thanks a lot Tom and Andy. The info is really useful, and as the html code and structure of the pages is a lot better than from the old site, there is nothing else that I could think of that is causing our positions to drop...
There is one part I do not fully understand:
"is the new website structure sat on top of old urls which are redirected to the new site or old site?"
Could you explain what you mean by this?
Thanks again for your help!
-
Hey Martijn
Let's address this in 2 parts:
First, if you 301 redirected the page with the higher authority, in theory the new page will receive that authority and your score could go up. The 301 tells Google to pass the link equity of the old URL to the new URL and in the SEOMoz crawler this is replicated. If you look at websites that have had old domains 301'd to the new root domain, you can see the old links that point to the old URL come up as links for the new URL. With that in mind, you can expect that the SEOMoz crawler will pass the authority on as well.
Now, as for whether or not you should do this - I think you should straight away. If it subdomain is just showing images this may not apply, but by having the 2 versions of the website live you may be running the risk of having duplicate content. If this is the case, this could severely harm your site's ranking, so I'd address it straight away with a 301 redirect or by rewriting the content.
Another potential issue, and one that might explain why your rankings have dropped to page 2, is that you are "cannibalising" your keywords. By having similar content, title tags etc - even if it is not technically duplicate - you could be confusing the search engine crawlers. It may not know which page to prioritise.
Now, if the images that are showing up on Google images are attracting a healthy amount of traffic, I would think twice about redirecting straight away. You may want to leave it where it is, but adjust the copy and on-page elements to ensure that you're not cannibalising your keywords. Having said that, the links to that page, which may be ranking it highly in Google images, could theoretically work again if 301 redirected, as all link equity is passed when you do so.
Overall, I'd keep things neat and simple for the user and have 1 version of the site, implementing a 301 redirect to the appropriate new URLs. Include the images on these equivalent new URLs.
-
Ok a few things here to talk about.
PA won't instantly move across, just as "page rank" and other ranking factors wouldn't. What would happen though is that a large portion of the link worth from the old urls would move the the new ones - though this raises the question... is the new website structure sat on top of old urls which are redirected to the new site or old site? ... if the first great if the later move them to the new urls and slowly watch PA move across.
In terms of images being indexed, they will remain in the index and searchable for sometime after deletion, also when they try to send someone across to the page with it on - if you've 301'd it correctly it will be a link to the new site and product anyhow and also Google will find that image again to index. (hope that makes sense).
In all honesty you set up sound a little odd, I would suggest making the move sooner rather than later to ensure you don't get a duplicate content issue too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What happens when you replace a page with a new version that has the same URL?
a new page template was created the plan is to publish the new page (which has the same URL as before) to web and delete the old page that has the URL , will that have an SEO implications ?
Technical SEO | | lina_digital1 -
Car Dealership website - Duplicate Page Content Issues
Hi, I am currently working on a large car dealership website. I have just had a Moz crawl through and its flagging a lot of duplicate page content issues, these are mostly for used car pages. How can I get round this as the site stocks many of the same car, model, colour, age, millage etc. Only unique thing about them is the reg plate. How do I get past this duplicate issue if all the info is relatively the same? Anyone experienced this issue when working on a car dealership website? Thank you.
Technical SEO | | karl621 -
Migrating to new subdomain with new site and new content.
Our marketing department has decided that a new site with new content is needed to launch new products and support our existing ones. We cannot use the same subdomain(www = old subdomain and ww1 = new subdomain)as there is a technically clash between the windows server currently used, and the lamp stack required to run the new wordpress based CMS and site. We also have an aging piece of SAAS software on the www domain which is makes moving it to it's own subdomain far too risky. 301's have been floated as a way of managing the transition. I'm not too keen on that idea due to the double effect of new subdomain and content, and the SEO impact it might have. I've suggested uploading the new site to the new subdomain while leaving the old site in place. Then gradually migrating sections over before turning parts of the old site off and using a 301 at that point to finalise the move. The old site would inform user's there is a new version and it would then convert them to the new site(along with a cookie to auto redirect them in future.) while still leaving the old content in place for existing search traffic, bookmarks and visitors via static URLs. Before turning off sections on the old site we would create rel canonicals to redirect to the new pages based on a a mapped set of URLs(this in itself concerns me as the rel canonical is essentially linking to different content). Would be grateful for any advice on whether this strategy is flawed or whether another strategy might be more suitable?
Technical SEO | | Rezza0 -
Page that appears on SERPs is not the page that has been optimized for users
This may seem like a pretty newbie question, but I haven't been able to find any answers to it (I may not be looking correctly). My site used to rank decently for the KW "Gold name necklace" with this page in the search results:http://www.mynamenecklace.co.uk/Products.aspx?p=302This was the page that I was working on optimizing for user experience (load time, image quality, ease of use, etc.) since this page was were users were getting to via search. A couple months ago the Google SERP's started showing this page for the same query (also ranked a little lower, but not important for this specific question):http://www.mynamenecklace.co.uk/Products.aspx?p=314Which is a white gold version of the necklaces. This is not what most users have in mind (when searching for gold name necklace) so it's much less effective and engaging.How do I tell Google to go back to old page/ give preference to older page / tell them that we have a better version of the page / etc. without having to noindex any of the content? Both of these pages have value and are for different queries, so I can't canonical them to a single page. As far as external links go, more links are pointing to the Yellow gold version and not the white gold one.Any ideas on how to remedy this?Thanks.
Technical SEO | | Don340 -
Duplicate pages
Hi Can anyone tell me why SEO MOZ thinks these paes are duplicates when they're clearly not? Thanks very much Kate http://www.katetooncopywriter.com.au/how-to-be-a-freelance-copywriter/picture-1-58/ http://www.katetooncopywriter.com.au/portfolio/clients/other/ http://www.katetooncopywriter.com.au/portfolio/clients/travel/ http://www.katetooncopywriter.com.au/webservices/what-i-do/blog-copywriter/
Technical SEO | | ToonyWoony0 -
New Website and Domain Question
Hi all, I am launching a new website around the end of October and I have purchased a great domain to use for it. My question is should I put some kind of holding page up to try and start building up some domain authority in preperation for launch? Or maybe a blog at www.domain.com/blog and then keep all the blog content at the same location when the full site goes up? Or is it best to wait and just launch the site when the first version is complete? Thanks, Ben
Technical SEO | | BenInder0 -
Seo template for new website
I am revamping my website (www.UltimateBasicTraining.com). It's going to be major and I am concerned about the potential traffic loss since over 60% of my overall traffic comes from organic search results in the military basic training area. Are there any good SEO website templates I can start from? I see a lot out there but would prefer the advice of professionals. Thanks
Technical SEO | | TheVolkinator0 -
Our Development team is planning to make our website nearly 100% AJAX and JavaScript. My concern is crawlability or lack thereof. Their contention is that Google can read the pages using the new #! URL string. What do you recommend?
Discussion around AJAX implementations and if anybody has achieved high rankings with a full AJAX website or even a partial AJAX website.
Technical SEO | | DavidChase0